logo
Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess

Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess

Yahoo5 days ago
The Jeffrey Epstein files saga at times all but ground Capitol Hill to a halt last month — driving a wedge between Republicans in the House as Democrats went on offense to press President Donald Trump's Justice Department to release more investigative material.
But since returning to their districts for summer recess, lawmakers aren't hearing much about Epstein at public town hall meetings they've hosted so far.
The debate that's dominated Washington in recent weeks didn't come up at all in some town halls Republican and Democratic House members have held — including a raucous event Thursday hosted by Wisconsin GOP Rep. Bryan Steil and two more mild-mannered affairs held by Wyoming Republican Rep. Harriet Hageman. During others, it's been the topic of just one or two questions.
In Wisconsin on Thursday, Rep. Mark Pocan — a Democrat who hosted a town hall in Prairie du Chien, in neighboring Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden's district — brought up Epstein himself, as part of a response to a question about whether Trump might declare martial law and cancel elections.
'It's a step too far to say you're going to release something and then say, 'No, there's nothing there to look at,'' he said.
Only one questioner raised the topic of Epstein — and she did so to call it a distraction.
Pocan kept his comments focused largely on the Republican tax and cuts spending bill that Trump signed into law on July Fourth — repeatedly warning that cuts to Medicaid could gut Wisconsin's public health insurance programs and force the state to spend tax dollars filling holes left by the federal government.
The Democratic congressman said afterward that's why he mostly avoided talking about Epstein.
'I keep it to economics. I'm an economic, progressive populist. I think that's how most people make decisions when they go to elections. That's how Donald Trump won the election. That's why Donald Trump's doing poor in the polls,' he said.
The woman who'd brought up Epstein, Krista Brown, a 38-year-old stay-at-home mother from Viroqua, said she has bigger concerns than Epstein — such as whether steep cuts in staffing at the Department of Education will delay action on a Title IX complaint she'd submitted on behalf of her children, or whether National Weather Service offices will be staffed.
'It has more to do with the things that people need as a foundation than it does about arguing over things that the administration wants us to spend our oxygen on. I'm just not interested in that,' Brown said.
'When you live rural, you care about who's going to plow your goddamn roads — when it's going to get plowed, if the buses can get through, how cold it is, if the weather's going to be reported,' she said. 'That's what matters. And the rest is just going to float away, because pretty soon it's going to get so hard in real life that there's not even going to be time to talk about that.'
The relative lack of focus on Epstein at town halls reflects the broader priorities of Americans. A recent CNN poll conducted by SSRS found that the economy and immigration-related concerns are the issues Americans consider most important. The poll also found increased Democratic attention to government spending, concerns about separation of powers and the rule of law, and Trump himself.
The amount of information the federal government has released on the Epstein case was an issue that didn't rise to prominence, with just one respondent mentioning it as the most important problem.
Still, even if Epstein isn't Americans' top priority, half of respondents said they are dissatisfied with the amount of information released about the Epstein case after the Justice Department released a memo saying there is no evidence the convicted sex offender kept a so-called client list or was murdered. That includes 56% of Democrats, 52% of independents and 40% of Republicans.
Democrats, in search of an advantage against Trump and administration officials who pledged prior to taking office to release Epstein-related files, have sought to force the issue. In the Senate this week, ahead of its own recess, Democrats are using an arcane procedural tool to try to force the Justice Department to release all of the files related to Epstein, including audio, video and any other relevant documents.
Republican leadership, meanwhile, is eager to stay away from the topic of Epstein.
House Speaker Mike Johnson cut legislative business short and sent members home early last week to avoid being forced to hold votes on releasing Epstein-related files.
The National Republican Congressional Committee, the House GOP's campaign arm, encouraged House Republicans in a memo to use the August recess to focus on selling Trump's agenda.
'With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the NRCC memo said.
Some House Republicans who have held town halls have been asked about the Epstein files.
Utah GOP Rep. Mike Kennedy compared the unreleased Epstein files to 'a festering oil-infected wound with pus underneath' in response to a question about whether he would vote in favor of releasing the documents during a virtual town hall last week.
Kennedy pledged to push for 'full transparency' in the matter and that he would 'vote immediately to get all that released,' permitted that the identities of victims are concealed.
As Republican Rep. William Timmons of South Carolina fielded questions at a telephone town hall last week, one caller shared his 'outrage' over the Epstein files – asking why the House adjourned 'when this hasn't been dealt with.'
'If there's a group of pedophiles out there who are just getting away with it, this is an outrage, and I don't care who they are. I don't care if they're the president of the United States,' the caller said.
Timmons responded that 'there is evil in this world, and we have to protect the innocent, so we need to get to the bottom of it.' 'The president and the attorney general are doing the work necessary to release all of the information,' he said.
'The Republican Congress should not be attacking the president,' the GOP lawmaker said. 'The president has earned our trust, has earned the right for us to defer to him on issues at the executive branch.'
But other issues have dominated town halls so far this summer — including the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill,' border security and deportations and federal funding cuts.
At a Hageman town hall earlier this week, Jane Sanderson, 75, of Worland, who voted for the congresswoman, asked her why the Department of Government Efficiency's spending cuts hadn't put a dent in the United States' national debt.
Timmons, the South Carolina congressman, was asked about health care, tariffs and aviation safety. Trump's golf habits came up as often as Epstein.
At the same time Pocan held court in Prairie du Chien, Steil, a three-hour drive away in Elkhorn, was accused of doing Trump's bidding too frequently.
'President Trump seems to run Southeast Wisconsin through you,' one audience member told him.
Steil faced criticism over the Trump administration's treatment of undocumented immigrants. He was shouted down as he defended Trump's implementation of tariffs on imports from a host of trading partners. And the town hall ended amid shouting after he began to answer a question about starvation in Gaza — an issue that is splintering the right, as Trump pushes Israel to address the humanitarian crisis as its military actions there continue.
'To me, the easy answer to address this crisis is for Hamas to surrender and release the hostages. That ends the war tomorrow,' Steil said, in a comment that was met with a mix of cheers and shouts of disagreement. 'Israel was unfairly, unjustly attacked, their civilians were killed and kidnapped by Hamas terrorists.'
CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi, Sarah Davis, Jenna Monnin and Betul Tuncer contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Corrections: Aug. 7, 2025
Corrections: Aug. 7, 2025

