logo
Gov. Stitt, legislative leaders announce budget deal including tax cuts, tort reforms: What we know

Gov. Stitt, legislative leaders announce budget deal including tax cuts, tort reforms: What we know

Yahoo14-05-2025

Gov. Kevin Stitt has joined Oklahoma legislative leaders in announcing a sweeping agreement on a nearly $12.6 billion state budget for the next fiscal year, one that features an income tax cut Stitt long has hoped for during his six-plus years in office.
The deal, which the governor said was designed to make Oklahoma more business friendly, will cut the state's highest income tax rate by a quarter of a percentage point, Stitt said. The agreement also covers tort reforms and the creation of specialized business courts, which have been a priority for Stitt.
"We're signaling to the world and the country that Oklahoma is open for business," Stitt said at a news conference Wednesday, May 14.
He was joined by House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, and Senate Pro Tempore Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, as well as other Republican lawmakers.
For years, Stitt has been a vocal advocate of reducing Oklahoma's income tax, which now stands at 4.75% for those earning more than $7,500. Before the current legislative session started, he rolled out his 'half and a path' plan to cut that tax by a half-percentage point and create a path toward a day when the state might completely eliminate income tax.
In a year when projections show state revenues would be slightly down, and with most executive agencies asking for funding increases – not to mention the uncertainties regarding the state Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, which has an estimated financial shortfall of about $27.4 million for the current fiscal year – it was thought a tax cut would be unlikely.
Budget questions at the Capitol: Will Oklahomans receive an income tax cut? Would a cut be wise?
But that changed in recent days. On May 7, Stitt posted a video on X praising 17 senators — all Republicans on the more conservative side of the 39-person GOP caucus in that chamber — who had pledged to support a tax cut. The next day, Paxton said a tax cut remained a possibility. The day after that, Sen. Brian Guthrie, R-Bixby, filed Senate Concurrent Resolution 11, expressing the intent to enact a 0.25 percentage point income tax cut.
While it's not the half-percentage point cut requested by Stitt, the governor seemed pleased with the deal, which he said gets Oklahoma closer to the tax rates of neighboring states.
"We compete in a regional and also a national market, and we have to stay up with our competition," he said.
According to an analysis by the Oklahoma Policy Institute, a Tulsa-based think tank, cutting income taxes by a quarter of a percentage point would reduce state revenues by $306 million. That analysis showed such a cut would save Oklahomans who make $79,700 or less between $9 and $95 annually, and would save those in the top 1% of incomes – making $683,500 or more – $2,936 annually.
The tax cut deal has landed a year after the Legislature approved, and Stitt signed, a bill that eliminated the state grocery tax.
Last year, thanks to a transparency initiative led by the Senate, most of the budget negotiations between House and Senate leaders – and sometimes the governor – were done in meetings that were open to the public. Paxton, however, has said those meetings often had a circus-like atmosphere, and didn't want to repeat that process this year.
School tax credits: Report shows 40% of credits go to households earning $150K or more
Instead, he promised that legislators would have ample time – multiple days, preferably – to consider any budget agreement before having to vote on it. The deal reached Wednesday seems to fit those parameters.
Paxton said at the news conference that he was focused during budget negotiations on making sure economic opportunities would be available to young Oklahomans.
"This budget gets us a long ways down the road to make sure that happens," he said.
Hilbert said he thought budget talks between the House, Senate and governor's office went as smooth as he had seen in his seven years being involved in the process.
"We've figured out ways without being disagreeable and really move the state forward," he said.
As Republican legislative leaders touted their collaborative efforts to reach a budget deal, Senate Minority Leader Julie Kirt, D-Oklahoma City, said Democrats in her caucus were left out of final discussions.
'We did not get details about this budget before this announcement was made,' Kirt said during a news conference following Stitt's announcement. 'We actually still don't have details because nothing was handed out.'
While she was awaiting full details on the budget, Kirt said what her caucus had seen so far leads her to believe it doesn't go far enough to address key issues for Oklahomans.
'It's not focused on working families,' she said. 'It's not about solving the real problems that we have for our public schools, and then we don't hear solutions around health care and mental health care and people having the access they need to those things.'
(This story was updated to add new information.)
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Stitt, Oklahoma lawmakers reach budget deal with income tax cut, more

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrails vs. contrails Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. Cloud seeding While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. Geoengineering While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. Taking focus In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said. ___ Associated Press writers Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida, and Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, contributed to this story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store