US Marines are getting in on Navy submarine hunting
The event marks increased Marine and Navy coordination in anti-submarine warfare.
Sonobuoys can detect enemy submarines, allowing them to be targeted for attack.
Marines just wrapped up a training exercise that saw troops tossing sonobuoys out of the back of MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft, part of an effort meant to boost how the Marines and Navy can work together to fight enemy submarines.
"We're past the question of whether the Marine Corps can contribute to ASW," said Navy Capt. Bill Howey, director of maritime operations for Commander, Submarine Group Two, in a press release on the training. "Now we're refining how they contribute and then integrating that into the fleet playbook."
Anti-submarine warfare (ASW) involves detecting, tracking, and neutralizing enemy submarines using specialized ships, aircraft, sonar systems, and underwater weapons. It is a critical component of naval defense aimed at protecting fleets and strategic waterways from hidden underwater threats, though it hasn't traditionally been a mission in which Marines have been involved.
Expendable sonobuoys, like those used in the exercise, are launched, or in this case dropped, from the air (from fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft and uncrewed airborne platforms) and are used for detecting and tracking submarines. They can also help with targeting subs for a torpedo attack.
The recent training was part of a yearslong reshuffling for the Marine Corps from fighting counterinsurgency warfare in the Middle East toward peer-level warfare against adversarial nations like China or Russia. It seems to be among the first times the DoD has relied on the Osprey for sonobuoy deployment.
Maj. Sean T. Penczak, the executive officer of Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 162 said that "the Osprey's unique capabilities as a tiltrotor aircraft allow it to excel within the framework of distributed aviation operations and expeditionary advanced base operations."
"Its ability to cover long ranges with a payload comparable to the P-8, while maximizing time on station for time-critical tasking, has made it highly effective in the anti-submarine warfare arena— demonstrating its versatility and value as emerging threats continue to evolve," he said of the Osprey.
The other aircraft Penczak referenced is Boeing's P-8 Poseidon airplane, which is based on the civilian 737-800 and was created for maritime missions like anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface warfare. The plane can deploy torpedoes and anti-ship missiles and serves as a premier airborne ASW platform.
NATO countries have stepped up their anti-submarine warfare efforts in recent years in the Atlantic Ocean and Arctic amid more frequent Russian submarine activity. They are also ramping up efforts to combat unintentional damage and sabotage to undersea cables and critical infrastructure, sometimes relying on sensor systems, uncrewed surveillance, and patrols.
Sonobuoys like the ones used recently aren't new to the US military's arsenal of submarine detection tools, though they are a new tool for Marines. The sensors were developed during World War II in response to German U-boats' attacks on Allied vessels in the Atlantic.
A DoD technical paper described this tech as a "simple, reliable, inexpensive, technically complex, adaptive, and effective device that has been produced by the millions and used for almost seventy years."
"A few years ago, the idea of Marines flying [anti-submarine warfare] missions might have raised eyebrows," Col. James C. Derrick, commanding officer, Marine Aircraft Group 26, said in his statement. "Now we're doing it as part of the plan, using the Osprey's unique capabilities to help enable naval maneuver."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
For AI and stock bubbles, the party has to stop sometime
If you follow markets and the economy, the only thing you've heard over the last few days is that AI spending is propping everything up, from GDP to the S&P, and that can't last forever. Why it matters: When bubbles burst, they don't do it gently. The big picture: Like every land rush in history, from railroads to websites with sock puppet mascots, investor faith in AI is strong enough to ignore all the warning signs around them. Barring the data center boom, underlying economic growth isn't that strong. Valuations in the stock market are stretched beyond all historic norms, and the best earnings growth comes from just a few megacap companies. Tariff policy is starting to show up in inflation data, which threatens to weigh on consumers, the real engine of the economy. What they're saying: " While you can quibble with this or that estimate or figure, the order of magnitudes make it pretty clear that AI itself is not enough to buoy the economy, sales, or earnings ahead," Bob Elliott, chief investment officer at Unlimited Funds, wrote in a Substack post yesterday. "Instead it is going to require an overall economic productivity rise to meet the bulls hopes (and then some)." The intrigue: AI has so far been very good at getting companies to spend on things like chips, buildings and electricity. The spend on all that stuff runs into the hundreds of billions of dollars a year. But it's not translating to spending on people. As Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management, put it this week, "The human economy is stumbling, but the robot economy is flourishing." In fact, some employers are touting how many humans they've been able to fire with AI. Less so how many they've been able to keep paying and retrain into more productive work. Reality check: There is no sign yet that any of the biggest players in the market are at all inclined to pull back on spending. If anything, the demand looks to be strengthening, inspiring the most magnificently performed of the Mag 7 — Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia — to continue a voracious pace of talent hiring and infrastructure building. What to watch: How the back and forth plays out between the optimists and the pessimists. A stew of bad headlines caused a sharp market selloff last Friday. There was an equally enthusiastic rebound on Monday before a dip yesterday. "This week will be a telling one: a tug-of-war is unfolding between traditional institutional seasonality, which suggests weakness, and retail investors who may see a dip as a buying opportunity. It's a good test for who's really in control," wrote Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide, on Monday.


