Healy Rae encourages ash forest owners to apply for grant aid
The scheme supports forest owners to clear dead ash trees and replant with another species, and to make themselves eligible for the additional Climate Action Performance Payment (CAPP) of €5,000/ha.
Minister of State Healy-Rae welcomed the fact that DAFM has paid out €23 million in total since 2013 on ash dieback affected forests.
According to DAFM, a total of €4.5 million has been paid out this year so far on clearance and replanting grants, and a further €4 million has been paid since last September on the CAPP to those who have cleared their lands and replanted.
In July 2023 DAFM launched the latest ash dieback scheme, the Reconstitution Scheme for Ash Dieback, under the new Forestry Programme with enhanced features that included:
A 100% increase in the site clearance grant rate, to €2,000 per hectare.
Enhanced replanting grant rates of between €3,858 and €8,555 per hectare, depending on the forest type replanted.
According to the minister, this means that for clearing and replanting, the range of payment to ash forest owners entering the scheme is between €5,858-€10,555/ha, and they can also avail of the additional €5,000/ha CAPP payment.
In addition, for those still in receipt of the farmer rate of yearly premium, they can receive a once-off top-up payment to the new premium rates within the new programme.
Minister of State Healy-Rae has encouraged farmers to "engage" with the enhanced scheme as soon as possible.
He said: "I welcome the fact that over a third of the total spending on ash dieback has occurred since last September (2024), and that the CAPP payment has been instrumental in encouraging ash forest owners to take action.
"There are still many ash forest owners who have not yet applied to reconstitute their ash forests and avail of this payment."
"I want to encourage ash forest owners to engage with the enhanced reconstitution scheme as soon as possible, as the quickest and most effective way to clear and reconstitute affected sites, and to avail of the Climate Action Performance Payment Scheme," Minister of State Healy-Rae added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
21 hours ago
- Agriland
Minister Muir responds to concerns raised over NI Nutrients Action Programme
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) Minister Andrew Muir has responded to concerns raised over Northern Ireland's Nutrients Action Programme (NAP). Opposition mounted in recent months against the draft NAP proposals announced this year by Minister Andrew Muir. In May, Minister Muir launched a public consultation on the NAP for 2026-2029, which he said contains 'additional measures which have been developed based on scientific research'. The main additional measures include further restrictions on use of chemical phosphorus fertiliser and a farm phosphorus balance limit for more intensive farms. In late May, representatives from across the farming and food industry in NI, including the Ulster Farmers' Union, wrote to Minister Muir, to highlight concerns about proposed changes. In the letter, industry said: "We are particularly concerned about how the science is being used, the complete lack of economic impact analysis and inconsistencies between certain measures within this consultation document and other policies which makes it difficult for stakeholders to comment on these proposals." The letter warned that the impact of proposals could be "far-reaching for the rural economy and indeed all of NI and it is therefore untenable that a proper impact assessment has not been carried out". Minister Muir has now responded to the open letter from the agri-food industry. His response letter, dated August 4, says: "The NAP was introduced 18 years ago to fulfil our legal requirement to reduce water pollution from agricultural sources. "I wish to again recognise the hard work farmers and others have undertaken to date to address water quality. "Your statement reiterating that the agri-food sector is fully committed to improving water quality and the sustainability of the environment within which it operates is greatly appreciated." Minister Muir in his letter said that the legally-required NAP review is an "important opportunity to shape the actions we can take together" over the next four years. The current consultation on the NAP 2026-2029 closed on July 24. "I welcome all the responses received, which will be collated and considered in the coming weeks," the minister said. "My department is currently finalising the next steps and the processes for the development of the NAP 2026-2029, and stakeholders will receive information about this in the coming weeks. "In particular, given the level of interest from a range of stakeholders in the NAP, and some of the issues raised to date, I have decided to provide an additional level of engagement within this process and further consultation." In the short-term, once the consultation responses have been analysed, they will be considered by a stakeholder task and finish group with an external facilitator, the minister confirmed. This group will include representatives from farming, agri-food, environmental groups and the department. "It will also be able to consider and bring forward alternative solutions for consideration by working collaboratively," Minister Muir explained. "The group will take into account the proposals consulted upon, the consultation responses to date, and any other potential solutions raised within the group." The group will be asked to propose measures and actions that will meet legislative requirements, are evidence-based and workable at farm level within realistic timeframes, according to the minister. "During this process, consideration will be given to the economic impact of the proposals including the revised proposals and a draft economic impact assessment will be prepared," he said. "The group will provide an additional level of engagement in the policy development process. "When its work is completed, the department will then undertake a further, statutory compliant, eight-week consultation. "This will give wider stakeholders and the public an opportunity to provide views on any updated proposals. "I will take these into account in making my final decision on the updated NAP, which will be referred to the executive committee for consideration." Minister Muir said he acknowledges that some of the proposed measures in the NAP consultation will require investment, and officials within his department will consider how that funding need can be met. He said he is due to meet the Finance Minister to discuss the support that can be provided. The minister also said that in relation to sewage pollution, "I wish to repeat my clear view that agriculture is not the only contributor to what has been happening at Lough Neagh and many other waterbodies across NI". "I have been consistently on the record that the separate regulatory regime with NI Water on wastewater known as SORPI needs to change and I will be bringing proposals to my executive colleagues on the matter over the time ahead," Minister Muir added.
