Puerto Rico ACLU denounces transfer of immigrant detainees to 'Alligator Alcatraz'
People who are taken into immigration custody in Puerto Rico, many of them from the Dominican Republic, are sent to the mainland U.S., as the island lacks permanent detention centers that can hold detainees for prolonged periods.
The ACLU of Puerto Rico said Friday in a news release that they had received reports this week of detainees from the island being transferred to the facility in Florida as well as allegations of "rights violations and dehumanizing treatment."
Annette Martínez, the executive director of the civil rights nonprofit, condemned President Donald Trump's plan to build more detention centers as well as the construction of Alligator Alcatraz during an interview with NBC News earlier this month.
"This isn't even a detention center. We're talking about a facility that more closely resembles a torture center," Martínez said in Spanish. "It's even been described as a place where you enter and you can't leave."
In a lawsuit filed by the ACLU this week against the Department of Homeland Security, four people detained in Alligator Alcatraz and their attorneys alleged that the federal government has interfered with their ability to access detainees and provide counsel for those being held there.
Michael Borrego Fernández, a Cuban national being held in the Florida detention center and one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, alleged "harsh and inhumane conditions" at the facility.
"He reported that detained people were told that they are only allowed one meal a day (and given only minutes to eat), are not permitted daily showers, and are otherwise kept around the clock in a cage inside a tent," the complaint states. "Mr. Borrego also reported that there have been physical assaults and excessive use of force by people working as guards, and a lack of medical care and attention."
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin denied allegations of inhumane conditions, telling NBC News in a statement: 'No lawbreakers in the history of human civilization have been treated better than illegal aliens in the United States."
An estimated 700 detainees in Alligator Alcatraz are being held in cage-style units covered by white tent structures erected in the middle of a hurricane-prone wetland surrounded by snakes and alligators.
Since its construction, immigrant detainees and their loved ones have alleged terrible conditions in the facility — including lack of water, issues with electricity and copious mosquitoes.
A Dominican immigrant who was arrested in Puerto Rico last month has spent two weeks detained in Alligator Alcatraz. In an interview with El Nuevo Día, a Puerto Rican newspaper, the immigrant alleged that detainees with medical conditions are unable to access treatment and described having little access to food and showers.
"We are concerned that the United States government, which tries to present itself internationally as beacon of democracy and justice, is developing immigration policy in this way," Martínez said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
What does Donald Trump have to prove to win his WSJ lawsuit over ‘fake' Epstein card?
President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal after the newspaper published the president's alleged birthday card to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – but what will he have to prove to win the case? The lawsuit filed in Miami federal court on Friday names the paper's owners, including right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch, as well as the paper's parent companies, Dow Jones and News Corp, and two Wall Street Journal reporters, claiming they defamed Trump. Weeks after the White House attempted to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax,' the Journal published Trump's alleged 50th birthday card message to Epstein. The 2003 note was described as including a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that read: 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' But the lawsuit claims the paper 'failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained.' Trump's handling of claims related to Epstein, the child sex predator who died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019, has drawn criticism even from his own MAGA base, as many Americans believe the US government is hiding information about Epstein's associates. According to experts, The Wall Street Journal could seek reciprocal discovery, and Trump would be forced to answer highly-publicized questions about his relationship with Epstein, and whether he was aware of his crimes. Here's what Trump would need to happen to win the lawsuit: Prove the Journal was lying – or failed to properly fact-check their story For Trump to win the $10 billion defamation suit, he would have to provethat The Wall Street Journal was lying, or did not fact-check their claims before publishing. A spokesperson for Dow Jones defended the accuracy of the reporting and their fact-checking of its claims. 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit,' a spokesperson said in a statement. News Corp did not immediately return The Independent's request for comment. According to Damon Dunn, a First Amendment and media attorney, Trump would have to prove the story was false, damaging to his reputation, and published with 'actual' malice – a lofty legal standard to reach, Dunn told Business Insider. 'The provenance of the 'card' appears suspect, but, even so, is it defamatory that one millionaire sent a birthday card to another in 2003 before Epstein was discovered?' Dunn said, noting the card was allegedly written years before Epstein was convicted of sex crimes. Former federal prosecutor Chris Mattei said the lawsuit may allow the Journal to seek reciprocal discovery – meaning it can ask Trump to provide additional information or evidence that he did not write the letter, as well as details about his relationship with Epstein and whether he was aware of his crimes. "If Trump's defense is that this was false, then any evidence suggesting that he had a relationship with Epstein, the degree to which that relationship was close or not, would be relevant to the question of whether or not it's likely Trump had any sort of role in this letter," Mattei said. "And so an aggressive Wall Street Journal here would seek broad discovery about the extent of Trump's relationship with Epstein." Mattei said he felt Trump's case was unlikely to have merit, and likely stood as a test to 'explore what kind of power and leverage he has over the American media.' "There will be some period of weeks where The Wall Street Journal will be able to file its motion to dismiss if it wants to make a request for discovery, the judgment rule on that request could take a little bit more time," Mattei said. "And so if it is indeed contested, you could see the initial phase of this, including discovery, playing out over the next six months." What Trump is claiming in the lawsuit Despite the Journal's defense of its reporting, Trump still claims the Murdoch-owned paper exhibited 'glaring failures in journalistic ethics and standards of accurate reporting.' The story detailed a gift Trump allegedly gave Epstein for his 50th birthday that included a signed note from Trump inside a drawing of a naked woman. The note apparently included the disturbing phrase, 'may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the report. The filing, however, notes that the Journal did not publish the drawing or the letter that it alleges Trump wrote. Trump denied writing the letter, going so far as to claim he has never drawn a picture in his life. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he said, according to the Journal. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' The Wall Street Journal, however, later fired back in another story, highlighting several images drawn by Trump, including four that were auctioned off during his first term in office. Trump threatened legal action against the paper, and the two journalists whose bylines appear on the report, Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo, were almost immediately targeted by CNN, the report stated. The president also took to his Truth Social platform to air his grievances about the story. ' The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued,' Trump wrote. Trump also claimed that Murdoch did not want to print the letter, but he 'did not have the power to do so,' prompting Trump to file the suit. After the article was published, Trump said he directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'produce any and all pertinent grand jury testimony subject to Court approval.' On Friday, the Justice Department sought court approval for that public release. Federal prosecutors in 2019 charged Epstein with sex trafficking underage girls in both Florida and New York. He died by suicide in jail while awaiting trial. Trump has threatened other media outlets over coverage The president has regularly threatened to take legal action against media outlets over unflattering or antagonistic coverage. His lawsuits against ABC and CBS resulted in controversial settlements that have sparked fears among press freedom advocates that publishers are only emboldening the president's chilling message to the media. Now Murdoch, who also owns The New York Post and The Sun, once a close ally, has found himself in the same boat. The network ultimately settled that defamation lawsuit, which was brought by voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems, for a record-breaking $787 million.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump rants that Washington Commanders should change name back to ‘Redskins'
President Donald Trump apparently isn't done renaming things this year. After rebranding the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America earlier this year, Trump is now calling for the Washington Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians to revert their names to the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, respectively. The Redskins left that name behind in 2020 after years of pressure from groups complaining that the team was using a racial slur for Native Americans as its name. The team initially went by the "Washington Football Team" until it settled on the Commanders as its new name. The Indians became the Guardians in 2021 after similar pressure to change the name and the team's Chief Wahoo logo. The Cleveland Major League Baseball team had been called the Indians since 1915. On Sunday, Trump went on a Truth Social rant demanding that the teams revert to their original names, claiming that "our great Indian people" want the name changes. It came as the president is under pressure for his links to Jeffrey Epstein and his administration's failure to release all the files associated with his case. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' Trump wrote. 'There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' In 2020, a University of Michigan/University of California, Berkeley poll given to Native American respondents found that half were offended by the name "Redskins," and 65 percent said they were offended by the "tomahawk chop" done at sporting events. Even more — 73 percent — said fans doing imitations of Native American dances was offensive. Despite Trump's social media tantrum, it does not appear as though the Commanders will be changing their name anytime soon. The team's owner, Josh Harris, told Fox News back in April that there were no plans to restore the team's original name. "The Commanders' name actually has taken on an amazing kind of element in our building," Harris told Fox News' Bret Baier, who asked if the team would revert to its original name as part of its new stadium deal in Washington, D.C. "So, the people that certain types of players that are tough, that love football, are delegated Commanders and Jayden [Daniels], for example, is a Commander, and they're ranked." Harris said that since Washington D.C. is a "military city" the team would be "moving forward with the Commanders name, excited about that, and not looking back." There is also no indication that the Guardians are planning a return to the days of "the Tribe." The team has long maintained that it took on the name "Indians" to honor Louis Sockalexis, believed to be the first Native American player in major league baseball. Sockalexis played with the Cleveland Spiders in the late 1800s. He died in 1913, and two years later, the then-Cleveland Naps changed their name to the Cleveland Indians, though there is no definitive way to know what the team's intentions were at the time. The Guardians' new name references the art deco 'Guardians of Traffic' statues that tower over the Hope Memorial Bridge, which is just outside the team's stadium in downtown Cleveland.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
JD Vance to spend summer family holiday in the Cotswolds
He made his name with a memoir set among the hillbillies of the rugged Appalachians – yet it seems JD Vance now favours altogether more gentle hills. For his family's holiday this year the US vice-president is understood to have chosen the Cotswolds, where Land Rovers outnumber pickup trucks. Vance, his wife, Usha, and their three young children are expected next month to rent a property in the region – an increasingly popular choice for wealthy tourists – soon after Donald Trump, the US president, finishes a stay in Scotland. Earlier in August, Vance and his family are expected to visit London, despite the vice-president having said – shortly before last year's presidential election – that the city was 'not English any more.' In February, Vance lashed out at European governments – including that of the UK – accusing political leaders of suppressing free speech, failing to halt illegal migration and running in fear from voters. 'In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat,' he told the Munich Security Conference, listing a string of cases he claimed were evidence. Britain was singled out for arresting a man praying near an abortion clinic. But while Vance might enjoy the Cotswolds – home to the Chipping Norton set whose ranks include David Cameron and Jeremy Clarkson – a different reception could await when he later travels on to Scotland, which is home to anti-Trump sentiment. In his Munich speech, Vance hit out at the Scottish government over abortion rights, saying it was distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay 'within so-called safe access zones', warning them that 'even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law'. He added: 'The government urged readers to report any fellow citizens suspected guilty of thought crime in Britain and across Europe.' A spokesperson for the Scottish government said Vance's claim was inaccurate. It appeared to be a reference to the introduction of safe access zones within 200 metres of abortion clinics, banning any form of harassment. 'Private prayer at home is not prohibited within safe access zones and no letter has ever suggested it was,' added the spokesperson. Vance's trip to the UK comes at a time when tourist traffic going in the opposite direction has plummeted against the backdrop of Trump's policies and rhetoric. The number of UK residents visiting the US was down 14.3% in March compared with the same month in 2024, official figures showed. However, Britons continue to make up the largest number of overseas visitors to the US.
