After protests, Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board orders closure of incinerator in eco-sensitive zone near Gangotri
The unit was found to have violated the provisions under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and for operating in the Bhagirathi Eco Sensitive Zone without obtaining a consent to operate. It was also found that it had no proper monitoring facilities, a logbook of operations, or a disposal of waste generated from the process, said the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Body.
The residents, part of the collective Himalayi Nagarik Drishti Manch, had written to authorities, stating that the incinerator was burning mixed solid waste disposed of in the area, causing emissions.
Such units are required to obtain a Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate certificate from the State Pollution Control Board, and they are mandated to keep their effluent quality within the specified norms as specified under the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. The Gangotri unit processes one tonne of solid waste every day.
Moreover, the unit was set up in the Bhagirathi Eco Sensitive Zone, an area in which every activity is monitored and regulated by a committee under the chairmanship of the Chief Secretary of the state. The incinerator was permitted by the committee last year and was set up by the Ministry of Tourism under the PRASAD Scheme (Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive).
Officials from the state and Central Pollution Control Body visited the facility on June 24 and found that the Uttarkashi District Tourism Development Officer had not obtained a Consolidated Consent and Authorisation (CCA) under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and authorisation under the Hazardous and other wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016. Though the unit representative said that it processes one tonne of solid waste every day, they could not provide a logbook record. Similarly, the unit representative said the ash generation is negligible and it is kept on the premises, but there was no record of the ash generation, the pollution control body said. The unit also did not maintain records for plastic waste collection.
The pollution control bodies also recommended that the facility obtain necessary permissions, including a Consent to Operate from the UKPCB.
Following a letter from residents of Uttarkashi to authorities regarding the operation of the unit at Bhagirathi Eco Sensitive Zone, the Uttarkashi DM had said that the unit is a zero-emission system with a solar-powered furnace and operates through a programmed oxygenation plasma technology. He also said that the waste is processed without any combustion or involvement of water or other moving parts. However, according to CPCB guidelines, incinerators have a pollution index of 100 and fall under the red category.
Aiswarya Raj is a correspondent with The Indian Express who covers South Haryana. An alumna of Asian College of Journalism and the University of Kerala, she started her career at The Indian Express as a sub-editor in the Delhi city team. In her current position, she reports from Gurgaon and covers the neighbouring districts. She likes to tell stories of people and hopes to find moorings in narrative journalism. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Poor construction or upkeep? After staircase collapse, blamegame begins
Ghaziabad: Days after a staircase collapsed at Green View Apartment in Vasundhara, a blame game between UP Housing Board and RWA of the society has begun. On the one hand, RWA says UP Housing Board is responsible for the incident, citing poor construction, while on the other, the board has laid the blame on the former, saying it "failed" to carry out its duty to maintain the society. On Wednesday, UP Housing Board issued a notice to the RWA to carry out an inspection of its apartments and undertake repair and maintenance work of the common area. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida The notice says, "In case of any untoward incident due to lack of maintenance of the apartment, the responsibility will be on the RWA, which could also invite suitable action against the concerned RWA." This has triggered a debate between the board and the RWA. UP Housing Board executive engineer Nikhil Maheshwari said, "Notices have not been issued to the Green View Apartment only but a few other apartments as well and we expect affirmative action on the part of the RWA, which will preempt incidents like the one that took place in Green View Apartment in Vasundhara, in which the staircase collapsed and residents had a providential escape." Early on Sunday, a father-son duo and their pet dog were rescued after the staircase leading to their third-floor apartment came crashing down. Pankaj Sharma, a resident and auditor of Green View Apartment, while reacting to the notice, said, "The board is shirking from its responsibility by issuing such notices. It was the UP Housing Board which, about 27 years ago, developed the society and the staircase collapse incident is proof enough that during the making of the society, the structural safety was compromised. We demand that a structural audit of such buildings be conducted by the UP Housing Board, which administers Vasundhara township, and give us in writing how many years a particular building is safe to inhabit. " Reacting to this, Maheshwari said, "The incident took place because of poor maintenance. The society is about 27-28 years old, and there is a functional RWA there, which should have taken up maintenance work from time to time, which it didn't. To add to the problem, about 250-300 flower pots have been placed on both sides of the staircase, including the one that collapsed. They have even converted the terrace into a terrace garden against the norms and the RWA remained a mute spectator to this. The seepage over the years led to the weakening of the structure, which led to the collapse and the responsibility is clearly on the RWA. We cannot be put in the dock." SC lawyer Prashant Kanha, meanwhile, said, "The Uttar Pradesh Apartment (Promotion of Construction, Ownership and Maintenance) Act, 2010, clearly says expenses of administration, maintenance, repair or replacement of the common areas and facilities, utilities, equipment and machinery and all other sums are assessed against the owners of the apartment by the Association of Apartment Owners." "However, this comes with a condition that if the RWA or any residents lodge a formal complaint with the developer over structural issues—the Housing Board, in this case—then part of the blame also lies with the developer," added Kanha. The UP Housing Board, in this case, has denied receiving any such complaints either from the RWA or residents. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Kulsi river safe for bathing at two monitored locations: CPCB
