"If Cases Filed For Feeding Pigeons, Why Not For Strays": Ex-Minister To NDTV
Former Union Minister Vijay Goel has called for legal action against individuals feeding stray dogs in public places in Delhi, citing rising cases of dog bites across the capital.
In a conversation with NDTV, Mr Goel said such feeding should attract fines and FIRs, similar to recent legal action taken against pigeon feeders in Mumbai.
If FIRs can be filed against those who feed pigeons, why not against those who feed stray dogs on the streets?" Mr Goel asked, referring to a recent Maharashtra High Court order in which the BMC fined 107 individuals for feeding pigeons and the court mandated additional FIRs.
Mr Goel said the issue of stray dog attacks has turned into a public health hazard and requires an immediate and coordinated response from the Delhi Government and the Municipal Corporation. He also demanded a compensation policy for victims of dog bites, pointing to the fatal risk of rabies. "More than 20,000 people die from rabies every year in India. There is no known cure once symptoms appear," he said.
Mr Goel accused both the state and civic agencies of failing to implement sterilisation and vaccination programs effectively. He said civil defence volunteers and local police should be deployed to stop the public feeding of stray dogs.
He put forward five key demands:
Immediate compensation to citizens attacked by stray dogs.
Launch of a toll-free helpline for reporting dog bite incidents.
Fines and FIRs against those feeding stray dogs in public areas.
Initiation of a citywide stray dog census to guide intervention planning.
Official request to the Centre to amend Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules and allocate funding and staff to municipal agencies.
He also urged that at least one government-run dog shelter be set up as a starting point, stating that the Municipal Corporation's mandate on sterilisation and vaccination has seen "gross negligence."
Mr Goel warned that without urgent action, the issue could evolve into a serious legal and public health crisis.
His statement comes as NDTV continues its special campaign- 'India's Dog Dilemma,' highlighting the escalating tension between urban safety, legal responsibility, and animal rights. With rising bite incidents and little clarity on enforcement, the question remains: who will take ownership of Delhi's stray dog crisis before it turns unmanageable?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Closure of Jan Aushadi Kendras: Karnataka's Health Minister justifies move, says it is to ensure free medicines
Justifying Karnataka's move to close Jan Aushadi Kendras on the premises of government-run hospitals, Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao wrote to Union Health Minister J.P. Nadda on Tuesday stating that the move was intended to ensure free and assured supply of essential medicines to patients. Responding to the Union Health Minister's letter to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on the issue, Mr. Rao has said the intention to close the kendras only on the premises of government hospitals is to reduce the out-of-pocket expenditure for patients. 'The decision was taken to prevent doctors from directing patients to purchase medicines from these commercial outlets, thereby ensuring they are not denied free medicines available at the hospitals,' he said in the letter. Karnataka ranks among the top States in terms of the number of operational Jan Aushadi Kendras, with over 1,417 currently functioning. Of these, only 184 are located on the premises of government hospitals under the Department of Health and Family Welfare, while the rest operate independently outside government hospital campuses. Free supply Stating that the Karnataka government is committed to the free supply of all essential medicines, as listed in the Essential Medicines List (EML), across public healthcare institutions, Mr. Rao's letter said: 'To streamline public healthcare delivery and eliminate the risk of patients being denied medicines at government facilities, the State government has directed that prescriptions by government doctors be limited to medicines available within the hospital supply.' 'Medicines are regularly provided to government hospitals through Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited (KSMSCL). Hospitals have also been allocated sufficient funds and have standing instructions to purchase medicines locally in case of any shortage. This effort is aimed at ensuring universal access to essential medicines for patients visiting government hospitals — entirely free of cost,' Mr. Rao said in the letter. Asserting that the decision does not restrict the operation of Jan Aushadhi Kendras outside government hospital premises, Mr. Rao said citizens are free to access them as per their choice. 'This move is primarily aimed at benefiting poor and marginalised patients who rely heavily on government hospitals for healthcare,' the Minister said in the letter. Subsidised rate Highlighting the affordability of medicines sold under the Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP), Mr. Rao noted that the scheme offers medicines at prices 50% to 80% lower than branded alternatives. PMBJP is implemented by the Pharma and Medical Bureau of India (PMBI), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act. Mr. Rao urged Mr. Nadda to direct PMBI to supply medicines to Karnataka's Health Department at the same rates offered to Jan Aushadi Kendras. 'This will go a long way in supporting the State's free drug supply initiative,' he added.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Abortion law faces heat in HC over mental health clause
