Escudero denies alleged insertions in 2025 budget
At a press conference, Escudero called the reports a 'demolition job' in connection to his earlier bid to retain his Senate presidency post.
'Sabi nilang noong una P9 billion daw 'yung sa Sorsogon, P12 billion daw 'yung Bulacan. Sunod sinabi na P142 billion, sunod binura nila 'yun, ginawang P150 billion. Alin ba talaga ang sasagutin ko roon? Pangalawa, noong una ang sinabi ako lang, sunod sinama si Senator Villanueva, sunod buong Senado na raw 'yun,' he said.
(They first said that it was P9 billion in Sorsogon, P12 billion in Bulacan. Next they said it was P142 billion, then they deleted it, making it P150 billion. Which one do I really have to answer? Secondly, they said it was only me at first, then Senator Villanueva was included, then the entire Senate.)
'Bibigyan ko kayo ng kabuuang sagot. Ang kabuuang panukala amendment kaugnay sa 2025 budget ay umaabot sa humigit kumulang P600 bilyon. Nilipat- lipat, tinanggal, dinagdag. So, kung totoo man 'yung sinasabi nila na P150 billion ang binago ng Senado, nasaan 'yung P500 bilyon 'yung magbabagong 'yun saan nanggaling?'
(I will give you a complete answer. The total proposed amendment on the 2025 budget amounted to approximately P600 billion. It was later on revised. If their allegation that the Senate changed P150 billion, where's the remaining P500 billion?)
In December last year, signed into law the P6.326-trillion national budget for 2025 and vetoed over P194 billion worth of line items that are not consistent with his administration's priorities.
Former executive secretary Vic Rodriguez, Davao City 3rd District Representative Isidro Ungab, and others have asked the Supreme Court (SC) to declare the 2025 national budget as unconstitutional amid alleged irregularities and supposed blank items in the bicameral conference committee report.
Marcos, meanwhile, maintained that there were no blank pages in the bicameral conference committee report on the 2025 national budget.
Escudero further denied that there was a P150 billion insertion to the 2025 General Appropriations Act. He also said that there were 'changes' in the budget for the province of Sorsogon, but it did not amount to P9 billion, as speculated.
'Para sa'kin, hindi parang makalipas ang 27 taon, ngayon lamang yata ako maaakusahan ng isang bagay na ganyan. Ang masakit dinamay pa si Senator Joel,' he expressed.
(After 27 years, It's only now that I'm being accused of something like this. What hurts more is that Senator Joel is being included.)
To avoid similar insinuations, Escudero said he will suggest that Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, who is set to lead the Senate committee on finance, to release a list of each senator's proposed amendments in the national budget.
The Senate President further asked the government agencies not to request for a budget higher than what was submitted by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM).
This, as President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. said in his fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) that the government would operate under a reenacted budget in 2026, warning that he will veto a proposed budget bill that will not be in harmony with his administration's programs and priorities.
The President also said he will return any proposed Generation Appropriations bill that is not fully aligned with the National Expenditure Program (NEP).
'Ang panukalang budget ay nanggagaling hindi lamang sa executive pero pati sa Kongreso. Hindi naman porket binalangkas ng executive lahat 'yun ay tama na. Hindi naman porket binalangkas ng executive lahat 'yun ay hindi na pwedeng baguhin at tila nakaukit na sa bato,' Escudero said.
(The proposed budget comes not only from the executive but also from Congress. Just because it was the executive that outlined everything, all of those are already right and cannot be changed.)
'Ang marapat na dapat baguhin, dapat baguhin dahil 'yung mga kalihim mismo ng Pangulo ay humihiling sa Kongreso ng dagdag o pagbabago sa kani-kanilang budget. So siguro kung may ganyang uri ng kautusan ang Pangulo dapat pagsabihan din niya ang kanyang mga kalihim na kapag may sinumite ng budget ang DBM para sa kanilang departamento, 'wag na silang humirit pa dahil bago sila makahirit ang pagkukunan ay ibang departamento rin,' he added.
(What should be changed, must be changed because the President's cabinet secretaries themselves are asking the Congress for an increase or change in their respective budgets. So maybe the President should also tell his secretaries that when the DBM submits a budget for their department, they should stop asking for an increase because the source for that increase will be gotten from the budget of another agency.)
The DBM defines a reenacted budget as a situation where the previous year's GAA is extended and remains in effect for a preceding year until such time the Congress passes a budget bill into law.
