Yen weakness subdues luxury splurge at Cartier-owner Richemont
The Swiss luxury group's Japan sales declined 15% year-on-year at constant exchange rates in the fiscal first quarter, it said Wednesday in its fiscal first-quarter sales report.
It follows a 59% jump in revenues in the same quarter last year, as a weaker yen sparked a surge in international tourism and luxury spend.
Shares were up 0.6% by 8:35 a.m. London time.
The Japanese yen began steadily depreciating last year after the Bank of Japan brought an end to negative interest rates and terminated its yield curve control policy in March. In June of that year, the Japanese currency weakened to 38-year lows, crossing the 161 mark against the dollar.
Richemont, whose brands also include Van Cleef & Arpels and Buccellati, benefitted from that weakness throughout last year, reporting 20% to 25% sales growth in Japan over consecutive quarters.
It was not alone. Other major luxury groups LVMH, Kering and Burberry all noted the uptick, led in particular by Chinese shoppers flocking to the East Asian country.
However, a recent strengthening of the yen in the first half of 2025 has put paid to those trends.
"In Japan, sales declined by 15% against a demanding +59% comparative in the prior-year period, with a strengthening Yen strongly reducing tourist spend, most notably from Chinese clientele, whilst local demand remained positive," Richemont said in a statement accompanying the Wednesday results.
Richemont nevertheless has emerged a rare outlier in a wider luxury downturn, as demand among wealthy shoppers for its high-end jewelry continues to shine.
Revenues at the Swiss luxury group rose 6% year-on-year at constant exchange rates to 5.41 billion euros ($6.28 billion) in the three months to the end of June, slightly ahead of the 5.37 billion euros forecast by analysts in an LSEG poll.
Sales at the group's Jewellery Maisons division continued to lead the charge, rising 11% at constant exchange rates.
Revenues within it Specialist Watchmakers division, which features Piaget and Roger Dubuis, nevertheless continued to lag, declining 7% over the period.
The group said the weakness largely reflected declining sales in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Japan, even as sales in the Americas rose.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
The US can have tariffs on baby safety products or a baby boom, but not both
President Trump has voiced a desire to ignite a new 'baby boom' in America, floating a $5,000 baby bonus and other policies aimed at spurring family formation. But the administration's tariff policies are now undercutting that vision — even in the wake of a U.S.–China trade deal that brings some clarity to parents and industry, but not nearly enough relief. The recently finalized trade framework sets a nominal 55 percent tariff on most Chinese imports, including baby and child safety products, down from the 126.5 percent peak earlier this spring. That's a welcome improvement, but it is still more than double the rate from before the trade war began. For essential products such as cribs, car seats, strollers and safe sleep spaces, that's a huge added cost; one that shows no signs of going away. These aren't luxury goods. Many are legally required. All are foundational to the health and safety of young children. Yet the White House has confirmed it will maintain the 55 percent rate, with no exemptions currently planned for baby products and no clear timetable for further relief. This leaves families facing steep prices and mounting uncertainty, just as the administration is trying to encourage more Americans to have children. The good news is, the White House can fix this without derailing its deal with China. All it needs to do is exempt from the tariffs all products essential to the care and protection of babies and children. The first Trump administration exempted these products in 2018, and the current administration floated doing so again a few months ago. But now the pause seems to have put such an exemption on the backburner. That's a mistake. Baby and childcare products are uniquely vulnerable to tariff pressure: More than 90 percent are imported from Asia, with the overwhelming majority manufactured in China. Even with the new framework in place, U.S. importers remain hesitant. They don't know if the deal will hold, and they don't want to ramp up orders only to see tariffs spike again. A permanent exemption for baby products would eliminate that uncertainty, and protect families from sudden price shocks. Otherwise, the severe price increases we have seen are likely to continue. Before the new deal, strollers had risen in price by anywhere from $150 to $450. A popular UPPABaby car seat has increased in price by more than 40 percent, despite efforts to absorb cost. The vast majority of brands and products are facing similar increases. We anticipate an average overall price increase of around 30 percent across critical baby and child products. Beyond the price crisis is a looming product shortage. Manufacturers who slowed production during the tariff surge are now in limbo. Retailers are stockpiling inventory where they can. As one told us, 'If I could fill a warehouse with car seats and strollers right now, I would.' Without relief, families will be forced into painful — and risky — choices. Picture a single mother whose car seat is damaged in a minor crash. She is legally required to replace it, but she either can't afford a new one or can't find one in stock. She considers buying a