
Youm-e-Istehsal: Punjab Assembly expresses solidarity with Kashmiris
Provincial Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman, presented the resolution in the house, which received full support from all political parties. The resolution condemned India's illegal actions on August 5, 2019, when it unilaterally altered the constitutional status of Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The assembly rejected this aggressive move as a violation of international law and UN resolutions. It reaffirmed Pakistan's diplomatic and moral support for Kashmiris, emphasizing their right to self-determination as per UN resolutions.
The resolution strongly denounced India's human rights violations in Kashmir, calling them a blatant breach of the Geneva Conventions. It also dismissed India's claims over Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, stating that the Kashmir dispute must be resolved strictly in line with UN resolutions and the aspirations of the Kashmiri people. The house demanded India releases all political prisoners, halt atrocities, and grant unrestricted access to international media and journalists in Kashmir. The assembly also saluted the resilience and bravery of Kashmiri people in their struggle against Indian occupation.
The session, presided over by Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, commenced nearly three hours behind schedule.
Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, in his message on Youm-e-Istehsal-e-Kashmir, stated that August 5, 2019, marks the darkest chapter in Kashmir's history. On this day, India illegally revoked the special status of occupied Jammu and Kashmir, brutally stripping Kashmiris of their fundamental rights.
Speaker Malik Ahmad Khan emphasized that India has employed oppression, coercion, and tyranny against Kashmiris for the past 78 years, yet their struggle for freedom continues with unwavering determination. He asserted that India's illegal occupation of Kashmir is a blatant violation of United Nations resolutions, while the Kashmiri people's resistance enjoys global support.
He warned that India's disregard for international law has severely jeopardized regional peace. The presence of nearly one million Indian troops in the region stands as undeniable proof of New Delhi's repression. 'The sacrifices of Kashmiris bear witness to their unbreakable resolve — they have not bowed before oppression, nor will they ever,' he declared.
Expressing hope for Kashmir's liberation, the Speaker said, 'The day is not far when the sun of freedom will rise over the occupied valley.'
Pakistan People's Party Parliamentary leader in Punjab Assembly Ali Haider Gillani raised concerns over the rising water levels in the Indus and Chenab rivers, which have submerged several villages, particularly in South Punjab, including Multan. He demanded immediate relief for affected communities and a detailed briefing in the assembly.
In response, Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman stated that the Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA) was actively monitoring the situation and issuing alerts in high-risk areas. However, he acknowledged that many residents hesitate to evacuate due to concerns over livestock and belongings. He also informed the house that the Punjab Chief Minister had announced cash rewards for over 850 rescue workers during a cabinet meeting.
Gillani delivered an impassioned speech, accusing India of betraying Kashmir's freedom. He claimed that since the revocation of Kashmir's special status, 28,000 Kashmiris have been imprisoned, with economic losses exceeding $4.5 billion. He also accused the Modi government of killing 1,009 civilians, including 136 women and 205 children
Opposition Leader Ali Imtiaz Warraich strongly condemned the arrest of nine assembly members and workers during a peaceful protest outside DHA Rahbar. He accused Punjab Police of raiding the rally, damaging vehicles, and unlawfully detaining participants despite the demonstration being entirely peaceful. Warraich demanded their immediate release and warned that if the members were not freed, the parliamentary party would convene to decide on further action.
Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan assured the house that he had contacted relevant authorities, and the detained members would be released soon. He also condemned the recent altercation between two lawmakers, Hassan Riaz and Khalid Dogar, pledging to mediate between the government and opposition to resolve the issue.
Deputy Speaker Zaheer Iqbal Chanar condemned the mistreatment of lawmakers—including vandalism of vehicles and tearing of clothes—as an insult to the assembly's dignity.
Rana Muhammad Arshad, Chief Whip of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), addressed the assembly, emphasizing the party's historic role in advocating for the resolution of the Kashmir issue. He stated that the leadership of PML-N has always played a crucial part in supporting Kashmir, which he described as the 'jugular vein' of Pakistan. He asserted that the attempt to separate Kashmir from Pakistan was a conspiracy orchestrated by the British and Hindus.
