Tesla shares slip after double downgrade amid Trump feud fallout
Investing.com -- Baird analysts have downgraded Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) to Neutral, citing "uncertainty abounds" around the company's near-term outlook. Shares in the company fell 1.8% in pre-market trade.
Despite a strong recent performance, which saw TSLA shares climb 24% following a "fundamentally poor quarter," Baird believes "lofty expectations" for the June launch of a more affordable vehicle and robotaxi service are already priced into shares.
Baird highlighted several reasons for the downgrade, including "lofty expectations, key-man risk, and increasing competition."
The analysts specifically pointed to CEO Elon Musk's relationship with President Donald Trump, stating that it "now adds uncertainty and fuels questions regarding brand damage."
They see Musk's political activities as exemplifying "key-person risk associated with Musk's political activities." Baird expects these brand concerns to "persist until sustained evidence of volume growth avails itself."
Regarding the much-anticipated robotaxi service, Baird noted that "Robotaxi expectations are high, and competition is intensifying."
While Musk has projected "hundreds of thousands of vehicles on the road by 2H next year," Baird's model forecasts only 6,000.
They believe the robotaxi business will be "harder (and likely less profitable) than the lofty expectations held by several investors."
Baird has also lowered its 2026 delivery estimates for Tesla, reflecting the removal of the EV tax credit. Their updated estimates for Q2 2025 deliveries are 377,000, below the consensus of 404,800. For the full year 2025, they project 1.72 million deliveries (versus consensus 1.70 million), and for 2026, 2.19 million (versus consensus 2.06 million).
Despite these near-term concerns, Baird maintains its long-term view of Tesla as a "core holding." They see an "outsized opportunity related to both robotaxi and robotics" in the longer run, but are "stepping to the sidelines for now."
Analysts at Baird also lowered their rating on Tesla stock.
Related articles
Tesla shares slip after double downgrade amid Trump feud fallout
Chewy set-up into and post Q1 results is 'increasingly less attractive'
Interactive Brokers hit by Citi downgrade as valuation climbs but Redburn ups PT
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
19 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
What happens in Washington decidedly does not stay in Washington, with practically every action taken by the richest and most powerful country in the world having a near-immediate global reaction—on tariffs, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, global health, and more. Sometimes those reactions aren't even confined to the planet—as the recent social-media smackdown between President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk illustrated. On June 5, as the feud between the two erstwhile besties escalated, Trump posted on his Truth Social Platform, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Just over 90 minutes later, in a post on X, Musk clapped back: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Not long after that post went wide, Musk quietly deleted it. Later that evening, an X user posted to Trump and Musk, 'This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days.' Minutes later, Musk responded, 'Good advice. OK, we won't decommission Dragon.' That defused the immediate emergency, but the threat and counterthreat raised questions about just how dependent America's space efforts are on the whims of two sometimes mercurial billionaires. Could a mere word from Musk ground the nation? Could a stroke of a Trump Sharpie similarly hobble SpaceX? The short answer in both cases is maybe, but not likely. There's no overstating just how central SpaceX has become in the space sector in the 23 years since it was founded as the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation. Since the inaugural flight of the company's Falcon 9 in 2010, the rocket has become the world's workhorse vehicle for rides to orbit, with 485 completed missions, including 440 acrobatic landings of its reusable first stage. The rocket and its Dragon spacecraft provide regular service to the International Space Station (ISS), carrying crews up and down, and ferrying cargo and supplies aboard uncrewed Dragons. In 2024, the company's larger Falcon Heavy launched NASA's Europa Clipper spacecraft to Jupiter's moon Europa. It is set to launch the ambitious Nancy Grace Roman Telescope in May 2027. The working relationship between SpaceX and the government is by no means limited to NASA. In April, as Ars Technica reports, the U.S. Space Force awarded the company a $5.9 billion contract, making SpaceX the leading provider of launch services for Pentagon satellites. The military is also a major customer of SpaceX's Starlink satellite constellation, with 50 military commands now using the orbiting Internet service, according to Defense News. 'We have $22 billion in government contracts,' said Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president and COO, in a live streamed public panel last year. 'We earned that. We bid it, we were the lowest price, best bidder, we won and we execute.' If anything, the company is going to have the opportunity to execute still more, reinforcing the ties between SpaceX and the government. In 2021, NASA selected SpaceX's still-in-development Starship rocket to serve as the lander that is planned to carry American astronauts down from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon sometime before the end of the decade. In 2024, the space agency tapped SpaceX to build the vehicle that will nudge the ISS out of orbit when the program ends in 2030. And in May, Trump's so-called skinny budget called for NASA to cancel its over-budget and behind-schedule Space Launch System, the 21st century answer to the 1960s' Saturn V moon rocket, leaving Starship as the likeliest successor. Meantime, while Boeing's Starliner spacecraft was supposed to be joining Dragon in providing rides to the ISS—taking a share of the launch business revenue from SpaceX—Starliner famously failed in its inaugural flight last year. This left astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams stranded aboard the station for 8 months, on a mission that was supposed to last merely eight days. Similarly, Blue Origin, the rocket company founded by Musk's fellow mega-billionaire Jeff Bezos, was expected to provide some launch-service competition for SpaceX, but the company has managed just one, only partially successful orbital launch of its New Glenn rocket, in January 2025, and has limited most of its activity to flying popgun suborbital missions for wealthy space tourists. 