
Six More States Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Six more states have banned junk food purchases from being bought with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced.
West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas have all had new waivers approved that allow each state to modify what can and can't be bought using food benefits. Across all of these states, the change will impact approximately 8.5 million people.
It brings the total number of states banning junk purchases to 12, following similar waiver approvals earlier this year for Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah.
Why It Matters
SNAP benefits, also known as "food stamps," are paid to low- and no-income households across the U.S. that would otherwise struggle to afford groceries. Across the country, more than 40 million people receive the allowance.
A customer shops for produce at an H-E-B grocery store on February 12, 2025, in Austin, Texas.
A customer shops for produce at an H-E-B grocery store on February 12, 2025, in Austin, Texas.
Brandon Bell/GETTY
What To Know
A waiver grants flexibility by modifying specific USDA program rules, enabling states to administer the SNAP program in different ways. Various states currently have SNAP waivers in place, and they were widely implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic to help Americans get better access to food benefits.
The new waivers, while different for each state, mean that starting in 2026 certain types of foods can no longer be bought using electronic benefit transfer cards, which are loaded every month with payments to spend in participating grocery providers across the country.
Junk food generally refers to foods that have lots of calories, particularly those high in macronutrients such as sugar and fat, but little nutritional value. In Texas, the ban will cover soda, energy drinks, candy, and prepared desserts, while in Louisiana, soft drinks, energy drinks, and candy will be banned. Some of the waivers are less restrictive: in Colorado and West Virginia, only soft drinks will no longer be eligible for purchase.
The push to tighten rules around unhealthy purchases has been led by Republican states, with Colorado being the only Democratic state to join the throng.
Proponents of limiting SNAP purchases have argued removing unhealthy foods from the program will improve health outcomes, while others have argued that it controls how America's poorest eat and fails to address wider problems regarding access to affordable, healthy food.
What People Are Saying
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy: "For years, SNAP has used taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy—products that fuel America's diabetes and chronic disease epidemics.
"These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health. I thank the governors who have stepped up to request waivers, and I encourage others to follow their lead. This is how we Make America Healthy Again."
Texas Governor Greg Abbott: "To ensure the health and well-being of Texans, we must promote better, healthier food habits. Earlier this year, I requested a waiver from the USDA to ensure SNAP benefits cannot be used to purchase junk food.
"I applaud [Agriculture] Secretary [Brooke L.] Rollins and the Trump Administration for their approval of this waiver to support and promote healthy eating habits. The state of Texas will continue to consider innovative ways for Texans to lead healthy and productive lives."
Kavelle Christie, a health policy and advocacy expert and director at the Center for Regulatory Policy and Health Innovation, previously told Newsweek: "The issue isn't about individuals misusing their benefits, but their limited choices. In many rural areas and food deserts, convenience stores and fast-food chains are often the only available options.
"For many families, fresh produce and healthy meals are luxuries that are unattainable, not because they do not want these foods, but because they are unavailable or too expensive."
A food desert refers to an area, usually a low-income community, where residents have limited access to affordable and nutritious food, particularly fresh fruits and vegetables.
