Program that gave Inuvialuit families $500/month for groceries ending
The program, which began in January, provides $500 per child, every month to families who live in one of the Inuvialuit region's six hamlets and who have school-aged children. The money can only be spent on groceries at select stores in the area.
The IRC announced in July that the grocery supplement would end, saying in a news release that the corporation "will no longer have access to funding." It encouraged families to begin planning ahead for the school year, when the subsidy will no longer be available.
The supplement is part of the corporation's school foods program which also provides students in the region breakfast and lunch on weekdays.
CBC News contacted the IRC but it declined to comment.
For some families in living in the N.W.T.'s more remote hamlets, the program has provided necessary support amid challenges with food security.
Lynn Archiekasook, in Tuktoyaktuk, said the grocery subsidy program has helped take "a lot of worries" off of her family's shoulders.
Archiekasook has lived in Tuktoyaktuk all her life. She has five children, aged eight to 21, and she receives $1,500 each month through the grocery supplement. She said high food prices in her community mean that only a week after receiving this month's food credit, all the money had been spent.
Now her family has been slowly moving toward other methods of gathering food, and changing their diet to eat more things like caribou and geese. Once the grocery supplement is gone her family will continue to rely more on traditional ways of gathering food, like hunting and fishing, she said.
With no official food bank in her hamlet, Archiekasook said the end of the grocery program will be a heavy loss for many in her community.
In Ulukhaktok, where the cost of living is similarly high, many residents are also concerned.
"It's so incredibly hard to get by," said Pat Klengenberg, the mayor of Ulukhaktok. "This program has probably been the best program available to our community."
While the supplement can only be used for buying food, Klengenberg said it has ultimately helped families prepare for the future in other ways.
"When a program like this is put in place, it really helps out the whole family," Klengenberg said.
"Not just with food within the household, but also overall with keeping up with bills and being able to get ahead instead of barely getting by or falling behind in bills."
Klengenberg said the hamlet will begin to look at alternative ways to provide community members with food. He suggested a possible collaboration with the hamlet's hunters and trappers committee, which could provide community members with locally-sourced meat, or ordering a lot of dry food on the barge to store in the community.
"If everyone works together, the best outcome could be providing more food for our kids," Klengenberg said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chicago man dreams of running a fishing lodge despite 'zero knowledge' — Dave Ramsey only hears 'nightmare'
Small businesses are at the core of the American Dream, but that doesn't mean every single one of those golden business ideas should become a reality. That's what finance guru Dave Ramsey said on his show during a conversation with Caleb, a caller from Chicago who wanted advice on getting a down payment to start a new venture. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Caleb's business dream? Buying a fishing lodge in Canada. He said he'd never run a business before but loved to fish and hunt, and that he thought he could get $100,000 for a down payment on a lodge and run the venture for about half the year. He also told Ramsey that he talked to a few fishing lodge owners he knew who didn't own a business before buying their lodges, but Ramsey wasn't having any of it. When Ramsey learned Caleb had never run a business, let alone worked in the fishing or hospitality industry, Ramsey had a blunt assessment. 'You are about 90% dream and about 10% reality,' said Ramsey. And when asked about his business plan after getting the fishing lodge, Caleb's response was that many lodges are owned by seniors who don't know how to market their property. Caleb thinks he would be able to promote the lodge easily, but Ramsey wasn't buying it. 'There are three rules of business: it's gonna take twice as long as you think, it's gonna cost twice as much as you think, and you're not the exception,' said Ramsey. 'I'm not trying to be a dream killer, I love killing nightmares though.' The costs of running a small business Those three rules of business are lessons that Ramsey has uttered before. So many business dreamers think they have a great plan at the start, going as far as investing funds or taking out loans before realizing they've gone into debt for an idea that isn't landing with the target audience. In fact, more than 1 in 5 businesses in the U.S. fail during their first year. The dream of owning a business keeps America's free enterprise economy going, but sometimes those dreams can cloud the true costs of running a small business. New small businesses cost an average of $40,000 in their first year, including hiring staff, producing goods, getting inventory and securing a physical location. But those costs can vary wildly: for example, an online startup could cost as little as $100, while opening a restaurant could cost up to $750,000. Hiring staff can be one of the most expensive aspects of running your own shop. Adding an employee to payroll could cost you anywhere from $4,000 to $20,000, and that doesn't include salary or benefits costs. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, total employee costs — including their wages, benefits and taxes — could amount to 1.25 to 1.4 times their actual salary. And you can count on putting at least some of your savings into a new business. The Kauffman Foundation reports that nearly two-thirds of small business owners have to dip into their personal or family savings to fund their venture. It's also worth noting that in 2023, 71% of small business owners were in debt. Read more: Americans are 'revenge saving' to survive — but millions only get a measly 1% on their savings. What to consider before starting a small business Deciding to start a small business requires thorough planning, financial smarts and self-honesty, as your idea may not work out the first time around. Let's break down the steps to take and things to consider before you open up shop. For starters, consider all your startup costs. These include any licenses and permits you might need, legal fees, equipment and inventory goods, marketing and promotional costs, and storefront deposits. Next, try to predict your ongoing or operational costs, such as your monthly rent, employee wages, inventory restocking, ongoing marketing, taxes and storefront maintenance. Don't forget to account for any 'hidden' costs, such as shrink, card processing fees or slow sales months. Talk extensively with other business owners in your industry and don't be afraid to ask them about how much they make, or where they might have gone wrong. Analyze industry trends and risks associated with your product or service and consider surveying potential customers. Finally, create both best- and worst-case financial projections, especially for that first vulnerable year of business. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of 'massive unemployment' in the US due to the 'biggest change' in history — and says this 1 group of 'smart' Americans will get hit extra hard. Are you one of them? How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man worries he'll die young — should he spend $500k to retire early?
Faced with a history of family members dying young, Sarah's husband wants to spend US$500,000 to retire early. She called The Ramsey Show to find out if fear is a good enough reason. Sarah and her husband, 53, are in a strong financial position. Their house is paid off, they've saved millions for retirement and on paper, they're set. But his family history looms large. With his mother dying at 59 and both of his brothers dying at 55, he's starting to wonder if he should clock out of work early, just in case. That's why he's seriously considering spending the money to buy five years of his pension and retire early. The Ramsey Show hosts pushed back on the idea of making a major financial decision based on fear. 'None of us is promised tomorrow,' said Ken Coleman. Don't Miss Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich — and 'anyone' can do it The Canadian economy is showing signs of softening amid Trump's tariffs — protect your wallet with these 6 essential money moves (most of which you can complete in just minutes) I'm almost 50 and don't have enough retirement savings. What should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 solid ways you can catch up Buying a pension to retire early? At the heart of the matter is Sarah's husband's fear of dying young. While she called to ask if they should buy the pension, the Ramsey hosts cautioned against making an emotional decision. 'I would not sacrifice the future here on the altar of the immediate,' said Coleman. 'We have to live in the moment, yes, but also not sacrifice our future based on some emotion that's not rooted in facts.' Jade Warshaw echoed his sentiment. 'I don't like that idea,' she said. 'Something about that doesn't feel right.' As the hosts dug deeper, it became clear the couple doesn't need the extra money from the pension to retire early. They own their home outright and have millions saved for retirement. If they spent US$500,000, they'd receive about US$6,000 per month in retirement income. But given their other assets, they likely don't need it to live comfortably. 'You don't need the money, so I certainly wouldn't buy it,' Warshaw said. 'Now it's up to you guys to decide: what is this US$6,000 a month worth to us?' If it's not worth working for seven more years, he could retire now, without buying the pension. Beyond the numbers, Warshaw encouraged the couple to consider using some of their money to assess and improve his health. Lifestyle changes and preventive care could help improve both his quality of life and longevity. Read more: Here are — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? When does it make sense to retire early? Retiring early can be appealing for many reasons. Maybe, like Sarah's husband, you're worried about your health. Maybe you feel burned out or want more time to travel. Whatever the reason, it's important to consider the financial side. If you've spent your working years saving, paid off your house and built a solid nest egg, early retirement might be an option. But if you're still in debt or have minimal savings, this might be the time to buckle down on your financial goals instead. In Sarah's case, her family's strong net worth and paid-off house make early retirement a real possibility. If they had called in with debt or little savings, the advice would've been different. According to a recent Northwestern Mutual survey, Americans believe they'll need US$1.26 million to retire comfortably. Canadians fare similarly, with a BMO survey reporting that they believe they'll need around CA$1.54 million to retire comfortably. Sarah and her husband are already in that ballpark, setting them apart from the average household. And if full retirement doesn't make sense just yet, a gradual approach might. Scaling back to part-time hours — say from 40 to 20 a week — can offer many of the same lifestyle benefits without jeopardizing your financial future. 