used or counterfeit seat of questionable safety or continuing to use the damaged one. Parents should not be forced to gamble with their children's safety. Although the administration's goal of reducing America's reliance on foreign manufacturing is understandable, the realities of this sector require a different approach. Baby and child safety products are highly regulated and built through decades-long partnerships with specialized factories abroad. These supply chains can't be replicated domestically overnight, nor can most families afford the price increases that would come with reshoring. A 2021 Pew survey found that cost was the most commonly cited reason non-parents were unlikely to have children, and those costs have increased steadily since. A 2022 report from the Brookings Institution found that inflation had added more than $26,000 to the cost of raising a child, hitting low-income families hardest and pushing many to delay or scale back their plans for children altogether. Tariffs shouldn't make that burden worse. A broad exemption for all essential baby and child products would provide certainty regardless of how the broader China deal unfolds. It would support struggling families, stabilize the industry and bolster the administration's pro-family goals. Without the exemption, the consequences won't be measured in dollars alone, but also in risks no parent should have to take.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
China plans crackdown on zero-mileage used car sales
SHANGHAI (Reuters) -China's industry ministry is planning to ban the resale of cars within six months of their initial registration as part of efforts to combat sales of so-called zero-mileage used cars, an industry association publication reported on Saturday. Zero-mileage used cars have emerged in China as a result of the uniquely cutthroat competition for sales in the world's largest auto market, which is reeling from a brutal, years-long price war caused by chronic overcapacity. The practice involves insuring a new vehicle before it is sold, allowing automakers and their dealers to meet sales targets. But it can create hassles for customers. Auto Review, a publication run by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, reported the plan in an editorial published on its WeChat account. It said that the China Automobile Dealers Association, another industry group, had separately proposed a code system for exports of used cars. The editorial added that Chery and BYD were among companies planning to hold dealers accountable for violations, including licensing cars before they are sold. The measures, if enforced, would mark the first policy action taken by the Chinese government to stop the practice, which became a nationwide issue after Great Wall Motor CEO Wei Jianjun called it out in May. Since then, there have been several signs China's central government was preparing a crackdown, from a Communist Party newspaper condemning zero-mileage used cars last month to the country's cabinet pledging on Friday that it would control "irrational" competition in the domestic auto industry. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-China EV brands Zeekr, Neta inflated car sales using insurance scheme
(Reuters) -Chinese electric vehicle brands Neta and Zeekr inflated sales in recent years to hit aggressive targets, with Neta doing so for more than 60,000 cars, according to documents reviewed by Reuters and interviews with dealers and buyers. The companies arranged for cars to be insured before they were sold to buyers, the documents show, enabling them under Chinese industry car registration practices to book sales early so they could hit the monthly and quarterly targets, the dealers and buyers said. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Neta booked early sales of at least 64,719 cars through this method from January 2023 to March 2024, according to copies of records it sent to dealers, seen by Reuters. That was more than half the sales of 117,000 vehicles it reported over the 15 months. Zeekr, a premium EV brand owned by Geely, used the same method to book early sales in late 2024 in the southern city of Xiamen through its main dealer there, state-owned Xiamen C&D Automobile, according to dealers, buyers and sales receipts seen by Reuters. Vehicles booked as sold before reaching a buyer are called "zero-mileage used cars" in the Chinese auto industry. The practice has emerged out of cutthroat competition for sales in the world's largest auto market, which is reeling from a brutal, years-long price war caused by chronic overcapacity. The industry faces a moment of reckoning, with state media calling out the zero-mileage car practice, the cabinet pledging to regulate "irrational" competition, and other central government bodies organising meetings with the industry's largest players to express concern about such methods. On Saturday a publication run by the China Association of Auto Manufacturers said the industry ministry was planning to clamp down on the practice by banning cars from being resold within six months of being registered as a sale. STATE MEDIA FOCUS Also on Saturday, state media reported that Zeekr had been selling cars with insurance already purchased to inflate sales, the first such naming and shaming of a specific automaker. In a front-page story, the China Securities Journal newspaper interviewed Zeekr car buyers in cities such as Guangzhou and Chongqing, who the newspaper said had found that their cars already had insurance policies before they