Agriland
2 days ago
- Agriland
MEP calls on DAFM to 'review and revise' approach to GAEC 2
An Irish MEP has called on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) to revise its approach to the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition 2 (GAEC 2). GAEC 2 is the conditionality standard of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) related to the protection of peatlands and wetlands. Last week, the department launched an appeals process for farmers seeking to have their land removed from the standard. However, farm organisations voiced concerns about several conditions attached to the appeals process. Midlands North-West MEP Ciaran Mullooly has also called on DAFM to "immediately clarify and withdraw unnecessary conditions it is imposing on landowners seeking to appeal the classification of their land under GAEC 2". He criticised the department's requirement that landowners applying for an appeal may have to provide: A signed declaration from the appellant that the parcel(s) in question has/have never been drained and he/she plans to carry out drainage works in 2025 as required; Evidence to show that the appellant plans to carry out drainage work in 2025 e.g. contractor quotations, estimate of costs etc as required. 'This demand completely misunderstands the purpose of the appeals process,' Mullooly said. 'Farmers are appealing the peat soil designation because they believe it is scientifically incorrect - not because of what they plan to do with the land next year. 'The decision on whether land is peat soil or not must be based on soil science - not hypothetical future land use or drainage plans. To suggest otherwise is to undermine the integrity of the entire process," he said. Ciaran Mullooly MEP The Midlands-North-West MEP said that the department risks "confusing and intimidating landowners". 'Once again, we see bureaucracy being used in a way that frustrates rather than facilitates access to a fair and transparent appeals process. "Farmers are entitled to have incorrect classifications overturned. That entitlement must not be made contingent on signing unnecessary undertakings or presenting irrelevant contractor paperwork," he said. The MEP is calling for the department to "immediately review and revise its approach to GAEC 2 peat soil appeals and ensure the process remains grounded in science, fairness, and farmers' rights". The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) previously said that the department has made amendments to the appeals process. In an update to the appeal document, DAFM outlined that the documents which have caused concern are not required where no drainage works are planned on previously undrained/drained GAEC 2 land parcel(s) in 2025. Following the amendments, IFA Rural Development Committee chair John Curran said that it is "now clear that all farmers have the opportunity to appeal the indicative GAEC 2 status of individual parcels". 'The clarification also makes the need for signed declarations/proof of drainage works obsolete. "These requirements should be removed from appeal application requirements," he added.
Agriland
3 days ago
- Agriland
Irish Grain Growers Group Meets Minister Heydon on Budget 2026
Representatives of the Irish Grain Growers' Group (IGGG) met recently with Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Martin Heydon to discuss the stakeholder organisation's priorities for Budget 2026. An IGGG spokesperson told Agriland: 'We had a very positive engagement with the minister and his officials. 'This was particularly the case where our proposals to secure future tax amendments for tillage sector are concerned. 'A follow-up meeting on these matters involving department of agriculture officials and IGGG representatives will take place over the coming weeks." The spokesperson added: 'There is general agreement that the tillage sector can play a key role in delivering higher levels of sustainability across Irish agriculture as a whole. And this must be fully reflected in government policy.' IGGG's leadership team will be lobbying strongly over the coming weeks and months on the issues of Budget 2026 and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) review proposals, recently published by the European Commission in Brussels. 'The CAP review will be of deep concern to every tillage farmer in Ireland,' the IGGG representative continued. 'The proposals on the table are totally unacceptable." The spokesperson said that If the proposals are implemented, they will "further reduce the core support funding levels available to the crops' sector". 'It really is a case of 'here we go again'. This is the third consecutive review of the CAP that will act to suck funding away from tillage. 'It started with the decision to introduce a process of conversion within the basic payment model at the CAP review before last. "And what's on the table now is a continuation of this process. This is totally unacceptable.' Meanwhile, Harvest 2025 continues apace. This week will see tillage farmers continue with the cutting of winter oats and oilseed rape crops with winter wheat and spring cereals to follow. IGGG is confirming that harvest 2025 yields should be in line a five-year average figure. Straw - certainly where winter cereals are concerned - is of high quality with regular customers doing deals similar to last season. Yield of straw in spring barley looks like, at this point, will be back on last year's levels. There is also the prospect of early-sown spring barley crops being harvested this week . However, a key issue – specifically with regard to the prospects for malting barley - has arisen. According to the IGGG representative: 'It has been made known to us that some merchants with ties to Boortmalt have placed a quota of 1.9t/ac on the malting barley intakes they will accept this year. 'This is irrespective of what quantities of barley delivered actually meet the malting criteria. So, in cases, let's say, where growers are achieving certified barley yields of 3t/ac, this means that 1.1t will be sent for feed. It's a totally unacceptable situation. 'Tirlán and Dairygold have stated that malting barley contracts will not be cut for the 2025 season.'
