logo
Trump administration seeks to end bond hearings for immigrants without legal status

Trump administration seeks to end bond hearings for immigrants without legal status

Yahoo5 days ago
The Trump administration is reportedly seeking to bar millions of immigrants who allegedly arrived in the US without legal status from receiving a bond hearing as they try to fight their deportations in court.
The new policy would apply during removal proceedings, which can take years, for millions of immigrants who entered the country from Mexico in recent decades, according to a report from the Washington Post, which reviewed documents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice).
Such immigrants had previously been allowed to request a bond hearing before an immigration judge, but Todd Lyons, Ice's acting director, stated in a memo reviewed by the Post that the homeland security and justice departments had 'revisited [their] legal position on detention and release authorities'. The departments determined that such immigrants 'may not be released from Ice custody', Lyons reportedly wrote in the memo.
Related: Trump's tax bill funds $6bn expansion of US-Mexico border surveillance, report finds
That new restriction, which is expected to face legal challenges, was issued on 8 July shortly after the Republican-controlled Congress provided Ice $45bn over the next four years to detain immigrants for civil deportation proceedings.
'To be clear, [Ice's] position here is laughable and is being rejected by immigration judges all over the US, and will soon be dismissed by actual federal court judges in habeas proceedings,' Charles Kuck, an immigration attorney and Emory University law professor, wrote on X in a post that alluded to challenges against one's detention.
The policy change would mark the latest significant departure for Ice, which during Joe Biden's presidency provided a guide on how immigrants who are detained can post bond.
'Judges see a lot of people every day,' the guide stated. 'You can make your testimony stand out by speaking sincerely. Think about a story that will show the judge how much your family needs you. Explain to the judge why your detention hurts your family very much.
'We hope that this guide provides you with helpful information when preparing for your bond hearing. We wish you the best of luck with your case!'
The Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for reducing immigration, defended the new reported policy.
'Detention is absolutely the best way to approach this, if you can do it,' Mark Krikorian, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, told the Post. 'It costs a lot of money, obviously.
'You're pretty much guaranteed to be able to remove the person, if there's a negative finding, if … [they're] in detention.'
The Trump administration had already worked to limit which immigrants can post bond. Previously, people arrested after they had entered the US and placed in regular removal proceedings were eligible for a bond hearing, according to the National Immigration Project, a non-profit whose attorneys have defended immigrants facing deportation.
But in May, the federal Board of Immigration Appeals issued a ruling stating that such people were subject to mandatory detention, meaning that Ice could jail them during removal proceedings and not provide them an opportunity to appear before an immigration judge and get a bond set.
Ice did not immediately respond to the Guardian's request for comment on the reported new policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say
Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say

Los Angeles Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say

NEW YORK — An off-duty U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer was shot in a Manhattan park after an apparent robbery gone wrong, New York City police and federal officials said Sunday. The 42-year-old officer was in stable condition after the Saturday attack and is expected to survive. A spokesperson for the New York Police Department said there was no indication the shooting was politically motivated. The agent, who was not in uniform, was sitting in a park beneath the George Washington Bridge when he was approached by a man riding on the back of a moped, who shot him in the face and arm, police said. The off-duty officer returned fire as the moped sped off. No arrests had been made as of Sunday afternoon, according to a police spokesperson. The Department of Homeland Security shared video online of the two men on a moped, alleging the shooter was caught entering the country illegally in 2023 but released. The NYPD spokesperson said they had no information about the source of that claim. In a social media post Sunday afternoon, President Trump seized on the shooting, alleging it was evidence of Democrats' failures to secure the border. 'The CBP Officer bravely fought off his attacker, despite his wounds, demonstrating enormous Skill and Courage,' he wrote. The shooting comes as federal officials say there has been a surge of attacks on agents carrying out Trump's mass deportation agenda. Enforcement officers involved in the crackdown often cover their faces, which critics say spreads fear and panic across communities and imperils citizens as well as immigrants without legal status. The Trump administration defends masking, which it says is needed to avoid harassment of agents in public and online. On Sunday, the acting director of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, said he would allow agents to continue covering their faces, which he called a safety measure 'If that's a tool that the men and women of ICE that keeps themselves and their families safe, then I will allow it,' he said.