Guwahati: The Kulsi river in Kamrup district, which is known for being a habitat of the endangered Gangetic dolphin, is still safe for outdoor bath at two locations — Chaygaon near NH37 Crossing and Kukurmara, where pollution control board monitored water quality last year, as per a water quality report by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). This river is considered one of the last refuges for this species in Assam. It is a tributary of the Brahmaputra and originates in the West Khasi Hills of Meghalaya. Responding to a question about the pollution in the river raised by Congress MP from Assam and deputy leader in the Lok Sabha, Gaurav Gogoi, the minister of state for Jal Shakti, Raj Bhushan Choudhary, said as informed by the Assam Pollution Control Board, no specific information is available on any such report, and it has not undertaken any detailed study specifically regarding severe pollution affecting the tributary at Boko. In the written reply, the minister stated that as informed by CPCB, the water quality data of the Kulsi River monitored at these two locations in 2024 indicates that the Kulsi River is complying with the Primary Water Quality Criteria for Outdoor Bathing notified by the ministry of environment, forests and climate change (MoEF&CC) under Environment (Protection) Amendment Rules, 2000. The minister said CPCB, in association with State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and Pollution Control Committees (PCCs), has established a Water Quality Monitoring Network under the National Water Quality Monitoring Programme. "In Assam, the water quality is monitored at 239 locations, which include 112 locations on 73 rivers, out of which the Kulsi River, a tributary of the Brahmaputra River in Boko, is monitored by the Assam Pollution Control Board at two locations — at Chaygaon near NH37 Crossing and Kukurmara," he added. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Stanford brings back SAT, ACT scores for Fall 2026 admissions: What students need to know
Stanford University has confirmed that standardised test scores will once again be a mandatory part of its undergraduate admissions process, beginning with the Fall 2026 application cycle. The move, which reverses a pandemic-era test-optional policy introduced in 2021, means applicants must now submit either Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) or American College Testing (ACT) scores for their applications to be considered complete. The university's updated admissions criteria, published this week, also state that legacy status will continue to be considered in the selection process, even as California moves to restrict the practice in institutions that accept public funds. The dual announcements are reshaping how students, especially those applying from California, may approach one of the country's most competitive university admissions processes. SAT, ACT scores now required again Stanford's shift back to requiring test scores follows a faculty-led review which found a meaningful correlation between standardised test performance and academic outcomes at the university. In an earlier statement, the university clarified that test scores are viewed as only one element in its holistic admissions process, and that there is no defined minimum Grade Point Average (GPA) or test score for applicants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo 'Academic potential remains the primary lens through which applications are evaluated,' the university wrote in a previous public update, according to The Stanford Daily . It added that standardised test scores can serve as a useful signal of preparedness when reviewed alongside school grades, course rigor, recommendation letters, and personal essays. According to The Stanford Daily, Brad Howard, associate vice president for University communications, noted in an email that the decision was timed to allow prospective students sufficient time to prepare. For current high school students planning to apply in the upcoming cycle, this reinstated requirement may affect how they prioritise test prep and application timelines in the coming months. What this means for applicants For students who began high school under a test-optional landscape, the return of SAT and ACT scores as required materials may present both a strategic and psychological shift. Applicants will now need to balance academic coursework, extracurriculars, and essays with the added pressure of standardised test preparation. Still, the university has emphasised that scores are considered in context. Students from schools with limited access to test preparation resources or those facing personal challenges during testing may use the additional components of the application to present a fuller picture of their background and potential. It is worth noting that many peer institutions, including MIT and Yale, have also recently reinstated test score requirements, citing similar research on academic performance and equity, as noted by The Stanford Daily . This suggests that standardised testing may be regaining influence in elite admissions, even as national debates about access and fairness continue. Legacy admissions policy remains In a separate but closely related development, Stanford also announced that it will continue considering legacy status, that is, whether an applicant has family members who attended the university, despite the passage of Assembly Bill 1780 in California. The new legislation prohibits universities that receive state-funded financial aid from giving admissions preference based on legacy or donor connections. According to The Stanford Daily , to comply with this law without changing its admissions approach, Stanford will withdraw from the Cal Grant program, a state-funded initiative that supports college costs for qualifying California residents. Instead, the university has committed to covering financial aid using its own institutional funds, ensuring that eligible students continue to receive support. For students, the return of testing makes early planning more important than ever. Whether that means registering for fall test dates, seeking out preparation resources, or understanding how your scores fit into a broader application strategy, the key is to stay informed and begin preparing early. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
