Australia: PWDA Calls For Clarity And Inclusion Following Delays To Foundational Supports Rollout
Press Release – People with Disability Australia – PWDA
PWDA welcomes the Governments ongoing commitment to disability reform and stands ready to work collaboratively to ensure foundational supports are implemented in a way that is timely, inclusive, and sustainable.
People with Disability Australia, the national peak representative and advocacy body, is calling on the Federal Government to provide greater clarity and to consult more closely with people with disability, following the announcement that the rollout of foundational supports – scheduled to begin on 1 July 2025 – will be delayed.
Foundational supports are designed for people with disability who are not eligible for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). They are especially relevant for Autistic children and people with psychosocial disability.
The delay has created uncertainty in the community about when and how these essential supports will become available.
PWDA President Trinity Ford said that while the disability community understands the complexity of implementing this reform, and the need to get it right from the start, it is critical that all people with disability are brought along and involved.
'Many people with disability who are not eligible for the NDIS still have real and ongoing support needs,' Ms Ford said.
'These foundational supports will hopefully create a more inclusive and equal network of disability supports. But delays and uncertainty around the rollout's details, timelines and co-design means people with disability are still waiting – unsupported and without answers.'
PWDA emphasises that early intervention and accessible community-based supports are key to improving long-term outcomes for people with disability, particularly those who have historically fallen through the cracks of service systems.
'We're calling on the Government to communicate transparently about next steps and to ensure people with lived experience of disability are at the centre of future planning,' Ms Ford said.
'It's vital that the design and rollout of these supports reflect the diversity of our community – including people with psychosocial disability, children with developmental concerns, and others who are not being serviced by the NDIS.'
PWDA welcomes the Government's ongoing commitment to disability reform and stands ready to work collaboratively to ensure foundational supports are implemented in a way that is timely, inclusive, and sustainable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
30 minutes ago
- Scoop
Porirua Residents To Decide On Super-Council, Pacific Leaders Urge Protection Of Local Representation
Porirua voters can express their opinion on the potential creation of a Wellington-wide super-council. But Pacific leaders have voiced concerns that the model could dilute local representation unless equity and cultural voices are prioritised. In this year's local elections, Porirua residents will be able to participate in a non-binding referendum that asks whether the city should investigate amalgamating with Wellington, the Hutt Valley, and the Wellington Regional Council into a single entity, while retaining local decision-making. Porirua Mayor Anita Baker says the timing is right for this issue to be brought to voters, adding that the last formal proposal for amalgamation was in 2013 and that the local government landscape has changed significantly since then. Pacific leaders are worried that the move could weaken representation, especially if equity is not prioritised and voter turnout remains low. Councillor Izzy Ford, one of only three Pacific representatives on the Porirua Council, supports the initiative but emphasises the need to respond to community feedback to maintain trust, even though the referendum is non-binding. According to the council's official report, voter turnout in areas of Wellington City, including Mount Cook East, dropped below 30 per cent in 2022. In Porirua, turnout was slightly higher at 37 per cent. Ford hopes the referendum will provide clear guidance, but she stresses the importance of the council committing to listening to the community. Representation remains a major concern for Ford. She questioned how the council would ensure that all voices in Porirua, particularly those from underrepresented communities, are heard in this process. Ford hopes the referendum will lead to a definitive direction from the people of Porirua. 'If they give us a total yes and we don't act on it, then that's going to build more mistrust,' she says. 'There's always that concern, because our people don't always turn out to vote. 'That's a glaring concern, is the underrepresentation of Pasifika around the table.' Engagement with Pasifika communities is important, according to Ford. 'Having things translated into Pasifika languages, so that it's a bit easier for people to digest, and going into spaces like the churches, where a lot of our Pacific people are, and then it's non-threatening sort of spaces as well, and using our common faces in those common spaces, so that people can see them as non-threatening.' Gabriel Tupou, Councillor for Hutt City, is concerned that the amalgamation could reduce Pacific representation. As the only Pasifika councillor in the Hutt Valley, Tupou says the issue must be openly discussed with communities. 'In a super-city model, we risk less representation. Currently, we have 12 city councillors and the mayor. That will be greatly reduced. 'With the large Pasifika demographic we have, they must have input, just like every other community.' Tupou also raised concerns about the referendum regarding Māori ward running alongside the amalgamation question. Tupou highlighted that Hutt City Mayor Campbell Barry plans to present a similar referendum proposal next month. 