1. The Ramsey Show Highlights: Pay $500,000 To Retire? (He's Afraid He's Going To Die Early)(June 13, 2025) 2. NorthWestern Mutual: Planning and Progress Study 2025 3. BMO: BMO Retirement Survey: Over Three Quarters of Canadians Worry They Will Not Have Enough Retirement Savings Amid Inflation (Feb 12, 2025) What To Read Next Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among Canada's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio Ramit Sethi says you should hit these 9 'money milestones' before 40 if you want to be rich — how many have you crossed off the list? Pet owners, here's how you can get up to 90% cashback on expensive emergency veterinary bills — and you can even get a free quote in 30 seconds This man from Toronto feels broke making $73,000 a year — his wife recently left him and he has an 18-month-old child. Here's what Dave Ramsey told him This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Hamilton Spectator
19 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canadians feeling better about how Ottawa and the provinces work together, survey suggests
OTTAWA — Ahead of a meeting between the prime minister and premiers this week, a survey has found 'significant improvements' in the way Canadians feel about how well Ottawa and the provinces work together. According to a report on the state of Canada's federation from the Environics Institute and five other organizations, 52 per cent of Canadians feel like their governments work very well or somewhat well together, compared to 39 per cent who felt that way when the same survey was conducted in 2024. Conversely, 41 per cent of Canadians now feel like their governments are not working well together — either not very well or not well at all — compared to 54 per cent who felt that way one year ago. 'What's changed since last year? You have a new (federal) leader, but you also have this new sense of urgency, where I think the public's patience for government finger-pointing at each other has probably gone way down because the stakes have gone way up,' said Andrew Parkin, executive director of the Environics Institute, on the ever-escalating Canada-U.S. trade dispute. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney and the country's premiers will convene in Huntsville following U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to slap 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian imports by Aug. 1 if a trade agreement between the nations is not reached by then. The survey found that Canadians' feelings about intergovernmental relations improved in most parts of the country outside of the North, where opinions were already more positive than in other regions. Compared to 2024 figures, Saskatchewan boasted the largest increase, where the proportion of those who felt satisfied by federal-provincial collaboration more than doubled. In Alberta and Quebec, however, the number of Canadians who felt the federal Liberals and their provincial governments did not work well together still outweighed those who felt the opposite. The survey was conducted between May 1 and June 16 with 5,391 Canadians, with 90 per cent of responses collected online and the remainder by telephone. Because the majority of the survey was conducted online, the Environics Institute did not calculate a margin of error because online polls, despite being representative, cannot be considered truly random. For the first time in the annual survey's seven-year-history, the Environics Institute also asked respondents whether they trust the federal government or their provincial government more when it comes to handling international trade relations. The report notes that 42 per cent of Canadians are more likely to trust the federal government on that file, which is triple the 14 per cent of those who trust their provincial government more. Levels of trust were highest in Quebec at 46 per cent, and lowest in the Prairie provinces at 38 per cent. Ottawa does not enjoy that same level of trust when it comes to other portfolios. 'After three consecutive years of increases, there has been a drop in the proportions trusting neither the federal nor their provincial government to deal with other key issues such as health care, climate change, immigration or the economy,' the report states. The proportion of Canadians who did not trust either Ottawa or their provincial government to address climate change, for example, dropped by seven percentage points from last year. 'This change follows the removal of the federal consumer carbon tax after the change of prime minister earlier this year,' the report noted. The survey also looked at supporters of provincial conservative parties in the prairies compared to those in Ontario, and found that of those who backed Alberta's United Conservative Party, the Saskatchewan Party and Manitoba's Progressive Conservatives, 68 per cent had a negative view of intergovernmental relations, while 27 per cent had a positive assessment. Meanwhile, 40 per cent of supporters of Premier Doug Ford's Progressive Conservatives had a negative view of those relations, with 56 per cent considering the relationship between provinces and the federal Liberals to be positive. Ford, a key ally to Carney, opted not to aid Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives, with whom he has a frosty relationship, in the recent federal election campaign.