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Union government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a 57-year-old Hisar resident challenging the legal provision that allows abortions based on presumed mental health injury without requiring evaluation by a psychiatrist. Deepak Kumar, the petitioner, has sought a declaration that a key clause under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971, particularly Section 3(2) and Explanation 1, is unconstitutional. He argues that the provision violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution by allowing gynaecologists to terminate pregnancies on mental health grounds, even though they are not qualified to assess psychological conditions. He has also asked the court to rule that abortions should only be allowed when the life of the woman or the fetus is in immediate danger, not in cases of failed contraception or presumed mental anguish. The PIL, filed through advocates Dr Pankaj Nanhera, Sanchar Anand, Nitin Verma, and Yogesh Vashista, came up for hearing before the division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry, which issued notice to the Union government and fixed the next hearing for September 16. Section 3(2) of the MTP Act allows a registered medical practitioner to terminate a pregnancy if it risks the woman's life or may cause 'grave injury' to her physical or mental health. For pregnancies up to 20 weeks, the opinion of one doctor is sufficient; between 20 and 24 weeks, two doctors must concur for certain categories of women. Explanation 1 to this section presumes that if a pregnancy results from the failure of contraceptive methods, the resulting mental anguish is automatically considered a grave mental health injury, making abortion legally permissible. The PIL argues that: • Gynaecologists are not trained to assess mental health and should not be given the power to presume psychological harm. • Only psychiatrists can evaluate whether a woman is experiencing mental anguish severe enough to justify an abortion. • The automatic presumption that contraceptive failure causes grave mental injury is arbitrary and may lead to misuse of the law. • The law lacks clear definitions of what qualifies as 'grave injury' to mental health, giving doctors unchecked discretion. The petitioner contends that these provisions enable abortions in situations that fall outside the core intent of the MTP Act, and that such broad presumptions may undermine fetal rights and open doors to female feticide. Among other reliefs, Deepak Kumar has requested the court to: • Declare Section 3(2) and its Explanation 1 unconstitutional. • Clarify that 'grave injury' to mental health should not include distress caused by unintended pregnancies due to failed contraception. • Limit the scope of legal abortions to life-threatening situations for the woman or fetus. The court has admitted the petition and listed it for further hearing on September 16.
NDTV
12 hours ago
- NDTV
Doctors Reveal How Mobile Phones, Laptops Affect Fertility In Men And Women
Several reports have claimed that mobile phones and laptops may impact fertility in both men and women, although the evidence is not yet conclusive, experts still urge people to take precautions. "The ovaries are temperature sensitive; they like it cool. Heat from laptops or radiation from mobiles may lower the air quality or disturb your hormones over time. You may not feel it today, but your future self might," Dr Kalyani Shrimali, Fertility Specialist, Nova IVF Fertility, Indore, told NDTV. "Laptops placed directly on the lap generate heat and thermal stress in the pelvic region, which can negatively impact ovarian function." Dr Bhavana Girish, IVF Specialist at Motherhood Fertility & IVF Banashankari, Bangalore, told NDTV that radiation exposure from Wi-Fi and radiation signals might cause ovarian damage, which would lead to poor egg quality, lower AMH levels and lower egg counts. How Fertility Is Affected In Males Using laptops on your lap can increase scrotal temperature, and studies have shown that it can rise by 1 degree C to 5.1 degrees C when using a laptop. Meanwhile, exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from mobile phones may reduce sperm quality, count and motility. "While the impact of the radiation among the general population is still debated, studies suggest that in some men, especially those with certain genetic traits or existing vulnerabilities, this exposure of low-level electromagnetic radiation may contribute to reduced sperm quality and increased DNA fragmentation," Dr Nidhi Tripathi, Fertility Specialist at Birla Fertility & IVF, Noida told NDTV. "There are also multiple aspects of indirect impact that need to be considered," Dr Tripathi said, adding that overuse of smartphones is linked to poor sleep, which in turn alters melatonin levels. Melatonin plays a vital role in protecting sperm from oxidative stress and supporting overall sperm health. Sedentary behaviour and digital burnout also affect hormonal balance and testicular function over time. How Fertility Is Affected In Females When it comes to female fertility, exposure to EMR from mobile phones and laptops may affect ovarian function, hormone regulation and egg quality. Several studies have also linked EMR exposure to disrupted menstrual cycles. "Ovarian follicles are heat sensitive and repeated exposure to elevated temperatures may reduce the ovarian reserve or disrupt your folliculogenesis, ultimately leading to lowering of your reserve or low AMH," Dr Shrimali said. The blue light from screens can disrupt sleep patterns, leading to hormonal imbalances that may affect fertility. Dr Shrimali also said that constant screen time affects sleep, weight, and leads to stress, all of which affect your ability to conceive. What Are The Preventive Measures The doctors have suggested that people use a laptop on a table and keep their mobile phones in bags. "Some of the ways which we can reduce the effect of laptops and mobiles on fertility is by limiting their usage as much as possible, avoiding the usage of laptops, either using a desktop or keeping the laptop on a desk, avoiding mobiles or laptops at least two hours before sleeping to avoid the disruption of your sleep cycle and avoiding keeping your mobiles in your pocket all the time," Dr Girish said.
