Department store chain shutting last shop TODAY after 140 years as it's wiped off high street due to Budget tax hikes
Beales has confirmed its last ever shop, located in the Dolphin Centre shopping mall in Poole, Dorset, will be closing for good today.
2
It marks the end of an era for the one of the oldest faces of the British high street, which first opened in Bournemouth in 1881.
Struggles began for the retailer when it entered administration in January 2020, forcing the closure of 22 of its 23 shops.
The shop in Poole reopened the same year after relocating to the shopping centre and remained the only Beales store standing.
Despite weathering the financial storm for the past five years, Reeves' economic policies proved to be the final nail in the coffin for the iconic departmental store.
Beales hit back at the Chancellor's economic policies by announcing a " Rachel Reeves ' Closing Down Sale".
On social media, the popular chain joked that it had fallen victim to the Budget "black hole".
The closure will also affect an NHS clinic, which is located on the top floor of the Poole store.
It was set up in 2021 to reduce waiting times, but will now move to St Mary's hospital on June 5.
The death of the high street is the death of communities
Beales chief executive Tony Brown explained that business had become "unviable" following the Chancellor's Budget last October.
He said: "This, coupled with the risks and uncertainty of further tax increases in the coming years, have left us no other option.
"We have been working with the Dolphin Centre, who have been supportive, along with our investors to ensure an orderly exit.
"Our team has been informed, as have our suppliers. We will ensure the exit is managed and no one will be left with a financial loss."
Below the advert for the " Rachel Reeves Closing Down Sale", which included discounts of up to 80%, the high street favourite launched a scathing attack on the Chancellor.
A caption on the store's Facebook page read: "Our closing sale is almost over (cheers for the help, Chancellor) - and we've just dropped hundreds of lines to 80% OFF or more!
"Grab a bargain before we vanish into the budget black hole. #FinalSale #80Off #LastChance #WhenItsGoneItsGone."
UK Retail Shake-Up: Superdry and More
It has struggled to cope with rises in national insurance contributions and higher minimum wage which came into effect last month.
Like many other businesses, Beales faced higher employer NI contributions, which have risen from 13.8% to 15%.
Additionally, the threshold at which these contributions must be paid has been lowered from £9,100 to £5,000.
It came as the national minimum wage was notably increased, rising to £12.21 per hour.
For workers aged 18-20, the minimum wage increased to £10 per hour from £8.60.
These changes to the tax system were confirmed by the Chancellor in the Autumn Budget last October and came into effect on 1 April.
The British Independent Retailers Association (Bira) warned this closure could be the first of many as retailers continue to struggle with mounting costs.
Commercial director Jeff Moody said he was "deeply saddened" to hear about Beales shutting up shop.
Why are retailers closing stores?
RETAILERS have been feeling the squeeze since the pandemic, while shoppers are cutting back on spending due to the soaring cost of living crisis.
High energy costs and a move to shopping online after the pandemic are also taking a toll, and many high street shops have struggled to keep going.
However, additional costs have added further pain to an already struggling sector.
The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs from April will cost the retail sector £2.3billion.
At the same time, the minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour from April, and the minimum wage for people aged 18-20 will rise to £10 an hour, an increase of £1.40.
The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year.
Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025."
It comes after almost 170,000 retail workers lost their jobs in 2024.
End-of-year figures compiled by the Centre for Retail Research showed the number of job losses spiked amid the collapse of major chains such as Homebase and Ted Baker.
It said its latest analysis showed that a total of 169,395 retail jobs were lost in the 2024 calendar year to date.
This was up 49,990 – an increase of 41.9% – compared with 2023.
It is the highest annual reading since more than 200,000 jobs were lost in 2020 in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced retailers to shut their stores during lockdowns.
The centre said 38 major retailers went into administration in 2024, including household names such as Lloyds Pharmacy, Homebase, The Body Shop, Carpetright and Ted Baker.
Around a third of all retail job losses in 2024, 33% or 55,914 in total, resulted from administrations.
Experts have said small high street shops could face a particularly challenging 2025 because of Budget tax and wage changes.
Professor Bamfield has warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector.
"By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
He added: 'This is not just the loss of another shop.
"It represents the end of a retail institution that has served communities for nearly one-and-a-half centuries.
'This closure starkly illustrates the devastating impact that recent tax increases are having on our retail sector.'
At its peak, Beales operated 41 stores across the country, selling a range of furniture, cosmetics, fashion products and toys.
