logo
Man who punched Iraq War veteran three times found guilty of his murder

Man who punched Iraq War veteran three times found guilty of his murder

Yahoo10-07-2025
A man who punched an Iraq War veteran three times in a street attack which led to his death 10 months later, has been found guilty of his murder.
Gregory Twigg, 32, landed three 'powerful and cowardly' punches on medically-retired British Army veteran Lee Woodward, in an attack in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, on the night of June 24 2022, leaving him severely brain damaged, until he died on April 26 2023.
Twigg, who is already serving an eight-year and three-month prison sentence, after pleading guilty in September 2022 to grievous bodily harm with intent for the attack on Mr Woodward, has now been found guilty of his murder.
Mr Woodward's family cried and whispered 'yes' as a jury of seven women and five men returned their verdict on Thursday, after two hours and 57 minutes of deliberations, at the end of a trial at Stafford Crown Court.
The trial was told Mr Woodward had been on a night out with his fiancee Kate Griffin, and had left The Liquor Vaults pub in Trade Street minutes before her, when he became involved in a confrontation with the occupants of a Vauxhall Astra that had been driving past him.
Twigg, who admitted he had taken cocaine and had drunk vodka and sambuca, told the trial he had become angry after Mr Woodward had allegedly sworn at and threatened him and his friends as they were driving past him on their way to a night out.
The driver, Nathan Lockley, pulled the car over and a confrontation ensued, with Twigg getting out of the back seat of the vehicle and attacking Mr Woodward three times.
Prosecution counsel David Mason KC said Twigg was 'fired up on drink and coke and raging' when he attacked Mr Woodward, who he said posed no threat to the defendant, after the first punch left him looking 'like a highly dazed boxer'.
CCTV from a nearby pub showed Twigg knocking Mr Woodward, who was over six feet tall, to the ground, before a second punch knocked him into a parked car.
The third punch left him unconscious in the road and Twigg fled the scene with his friends. He was arrested less than an hour later in Newcastle-under-Lyme.
The trial was told Mr Woodward suffered a severe brain injury and would have required full-time care in a nursing home for the rest of his life, but he died after contracting peritonitis and pneumonia in hospital.
Twigg had told the jury he never intended to cause Mr Woodward serious harm and had only wanted to give him a black eye so that he would leave him and his friends alone.
He said he punched him twice more because he feared Mr Woodward was going to hit him back, and he was 'devastated' that his actions had resulted in his death.
In a statement, Ms Griffin had said her partner of 10 years, who had been medically retired from the British Army after suffering a back injury while on a tour of Iraq, relied on strong medication and would never have started a fight because of his back pain.
Mr Mason told the court Twigg's punches were 'powerful and cowardly' and that he had intended to 'flatten Lee so he would never get up'.
He said Twigg was trying to 'wriggle out' of a murder conviction by attempting to convince the jury he only wanted to give him a black eye, because he knew that by pleading guilty to causing grievous bodily harm with intent in 2022, that it made him guilty of murder.
Judge Roger Thomas KC thanked the jury for their hard work and told Twigg, who appeared to show no emotion in the dock, that he would be facing life imprisonment, but the minimum term would be decided when he is sentenced on September 19.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's long-stalled suit against Bob Woodward dismissed
Trump's long-stalled suit against Bob Woodward dismissed

The Hill

time18 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump's long-stalled suit against Bob Woodward dismissed

A federal judge on Friday dismissed President Trump's lawsuit against famed Watergate journalist Bob Woodward for publishing audio tapes of interviews he conducted with Trump for a 2020 book. U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe's ruling comes a year and a half after Woodward and his publisher asked the judge to dismiss the suit. Trump's attorneys had long complained about the lack of progress, repeatedly urging Gardephe to rule. An appointee of former President George W. Bush, Gardephe rejected Trump's arguments that he is a joint author of the tapes and ruled that even if he wasn't, the interview responses are protected copyright. 'There is almost no support in the case law for the notion that an interviewee has a copyright interest in his responses to interview questions, and such a conclusion would run counter to animating principles of the Copyright Act,' the judge pushed back. The judge also dismissed Trump's state law claims, ruling those were preempted by federal copyright law. 'In another biased action by a New York Court, this wrongful decision was issued without even affording President Trump the basic due process of a hearing. We will continue to ensure that those who commit wrongdoing against President Trump and all Americans are held accountable,' a spokesman for Trump's legal team said in a statement. Trump sued Woodward in January 2023 after giving him 19 interviews for his book, 'Rage.' The lawsuit conceded Trump gave the interviews and permitted Woodward to record them, but the complaint claimed the journalist and his publisher were not authorized to sell the audio recordings themselves. The $49 million lawsuit named Woodward, Simon & Schuster and its then-parent company, Paramount Global, as defendants. Paramount later sold the publishing giant to a private investment firm. The Hill has reached out to Simon & Schuster and Paramount for comment. Trump's attorney had repeatedly expressed frustration with the judge for mulling the dismissal motion for months without taking action. Following Trump's election, his attorneys kept pressing the judge to move ahead, but in December, the judge said he was 'at work' on it and declined to expedite it further.