Speaking on the occasion of Youm-e-Istehsal-e-Kashmir, Arshad highlighted that this day holds deep historical significance rather than being a new observance. He recalled that in 2016, then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had taken a firm stance at the United Nations, demanding that Kashmiris be granted their right to self-determination in accordance with UN resolutions.
Arshad also referenced India's illegal annexation of occupied Kashmir on August 5, 2019, during the tenure of the PTI government. He criticized the PTI administration for limiting its support to symbolic protests on Fridays, which, according to him, yielded no tangible results. He stressed that August 5 would forever be remembered as the darkest day in Kashmir's history.
The PML-N leader further addressed India's aggression, recalling that when India launched attacks on Pakistan on May 5 and 6, a strong response was delivered on May 10 by Field Marshal General Syed Asim Munir and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who decisively struck the enemy on its own soil, securing victory for Pakistan.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
a minute ago
- Express Tribune
Kashmir, Khan and echoes of betrayed promises
The writer is a public policy analyst based in Lahore. She can be reached at durdananajam1@ Listen to article August 5 has come to symbolise two distinct narratives in Pakistan. For supporters of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) — which now represents an overwhelming majority of the population, thanks to the establishment's relentless and illogical rivalry with Imran Khan — it marks the second anniversary of their leader's incarceration. At the official level, however, the day is commemorated in solidarity with the people of Indian-occupied Kashmir, whose semi-autonomous status and special rights were stripped following the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35-A of the Indian constitution. Yet, one suspects that most Pakistanis are aware of the constitutional intricacies affecting Kashmiris. Given the mass exodus from Pakistan and the alarming rise in poverty, it's understandable why many would hesitate to wish the same fate upon Kashmiris — being absorbed into a nation deliberately kept broken and dysfunctional by its ruling elite. The condition of those living in Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir is, perhaps, evidence enough of this grim reality. In 2018, PTI emerged as one of Pakistan's most popular political parties. By 2025, it has reclaimed that status. In the intervening years, PTI governed for three years before being pushed to the political margins through a familiar tactic: the formation of a united opposition. In Pakistan, political unity is rare and usually reserved for two occasions — when legislation serves personal or business interests; and when the ruling party must be ousted under the guise of national interest. Many analysts and PTI loyalists argue that Imran Khan should have declined the premiership in 2018. They believe that leveraging his popularity from the opposition benches could have secured him a sweeping mandate in subsequent elections — free from establishment strings. With legislative strength, he could have pursued bold reforms with full institutional backing. Instead, Khan opted for hybrid governance, believing he would be treated differently than his predecessors. Like most Pakistanis, he assumed that his unwavering loyalty to Pakistan would earn him institutional support. After all, no previous leader had prioritised national interest over personal gain. From 2014 to 2018, Khan relentlessly branded the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) as "thieves", embedding this narrative deep into public consciousness. Despite reservations about his alliance with the establishment, many hoped Khan's government would be allowed to function independently, free from judicial interference. Over time, he cultivated an aura of indispensability. His trust in the establishment led him — and the public - to believe that the very "thieves" he helped remove would never return to power until held accountable. But like all constructs built on fragile assumptions, this belief crumbled under the weight of reality. By April 9, 2021, Khan's popularity had waned, largely due to the inevitable governance challenges arising from a hybrid and compromised system. Yet, overnight, he surged back to prominence when PTI was ousted and replaced by the very political actors the establishment had long vilified. The irony was not lost on the public. The next day, Pakistanis across the country — and in diaspora communities in the US and the UK — took to the streets. Their protest wasn't just about PTI's removal; it was a collective mourning of the collapse of trust in the establishment and the erosion of democratic values. When Shahbaz Sharif was appointed Prime Minister, he was facing indictment in a multi-million-dollar financial fraud case. Instead of facing justice, he was greeted with rose petals - a stark reminder of the selective accountability that plagues Pakistan's political system. By April 10, 2021, Imran Khan stood alone as the only credible figure in Pakistan's political landscape — for an vast majority of the population. As predicted, Khan remained the most popular leader in 2024 and won the elections with a resounding mandate. Had he trusted the democratic process instead of relying on power brokers, the trajectory might have been different. His two-year resistance to unconstitutional interventions and the public's shattered trust in the military have plunged the country into a state of collective frustration. The illegitimacy of the PDM 2.0 government is evident to all — except those who engineered it. The people stand with Khan because they see in him a reflection of their own victimhood at the hands of a power structure that, though designed to serve the nation, has become its greatest adversary. Today, the pressing question is: Can Imran Khan survive the ruthless persecution of his party and the inhumane conditions of his imprisonment? History offers a sobering pattern. Pakistan's most popular leaders — those who believed in the power of the people — Liaquat Ali Khan, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto — all met unnatural ends. Khan's defiance of absolute power and his rivals' surrender to it have set the tone for Pakistan's future. The king stands naked. No matter how desperately he tries to cloak himself, the people see through the hypocrisy, illegitimacy and usurpation of power. August 5 stands as a testament to the resilience of people who refuse to be silenced. In commemorating this day, Pakistanis are not just mourning losses — they are reclaiming their right to choose, to question, and to hope.