were sold. They said they were refused refunds, even though they felt they were deceived. The newspaper questioned Zeekr's unusually high sales in the cities of Shenzhen and Xiamen in December. Its reported sales in Xiamen surged to 2,737 that month, more than 14 times its monthly average. Reuters could not determine how much of that volume might have been booked early. The China Securities Journal also raised questions over Neta's sales, saying it showed anomalies. Reuters is reporting for the first time details of how Neta inflated sales. Zeekr, Zhejiang Hozon New Energy Automobile, which owns Neta, and Xiamen C&D did not respond to requests for comment on Saturday. A spokesperson for Geely said, "Geely firmly rejects the report put forward by the China Securities Journal." The spokesperson declined to comment on Reuters findings or provide further details. Li Yanwei, an analyst with the China Automobile Dealers Association, said he believed the firms carried out such practices to embellish their financial reports and achieve their performance goals. "This way of whitewashing performance is not advisable," he wrote on Chinese social media platform Weibo on Saturday. Analysts and investors tracking China's auto industry gauge performance and estimate inventory levels with two sets of sales data. Wholesale numbers reported by automakers to the industry association show sales from automakers to dealers, while retail data compiled from insurance registration records show the sales to users. Some zero-mileage used cars are exported to be sold as second-hand cars overseas, but analysts and dealers say the domestic sales volume is significantly higher, with Chinese customers nationwide buying what they believe to be discounted new vehicles, only to find out later their car is not insured under their name. PRESSURE ON DEALERS Last month the state-owned People's Daily, the mouthpiece of China's ruling Communist Party, published an editorial condemning the sale of zero-mileage used cars domestically and listing a litany of harms the practice brings upon the industry and buyers. This month four dealer associations based in the wealthy Yangtze River Delta urged automakers to set them more reasonable sales targets and incentive policies, saying, without providing details, that dealers were being forced to falsify sales. Neta booked sales early by arranging insurance policies for cars before sending them to dealers, according to records shared with Reuters and a dealer for the brand. The records contain details for each car and the insurance policies purchased on them, with the names of the insurance agents. Dealers were able to refer to these when they found a buyer to transfer the policy to, according to copies seen by Reuters. The company booked early sales of 64,719 cars this way. "In Neta's case, the company made it clear to dealers that the cars were insured ahead of time and therefore counted as sold," said the dealer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fears of retaliation from the company. "We had to explain to buyers that the traffic insurance was complementary and remind them it would expire earlier and should be renewed on time," he said. But three Neta buyers, who asked not to be named, told Reuters the dealerships had not told them the policies had begun well before the purchase date, only finding out when the policies expired. The dealer said Neta started doing this in late 2022 to obtain EV subsidies that were set to end that year. Neta's sales peaked in 2022 when it was ranked as the eighth-largest maker of new EVs in China with sales of 152,000 vehicles. Sales fell last year to 87,948 vehicles, including 23,399 exported, and it sold 1,215 cars in the first quarter of 2025, according to data from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. The brand has been in financial trouble since late 2024, and its owner, Zhejiang Hozon New Energy Automobile, entered bankruptcy proceedings in China last month, according to state media. 'JUST DO IT' The Neta dealer said many of the zero-mileage used cars he received from the company remained in his warehouse, unsold. The company "only had one message: Just do it, everyone else is doing it". Zeekr, which is being privatised by Geely Auto, booked sales with the help of Xiamen C&D, which runs dealerships for Zeekr and other brands. Xiamen C&D insured and registered the vehicles under the names of two subsidiaries in December, allowing Zeekr to count the sales before year-end, according to four dealers and two buyers, as well as a receipt shared with Reuters. Zeekr dealers sold some of the cars in subsequent months to buyers in other cities such as Beijing and Chongqing, the sources said. "The Zeekr salesman said the car would be 3,000 yuan ($420) less than a car I would get from the store and I would also get a charging coupon worth 10,000 yuan," said a buyer in another southern city. He declined to be named, citing concerns of retaliation from the automaker. The China Securities Journal reported that most of the owners it spoke to said their cars were insured by Xiamen C&D and its affiliates. China Automobile Dealers Association data showed that 2,508 of the 2,737 sales Zeekr booked in Xiamen in December were sold to companies, while 257 went to individual buyers. But data published by Xiamen's vehicle administration bureau showed just 271 cars registered in December for license plates, which genuine buyers generally obtain once they receive their cars. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
