Australian influencer Caitlin Lyndon's Melbourne home destroyed in alleged targeted firebombing incident
Caitlin Lyndon, known on social media as 'fitmum93', was partying with friends in Bali on Sunday night when she received a phone call from Australian authorities informing her about the fire.
The OnlyFans star's home, which she had only moved into two months prior to the incident, was badly damaged in the attack.
'I cannot fathom that somebody would do this to me,' Lyndon told Melbourne media outlets on Monday.
'Everyone has enemies… but I would never imagine having pissed people off enough to have your personal home lit on fire where you and your son's belongings are.
'I guess Victoria Police are probably going to find (the perpetrators), so I'm just going to let them do their job.'
Victorian Police have described the Sandhurst fire as 'suspicious' and have received reports of two individuals fleeing the scene in a dark car, which are being investigated.
A car on fire in a nearby area was also discovered by Victorian Police, with investigators 'working to determine if the fires are linked'.
Lyndon took to Instagram in a now-deleted video discussing the incident, sharing with her 82,000 followers that her CCTV system had been disabled prior to the attack.
'I just don't know where to start – and I live in the biggest Karen estate ever, so this is just gross,'
'I didn't even think you could shut down CCTV so these c**ts are just dogs.
'I am grateful my son and dogs are safe as I can replace our furniture, our belongings, but our family I cannot.
'I've never wanted to hold my baby so tight in all my life – true friends and families' colours are shown in times like this.
'I'm not afraid to cry and show you that I have f****ng emotions because you know what – I worked my a** off to get where I was and even if I've lost everything, you've burnt it down and you've ruined my life.
'I will build my life again, but my son does not deserve this.'
The influencer also posted a photo of the property's damage to her social media on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
As a barrister, there was one question I desperately wanted to ask Erin Patterson
There is a particular detail about the so-called 'mushroom trial' in Gippsland that I can't get out of my head. Police located and catalogued over 400 books in the home of the defendant, Erin Patterson. The forensic purpose of this analysis was revealed when prosecutor Nanette Rogers, SC, put to the defendant in cross-examination that not one of the books found in her home was devoted to the subject of mushrooms. The point was to demonstrate to the jury that Patterson's purported interest in foraging for fungi was a recent invention, and no more than a feint. I am a barrister, albeit not of the criminal variety, and I wanted to throw on my robes and be permitted a cameo in Gippsland. I had a question for Patterson. Among the hundreds of books located in her belongings, is there a copy of Shirley Jackson's classic gothic novel, We Have Always Lived in the Castle? Jackson's macabre tale, told from the perspective of Mary Katherine (Merricat), offers a number of eerie parallels with the beef Wellington meal served in Leongatha. Six years before the story starts, Merricat's parents and younger brother have died of arsenic poisoning after sitting down to eat a meal prepared by her sister, Constance. Uncle Julian ingested poison, but survived, and lives with his nieces. Constance was charged with murder, but has been acquitted. Towards the end of the novel, Merricat confides: 'I said aloud to Constance, 'I am going to put death in all their food and watch them die'. Constance stirred, and the leaves rustled, 'The way you did before?' she asked. It had never been spoken of between us, not once in six years. 'Yes,' I said after a minute, 'the way I did before'.' No reason or motive for the murders is ever revealed. The reader is left to sit with the uncomfortable knowledge that Merricat has poisoned her family, but has not told us why. Spotted among the regular attendees at Patterson's trial were Melbourne authors Chloe Hooper, Sarah Krasnostein and Helen Garner. Hooper is the author of The Tall Man: Death and Life on Palm Island (2009), a powerful book about the death in custody of Cameron Doomadgee, and Garner's books about trials and crimes, including This House of Grief: Story of a Murder Trial (2014) deserve their legendary status. Later, it was confirmed that the trio will soon release a book. No doubt it will be a poignant account of the deaths of Gail Patterson, Don Patterson and Heather Wilkinson and the trial of Erin Patterson. I cannot hope to emulate their writing, I have nothing more august to offer than this short piece: This House of Beef (Wellington). But thinking about the family tragedy behind the mushroom trial has now caused me to dwell on a triumvirate of notorious cases of Victorian children murdered by their fathers that have intersected with my life: Darcey Freeman, the Farquharson boys, and Luke Batty. My connection with the death of Luke Batty was direct and intimate. I was briefed to appear for his mother Rosie Batty in the 2015 inquest into the death of her son. The tragedy of Luke's murder at the hands of his abusive father haunts me to this day. During the inquest, I experienced but a fraction of the intense media scrutiny that the legal teams have endured during the Patterson trial. And I know how destabilising it can be. Each day of the inquest there was a phalanx of cameras waiting for us outside the Coroners Court. I was pregnant with my daughter who is now 10 years old. My swelling belly, proof of the life within, felt utterly obscene in light of the tragedy that we were there to attempt to make sense of. By the time of the last sittings in December 2014, I was nearly six months pregnant. I was in the public bathrooms often – attending to the frequent urgent needs of a heavily pregnant woman aged 43. In those small, too close stalls, I could hear women milling near the wash basins tsk-tsking and tutt-tutting over the evidence that had been adduced before the break. I overheard some of them confide in one another that they had nothing to do with either the proceedings or the Batty family, but had taken leave to watch the inquest as a form of spectacle. I remember feeling overcome in the tiny bathroom and needing to move deftly to dodge the outstretched hands of matronly types attempting to touch my growing belly – as if the baby inside me were as much available for public consumption and commentary as the child whose awful death we were all there to bear witness to.
