logo
Why every seller should get a survey before putting their house up for sale

Why every seller should get a survey before putting their house up for sale

Telegraph3 days ago
Paying out a few hundred pounds on a survey before selling your home could be the most valuable money you'll spend when moving house.
Almost 20pc of buyers have pulled out of a purchase after putting in an offer, according to moving comparison website Compare My Move. Nearly half the time, the decision was down to discovering issues that required major repairs.
Sellers can preempt issues that could crop up on a buyer's survey by having their own report carried out first. A Level 2 homebuyers report, suitable for properties less than 50 years old, costs £445 on average.
A full structural Level 3 survey that includes a more thorough look at the property's structure and condition, including looking under floorboards, could cost £700 to £1,500. However, if it means finding out about and getting on top of any issues before a sale, it is likely to be money well spent.
Ray Smith, chartered surveyor at Watsons Property Group, said: 'Common issues we see include cracked roof tiles, signs of damp, poor loft ventilation, timber decay and invasive plants like Japanese knotweed. We also come across the more unexpected, such as bats in loft spaces, oversized wasp nests and signs of long-forgotten fire damage.
'Sellers who tackle these problems before going to market, or are upfront about them, can build trust with potential buyers and reduce the risk of last-minute renegotiations or sales falling through. It can even help justify your asking price and keep the chain moving smoothly.'
Telegraph Money lists the five most common survey concerns that lead to sales collapsing and what you can do to protect yourself:
1. Instances of damp
When damp is picked up on a survey, buyers picture black mould, rot and expensive disruption – even if it is actually a very mild case.
Some instances of damp can be simple and quick to fix, while in other cases they can be more serious and costly.
Brett Ray, of property inspection app Survey Shack, said: 'The issues that derail sales aren't rare; they're routine, and that means they're avoidable.
'By being prepared, sellers could save themselves thousands of pounds in the long run.'
For example, poor ventilation in a period home occupied by a family can lead to high moisture levels in the air, which may cause mould or stains on walls and ceilings. This is especially a risk in corners or places where air doesn't circulate well.
Sellers can often improve conditions by avoiding indoor drying of clothes, using extractor fans, and regularly airing out the property by opening windows and vents.
Where signs of past condensation or surface mould remain, redecorate after improving the ventilation. However, simply repainting over affected areas without addressing the cause can lead to suspicion during a buyer's survey.
In some cases, staining, damp patches or musty smells may be due to disconnected or poorly installed ventilation ducting in the loft, such as from a bathroom fan. This is often a low-cost issue to resolve and can make a noticeable difference to a property.
Another common issue in older homes is where external ground levels have been raised over time, for example, with new patios or driveways.
This can make the original damp-proof course – a barrier designed to prevent moisture rising up to a building's structure – ineffective, allowing moisture to rise into walls and affect nearby timbers such as skirting boards or suspended floor joists.
If in doubt about the causes for damp smells or stains, sellers can hire an independent damp and timber specialist who is a member of the Property Care Association to complete a report, which can range from £200 to £600 depending on the size of the home.
2. Roofing problems
Slipped, cracked or worn pointing on roof tiles may just need individual repairing or replacing. However, if neglected and allowed to accumulate, it could give the impression the roof is nearing the end of its life, which invariably triggers budget panic in buyers. A new roof on a typical three-bedroom semi-detached property can cost between £12,000 and £20,000.
Employ a reputable roofing company to fix anything obvious, and if there is life left in the roof, ask them to confirm it in writing, including the date of the inspection. This can be presented to the buyer's surveyor to head off any speculation over its lifespan.
'A roof in poor condition is evident to pretty much anyone,' said Mr Ray.
'Sellers should be asking a competent roofer who is either a member of the Federation of Master Builders or who has been personally recommended to provide an estimate for a replacement roof if that's what is required.
'If a buyer starts obtaining their own quotes that range from between £30,000 and £50,000, they are going to want to knock £50,000 off – so get out in front of the negotiations.'
3.Safe electrics
Tell-tale signs of older electrical systems include dated light switches, sockets mounted on skirting boards and an old-style fuse board. These visuals alone can lead a surveyor to raise questions and buyers to panic.
Regardless of apparent condition, many surveyors will recommend that an up-to-date electrical installation condition report (EICR) is obtained, particularly if there is no recent certificate to confirm the system has been tested and is safe. These reports usually cost between £150 and £300, but can be more if a property is unusual or complex.
Electrical faults carry serious safety risks, so a recommendation for further investigation is standard practice.
Without an EICR, buyers may assume the worst, sometimes fearing the need for a full rewire, which could lead to reduced offers or even withdrawals.
While full rewires are not always necessary, costs can vary depending on the age and layout of the system. The average cost of a full rewire for a three-bedroom house is likely to be between £4,450 and £8,000, according to the website Checkatrade.
If your own pre-sale survey suggests that further checks are needed, arranging an EICR in advance provides clarity and reassurance. If the report flags issues, it will outline what is required to bring the electrics up to standard, information that can be shared with the buyer from the outset.
4. Plumbing system
Lead pipes around drinking water, a dated boiler and signs of corrosion and stains around pipework or on ceilings under showers and baths are likely to lead to a surveyor recommending a specialist inspection.
A plumbing survey, which costs between £150 and £300, would investigate the system, while a gas safe engineer report would be instructed if there were concerns about the boiler. This costs between £80 and £250.
Ensure the boiler has been serviced and obtain a valid certificate to present to the surveyor so no doubts are raised in their report. If it's functional but old and nearing the end of its life, a buyer will spot it when they view your home, so it's worth raising the point upfront and building it into negotiations from the outset rather than waiting for a surveyor to comment on it after the buyer has offered.
Make it clear that the offer you're accepting is acknowledging the boiler is 20 years old and, while still working, may need to be replaced in two years, for example.
5. Structural movement
Cracks in a wall, even if historic, can raise alarm bells among buyers, as surveyors often can't give assurance that they are not a sign of current movement. Fearing a risk that part of the house could collapse without major repairs – buyers may be tempted to walk away.
Cracks that run through brickwork and are visible inside and outside the property can suggest ongoing structural movement and should be looked at more closely, as should those that extend all the way down to the ground, which can indicate movement in the foundations.
But not all cracks are a cause for concern. If your homebuyers survey raises questions about the stability of your property – a structural engineer's report costing between £600 and £1,000 will give you and potential buyers the definitive answer.
Mr Ray said: 'By producing an impartial report by a structural surveyor that confirms the cracks are historic and there is no current movement, the concern is neutralised before it becomes a negotiation tactic.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves ‘eyes £5bn windfall from sale of seized cryptocurrency'
Reeves ‘eyes £5bn windfall from sale of seized cryptocurrency'