New York Times

time3 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Corrections: Aug. 7, 2025

An article on Tuesday about jurists losing faith in President Trump's Justice Department misstated Andrew Wiederhorn's role with the restaurant chain Fatburger. He was previously a chief executive of the chain and founded its parent company. He did not create the restaurant chain. A picture caption with an article on Wednesday about a growing debate in Japan between those who defend pacifism as a national virtue and those who think the country must abandon it referred incorrectly to a treaty that Japan has not signed. It is the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, not the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. An article on Wednesday about how the Trump administration will gain access to the standardized test scores and grade point averages of all applicants to Columbia and Brown University misstated the findings of an SAT report from the College Board. The report found that 1 percent of the African American high school graduates who took the SAT in 2024 scored between 1400 and 1600, the highest possible scores, and 27 percent of the Asian graduates scored at that level. It is not the case that, of all the high school graduates who scored between 1400 and 1600 in 2024, 1 percent were African American and 27 percent were Asian. An article on July 31 about Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva voicing frustration with President Trump over tariffs misidentified birds roaming the presidential palace lawns. They were rheas, not emus. An article on Wednesday about how Texas Republicans are hoping the surge of Hispanic support for President Trump in 2024 will last through the 2026 midterm elections misstated the percentage of votes that Representative Henry Cuellar, Democrat of Texas, won in Starr County in the 2024 elections. It was 69 percent, not 60 percent. An article on Wednesday about the Trump administration's plans to terminate $7 billion in federal grants intended to help low- and moderate-income families install solar panels on their homes misstated the amount of money the Georgia Bright Communities Coalition was using to provide free rooftop solar panels to about 800 Georgia households. It is about $12 million of a $156 million Solar for All grant, not the entire $156 million grant amount. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Sony hikes annual profit forecast by 4%, citing smaller trade war impact
Sony hikes annual profit forecast by 4%, citing smaller trade war impact

CNBC

time5 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Sony hikes annual profit forecast by 4%, citing smaller trade war impact

Sony raised its full-year operating profit forecast Thursday by 4% to 1.33 trillion yen ($9.01 billion), citing a diminished impact from U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. In May, Sony forecast a profit of 1.28 trillion yen, factoring in a 100 billion yen hit from the tariffs. The Japanese conglomerate has transformed from a maker of household electronics such as the Walkman to an entertainment behemoth spanning games, movies, music and chips. Sony reported a 36.5% rise in operating profit to 340 billion yen for the April-June quarter, beating an estimate of 288 billion yen from eight analysts surveyed by LSEG.

