Liberals, Conservatives silent on security; leave Canada's defense posture unresolved
Experts criticize Liberal and Conservative defense platforms for avoiding Canada's security in a post-reliable-U.S. world. Parties focus on equipment, not strategic shifts. The silence on this existential threat, amidst rising global tensions, leaves Canada's defense posture dangerously unresolved, raising concerns about future preparedness
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
As Canadians head to the polls, a critical examination of the Liberal and Conservative defense platforms reveals a striking similarity: a profound silence on the fundamental question of Canada's ability to defend itself in a world where the U.S. is no longer a guaranteed ally.Experts warn that this strategic void leaves Canada dangerously unprepared for a rapidly evolving security environment.The recent release of both parties' defense policies, marked by competing promises on Arctic sovereignty and military spending, has been met with skepticism by national security analysts.While the consensus on meeting NATO's 2% GDP target and investing in Arctic infrastructure is noted, the focus on specific equipment acquisitions overshadows the larger, more pressing issue.The core concern, as articulated by experts, is the parties' deliberate avoidance of addressing Canada's security posture in a post-reliable-U.S. world.The specter of American isolationism, amplified by Donald Trump's rhetoric, has fundamentally altered Canada's strategic calculus. Yet, both Liberals and Conservatives appear reluctant to confront this reality."What does Canada need to defend itself, especially in the absence of a reliable ally to the south?" asks University of British Columbia's Michael Byers. This question, central to Canada's future security, remains unanswered in the parties' platforms.University of Calgary's Rob Huebert points to the "existential threat" posed by an "untrustworthy America," coupled with an increasingly aggressive Russia and a powerful China.He criticizes the parties' focus on "dribs and drabs" of equipment purchases, arguing that a comprehensive strategic reassessment is urgently needed.The political reluctance to address this issue is understandable, says Huebert. "Neither of the parties really want to address it in any serious context, just because it does create the possibility of electoral disaster if the wrong word is spoken."This avoidance, however, comes at a significant cost. As Dave Perry of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute notes, Canada's allies are increasingly impatient with "rhetoric and promises."The upcoming NATO summit, where a higher defense spending target is expected, underscores the urgency of concrete action.The experts also express skepticism about the parties' ability to implement their defense promises, citing a history of policy pronouncements without tangible results. "Canada has developed this tendency to talk about security, but to do nothing," says Huebert.The silence on this crucial issue, however, leaves a troubling question mark over Canada's readiness to face an uncertain future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Relationship is excellent': Trump confirms trade deal with China finalised
Trump says a trade deal with China has been finalised, with key agreements on rare earth supplies, tariffs, and student visas, pending final approval from both leaders after talks in London Prateek Shukla New Delhi US President Donald Trump on Wednesday claimed that a trade deal with China has been finalised, pending final approval from both him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated, 'Our deal with China has been finalised, pending final approval from President Xi and myself. As part of the agreement, China will supply, upfront, full magnets and any necessary rare earth materials.' He added: 'We will be imposing a total of 55 per cent in tariffs, while China will impose 10 per cent. The relationship between our countries is excellent. Thank you for your attention to this matter. In return, the United States will provide what was agreed upon, including allowing Chinese students to study in our colleges and universities—something I've always supported.' Framework reached after London talks Trump's remarks come shortly after the United States and China reached an initial understanding on a new trade framework, following two days of high-level discussions in London involving senior officials from both governments. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed that the agreement is expected to resolve long-standing trade tensions, particularly over restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, which are critical to defence and electronics industries. Officials said the framework will now be presented to Presidents Trump and Xi for formal approval. Further details on implementation timelines and the full scope of reciprocal commitments are expected following the final summit between the two leaders. The earlier Geneva talks had collapsed largely due to China's export restrictions on essential minerals. In response, the Trump administration introduced its own set of export bans, halting the shipment of semiconductor design tools, aircraft, and other critical goods to China. A crucial de-escalation A breakthrough between the two giant economies was much-needed. Following Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2, trade between the US and China had virtually frozen. The imposition of a 145 per cent tariff on most Chinese imports made it economically unviable for American companies to source goods from what had long been their second-largest trading partner. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the US delegation in the negotiations, described the previous tariff structure as 'unsustainable.' On May 12, both sides announced plans to scale back their record-high tariffs, marking a turning point in the talks. This is especially significant considering China's near-total dominance in the supply of rare earth elements — materials essential for producing everything from cars and jet engines to MRI contrast dyes and certain cancer medications.