The high street chain shut its store in Southport last September just three years after the site reopened.
FAMOUS NAMES GONE FROM THE HIGH STREET
Beales is not the only brand that's been wiped from the high street in recent years.
Ted Baker, fell into administration last March after years of turmoil.
At the time it had 46 shops in the UK employing around 975 people.
The last stores shut in August after failing to secure a full rescue.
It was relaunched as an online brand in the UK and Europe after a partnership with United Legwear & Apparel Co.
Flooring retailer Carpetright filed for administration in July after efforts to turnaround the struggling firm were derailed by a cyber attack.
The business had 1,800 staff and 273 shops across the country before going bust.
Around 54 stores were snapped up by its arch rival Tapi Carpets & Floors, which also bought its brand name and continues to run the brand online.
LloydsPharmacy, once the UK's second biggest community pharmacy chain, went into liquidation in late January 2024 with debts of £293million.
The previous year it had closed all of its pharmacies inside Sainsbury's and divided its 1,000 pharmacy estate into packages of hundreds of stores that it then sold to rivals in smaller deals.
There are no more LloydsPharmacy-branded sites on the high street, but it continues to operate online.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Car finance payouts limited, but lenders aren't off the hook
There may well be a few sighs of relief from senior finance company and banking executives following the Supreme Court's ruling, but it is unlikely you will hear the champagne corks verdict does almost certainly reduce the potential compensation bill significantly. Lenders no longer face the prospect of having to pay £30bn to £40bn to aggrieved car buyers. The likelihood of the government stepping in also appears to have receded the industry is not off the hook. The Financial Conduct Authority may still open a redress scheme for cases where dealers had a financial incentive from lenders to ramp up interest rates on loans as much as possible. The Supreme Court's ruling also upheld one consumer claim, in which the commission payments were deemed unfair – and that could provide a template for others to follow. All of this means the compensation bill could still be in the Supreme Court's intervention has been eagerly awaited since October, when the Appeal Court issued a verdict in three test cases which could have triggered an avalanche of compensation each case, people who had bought cars on finance claimed they were partially unaware that the deal had involved a commission payment being made by the lender to the car dealer. They claimed that in law the commissions amounted to bribes, or secret Appeal Court judges agreed, essentially saying that commission payments made by a finance company to a dealer for arranging a car loan were illegal if the car buyer had not given his or her "informed consent".They also concluded that a car dealer had a "fiduciary duty" towards the car buyer when it came to arranging a car loan. In other words, the dealer should set his or her own interests aside, and act purely on the customer's meant that millions of car buyers could potentially claim compensation – if they could show that the dealer had not specified what commission payments they were receiving for lining up a finance deal. It was not enough for the details to be buried in small had feared that this would lead to an avalanche of claims against them – and that the same arguments could be used to challenge other kinds of consumer finance agreements as well, potentially increasing the compensation bill still the Supreme Court threw very cold water over those arguments. The President of the Court, Lord Reed, dismissed the idea that car dealers had a "single minded duty of loyalty" to their customers, and insisted they "plainly and properly" had personal interests in the finance agreements they were involved ruling clearly blocks off what could have been a very wide avenue for compensation claims. However, the court did side with one of the claimants. In the case of Marcus Johnson, a factory worker, it decided that the finance agreement was "unfair" under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act. This was because the size of the commission payment was very large, and because Mr Johnson had been misled about the relationship between the dealer and the lender. He was, they said, entitled to say this could open the doors for other cases in which the commission payments are seen to be is also a key question the Supreme Court ruling does not answer. This is what should happen in cases involving so-called Discretionary Commission Agreements (DCAs). These were finance deals in which the car dealer could set the interest rate of a loan, within a set scale. The higher the rate, the more commission they would be paid – and the customer would be unaware of the Financial Conduct Authority banned such deals in 2021. It is now considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who were affected by them. If it goes ahead, millions of car buyers could still have a claim, though it is not clear how much compensation they would to Richard Barnwell, a financial services advisory partner at accountancy firm BDO, the bill could still be substantial."We believe there is still a potential for redress, for example, if discretionary commission arrangements are deemed to be an unfair relationship, redress could still be from to £5bn to £13bn or more," he analysts agree. According to Martin Lewis, who runs the MoneySavingExpert website, "the Supreme Court has certainly narrowed the number of people who will be able to reclaim car finance. I think you're probably talking the lower end of £10bn, as opposed to £40bn."That £10bn would still be a significant figure. But the finance industry appears to have avoided the potential free-for-all rush to claim compensation the earlier verdict had threatened to spark while the Treasury says it will "work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers", the BBC understands that the likelihood of the government intervening with retrospective legislation to protect financial firms has now diminished law of bribery only applies to persons who owe a single-minded duty of loyalty and are therefore bound to have no personal interest in the matter that they are dealing the present case the car dealers plainly and properly have a personal interest in the dealings between the customers and the finance companies.