What Happens Next
Each of the waivers will go into effect in 2026, meaning there will be no immediate changes for SNAP beneficiaries across the impacted states for now. Most come into effect early next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
28 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
RFK Jr. Cuts mRNA Vaccine Funding
I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Florida bans soda and candy for SNAP users in 2026
Florida is among a few states that have narrowed their list of food eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs (SNAP) this week to exclude sugary snacks and drinks. Why it matters: Starting next year, more than a million families in the state will no longer be able to use their benefits to buy a box of Little Debbie's, a liter of Coca-Cola or a Hershey bar at the checkout. The big picture: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined his "Make America Healthy Again" campaign in April, encouraging states to restrict SNAP purchases to ensure taxpayer dollars go toward "wholesome foods." One study found little difference between purchases made by households with SNAP and those without benefits, with 20 cents of every dollar spent on sweetened beverages, desserts, candy and sugar. How it works: SNAP, often called food stamps, helps low-income families, seniors and people with disabilities buy groceries. Five other states — Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia — were approved to restrict eligible food on Monday. Before these changes, SNAP recipients were already prohibited from using their benefits to purchase alcohol, tobacco, hot and prepared foods and personal care items, according to a press release. Zoom in: Florida amended its statutory definition of food to exclude: Candy, which the state defined as sugar or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruits, nuts, caramels and gummies. Prepared desserts, which the state defined as processed, pre-packaged sweet foods intended for immediate consumption. Soda, which the state defined as a beverage that is made with carbonated water and flavored with sugar or artificial sweeteners. Energy drinks, which the state defined as a beverage with at least 65 milligrams of caffeine per 8 fluid ounces that are marketed as increasing the consumer's mental and physical energy. Yes, but: Drinks like sparkling water and coffee are still eligible. What they're saying: "In Florida, we are ensuring SNAP supports nutritious options that help families thrive, not unhealthy products that lead to long-term health problems," Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a statement. "Thank you to President Trump for approving our waiver request." The other side: "Because these products are inexpensive, banning SNAP use on them won't have the desired effect," Christopher Bosso, a political science professor at Northeastern University, wrote in an op-ed for The Hill. "SNAP enrollees simply will use other funds on them," Bosso went on. "After all, SNAP is 'supplemental,' and most enrolled households have cash on hand to spend $3 on that 2-liter bottle of Pepsi if they want one."
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Mere Sight of a Sick Person Can Trigger Our Immune System
The mere sight of a sick person may set off an alarm system in your brain and body, even if they are too far away to infect you. A series of experiments using virtual reality headsets has now revealed just how "exquisitely sensitive" our brains are to symptoms of sickness. When participants saw a virtual avatar at varying distances showing clear signs of illness (like a feverish rash), their brains suddenly kicked into gear and their immune systems were put on high alert. When they saw a healthy, neutral-looking avatar, on the other hand, their brains did not show the same activation patterns, and their bloodwork lacked an immediate elevation in immune markers. Related: Some of these markers are known as innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). ILCs can spike in the blood when the body is directly exposed to a pathogen, but all it took in this case was the sight of a virtual infection and the mere prospect of exposure. "Together, these data show that ILCs react to infections not only when they are detected in the body but also when they are processed as a potential threat approaching the body," write the international team of authors, led by immunologist Sara Trabanelli from the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. When researchers used machine learning to statistically analyze the results of their experiments, they found that the brain's threat-detection activity could largely explain the immune response. After seeing a virtual sick person at a distance, the brains of participants lit up in a unique pattern, which was not seen when the avatar had a fearful expression or a neutral expression. The sick avatars that were furthest away elicited the strongest response from the brain's network. Interestingly, some of these activated areas are the same as those that can be triggered after a flu vaccine is given. The findings suggest that when the brain senses a looming threat, it responds rapidly, triggering activity in brain parts like the hypothalamus, which then communicate with the immune system. This gives the body time to put up a fight. The recent experiments took place among 248 healthy adults in total, and in one of the trials, participants wearing VR were asked to press a button when they felt a touch on their face. When their VR sets featured a virtual sick person, participants pressed the button faster upon feeling the touch than when they saw a neutral or fearful avatar. This suggests that their brains are primed because of the sight of sickness. The anticipation probably evolved as a fight-or-flight response, the researchers suspect, though they caution there's still a lot to resolve, including how perceived infectiousness and disgust interact. "These findings suggest an integrated neuro–immune reaction in humans toward infection threats, not solely following physical contact," conclude the authors. Thanks to our brains for staying vigilant on our behalf. The study was published in Nature Neuroscience. Related News Up to 1 in 5 Americans Think They're Allergic to Penicillin. Most Aren't. The Viral 'Kettlebell Challenge' Could Be Harmful. Do This Instead. The 'Fibermaxxing' Wellness Trend May Pose Health Risks. Here's Why. Solve the daily Crossword