Trump's Tariff Blitz on India Threatens 3.5 Million bpd in Global Oil Supply
Trump's Tariff Blitz on India Threatens 3.5 Million bpd in Global Oil Supply

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Tariff Blitz on India Threatens 3.5 Million bpd in Global Oil Supply

On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump vowed to slap India with extra tariffs because, "They're fueling the war machine," by buying Russian oil. Well, Trump made good on his threat on Wednesday, signing an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on India. The new tariff stacks on top of the existing 25% on Indian exports to the United States, and will come into effect in 21 days. Last year, India leapfrogged China to become the biggest buyer of Russian oil, purchasing up to 2 million barrels of discounted barrels per day, good for ~2% of global supply. India bought Russian oil worth $50.2 billion in fiscal year 2024/2025, accounting for 35% of its oil imports. It's not just that India is buying 'massive amounts of Russian Oil', said Trump, but 'they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits… Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' And now, Wall Street is warning that putting the clamps on Russia's top customer is likely to have some dire consequences. According to JP Morgan, Russia could retaliate by closing Kazakhstan's Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC), which western oil majors, including Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), Chevron (NYSE:CVX), Shell (NYSE:SHEL), TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) and Eni S.p.A. (NYSE:E) used to export 1 million barrels of crude per day. CPC has a total capacity of 1.7 million b/ are hints that Moscow is getting ready to act: Last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree that requires all foreign vessels to obtain permission from the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) before entering Russian seaports. The FSB has the authority to grant or deny passage. Novorossiysk, which handles oil flowing through CPC, is one of the ports affected. Russia could find itself in a world of hurt, too, with the loss of 2 mb/d in crude exports likely to force the country to pare back its current production level of 9 million b/d. This would, obviously, hurt the country's coffers pretty badly at a time when Russia is already reeling under falling oil prices. According to data by Russia's finance ministry data, the country's oil and gas revenue fell 33.7%Y/Y in June to a 16-month low. Russia's revenue from oil and gas sales are estimated to have declined 37% Y/Y in July thanks to a strong ruble and weak oil prices. "Cutting off this flow would require a massive realignment of trade flows," BNP Paribas analysts Aldo Spanjer told Reuters, pointing out that global oil supply is already stretched. Russia might have some options. According to the analysts, Russia could divert around 800,000 bpd of oil to Egypt, Pakistan, Malaysia, Peru, Indonesia, Brunei and South Africa. The analysts estimate that the combined effects of the stoppage Russian flows to India and CPC flows would disrupt 3.5 million bpd, with Sparta Commodities analyst Neil Crosby estimating that this would trigger an oil price spike to above $80 per barrel. According to a Wednesday briefing from Standard Chartered, if Indian refiners 'cannot source a near alternative, any deviation from the optimal crude slate will cause operational inefficiencies and lower refined product outputs, and the elasticity of substitution is lower than the market often estimates'. (Russian Urals is a medium-sour that has high diesel yields in refining). Citing research by Baker & O'Brien, StanChart notes that 'a full-conversion complex refinery could experience a 7% reduction in distillate production if it switches from Russian Urals to WTI as Urals generates more feedstock residue for hydrocracking, catalytic cracking and coker units; in contrast WTI would produce less diesel, fuel oil and jet fuel, but larger volumes of gasoline.' Meanwhile, Kazakhstan finds itself in the crossfire of the unfolding trade war, with the country's economy heavily dependent on oil exports. Unfortunately, Kazakhstan is highly vulnerable to a shut down of CPC due to the lack of viable alternatives. Whereas it could turn to the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline as a backup route, the 1,768-kilometer-long pipeline spanning three countries is frequently hindered by shallow waters. Kazakhstan's oil volume via BTC is expected to clock in at 1.7 million tons in the current year, an increase of only 300,000 tons. That said, Kazakhstan might be motivated to support Russia now more than ever. A major dispute has been ongoing between Kazakhstan and international oil companies over the Kashagan oil field development, with Kazakhstan seeking billions of dollars in compensation. The dispute centers around claims that the oil majors have not fulfilled their contractual obligations, leading to significant financial losses for the country. Kazakhstan's claims have escalated to $160 billion, encompassing lost revenue due to delayed and underperforming production. A couple of days ago, Bloomberg reported that Kashagan project shareholders won a lawsuit over a potential $4 billion environmental fine by Kazakhstan. However, the celebrations by the oil majors might be short-lived if Astana plays hard ball and demands they start paying a price that reflects the heightened political risks Alex Kimani for More Top Reads From this article on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store