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
AI's Power Needs Have The Potential To Make Nuclear Power Economic
'What will I do with the rest of my life?' That's what legendary Naval officer Hyman Rickover asked after the 2nd World War, and after a U.S. Navy powered by diesel fuel was revealed as somewhat behind the times by an Air Force that could project greater power much more quickly in global fashion. Thankfully Rickover was the personification of 'unreasonable,' and it's the unreasonable who create the future. In Rickover's case, he saw nuclear energy as the answer to the Navy's woes. Not only would nuclear power quiet submarines that could operate underwater for months at a time while ready to strike from anywhere at a moment's notice, that same nuclear power made it possible for Navy ships to much more effectively globalize their locations, including aircraft carriers on which planes armed with nuclear weapons could quickly and lethally project power. Obsolescence born of creative destruction wrought by the U.S. Air Force solved. But for one problem. As Marc Wortman, one of Rickover's biographers observed, 'nuclear propulsion for commercial ships' ultimately 'fell short.' What was doable for entities capable of drawing on taxpayers was not doable for businesses disciplined by actual market forces. One nuclear power plant built for the Navy in Pennsylvania cost $116 million to build, but the output 'cost eight times that of a typical coal-fired plant.' The seen is a Navy and its mission perpetuated by inefficient use of resources. The unseen is how the U.S. military would have evolved more broadly absent the walking, talking government subsidy that is the U.S. tax code. Which brings us to Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the immense power requirements associated with what promises to transform work as we know it, and in transforming it, freeing millions and likely billions from work they have to do, all in favor of the work they can't not do. What will lift workers and their productivity to levels that will render the present appear primitive by comparison is also transforming energy usage before our eyes. See Microsoft's partnership with Constellation Energy in which the technology innovator will buy power from a revived Three Mile Island nuclear plant as a way of meeting the consumption needs of its proliferating data centers. Readers can likely guess where this is going, or perhaps not. While some view nuclear energy as the one and only source of abundant power that is also clean, the economics of it have never added up. What worked very well in a power sense has had a luxury quality to it such that what made sense for government-funded entities made little economic sense to the entities lacking such a consistent and growing source of funds. Enter AI. Its power requirements are so substantial as to render nuclear power economic where for the longest time it was not. Better yet, since Microsoft won't presently require all the power generated at a revived Three Mile Island, the excess will bring energy costs down for the businesses and individuals in the area poised to benefit from what Microsoft doesn't consume. Which is a happy reminder that where markets prevail, problems are much more quickly solved. By making nuclear power economic, Microsoft and others aren't just bringing transformative technology to the world, they're also setting the stage for a market-driven energy evolution that wouldn't have revealed itself absent the copious consumption of the power necessary to discover it.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should You Invest in the SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW)?
Designed to provide broad exposure to the Technology - Software segment of the equity market, the SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on September 28, 2011. Retail and institutional investors increasingly turn to passively managed ETFs because they offer low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency; these kind of funds are also excellent vehicles for long term investors. Additionally, sector ETFs offer convenient ways to gain low risk and diversified exposure to a broad group of companies in particular sectors. Technology - Software is one of the 16 broad Zacks sectors within the Zacks Industry classification. It is currently ranked 6, placing it in top 38%. Index Details The fund is sponsored by State Street Investment Management. It has amassed assets over $477.14 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the performance of the Technology - Software segment of the equity market. XSW seeks to match the performance of the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses. The S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index represents the software sub-industry portion of the S&P Total Stock Market Index. The S&P TMI tracks all the U.S. common stocks listed on the NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ National Market and NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Software Index is a modified equal weight index. Costs Since cheaper funds tend to produce better results than more expensive funds, assuming all other factors remain equal, it is important for investors to pay attention to an ETF's expense ratio. Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.35%, making it one of the least expensive products in the space. It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.06%. Sector Exposure and Top Holdings Even though ETFs offer diversified exposure that minimizes single stock risk, investors should also look at the actual holdings inside the fund. Luckily, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis. This ETF has heaviest allocation in the Information Technology sector -- about 96.8% of the portfolio. Looking at individual holdings, Holdings Inc (BBAI) accounts for about 1.34% of total assets, followed by Cipher Mining Inc (CIFR) and Oracle Corp (ORCL). The top 10 holdings account for about 9.46% of total assets under management. Performance and Risk So far this year, XSW has lost about 2.88%, and is up roughly 28.48% in the last one year (as of 08/06/2025). During this past 52-week period, the fund has traded between $141.65 and $204.72. The ETF has a beta of 1.18 and standard deviation of 26.67% for the trailing three-year period, making it a high risk choice in the space. With about 142 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk. Alternatives SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Because of this, XSW is an excellent option for investors seeking exposure to the Technology ETFs segment of the market. There are other additional ETFs in the space that investors could consider as well. Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) tracks STOXX WORLD AC NEXGEN SOFTWARE DEV ID and the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF has $500.03 million in assets, iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF has $11.36 billion. IGPT has an expense ratio of 0.58%, and IGV charges 0.41%. Bottom Line To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research