Is illegal streaming as bad as shoplifting? Yahoo readers have their say
Is illegal streaming as bad as shoplifting? Yahoo readers have their say

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Is illegal streaming as bad as shoplifting? Yahoo readers have their say

Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers. As illegal streaming continues to rise, the law has begun to clamp down on serial offenders, and earlier this week, a man who ran an illegal TV streaming operation was jailed for more than three years. Stephen Woodward, 36, of Thirsk, North Yorkshire, made money by selling illegal access to copyrighted content, including sport. Woodward claimed to be making £100,000 a month through illegal streaming. As well as seizing £144,121 of cash, investigators secured an all-assets restraint order against a total of £1.1m held by Woodward. Sky customers who used Fire Sticks to illegally stream TV content have also been warned they face being cut off, if caught. And earlier this month, two people were arrested over allegations of illegal streaming following raids by the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) at City of London Police. As the cost of living continues to tighten purse strings, and streaming services clamp down on password sharing policies, it seems the U.K. has a loose sense of morality when it comes to streaming content illegally, from sports, to TV and movies. And now, a new Yahoo poll has backed up this assumption. In our poll earlier this week, Yahoo News UK asked our readers, "Is illegal streaming as bad as shoplifting?" It received 2,849 votes and showed 69% of Yahoo readers think illegal streaming is not as serious a crime as shoplifting. The poll's Have Your Say feature attracted some passionate comments, with many readers focusing on the rising cost of streaming. Jim H, from Glasgow, said: "If they brought it down to a reasonable price, people wouldn't need to pirate it, it's their own fault." Similarly, John M, from Dundee, said: "The cost of living today has made it near impossible for disabled people like me to ever afford to watch these things legally, that the state is turning a lot of us to criminals." The cost of living today has made it near impossible for disabled people like me to ever afford to watch these things legallyJohn M Renegade from Cornwall echoed the sentiments, saying: "People wouldn't feel the need to watch tv illegally if the price we pay to watch tv legally wasn't so expensive." Rick C from Nottinghamshire said that prices for legal streaming need to be more reasonable, "If the TV companies did not rip people off with there charges then more people would be prepared to pay (at a sensible cost)." Finghard from Bournemouth said the whole digital media industry was in desperate need of an overhaul saying, "If I have bought the original in any format I should be able to purchase the next for a nominal conversion price using the serial number from the hard copy I own. Why should I pay again and again for what I already own? This is one of the issues why people feel the need to carry out illegal ways to watch and listen to entertainment." Other readers took issue with the comparison between shoplifting and illegal streaming. Jason T from Newquay argued: "You aren't taking anything from anyone, plus people need to start cancelling subscriptions to send a message that the market is too fragmented and expensive and they need to move to the same model as music... Until the corporate greed stops. I fully support the piracy." Susan V from Ely adds: "Shop lifting is a quantifiable loss and effects more small shopkeepers more meaningfully than illegal streaming affects huge companies like Sky." On the other hand, there were some vocal critics of people who illegally stream content, pointing out the real world implications of the crime. Jim D from Birmingham said: "I can't abide media piracy. As someone with 25 years' experience in the creative industry, media piracy is blatant theft of ideas, hard work, and revenue. Look at the list of credits at the end of a movie to see how many livelihoods rely on a single project. "Only the creative industries are stolen from in this way. If piracy continues to be thought of as harmless and victimless, pretty soon there will be nothing new, creative, or innovative to watch, just AI slop." Media piracy is blatant theft of ideas, hard work, and D JR from South Yorkshire adds, "Funds from illegal streaming are used to support other crimes, such as drugs, child/sex trafficking etc. People only think about the cost to themselves, but don't think about the cost to society." Yahoo also asked, "Out of 10, how much of a law-abiding person are you?" The poll results showed that our readers saw themselves as preferring to stay on the right side of the law. This poll received 1,452 votes, with the most common vote being 9/10 and an average strength-of-feeling score of 6.59. This indicates many readers saw themselves as law-abiding citizens. However some comments were keen to point out that the punishments for illegal streaming don't match up to the severity of the crime. Ed M from Glasgow said, "Disgrace putting a man in prison who gave people who can't otherwise afford sky tv a cheaper option, these big companies are making billions off us consumers. They just can't get enough money off you." Owen J from Liverpool said, "Drug dealers get less than three years for selling drugs but it's ok for streaming services to extort people putting the price up each year and now there going stop people sharing passwords with family members." The dangers of piracy A government report published in November 2024 outlined the dangers of piracy, and how it affects the creative industries. Illegal streaming services often lack parental controls, and could put children at risk of exposure to unsuitable material. Illegal devices can be unsafe, as they are not required to be tested for UK safety standards. Illegal streaming is a copyright infringement and you are committing a crime. You can also put yourself at risk of data theft, malware, and fraud, particularly if you are sharing banking details with a streaming service. The creative industry employs more than 1.9m people and contributes £84.1 billion to the UK economy. By not paying for content you deprive the industry of money, and put the future of entertainment at risk. Buying and using illegal apps and devices funds organised crime. Crimestoppers say that 5 million people in the UK experienced a virus, fraud or personal data theft as a result of watching illegal streams, and 1.5 million people had money stolen from them as a result. Read more of Yahoo UK's Poll of the Week articles