ABC News
9 hours ago
- ABC News
Investigation launched into man's death after Traralgon arrest
A man has died after being arrested by police in Traralgon, south-east of Melbourne overnight. Police were called to an address in Moore Street just before 1am, where a 41-year-old man was reported to be behaving erratically outside his home. But when they arrested the man, he became unresponsive. Emergency services attempted to revive him, but he died at the scene. The ABC spoke to neighbours of the man who said he was known for his erratic behaviour. Local man Gino Tripodi told the ABC his heart was racing when he got home in the early hours of Sunday morning and saw the incident unfolding. "The old challenge of trying to get into your street to go home was a bit daunting," Mr Tripodi said. "I had to be okayed to walk home, so I didn't know where I was going to sleep if I couldn't walk through." Mr Tripodi said he had been on the road all day for work and most people were out partying when the incident took place. "Not knowing what exactly happened in the street, it just unfolded as I was talking to police at the end of the street," he said. "I feel for the guy and his family, condolences to them." Detectives from the Homicide Squad were investigating but the exact circumstances surrounding the death remained unclear. As with any death in police custody, the investigation will be overseen by the Victoria Police Professional Standards Command. Mr Tripodi said he couldn't praise the emergency services enough for what they did. "Considering you had police, the fire brigade and ambulance and all the teamwork together.. it was amazing how they combined together, they did everything they could," he said.
The Age
14 hours ago
- The Age
Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling
'When someone makes a workers' compensation claim, the insurer needs to figure out two main things: whether the person meets the definition of a 'worker' and whether the injury is one that falls under the scheme,' Denning said. 'To do that, they often ask for personal detail, like how the person was employed, where they live, and exactly what was happening when the injury occurred. That's especially the case for injuries that happen on a journey to or from work.' Denning said if someone was worried about what could happen with their data – especially if the claim ends up being rejected – it was a good idea to speak with a lawyer before proceeding. Under Victorian legislation, employees are entitled to compensation if their injury arises 'out of or in the course of any employment'. But as the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry notes, 'there is no single definition of what will and will not be deemed to be a work-related injury' – leading to ambiguity on whether a worker's injury should lead to compensation. The chamber said the legislation provided 'some clarity by listing several examples deemed to be 'in the course of employment', such as where the worker is travelling for the purpose of their employment, or where they are injured whilst attending a compulsory training course'. Insurer Allianz Australia, an authorised agent of the Victorian WorkCover Authority, rejected Muller's claim because he was injured during his commute outside work hours. 'Allianz has determined that your injuries have not arisen in or out of the course of your employment … you sustained the injuries while travelling from your home to your workplace,' it said. Allianz did not respond to requests for comment on Muller's case. Loading Muller accepts the decision to reject his claim but does not understand why he was interviewed about his personal life when his accident did not fall under WorkCover's umbrella. 'I thought, why the hell did I go through all this? This should never have proceeded,' he said. He is also frustrated that Allianz says it is unable to delete his personal information – particularly when large-scale cyber breaches are increasingly common. 'Regarding the request to erase information obtained during the claim investigation, please note that we are unable to delete this information. However, rest assured that no personal data will be disclosed externally,' it said. Investigators are not required to determine whether a person is eligible for WorkCover before interviewing them about their personal life. WorkSafe, which manages workers' compensation in Victoria, said investigators had a responsibility to ask a wide range of questions regarding a claimant's personal and health matters to assess a claim. It also said it was required to hold on to claimants' data for various periods in case claimants made future claims or launched legal proceedings. John Pane, data privacy expert and chair of digital rights not-for-profit Electronic Frontiers Australia, said the Victorian and federal governments needed to update privacy laws to require organisations to delete individuals' data on request, as happened in the European Union. 'There is no current right in Australia that grants individuals the power to demand that their personal data be deleted from any organisation that holds it, even if they unlawfully or erroneously captured it,' Pane said. 'And the retention period of these records could be for a substantial period of time.' While there is no 'right to erasure' in this country, Allianz is required, under the Australian Privacy Principles, to only use or disclose personal information 'for the purpose for which it is collected'. Taxpayers have poured more than $1.3 billion into WorkCover to help cover the rising cost of claims, particularly in mental health-related claims. There were 35,575 new claims to WorkCover in the 2024 financial year, up 25 per cent in three years.