Trump says Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back
Trump says Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back

Los Angeles Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump says Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back

CLEVELAND — President Trump wants Washington's NFL franchise and Cleveland's Major League Baseball team to revert to their former names, which where changed in recent years because many considered them racist. Trump said Sunday on his social media site that 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' Josh Harris, whose group bought the NFL's Washington Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said this year the name was here to stay. Not long after taking over, Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. Cleveland Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there weren't any plans to revisit the name change. 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said. Both teams have had their current names since the 2022 seasons. Washington dropped Redskins after the 2019 season and was known as the Washington Football Team for two years before adopting Commanders. Cleveland announced in December 2020 it would drop Indians. It announced the switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out 'Chief Wahoo' as its primary logo. The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of national discussions about institutions and teams to drop logos and names considered racist. The Guardians are the fifth name for Cleveland's baseball franchise. It joined the American League in 1901 as one of the eight charter franchises as the Blues. It switched to the Bronchos a year later and used the Naps from 1903 through 1914 before moving to the Indians in 1915. Washington started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later. Washington and Cleveland share another thing in common. David Blitzer is a member of Harris' ownership group with the Commanders and holds a minority stake in the Guardians. Reedy writes for the Associated Press.

Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'
Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'

New York Post

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was adamant Sunday that the Aug. 1 date President Trump gave Europe to negotiate new trade arrangements is a 'hard deadline.'' 'So on Aug. 1, the new tariff rates will come in. But nothing stops countries from talking to us after Aug. 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on Aug. 1,' Lutnick told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' when asked the European Union, whose representatives he was on the phone with before the interview. 'That's a hard deadline,' the Trump official said. Advertisement The president has shifted his deadline several times. On April 2, 'Liberation Day,' he debuted his customized rates, which were supposed to go into effect April 9. They it got pushed 90 days and then to Aug. 1. Trump has threatened to slap a 30% tariff rate against the EU and a flurry of customized tariff rates on other countries that fail to cut a new deal with him. Those tariffs come on top of the 10% baseline tax against virtually all countries. 3 President Trump moved his tariff deadline several times, but Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stressed Aug. 1 is now a firm cut-off. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Trump has made recalibrating US trade policy a top priority of his second term. AP Despite the fast-approaching deadline, Lutnick conveyed confidence that the US and EU will come to some sort of arrangement. 'There's plenty of room. Look, the president and the European Union, these are the two biggest trading partners in the world talking to each other. We'll get a deal done. I am confident we'll get a deal done,' the commerce secretary said. 'You are going to see the best set of trade deals you've ever seen for America and for the American people.' Advertisement Lutnick also stressed that the 10% baseline tariff rate is 'definitely going to stay' amid negotiations. So far, the Trump administration has announced tariff deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam as well as a tariff truce with China, which Trump claims is subject to a 55% rate. 'The next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books. President Trump is going to deliver for the American people,' he said. In addition to the baseline tariffs and levies on imports from China, the Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on automobiles, aluminum, steel and imports from Canada and Mexico that don't comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Advertisement 3 Lutnick urged US trading partners to finish negotiating deals with the Trump administration by the deadline. REUTERS Trump has threatened to raise that to 35% against Canada and 30% for Mexico. This month, he has been blasting out letters to smaller US trading partners urging them to get a deal done or face the 'Liberation Day' tariffs. But Lutnick indicated that many of the smaller countries may simply face the 10% baseline rate while the Trump administration focuses on retooling trade with larger nations. 'I think what you've got is you should assume that the small countries, you know, the Latin American countries, the Caribbean countries, many countries in Africa, they will have a baseline tariff of 10%,' Lutnick said. 'Then the bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America for not opening themselves up and [for] treating America unfairly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store