‘Ticking time bomb' Marine vet, 42, violently kicks, yanks 6-year-old stepson on dog leash, disturbing video shows
‘Ticking time bomb' Marine vet, 42, violently kicks, yanks 6-year-old stepson on dog leash, disturbing video shows

New York Post

time2 days ago

  • New York Post

‘Ticking time bomb' Marine vet, 42, violently kicks, yanks 6-year-old stepson on dog leash, disturbing video shows

Disturbing video allegedly captured a former US Marine repeatedly kicking and ferociously yanking his 6-year-old stepson on a dog leash during what Florida prosecutors described as two days of horrific torture, according to reports. Zachary Perez, 42, was allegedly caught on home surveillance footage parading the youngster through their Miami home with a pink leash wrapped around his neck and then aggressively jerking him backward to the ground, multiple videos obtained by NBC 6 showed. Other horrifying videos, released by the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office, captured the unhinged stepdad seemingly chasing the youngster with a stick, kicking him as he ran through the living room and viciously booting him in the stomach onto a bed in the boy's bedroom. 4 Zachary Perez, 42, was allegedly captured on home surveillance walking the boy around the home with a leash. Miami-Dade SAO Prosecutors, who described Perez — an Iraq War vet — as a 'ticking time bomb' willing to hurt anyone, said he was also seen forcing the boy to walk outside wearing a backpack filled with rocks during the malicious two-day ordeal, the outlet reported. The alleged abuse left the young boy with swollen eyes from being punched, scratches across his body, a rash on his neck from the dog collar and marks from tree branches used to whip him, court records alleged. 4 Perez appears to hold a stick as the child, who is blurred, is in the yard with him. Miami-Dade SAO The youngster's mother, Barbara Perez, previously claimed in court that her son now suffers from PTSD, a traumatic brain injury and hearing problems as a result of Perez's alleged savage cruelty. Perez's attorney claimed the boy's mother asked for help caring for the child and gave him permission to discipline him — a claim prosecutors argued lacks any evidence. 4 Since Zachary Perez's arrest, multiple people, including his 14-year-old daughter, have reportedly come forward with additional allegations of abuse, prosecutors said. Miami Dade Corrections The frenzied stepfather was arrested and charged back in May with aggravated child abuse — an allegation in which he pleaded not guilty. Since his arrest, multiple individuals have reportedly come forward with additional allegations of abuse, including his 14-year-old daughter, prosecutors said. 4 Prosecutors said the horrific abuse lasted for two days. Miami-Dade SAO The rampaging madman was initially denied bail but was released on house arrest on June 10. Perez was reportedly ordered to remain at least 500 feet away from his stepson and the boy's mother, and have no contact with either of them. Perez is due back in court on Aug. 28.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store