'It's not a planned monopoly,' said Shotwell in the live stream. 'If our competitors could get it together…' All of this leaves SpaceX and the government mutually interdependent, with Washington counting on the company to provide services no one else currently can, and the company happy for the paying work. That's not to say neither one could foul the joint nest. Trump's nomination of private astronaut and Musk friend Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator was widely seen as a sign of Musk's influence on the president—and Trump's decision on May 31 to pull the nomination was similarly seen as the first sign of the rift between Musk and Trump. But the president has made no other moves against Musk-world, and Musk's decision to delete his provocative post on X may have cooled tempers on both sides. SpaceX investors and other customers may serve as a brake on Musk's worst tendencies, and lawmakers from space-heavy states including California, Texas, and Florida may similarly restrain Trump. None of this says that neither man is beyond acting against his own—and his government's or his company's—best interests. The scorpion in the venerable fable famously stung the frog that was its only ride across the river—explaining before they both sank and drowned that 'it's in my nature.' Trump's and Musk's natures have always been impulsive. The space and defense sectors can only hope the two men show some restraint now.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sharps Technology CEO, Robert Hayes, to Present at the Virtual Investor Summit on June 10, 2025
Presentation to be webcast live at 10:00 AM ET NEW YORK, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Sharps Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: 'STSS' and 'STSSW') ('Sharps'), an innovative medical device and pharmaceutical packaging company offering patented, best-in-class smart safety syringe products to the healthcare industry, today announced that Robert Hayes, CEO, will present at the Virtual Investor Summit on June 10, 2025, at 10:00 AM ET. Investors are invited to listen to the presentation and can register here. Sharps recently announced that the Company has commenced shipments under three customer orders tied to previously announced purchase agreements. These shipments represent the Company's first commercial deliveries and its transition to revenue-generating operations. All products are being manufactured and shipped from Sharps' facility in Hungary, which has undergone significant upgrades to support high-volume production. Read the update release HERE. Presentation Details: Event: Q2 Investor Summit Date & Time: 10:00 AM ET on June 10, 2025 Presenter: Robert Hayes, CEO Webcast: LINK HERE Conference Overview and Structure:The Investor Summit is an exclusive event tailored for investors focused on small- and micro-cap stocks. It offers a unique opportunity to meet with management teams from high-potential emerging companies, gain insights from industry experts, and understand how peers are navigating the current market environment. This quarter's event centers on micro-cap companies that are currently undervalued and positioned near catalyst events that could significantly accelerate their growth trajectory. Registration for Investors:To request free registration, please go to the Investor Summit website, ( and click the "Registration" button. For More Information, please visit: or, contact johnna-mae@ About Sharps Technology:Sharps Technology is an innovative medical device and pharmaceutical packaging company offering patented, best-in-class smart-safety syringe products to the healthcare industry. The Company's product lines focus on providing ultra-low waste capabilities, that incorporate syringe technologies that use both passive and active safety features. Sharps also offers products that are designed with specialized copolymer technology to support the prefillable syringe market segment. The Company has a manufacturing facility in Hungary. For additional information, please visit FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:This press release contains 'forward-looking statements'. Forward-looking statements reflect our current view about future events. When used in this press release, the words 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'future,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'poised' or the negative of these terms and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify forward-looking statements. Such statements, include, but are not limited to, statements contained in this press release relating to our business strategy, our future operating results and liquidity, and capital resources outlook. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy, and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees of assurance of future performance. We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, our ability to raise capital to fund continuing operations; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; the impact of any infringement actions or other litigation brought against us; competition from other providers and products; our ability to develop and commercialize products and services; changes in government regulation; our ability to complete capital raising transactions; and other factors relating to our industry, our operations and results of operations. Actual results may differ significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, or planned. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this release. Investor Contact:Holdsworth PartnersAdam HoldsworthPhone: 917-497-9287Email: IR@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
The 'Halftime' Investment Committee weigh in on Trump vs. Musk impact on Tesla's stock
CNBC's Megan Cassella joins 'Halftime Report' to discuss the latest news on the public spat between President Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The Investment Committee debate what it means for Tesla.
