Schools will give pupils an extra WEEK off over half term so 'families can go on cheaper holidays'
Under the controversial schemes, pupils are having the autumn half term holiday extended from one week to two.
School days are then extended slightly throughout the year to make up the deficit.
But critics have attacked the 'ridiculous' changes, warning they more about 'making life easy for teachers' and are 'dumbing down' education.
They have also warned parents will struggle to take time off or arrange childcare during the time off.
Schools spearheading the revolution include North Walsham High School and Long Stratton High School, both run by the same trust in Norfolk.
One of the headteachers claimed the change would help parents avoid price hikes by airlines and holiday firms in peak periods and reduce staff absence by giving them a 'better break'.
But Chris McGovern, the chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, told the Mail: 'We have to ask what's more important – a passport to Majorca or a passport to [children's] futures?
'We need to be upping the academic demands on children. This is dumbing down.'
He added: 'Children need to have shorter lessons, rather than longer lessons. They get tired during the day.
'They have to provide a minimum number of hours per year, so in theory they could just makes days longer and longer and the number of days shorter and shorter.
'Education is not about making life easier for teachers – it's what's in the best interests for children.
'The workload for teachers has been reduced, for example school reports are now AI-generated. In some respects, they have never had it so good.
'It is still a hard job but it's a vocation as well. We shouldn't be changing the school year to fit in with the holiday plans of teachers.'
Announcing the new school year – which includes adding ten minutes a day to make up for the extra week off - North Walsham executive headteacher James Gosden said: 'Over the past few years, we have had numerous requests for holidays which we cannot authorise.
'This would provide an opportunity for parents and carers to access cheaper holidays.'
He added: 'At a time when sickness increases due to the winter months and fatigue, this would add a lengthier break into the longest term to support a reduction in absence – as students would have a greater opportunity to rest and enjoy the break.
'This would also give staff the chance for a better break and ensure less absence, thus minimising cover lessons and ensuring staff are rested, so they can continue to do an excellent job.'
Parents had supported the change, Mr Gosden said, with 78 per cent of the 157 families who responded to a consultation in favour.
But one parent, who asked not to be named, complained: 'It's ridiculous. October isn't when most families are taking holidays.
'I was against this because I don't see how it's going to benefit my kids.
'I've also got to make arrangements for them on these days, while teachers get more time off.'
Another said: 'Ten minutes a day won't make up for losing a whole week in school.
'And a week either side of the summer holidays would have been better than a week at Hallowe'en.'
There was further criticism online, with comments including: 'Are holidays more important than getting an education?
'And who can afford a two-week autumn holiday anyway except teachers?'
Another said: 'Public schools have been doing this for decades, they don't think TUI has twigged?'
Others supported the plans, with one saying: 'Good idea. My school day was much longer than most high school days at present.'
Another commented: 'If 78 per cent of families responded favourably then it sounds like the trust is onto something with this.
'Two weeks for autumn half term makes a lot of sense, especially if the children don't lose any education as a result.'
Priestlands School in the New Forest has already introduced a similar scheme, while three others in Hampshire – secondaries Wildern and Deer Park and Boorley Park Primary schools – announced in March they were looking into doing the same.
But there was opposition from residents, with one, Stacey Rabbetts, arguing children rely on routine and the changes would 'give them great stress'.
Claire Jenkins pointed out if only a few schools extended the autumn half term, there would not be sufficient demand for holiday clubs to take the pressure off parents who have to work and have no other options for childcare.
The Enrich Learning Trust, which runs North Walsham and Long Stratton high schools, said there were no immediate plans for the changes to be introduced at its seven other schools in the area – but admitted other trusts had adopted it.
A spokesman added: 'Having consulted with their school communities, they are planning a pilot of a two-week half-term in October 2025, with the aim of improving attendance in the second half of the autumn term, having had a slightly longer break.
'It is our understanding that this is something that is being tested by other trusts too.'
In April, it emerged another Norfolk school was planning to close early on Fridays to reduce 'financial pressures'.
Buxton Primary School said 8.30am to 3pm school days would become 8.10am to 3.05pm.
A similar scheme launched at several English schools, particularly Birmingham, in 2019 led to protest marches in Westminster.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Don't say 'detention'! SNP guidance for violent pupils branded 'green light for anarchy' by experts
SNP schools guidance for dealing with problem pupils makes no reference to 'detention' – after fears were raised that the word is too 'punitive'. In a move critics say is a 'green light for anarchy', it was also suggested that a 'time-out' for classroom thugs could 'conflict with a child's right to play'. Traditionally, detentions have been used to remove a disruptive child so that fellow pupils can get on with their work. But guidance on how to deal with them – published by Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth in June – failed to mention the sanction once. Now, new meeting minutes show that education groups lobbied for the word not to be used, even suggesting that detentions should be scrapped entirely. Scotland's schools face a rising tide of violence, with figures last year suggesting one teacher is attacked every four minutes. And last night critics slammed the SNP's soft touch approach. Christopher McGovern of the Real Campaign for Education said: 'This is total madness. Most pupils are desperate to see bad behaviour punished. They know that their education and future depends on peace, order and stability. 'Banning detention is a green light for anarchy, bullying and a breakdown of order.' Meanwhile, Scottish Tory education spokesman Miles Briggs said: 'It's little wonder the SNP Government can't get a grip on the epidemic of classroom violence when they're stressing over how to sugarcoat a minor sanction.' A 49-page guide to 'fostering a positive, inclusive and safe school environment' was published by the Scottish Government last month after coming under mounting pressure over anti-social behaviour in schools. Teachers were told thugs should be given a 'quiet space' to 'self-regulate' their emotions – and only be kicked out of school as a last resort. One tip for teachers was to give problem pupils a 'laminated set of bullet points, for example, to remind and support them to step away, seek help and follow an agreed and rehearsed process'. The guidance also warns staff against discipline which makes pupils feel 'shame' and 'alienation'. At no point was detention mentioned. Minutes from two meetings of the government's Consequences Sub-Group now suggest the sanction of 'detention' was dismissed during the draft stages of the report. Feedback in February raised concerns that 'detention may conflict with a child's right to play and existing Education Scotland guidance'. Another session in March saw advisers suggest the Scottish Government 'avoid punitive language like detention'. A spokeswoman for teachers' union the EIS said: 'We need more than policy documents to make a difference, we need investment and more resources – including more teachers and support staff.' A Scottish Government spokesman last night insisted that 'a child's right to play does not prevent the use of consequences in relation to behaviour.' He added: 'This is made clear in the final Scottish Government guidance. The minutes of the meetings referred to record the wide-ranging comments, reflections and inputs of the sub-group.'