'I think it's important to keep the Māori ward question clean and on its own." Tupou says that from a Pasifika perspective, the challenges of running for election are already significant, as candidates need to have broad appeal. He is also cautious about the financial implications. "We're looking at possibly a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars to carry out the amalgamation. 'South Auckland enjoys a larger Pasifika community, and they're able to mobilise their voice and voting power to elect Pasifika councillors,' Tupou says. 'But we don't have those same concentrations here.' Auimatagai Ken Ah Kuoi, community leader and Kilbirnie-based lawyer, warns that centralising governance could reduce the influence of smaller communities like Porirua, which has a large Pacific population. He says regional solutions may overlook local contexts, adding that a unified council model could offer benefits, but emphasises the need for safeguards. 'There's a risk Pacific voices could be diluted in a larger, more bureaucratic system,' he says. 'What works for Wellington might not suit Porirua or Wainuiomata. Pacific communities often have specific cultural needs that may get overlooked. 'A unified council model could benefit Pacific people by improving access to resources and regional influence. But it also carries risks - disconnection, loss of local control, and inequity if not managed carefully. 'To ensure Pacific communities benefit, any move toward amalgamation would need guaranteed local representation, strong community consultation, cultural competency across the new structure, and equity-focused service delivery.' Petone Community Board member Semi Kuresa says fair representation must be a non-negotiable starting point. Kuresa says while Pasifika make up more than nine per cent of Wellington's population, their enrolment and eligibility rates are much lower. He highlighted three key concerns: representation, cost, and the geographic boundaries of a new council. 'While amalgamation might seem practical to some, it raises serious questions about representation, particularly for Pacific communities,' he says. 'The contribution of our Pacific community isn't something that should be reduced to slogans or soundbites. A strong Pacific voice at the table matters. 'As someone intending to stand for Hutt City Council, I'm focused on ensuring communities too often overlooked are part of every stage of decision-making. We can't afford to dilute the voices we need to hear more of.' Voting for the 2025 local elections in Porirua, Wellington, and the Hutt Valley will take place from 9 September to 11 October. Each council will have its own ballot papers. Porirua will include a non-binding referendum on amalgamation and a binding vote on whether to retain the city's Māori ward.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
FICAC suspension unlawful, says Fiji law society
.. Photo: Facebook/FLS The Fiji Law Society says suspending the Commissioner of Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) without the advice of the Judicial Services Commission is unlawful. Society President, Wylie Clarke said it is equally unlawful for President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu to appoint an acting FICAC Commissioner, and dismiss its deputy commissioner and re-appoint him to a magistrate's role, without the recommendations of the Judicial Services Commission (JSC). It follows Fiji prime minister Sitiveni Rabuka posting on social media that the president had taken several actions, in response to recommendations of a report by the Commission of Inquiry (COI) into the appointment of the FICAC Commissioner. Rabuka said the president made decisions "after advice from me as prime minister and minister responsible for the Commission of Inquiries Act". This included suspending Barbara Malimali . Clarke said according to Rabuka, Ratu Naiqama appears to have made the FICAC decisions on the advice of the prime minister, and if that's the case, these actions are not constitutional or lawful. He said the prime minister has no constitutional role in the appointment or discipline of the Commissioner and acting deputy Commissioner of FICAC. "It appears both the prime minister and His Excellency the president have been poorly advised on their powers," the Law Society boss said in a statement. "The Government statement says that his Excellency acted in accordance with sections 81 and 82 of the Constitution. However s.82 is very clear. The president acts only on the advice of Cabinet or a Minister or of some other body or authority prescribed by this Constitution for a particular purpose as the body or authority on whose advice the president acts in that case. "In this case the 'prescribed authority' is the JSC." The Law Society statement added that the "FICAC saga" has distracted the government for many months and the Society had hoped the COI report would bring that to an end. Fiji Opposition leader, Inia Seruiratu, has called on the Government to make the COI report public. Seruiratu told local media he's not worried about the developments, saying everyone is replaceable. But he said the report should be made available to the public for the sake of transparency. Fijian Attorney General, Graham Leung, has also been dismissed by the prime minister, who cited findings from the same COI report. Pac News reported him saying the decision is in the best interest of the people that his government serves. Fiji Village reported Leung saying he respects the constitutional authority of the prime minister. Leung had been the Attorney-General for less than a year.
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
King's Birthday Honours 2025: Abuse survivor accepts honour, slams Government on redress
The Government's rejection of a Royal Commission of Inquiry recommendation on how Kiwis abused in state and faith-based care should be compensated is an 'insult', but won't stop him accepting a King's Birthday Honour, a survivor says. Chris Longhurst has been made a companion of the King's Service
