Skywell BE11 Interior Layout & Technology
Interior
What is it like on the inside?
The execution of the cabin is the best part of the car. Not that there aren't several things wrong with it, but you can sit in the front seats and convince yourself it's a nice place to be. Even some established carmakers struggle to do that consistently.
The interior looks well screwed together, with fake wood panels spanning the dashboard and doors, and contrast orange stitching just about pulling the leather seats back from the brink of 'dull'. There's lots of imitation leather that's actually soft-touch plastic, and liberal use of (also fake) chrome isn't our favourite gambit. But Skywell isn't the first to play that card and it won't be the last either.
Advertisement - Page continues below
The raised centre console eats into the sense of space up front, but the layout of the drive selector, e-parking brake and storage isn't too busy. And the armrest storage is cooled! So far so good. The touchscreen looks decent.
It does. It's a 12.8-incher, boasting much LCD goodness. It's a shame the menu tabs aren't well defined, so it's hard to find what you're looking for; the layout in general is bamboozling. Defeat successfully snatched from the jaws of victory.
The climate controls are on a permanent bar at the bottom of the screen. We laughed at the Scandi background pic given the various other echoes of Volvo, but you can change it to something else if you want. Meanwhile the 12.3in driver display is badly laid out and looks like it's from a different decade to the touchscreen. Weird.
Let's not talk about the 'scrollers' on the steering wheel: they, er, don't actually scroll. Ugh. Quick, turn the radio on and distract yourself with the (commendably rich) eight-speaker audio.
Advertisement - Page continues below
How is it in the back?
The rear's pretty roomy, but there's not much under-seat space to stretch out and wiggle your toes. And the seats themselves are quite firm and quite flat, so not ideal for longer trips. There's two USB ports back there (versus one up front) and a 10A socket, albeit one that'll need an adaptor to fit a UK plug.
Boot space weighs in at 467 litres, which is at the lower end of what we tend to see from contenders in this segment. Knock the rear bench down and load capacity climbs to 1,141 litres.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Most Expensive Tesla Models Compared: The $100k EV Battle
Only One Top Tesla Can Win Tesla prices may have come down in recent years, but there is still no sign of its $25k EV, and the manufacturer still has at least two models hovering at just below the six-figure mark. These most expensive new Teslas find themselves competing with an array of high-performance or luxury models from prestigious German brands, but how do they compare with each other? Here's how the two priciest Teslas match up. 0:05 / 0:09 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More Most Expensive Teslas: Model X Plaid Vs. Cyberbeast The two most expensive new Tesla models both cost $99,990 each, and they're the Model X Plaid SUV and the most powerful version of the Cybertruck – the Cyberbeast pickup truck. In its current form, the Model X Plaid is one of Tesla's oldest models, while the Cyberbeast is a much newer product. A difference in age aside, both of these Teslas have a set of on-paper stats that leave them without any true rivals, such has been Tesla's mastery of high-performance EVs. The key difference between the two is obvious: One is an SUV and one is a pickup. If you need to seat six people, the Model X Plaid is an easy pick. But if you want to tow more and have the flexibility to carry larger or awkwardly shaped items, the Cybertruck is better. The Model X's only party trick isn't always visible – we're talking about those Falcon Wing rear doors, which still turn heads when open. However, the rest of the SUV has begun to date, which is no surprise since the Model X went into production a decade ago. The lines are clean and stealthy, but it's no longer a particularly exciting SUV to look at. The Cybertruck makes much more of a statement, for better or worse, but we doubt it'll age as gracefully as the Model X. Being a pickup, it has a 6' x 4' bed with a standard motorized hardtop, various power outlets, and full-length bed lamps. If you want your expensive Tesla finished in a brighter color, you'll have to go for the Model X, as the Cybertruck sticks with its groundbreaking cold-rolled stainless-steel alloy body panels. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Interior And Features: Model X Seats More, But Cybertruck Can Carry More Stuff Both EVs have Tesla's minimalist interior layout, centered around a large touchscreen. The Model X has softer lines and panels, and its Cream interior color is warmer than any option available on the Cybertruck. The Model X Plaid has three displays, including one for rear passengers, along with tri-zone climate control, a 22-speaker sound system, and heated seats for every passenger. It also seats six across three rows. The Cybertruck has a darker, even more spartan cabin, especially in standard Tactical Grey. Only a thin ambient lighting strip breaks up the exceedingly dark environment. Finishes are a bit more rugged, from the suede textile trim to the stainless accents. It has a 15-speaker sound system, heated seats front and back, and dual HD touchscreens. Rear-seat space is good, in spite of the dramatically sloping roofline. Both these vehicles are practical, with large frunks and useful interior storage. There are a few differences, though, such as the Cybertruck having a bigger frunk (7.1 to 6.5 cubic feet), and the obvious differences behind the second row. The six-seater Model X Plaid has 15 cubes behind the third row, 33 behind the second row, and 85.8 behind the first row. In the Cybertruck, there are 56.2 cubes (enclosed) in the bed, another 3.4 in a lower storage space, and 54.2 cubes behind the front seats with the rear cushions folded up. This actually gives the Cybertruck more enclosed cargo space with two occupants, plus it has the versatility to carry much taller objects in the open bed. Performance: Two Of The Very Best Despite being vastly different vehicles, these expensive Teslas are remarkably closely matched in a straight line. The tri-motor Model X Plaid produces 1,020 horsepower and will hit 60 mph in just 2.5 seconds, before completing the quarter-mile in 9.9 seconds. Even years later, those are staggering numbers for a three-row SUV that weighs 5,248 lbs. Somehow, the Cyberbeast nearly matches the Model X Plaid to 60 (2.6 seconds), despite having less power from its three motors (845 hp) and being significantly heavier (6,863 lbs). Based on independent testing, the Model X Plaid's extra power and smoother body come into play at higher speeds, though – the Cyberbeast needs 11 seconds to complete the quarter-mile and will top out at 130 mph, as opposed to 163 mph for the Model X Plaid. In day-to-day driving, both EVs are fast enough to leave behind other traffic in a flash. The Cybertruck is a bit of a revelation for a pickup, with a steer-by-wire system and rear-wheel steering making it feel startlingly agile for such a heavy vehicle. Source: Tesla Cyberbeast Is Better For Range, Towing, And Off-Roading The small edge the Model X has in acceleration off the mark is overshadowed by the wide spread of capabilities of the Cyberbeast. Whereas the Model X Plaid has an EPA-certified range of 314 miles on 20-inch wheels, Tesla claims the Cyberbeast can hit 320 miles on a full charge. The Model X Plaid is almost guaranteed to be more efficient, but that will be confirmed when the EPA releases MPGe ratings for the Cyberbeast. The Plaid can tow up to 5,000 lbs, but the Cyberbeast crushes it with a maximum towing capacity of 11,000 lbs. With chunkier tires and up to 16 inches of ground clearance, the Cybertruck should be a much more capable off-road tool, too. Source: Tesla So, Which Expensive Tesla Is Best? We can't say one of these EVs is definitively better than the other, given that they compete in different segments. The Model X is ultimately quicker, expected to be more efficient, and can seat six. But the Cyberbeast has a longer list of advantages. It's much more visually impactful, and although it can only seat five, it provides more overall cargo space and versatility. The claimed range is better, it's going to feel just as quick up to the legal speed limit, and towing is vastly superior. Plus, it's the clear winner if you plan to do any off-roading at all. If the styling doesn't turn you off, the Cyberbeast does a better job of justifying its high price than the Model X Plaid. In both cases, be prepared for the heavy depreciation that blights EVs, especially expensive ones like these. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile
Auto Blog
5 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Mate Rimac Plans BMW E30 V10 Restomod, But Not Anytime Soon
It all started with an E30 BMW, and now the electric entrepreneur wants to shove a gas V10 into it. Electric Hypercar CEO Still Has a Soft Spot for the E30 Mate Rimac's path to fame and electric hypercardom started as a teenager racing an E30 BMW 3 Series, and it's been quite the story to follow. His Concept One electric supercar first put him into the international spotlight, and the current-day Nevera hypercar has set many records in its wake. But his love for the E30 has remained strong, and his ultimate E30 restomod isn't an electric one, but a V10-powered beast. All Roads Lead To E30 When the engine of the E30 BMW he raced blew up, he converted the gas powertrain to an electric one in 2008 when he was barely 20 years old. He founded the Rimac Group, and now he's also the CEO of Bugatti Rimac. His meteoric rise to stardom makes him one of the preeminent people in the automotive industry at only 37 years of age. Yet, it seems, his love affair with the E30 has not dimmed one bit. Why Rimac's Personal E30 M3 Is Too Rare to Modify Mate owns a 1990 E30 M3 Evolution III, one of only 600 cars made, and one of the rarest and most special E30s ever, right up there with the highly collectible M30-powered South African 333i, of which only a little over 200 were ever made. The Rimac boss is unlikely to molest his pristine M3, so his V10 engine will likely be shoved into a dedicated project car. He's been tight-lipped about exactly what engine the V10 will be, though. Surely the high-revving S85B50 found in the E60 M5 and E63 M6 will satisfy the requirements for a lightweight NA V10, while keeping it all nicely BMW in the process? We can't be sure, but it would make the most sense. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Rimac Says Restomod Will Have to Wait While the internet is getting all riled up about Mate Rimac's V10 E30, let us remind you that it's just an idea in his mind right now. He is preoccupied with running his automotive empire and possibly expanding into robotaxis, so there's hardly a spare minute to spend on painstakingly constructing an epic BMW restomod. He sees it as little more than a retirement project at the moment, so we might be in for a long wait. About the Author Cobus F. Potgieter View Profile
Auto Blog
5 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Mazda's Revolutionary SKYACTIV-Z Engine Promises Unheard-Of Efficiency & Power
Mazda's SKYACTIV-Z tech could change the way automakers and drivers look at gas-powered engines amid today's significant EV investment push. Mazda isn't giving up on gas-powered engines Mazda's SKYACTIV-Z project has highlighted the automaker's desire to continue innovating gas-powered engines while other legacy manufacturers accelerate investments into electric powertrain development. As a result, Mazda is establishing a portfolio balancing internal combustion engine (ICE), hybrid, and all-electric models, adapting to market demand. Mazda's current SKYACTIV-Z initiative aims to create a gas-powered engine that can combust with leaner fuel mixtures, resulting in better fuel economy, lower emissions, heightened performance, greater reliability, and simplified maintenance. SKYACTIV-Z tech also converts heat normally escaping from an engine into power for improved thermal (engine) efficiency. Expert engineer Masahisa Yamakawa at Mazda said that heat insulation was the only unexplored area among the seven controlled factors that improve thermal efficiency. SKYACTIV-Z strives to offer high thermal efficiency at any RPM or speed range, achieving better fuel efficiency when an engine is running on its own while supplying greater synergistic benefits when combined with electric motors. These synergistic effects include even higher fuel economy, lower emissions, and enhanced driving performance. Mazda CX-5 Skyactiv Engine — Source: Mazda Carbon neutrality in an ICE vehicle? While carbon negativity is often linked with all-electric vehicles, Mazda is working toward carbon negativity with gas-powered engines. More specifically, the automaker is exploring SKYACTIV-Z's potential to be used with carbon-neutral fuels and testing carbon capture tech using a substance called zeolite in the exhaust pipe to absorb CO2. Combined, these two strategies could facilitate carbon neutrality in an ICE vehicle. Mazda is also working toward fulfilling the potential of internal combustion engines to release air with less CO2 than they take in, thus cleaning the environment. Michiharu Kawano, another leading ICE developer at Mazda, said: 'As things stand, it's unlikely that all cars will be replaced by battery EVs. Which is why I believe we were right to persevere with the internal combustion engine. Whether generating electricity with an engine to turn the wheels or using a motor to complement the engine's power, hybrid systems require an internal combustion engine. Even with electrification, with the exception of battery EVs, we'll still be considering solutions based on internal combustion engines. With highly efficient internal combustion engines, we can make motors smaller, which should also help control electrification costs.' Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Mazda Motors President Takashi Yamanouchi stands among the company's next-generation gasoline and diesel engines, SKYACTIVE-G — Source:If SKYACTIV-Z comes to fruition, it won't be the first time the public has experienced benefits from SKYACTIV tech. In 2010, the SKYACTIV-G debuted in the Mazda 2 and achieved a hybrid-level fuel efficiency of about 70 mpg based on the Japanese 10-15 test cycle using only internal combustion, without relying on motor assistance. Research efforts for the SKYACTIV-G began in 2005, and the tech's breakthrough followed Mazda's confirmation that compression ratio significantly impacts thermal efficiency. The seven control factors related to ideal combustion were thus identified as compression ratio, air-fuel ratio, combustion period, combustion timing, wall surface heat transfer, pumping loss, and mechanical loss. SKYACTIV tech made its debut in the Mazda2 Final thoughts Mazda's SKYACTIV-Z is a 2.5L inline 4-cylinder engine that is currently being tested and meets stringent European and North American emissions standards, while boasting strong performance. If actualized in production, SKYACTIV-Z will simultaneously elevate fuel efficiency and performance while keeping costs affordable. SKYACTIV-Z is scheduled to debut in the Mazda CX-5's next generation in 2027. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile