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reeves ‘eyes £5bn windfall from sale of seized cryptocurrency'

Rachel Reeves is eyeing up a £5bn pre-Budget windfall as the government considers selling off seized cryptocurrency to plug a hole in the public finances. The Home Office is reportedly working with police forces to offload at least £5bn worth of Bitcoin and other currencies taken from criminals. It is planning to develop a storage system for the currencies to handle their sale, it has emerged, as concerns about Labour's spending plans mount ahead of the autumn Budget. Home Office plans for a 'crypto storage and realisation framework' would allow law enforcement to securely store frozen digital currencies and sell them, The Sunday Telegraph reported. Ms Reeves has been left with a gap of at least £5bn to fill when she sets out the government's spending plans this autumn, with the government's chaotic U-turn on planned benefit cuts raising the likelihood of tax hikes. The chancellor and Sir Keir Starmer have left the door open to a wealth tax to cover the shortfall. As well as the £5bn black hole left by the welfare climbdown, the impact of sluggish economic growth and Donald Trump 's trade war could leave the Treasury scrambling to find as much as £20bn in tax hikes or spending cuts elsewhere. It is not known how much cryptocurrency law enforcement agencies currently have, but one 2018 raid saw 61,000 Bitcoin seized from a Chinese Ponzi scheme. The value of Bitcoin has surged since Mr Trump's return to the White House, meaning the haul could be worth more than £5.4bn. Responding to the suggestion Ms Reeves could sell the reserves, Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf said: 'This would be a terrible decision. The UK should be implementing Reform's Crypto Bill and increasing its Bitcoin reserves. 'Selling now will go down as a far worse decision than Gordon Brown's fire sale of our gold. 'The Westminster class are dinosaurs who don't get the future.' But Aidan Larkin, the chief executive of seizure company Asset Reality, told The Sunday Telegraph: 'There is oil under our feet in terms of digital assets, from an illicit perspective, that could have hundreds of millions of pounds coming back into the UK each year.' Bitcoin investors have been spurred on by Mr Trump, who has lent his support to the market both by promising new legislation and regulatory changes, but also even launching his own digital currencies. The leading cryptocurrency reached $120,000, marking both an all-time high and an important landmark for those who believe that bitcoin is undervalued.

Syria, Japan, Coke sugar and  equal pay in women's sports
Syria, Japan, Coke sugar and  equal pay in women's sports

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Syria, Japan, Coke sugar and equal pay in women's sports

Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Residents say no gunfire heard Sunday morning in Syria's Sweida. Japan's exit polls show a defeat for the ruling party coalition in the upper parliament. The fight for equal pay in U.S. women's basketball is on court, while in the UK a female footballer reaches a milestone. Plus, Trump's push for Coke to use cane sugar. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter ⁠here⁠. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast ⁠here⁠. Visit the ⁠Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement⁠ for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit ⁠ to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading Japan's ruling coalition likely to lose upper house majority, exit poll shows, opens new tab Calm reported in Syria's Sweida as tribal fighters said to withdraw Rains from Typhoon Wipha batter Hong Kong as it heads for mainland China Trump sues Wall Street Journal over Epstein report, seeks $10 billion Haitian immigrants in Ohio stand firm as Trump threatens deportation Coke's shift to cane sugar would be expensive, hurt US farmers A Nazi document trove raises questions for Argentina Arsenal smash record to make Smith first women's million-pound signing 'Pay them': As WNBA All-Star party wraps up, athlete pay comes into focus

‘Outwitted': have water companies managed to sidestep Labour's bonus ban?
‘Outwitted': have water companies managed to sidestep Labour's bonus ban?

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Outwitted': have water companies managed to sidestep Labour's bonus ban?

It started before the election. Against a background of growing fury about the conduct of the water companies, Labour promised to end the injustice of their executives getting bonuses while sewage was dumped in England's rivers and seas. In March 2024, Steve Reed, the then shadow environment secretary, said: 'Since the last election the water bosses have paid themselves £25m in bonuses. Labour will ban the payment of bonuses to polluting water bosses until they have cleaned up their filth.' The policy became a significant part of the election campaign two months later. The manifesto promised: 'We will give regulators new powers to block the payment of bonuses to executives who pollute our waterways.' Once in power, Labour went straight into action. One of the first big laws it passed was the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025. The legislation contains provisions to ban performance-related payments to senior executives of water companies that repeatedly pollute England's waterways with sewage. Reed, now environment secretary, described it as a means to end the 'undeserved' payments. Under the act, the government banned six water firms including Thames Water from awarding bonuses for this financial year after seven major pollution incidents. However, it was not long before flaws in this plan began to emerge. Thames Water has faced particular challenges this year, with regular discussions over its possible collapse, even as customers' bills soar to pay for infrastructure. In February, as the legislation was going through parliament, a court ruled that Thames could proceed with a controversial £3bn loan from a group of creditors, at a 9.75% interest rate, in order to stabilise the company. In May, the chair of Thames, Adrian Montague, told MPs on the environment, food and rural affairs (Efra) committee that bosses were in line for 'substantial' bonuses linked to the loan, on the insistence of creditors. The company needed to pay the bonuses, he said, 'because we have to keep staff. It is a very competitive marketplace out there … If we are unable to pay bonuses, people will come knocking and try to pick out of us the best staff we have. That is not in customers' interests.' Soon afterwards, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs announced plans to use the act to block Thames bosses taking bonuses. A week later, Reed appeared in front of the same committee, telling MPs that the bonuses had been withdrawn. At the same hearing Montague conceded in a letter that he may have misspoken when he said the bonuses were insisted upon by creditors. Reed told the committee that Thames Water had 'appeared to be attempting to circumvent that ban, calling their bonuses something different so they can continue to pay them'. Thames responded, saying that rather than having been withdrawn, the bonuses were paused. But in July the Guardian revealed that Thames had already paid bonuses totalling £2.46m to 21 managers on 30 April, and was refusing to claw the money back. Although it had paused the bonus scheme, or management retention plan (MRP), it did not promise that the next tranches would not also be paid, with the managers due to receive the same sum again in December and a further £10.8m collectively next June. Under the Water (Special Measures) Act, the only bonuses that can be stopped to those at the very top of the company, such as the chief executive, the chief financial officer and the chair. Chris Weston, the chief executive of Thames Water, has voluntarily declined his 300% bonus, because, he said, it would have been a 'distraction'. The water campaigner and former Undertones frontman, Feargal Sharkey, campaigned with Keir Starmer during the general election. But Sharkey has been left unimpressed by the bonus ban. He said: 'Driving forward eye-catching policies designed to do nothing more than grab headlines is no way to fix the biggest problem facing this country in the 21st century, the government has been outwitted and outmanoeuvred by the water companies.' Was the Thames package designed to circumvent the rules? Documents it released to the Efra committee show that when designing the payments package, the company hired top consultants and law firms including Rothschild & Co, Linklaters and Mercer to help it come up with a retention programme that was legally sound and would get past regulators. During Thames board meetings set up to discuss the bonuses, members asked 'if any pressure to waive bonus would be a risk generally or under the water (special measures) bill', according to the documents The board was told the bonuses were in line with the specifications of the legislation: 'The [remuneration] committee requested to reconfirm whether the MRP was consistent with the Water (Special Measures) Act and related Ofwat consultation and it was confirmed that the MRP was a retention payment rather than a bonus, and had no performance-related element. As such, it was not restricted by the Water (Special Measures) Act.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Thames Water and its lawyers and advisers believe they could pay its chief executive and chief financial officer under the scheme if they wanted, because they are retention payments. If this loophole remains open, any water company that breaches pollution rules could continue to pay out millions in bonuses to their executives, as long as the payments are not labelled performance related. In a letter to the Efra committee in July, Reed would not directly answer whether these bonuses would be banned. He said: 'Should Ofwat determine Thames Water have breached the performance-related payments rule, then I expect them to take appropriate enforcement action.' A Defra spokesperson followed up and said: 'It is for companies to follow these new rules and help rebuild trust with their customers.' Water companies can also get round the bonus ban by hiking the pay of executives to make up for the lack of compensation. The Guardian revealed this week that Southern Water has nearly doubled its chief executive Lawrence Gosden's annual pay package to £1.4m. Southern has already been allowed to increase average bills by 53% over the next five years and is appealing to the Competition and Markets Authority to charge more. Ofwat says it may bring forward a planned review of the bonus ban, currently set for 2027, to look at the scope of the rules and see whether the net needs to be widened. The regulator added that executive salaries were a matter for the water companies, but said it expected them to be appropriate when taking bonus bans and company performance into account. A Defra spokesperson said: 'Undeserved bonuses for water company bosses have now been banned as part of the government's plan to clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good. Any instances of companies trying to circumvent the new rules are completely unacceptable. 'The government will leave no stone unturned against any bosses being made these outrageous payments.' Southern Water said the rise in its chief executive's salary was not an attempt to evade the bonus ban but part of a 'long-term incentive plan' as part of an effort to turnaround the company. It added that the payments were 'common industry practice'. A Thames Water spokesperson said: 'The company's CEO is not party to the MRP and has received no payments. None of the retention payments have been funded by customers. Full details of the plan have been shared with our economic regulator and the Efra committee.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store