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Middle-class families could face higher water bills to subsidise poorer households
Middle-class families could face higher water bills under new plans to subsidise the costs of low income households. Labour ministers will be urged to introduce a nationwide scheme that would see poorer families given huge discounts on their charges. The recommendation on creating a national social tariff will be presented to Sir Keir Starmer in a Government-ordered review of the water industry on Monday. The money to reduce water bills for poorer households would be most likely to be found by increasing bills for everyone else. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'Family homes across middle England face soaring water bills under the Labour Government, thanks to the triple whammy of above-inflation hikes, higher tariffs on multi-person households, and robbing Peter to pay Paul to fund tariffs for those on welfare benefits. 'This is on top of council tax bills going through the roof, and pay packets being squeezed due to Labour's jobs tax. 'We can't just keep increasing taxes and charges – record taxes are already making life too hard for people. The Government should be standing up for the makers, not the takers.' The scheme would replace a current patchwork of subsidy programmes put in place by individual suppliers to help poorer customers. Consumer groups have suggested unifying the level of support across England could lead to an extra two million people getting money off their bills. Ministers are not expected to decide immediately whether to accept the recommendation, given the complexity of introducing such a policy. The previous Tory government rejected similar proposals on the grounds that punishing middle-class households would prove politically unpopular. Earlier this year Labour ministers asked Sir Jon Cunliffe, a former deputy governor of the Bank of England, to lead a review into reform of the water sector. He published interim findings last month, in which he said he would bring forward proposals to 'strengthen' the system of social tariffs. The report found that the fragmented nature of support resulted in 'people in similar circumstances receiving significantly different levels of support, depending on what part of the country they live in'. 'Regulation has failed customers' Sir John wrote: 'The commission is looking at how to more effectively support customers who are struggling to pay their bills. This includes looking at options to strengthen social tariffs and to tailor water bills to better reflect household consumption.' He is expected to recommend that the Government introduces a nationwide social tariff in his final report, which will be published on Monday. Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, is expected to respond to the publication of Sir John's report by saying: 'Regulation has failed customers and the environment. We will introduce root and branch reform so hard-working British families will never again face huge shock hikes to their bills like we saw last year.' It comes after Labour ministers passed legislation through the Commons that quietly paved the way for such a reform. The Water (Special Measures) Act included provisions that allow water companies to pool the cash they raise to subsidise poorer households into one pot. It also authorised increased data-sharing between the Government and suppliers which could underpin auto-enrolment of customers onto social tariffs. Currently, the nine water companies in England offer their own individual social tariff schemes, which are subsidised by wealthier households. Because the programmes are localised, firms can only raise money from their own areas and must consult customers on how much they are willing to pay. The proportion of households on social tariffs has soared in recent years as a result of rising water bills and pressure on suppliers to do more to tackle poverty. Figures from Ofwat show that, across the country, one in 10 people are now receiving such support, with the resulting cross-subsidies costing £26 per customer. But that masks huge regional differences, resulting from both the level of support suppliers provide and the criteria they set for qualifying households. South West Water has the lowest proportion of customers on social tariffs, at five per cent, whilst United Utilities, which covers the North West, has the highest at 15 per cent. Customers of Portsmouth Water pay only £2 each in subsidy costs, whereas the bill at scandal-hit Thames Water has soared to £55 per person. Water UK, the industry body for suppliers, has lobbied for the introduction of a single social tariff to end what it calls the 'postcode lottery' of support. The Consumer Council for Water, a quango that acts as a consumer champion, has also encouraged ministers to introduce such a scheme. It has estimated that two million people who are entitled to support with their bills are losing out because the current system is too complex. Critics have said creating a national social tariff would lead to a flood of new customers eligible for support, meaning higher bills for everyone else. But industry sources said the eligibility criteria could be set so that subsidies are better targeted, limiting the need to raise more cash.
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Wax seals will no longer be used on official government documents – ending centuries old tradition
BONKERS laws meaning some Government documents have to be sealed with WAX are being scrapped after hundreds of years. Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden is tearing up red tape which causes delays for staff working in taxpayer funded bodies. 1 They include a rule which forces the Intellectual Property Office, overseeing patents, to close some documents with an official wax 'seal of the Patent Office'. Wax seals were first used in England to seal documents just before the Norman Conquest of 1066. Edward the Confessor was the first English Monarch known to have used them. Some of the most important documents in British history were sealed with wax, including Charles I's death warrant and the decree ordering Anne Boleyn to be beheaded. The DVLA - which completes around 45,000 handwritten forms a year - will be able to do away with the need for paper. The Government is considering legislation to scrap these laws to help staff speed up processes. A Cabinet Office source said: 'You cannot solve today's problems with outdated laws designed for a different era. 'Modernising the state and removing bureaucracy will empower ministers to do what we promised - deliver the Plan for Change, improve public services and raise living standards.'