Marcos approved earlier this month the P6.793-trillion NEP for Fiscal Year 2026. — BAP, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
4 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chiz to House: Senate not a playground to run after foes
"To these people, I say this, the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' Escudero said. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero on Wednesday asked members of the House of Representatives to refrain from trying to use the Senate as a tool to go after political adversaries. Escudero made the remark as he explained his vote for archiving the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'To the House of Representatives I say, do not allow yourselves to be used for the blind hatred and ambition of a few who did things haphazardly, gravely abused their discretion, and violated due process, rights under the Constitution as found by the High Court itself,' the Senate president said. 'In spite of all these, you expect everyone to roll over in obedience. When we did not, you moved hell and high water to destroy personalities, malign reputations, and tarnish institutions," he added. "To these people, I say this, the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' Escudero said. Escudero also said that he is not willing to play such politicians' game, stressing that he will 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.' To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process. The high court said the Senate cannot acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings. However, the SC said it was not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House , through the Office of the Solicitor General, then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case.
GMA Network
5 hours ago
- GMA Network
Hontiveros names instances when SC overturned its rulings
Senator Risa Hontiveros on Wednesday named two instances when the Supreme Court (SC) overturned its rulings as senators debated on whether to abide by the high court's decision that declared unconstitutional the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'The SC has reversed a unanimous decision in a lot of instances before,' Hontiveros said. One of these was the case of the League of Cities of the Philippines vs. the Commission on Elections (Comelec), where the SC En Banc granted a motion for reconsideration and declared 16 Cityhood Laws as constitutional in 2010. In 2008, the SC initially declared unconstitutional the creation of 16 new cities and ordered the Comelec against the holding of a plebiscite pursuant to cityhood laws in these municipalities. The SC in December 2009 reversed the 2008 decision and ruled that the towns can be declared as cities. However, in 2010, it made a second reversal and reinstated its 2008 decision. In its ruling in February 2011, the SC denied with finality that the 16 towns can be declared as cities. Hontiveros also mentioned the case of the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Inc. and others vs. Greenpeace Southeast Asia of the Philippines. 'Original decision, unanimous, December 8, 2015. Reversed unanimously on MR too, July 26, 2016,' Hontiveros said. 'Hindi lang po tulad nung sinabi ni minority leader na there's always a first time. It has happened before. So 'yung ganitong klaseng milagro na hinahanap, posibleng mangyari din po dito sa kasong pinag uusapan natin,' she added. (It's not just like what the minority leader said, that there's always a first time. It has happened before. So this kind of miracle being sought is also possible in the case we are discussing.) This came after Senator Rodante Marcoleta questioned whether even Supreme Court justice would overturn the ruling, considering that it was unanimous. The SC had ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. Meanwhile, with 19 votes, the Senate voted to transfer to the archives the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte.—LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate archives articles of impeachment vs. Sara Duterte
"Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' Escudero said. The Senate on Monday voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte, following the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) blocking the impeachment trial of Duterte. In the explanation of his "yes" vote, Senate President Francis Escudero said that he would 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.' 'Let history, Mr. President, record that in this moment, we chose the Constitution, we chose the rule of law by defending the integrity of the Supreme Court and maintaining the system of checks and balances under our republican system of government," Escudero said. "Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' he added. Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III and other members of the minority argued that the Senate should wait for the decision of the Supreme Court on the motion for reconsideration that the Office of the Solicitor General filed on behalf of the House of Representatives To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process. The high court said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings because the articles of impeachment were void. However, the SC said it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. Before voting on the motion of Sen. Rodante Marcoleta, as amended by Senate Majority Leader Sen. Joel Villanueva, the Senate also voted to dismiss the motion of Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III "to table" the Marcoleta motion. 'With five affirmative votes, 19 negative votes, the motion to table the motion of Senator [Sotto] is lost,' Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said. The Senate minority leader voted in favor of his motion, saying he has voted numerous times with the minority. 'I know that it will be a vote in the minority, but I have always voted in the minority on many issues in the Senate since 1992 up to the present. I always prayed I was wrong. Unfortunately, I was always right,' Sotto said. 'May God have mercy on your decision,' he added. The SC previously ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. The SC also ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. It said that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings and that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction to constitute itself into an impeachment court. –NB, GMA Integrated News