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
Who asked for population of Greater Manchester to flood UK in just 4 years? Politicians are so out of touch with public
WHAT holds a country together? It's one of the most important questions a nation can ask. Yet, today, were you to quiz anybody in Westminster, they would probably stare back at you with a blank expression, unable to give you a convincing answer. 11 This was not the case in the most ancient civilisations, such as Greece and Rome, of course, where this question was always on the minds of leaders. In Ancient Greece, the writer Pericles warned that leaders will only hold their state together so long as they listen to the people they lead, 'for only then can leaders rule with their trust'. And in Ancient Rome, too, the statesman Cicero reached the same conclusion, warning the leaders of the city state that unless they look after their own people first — which he considered their 'highest duty' — then their civilisation will rapidly crumble from within and become vulnerable to external invaders. Why, you are probably asking yourself, am I rewinding the clock to these ancient thinkers? Because what they understood is what far too many of our politicians in Westminster today fail to understand — that once this sacred bond between the rulers and the ruled breaks, there is no going back. Once leaders become so out of touch, so adrift from the people they claim to represent, then their civilisation will plunge into chaos, carnage and darkness. And is this not what is happening in Britain today? A political class, a ruling class, that increasingly looks utterly adrift from the hard-working, tax-paying, law-abiding majority? Take another issue some of those ancient philosophers alluded to: The influx of outsiders and foreigners through the deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration. Who voted for this? Only this week, shockingly, we learned that the population of England and Wales is growing at the fastest rate in history, with some 707,000 people added last year and some 2.5million since the outbreak of the Covid pandemic. Who voted for this? Seriously? Who voted for this population explosion, for a pace and scale of change that is now leaving many of our communities and our country unrecognisable? Who asked for their leaders to add the equivalent of the entire Greater Manchester area in only four years? And just look at how dramatic and historically unprecedented this is. Between the election of Margaret Thatcher, in 1979, and Tony Blair, in 1997, the annual rate of population increase in England and Wales never surpassed a peak of 188,000 people in a single year, and averaged roughly 111,000 people over each 12-month period. 11 But since Covid? Well, thanks to policies introduced by the hapless 'Uniparty', by politicians on both the Left and Right who are now openly ignoring what the people want, if not treating them with total contempt, these numbers have rocketed. Some 618,000 people were added to our population in the year to June 2022. Another 821,000 in the following 12 months. And now, in the year to June 2024, as we learned this week, another 707,000. What is the main reason for this? Well, it's definitely not what's called 'natural growth' among the native English and Welsh people — the kind of growth that ensures a country grows and evolves at a natural pace, where change is manageable. No. Far from it. Almost all of our population growth today is because of mass immigration, with 1.1million people migrating into England and Wales in the 12 months to June 2024, and 452,200 leaving. Think about that. Around 1.1million people in just one year — equivalent to adding a city the size of Liverpool, comprised entirely of migrants, in just 12 months. This is insane. Claims are nonsense And on top of that we can add another fact we discovered this week, which is that the number of small boat crossings this year alone has now surged above 25,000, up 51 per cent on the same point last year, and taking the total to more than 170,000 illegal migrants since 2018. The foreign-born and their descendants will emerge as a majority by the early 2070s. And roughly one in every four people on these islands will be following Islam by the end of the current century. What would those ancient thinkers have made of this, too, I wonder? A nation-state that cannot even control its own borders, where mainly young men of fighting age from distant lands are flooding freely into our country on a daily basis? In Westminster, our completely hapless politicians will try to distract you and downplay all this by blabbering something like 'we have always had an asylum problem', or, even worse, 'we have always been a nation of immigrants'. Both of these claims are nonsense. If you want to get a sense of just how historic and unprecedented this population explosion really is then consider just one astonishing fact, shared this week by an expert on the topic, Dr Paul Morland. In every single year since Tony Blair came to power, since 1997, there has been more immigration into these islands than there was throughout the entire period between the Anglo-Saxon era in the 5th and 6th Centuries and World War Two. At least until the last quarter-century, in other words, this country was defined by what those ancient thinkers thought was essential to maintaining the unity and survival of a state — a stable population with manageable rates of change, and where, on the whole, the