Express Tribune
a minute ago
- Express Tribune
The trade brawl
Listen to article India and the United States seem to have hit an unending argument over tariffs. The brinkmanship, however, is on the part of White House as President Trump has honed an attitude of pushing his allies and adversaries to the wall as he goes on to negotiate new trade concessions. Trump's new-found irksomeness with Russia, after a brief episode of cordiality, is at the crux of policymaking as the White House incumbent wants to penalise every state that indulges in profitable business with Moscow. Trump's decision to slap 50% tariffs on imports from Delhi, doubled from 25%, as a penalty for oil imports from Russia is likely to dip their bilateralism to lowest ebbs. India is also being blamed for fuelling the war in Ukraine, and for outsourcing Russian oil to destinations in Europe. In a rejoinder, Delhi says that its purchases from Russia have helped stabilise oil prices by easing the pressure on supplies from other regions. Trump's new contention, nonetheless, is that India should offer "zero tariff" for US goods import into India, and this is literally an unworkable equation. Thus, the standoff is graduating into one of the biggest trade brawls at a time when the US administration has not been able to settle down with China, Canada and major European partners over tariffs and concessions. Pakistan, apparently, was smart enough to get away with 19% tariffs — a rolled-down equation in adverse circumstances. This singling out of India is likely to have an impact in strategic terms with the US, as Delhi has no choice but to stick to its oil imports from Russia that account for one-third of its consumption. Will this jeopardise the special relationship Trump and Indian PM Narendra Modi were eager to strike in South Asia in terms of containing China is anybody's guess. India would be better advised to value regionalism, and open new vistas of cooperation with Beijing as well as Islamabad. There is a lot in geo-economics to share, and India's attitude of segregation is costing connectivity and prosperity in the region.


Express Tribune
31 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Three soldiers martyred in Mastung attack: ISPR
A combination photo shows Major Muhammad Rizwan Tahir, Lance Naik Muhammad Younas and Naik Ibni Amin, who embraced martyrdom in a terrorists attack in Mastung. Photo: ISPR Listen to article Three soldiers of the Pakistan Army were martyred as security forces killed four terrorists affiliated with 'Indian proxy groups' in Balochistan's Mastung district, the military's media wing said on Wednesday. According to a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), terrorists belonging to the Indian-sponsored 'Fitna al Hindustan' targeted a security forces' vehicle with an improvised explosive device (IED) in Mastung on the night of August 5 and 6. As a result of the blast, three soldiers — Major Muhammad Rizwan Tahir (age: 31 years, resident of Narowal district), Naik Ibni Amin (age: 37 years, resident of Swabi district), and Lance Naik Muhammad Younas (age: 33 years, resident of Karak district) — embraced shahadat (martyrdom). Also Read: Pakistan starts deporting registered Afghan refugees Major Rizwan, the ISPR said, was a courageous officer who had participated in numerous counter-terrorism operations and consistently led his troops from the front. In the ensuing sanitisation operation, four Indian-sponsored terrorists were located and sent to hell, the statement read. The ISPR added that the sanitisation operation would continue to eliminate any remaining threats in the area. 'Pakistan's security forces remain committed to eradicating the menace of Indian-sponsored terrorism from the country, and the supreme sacrifices of our brave sons only strengthen our resolve,' the statement concluded.