Economic Times
31 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump roasted online after claiming $2 flights from LA to SF — critics say this explains why his airline tanked
Flight prices and social media fun Live Events FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel During a press conference on Monday, Donald Trump said a flight from Los Angeles to San Francisco costs only $2. He said this while talking about sending National Guard troops to LA to handle protests, as per someone asked about sending Marines, Trump randomly started talking about California's high-speed bullet train project. Trump said the train project 'should've never been built' because 'you can fly there for $2'. He added, 'You could drive, you could do lots of different things,' to say the bullet train was not needed, as per The Latin Times is not the first time he made this claim. In February, he said the same thing during a talk about bad infrastructure costs. In February, he called California's train project one of the 'worst overruns' in U.S. history. Trump also said back then: 'You don't buy it. You take an airplane, it costs you $2. It costs you nothing', as stated in the in real life, flights from LA to SF usually cost $100 to $250, depending on the airline and timing. Trump even claimed it would be cheaper to give every traveler a limo ride than finish the train project. This led to people making fun of him online, saying he clearly doesn't know travel prices, as mentioned by The Latin person said this is 'why Trump Airlines failed,' referring to his failed airline from the 1990s. Another joked, 'Trump's living in coo coo land.' Some even said the president 'has dementia' or has lost touch with reality. Even though many people proved his $2 claim is false, Trump still hasn't taken it back, according to The Latin Times Trump said that during a press real flights usually cost between $100 and $250.
New Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump says US gets rare earth minerals from China in trade deal, tariffs on Chinese goods go to 55 per cent
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that the United States will get magnets and rare earth minerals from China under a new trade deal and that tariffs on Chinese goods will go to 55%.In return, Trump said the U.S. will provide China 'what was agreed to,' including allowing Chinese students to attend American colleges and global brands are among dozens of companies at risk of using forced labor through their Chinese supply chains because they use critical minerals or buy minerals-based products sourced from the far-western Xinjiang region of China, an international rights group said report by the Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance says companies including Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola and paint supplier Sherwin-Williams may be linked to titanium sourced from Xinjiang, where rights groups allege the Chinese government runs coercive labor practices targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other Turkic appeals court allows Trump tariffs to stay for nowThe report found 77 Chinese suppliers in the titanium, lithium, beryllium and magnesium industries operating in Xinjiang. It said the suppliers are at risk of participating in the Chinese government's 'labor transfer programs," in which Uyghurs are forced to work in factories as part of a long-standing campaign of assimilation and mass paints, thermos cups and components for the aerospace, auto and defense industries are among products sold internationally that can trace their supply chains to minerals from Xinjiang, the report said. It said that companies must review their supply chains.'Mineral mining and processing in (Xinjiang) rely in part on the state's forced labor programs for Uyghurs and other Turkic people in the region,' the report report came as China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, said that they have agreed on a framework to get their trade negotiations back on track after a series of disputes that threatened to derail them. The two sides on Tuesday wrapped up two days of talks in London that appeared to focus on finding a way to resolve disputes over mineral and technology exports that had shaken a fragile truce on trade reached in Geneva last about the report, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that 'no one has ever been forcibly transferred in China's Xinjiang under work programs.''The so-called allegation of forced labor in China's Xinjiang region is nothing but a lie concocted by certain anti-China forces. We urge the relevant organization to stop interfering in China's internal affairs and undermining Xinjiang's prosperity and stability under the guise of human rights,' ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said named companies didn't immediately comment on the report.A U.N. report from 2022 found China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where more than 1 million Uyghurs are estimated to have been arbitrarily detained as part of measures that the Chinese government said were intended to target terrorism and Chinese government has rejected the U.N. claims and defended its actions in Xinjiang as fighting terror and ensuring 2021, then U.S. President Joe Biden signed a law to block imports from the Xinjiang region unless businesses can prove the items were made without forced labor. The law initially targeted solar products, tomatoes, cotton and apparel, but the U.S. government recently added new sectors for enforcement, including aluminum and of China's major minerals corporations have invested in the exploration and mining of lithium, a key component for electric vehicle batteries, in Xinjiang, Global Rights Compliance said. Xinjiang is also China's top source of beryllium, a mineral used for aerospace, defense and telecommunications, its report said.A recent report by the International Energy Agency said that the world's sources of critical minerals are increasingly concentrated in a few countries, notably China, which is also a leading refining and processing base for lithium, cobalt, graphite and other minerals.