people did trust their leaders because those leaders did make an attempt to listen and respond to the people. But today all that is long gone. Today, in sharp contrast, we are living in a much more fragile and febrile civilisation where, as the likes of Pericles and Cicero warned, our leaders are no longer fulfilling their first duty of keeping their own people safe. Far from it. Our borders are completely and utterly out of control. We do not know who is coming in and who is going out of the country. Bound by shared history We have even discovered that our own leaders have been importing members of the Taliban, alongside thousands of other Afghans, while gagging the Press and refusing to tell their own people. And now, because of this policy of mass uncontrolled immigration — a policy that nobody in this country ever voted for — we have a sense of what is about to unfold. White Britons are now forecast to become a minority in this country by the year 2063, and much sooner for the under-40s. 11 11 The foreign-born and their descendants will emerge as a majority by the early 2070s. And roughly one in every four people on these islands will be following Islam by the end of the current century. Unless something changes, and changes soon, then all these trends will only accelerate in the years ahead, completely transforming our communities and nation, and ushering in enough people to fill six cities the size of Birmingham in the next 12 years alone. The English philosopher Sir Roger Scruton once said that a nation is held together by something deeper than a contract — it is bound by a shared history, a shared culture and the sense we belong to one another. Is it even possible to maintain things like a shared sense of history and culture when millions of people are being added to the population, more than 80 per cent of whom are today coming from outside Europe. But how on Earth can we ever hope to hold a nation together that is experiencing this scale of population change? That is imposing policies and broken borders on a people who never voted for this, and never asked for it. And how, we might also ask, is it even possible to maintain things like a shared sense of history and culture when millions of people are being added to the population, more than 80 per cent of whom are today coming from outside Europe? I do not know for certain what those ancient thinkers Pericles and Cicero would make of it were they to come back to life and assess the state of Britain today. I suspect that, like thousands of years ago, they'd warn we are living in a civilisation that looks set to crumble from within — a place where our leaders no longer appear all that interested in fulfilling their responsibility to the people and where mass immigration is blowing apart that once sacred bond between the rulers and the ruled. And for these reasons alone, they would probably conclude that unless we can somehow find our way to a radical change of direction then our civilisation, as we currently know it, will most likely not survive. 11 11 11
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump hits out at Federal Reserve as US jobs fall
Donald Trump launched a fresh attack on the chair of the Federal Reserve after the US jobs market suffered a sharp slowdown over the summer. The world's largest economy added just 73,000 jobs in July – fewer than the 110,000 expected – reviving hopes of a September interest rate cut. And figures for May and June were lowered by 258,000 in an unusually large revision by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). In retaliation, Trump last night said he would sack BLS head Erika McEntarfer. It came as US stocks tumbled after Trump slapped tariffs on trading partners. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1 per cent yesterday afternoon, while the S&P 500 dropped 1.2 per cent. The tech-focused Nasdaq was down 1.7 per cent. European stocks were also rocked by Trump's trade war, with Germany's Dax losing 2.7 per cent and Paris's Cac index dropping 2.9 per cent. The UK got off lightly as the FTSE 100 fell 0.7 per cent, or 64.23 points, to 9068.58. Pharmaceutical firms were among the biggest fallers in London after Trump demanded lower prices. AstraZeneca fell 1.9 per cent and GSK dropped 1.5 per cent. The retreat came as revised figures showed the US economy added just 14,000 jobs in June, a figure revised from a previously reported 147,000. Payrolls for May were slashed by 125,000 to a gain of 19,000 jobs. The BLS described revisions as 'larger than normal'. Atakan Bakiskan, US economist at Berenberg, said: 'The July report provided ammunition for those expecting a Fed rate cut in September.' 'This data has led to a rapid recalibration of US interest rate expectations,' Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, said. On his social media platform Truth Social, Trump wrote: 'Too little, too late. Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster. DROP THE RATE! .. Tariffs are bringing billions of dollars into the USA!' The President has branded the central bank chair a 'stubborn moron', saying he 'must lower interest rates now'. 'If he continues to refuse, the board should assume control and do what everyone knows has to be done,' he added. Reports last month suggested Powell's future could be in doubt after Trump met congressional Republicans to discuss sacking him. But the President later insisted he would only fire the central bank boss if he were guilty of fraud.
