Court of Appeal dismisses ex-student's bullying lawsuit appeal
A three-member bench, comprising Justices Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, Datuk Azmi Ariffin, and Datuk Faizah Jamaludin, ruled that the appellant failed to substantiate his claims against the school, principal, Malaysian government, and Education Ministry. The lawsuit, filed in 2017, alleged negligence leading to physical and verbal abuse.
The appellate court upheld the High Court's February 2023 decision, citing insufficient evidence. Justice Mohd Nazlan noted the appellant did not testify, and his adoptive mother's testimony was deemed hearsay. 'The alleged assailant was neither named in the suit nor called as a witness,' he said.
While condemning bullying, the court found no proof of victimisation. Justice Mohd Nazlan emphasised schools' duty of care but found no breaches in this case. The appellant had claimed repeated bullying, including being tied to his bed and spat on, with no action taken despite complaints. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Singapore court reserves judgement on Pannir Selvam's post-appeal application
SINGAPORE: Malaysian death-row inmate Pannir Selvam Pranthaman gained reprieve when the Singapore Court of Appeal reserved its judgment, following the second hearing on his post-appeal application held on Wednesday. The Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) policy on the scheduling of executions came under scrutiny during the proceedings, as Pannir Selvam's counsel and the Attorney-General's Chambers addressed the content of affidavits they submitted after the first hearing on May 7. At the initial hearing, the court observed that Pannir Selvam's request for a stay of execution, pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings arising from his complaint to the Law Society, rested fundamentally on the principle that the MHA's policy on execution scheduling must be applied equally to all. His lawyers argued that the MHA policy applied to him differs from an earlier policy, thereby violating his right to equal treatment under Article 12 of the Constitution. On this, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, who led the five-man bench, stated that Article 12 does not prohibit a state agency from changing its policy. "Article 12 applies by looking at the current legislation, the current statute, or the current policy, and asking yourself whether that policy is being applied in a way that is unfairly discriminatory," he said. Pannir Selvam's counsel further argued that the MHA had not provided an explanation for the differing application of its policy between state and non-state proceedings. In their submission, his counsel team argued that the MHA's approach to preserving a prisoner's life had changed. Previously, executions could be delayed if a prisoner's testimony was needed in any legal case. Now, the MHA says delays are only considered if the testimony is needed in a state-led case. "There have been no reasons provided by the MHA as to why this differential treatment between a state and a non-state proceeding is reasonable," said counsel Ng Yuan Siang. In response, Deputy Senior State Counsel Terrence Chua said the distinction exists because state-brought proceedings are, by definition, in the public interest. "It goes beyond the interest of an individual PACP (prisoner awaiting capital punishment), whereas the PACP cannot claim to represent public interest in their private applications. "But even then, I pointed out in my affidavit that state-brought applications are still assessed on a case-by-case basis," he said. The court responded by saying that if the applicant can show that the policy can give rise to an unfair distinction between two categories of persons between whom there is no rational difference, he may be entitled to a finding that the policy offends Article 12. The proceedings, which lasted over an hour, ended with Chief Justice Menon stating that the Court would reserve its judgment. Seated in the dock wearing a purple-coloured prison uniform, Pannir Selvam appeared calm throughout the proceedings in a packed courtroom, which was also attended by his siblings who had arrived from Malaysia earlier in the day. The hearing marks the latest chapter in Pannir Selvam's ongoing legal battle against his death sentence. He was convicted by the High Court on May 2, 2017, for importing not less than 51.84g of diamorphine into Singapore and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. Pannir Selvam filed an appeal, but it was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on Feb 9, 2018. Together with his family and legal team, he submitted petitions for clemency to the President of Singapore, who subsequently declined to commute the sentence. Pannir Selvam and his family were informed that he would be executed on May 24, 2019. He then filed another application to the Court of Appeal, seeking a stay of execution on the grounds that he intended to challenge both the rejection of his clemency petition and the Public Prosecutor's decision not to issue a Certificate of Substantial Assistance (CSA). The court granted this application on May 23, 2019. Following this, he filed several other judicial review applications. Pannir Selvam received another notice of execution on Feb 16, 2025, for a scheduled execution on Feb 20. He then filed for permission to make a Post-Appeal Application in a Capital Case (PACC), seeking a stay of execution, which was granted on Feb 19. Judge of the Appellate Division Woo Bih Li, in his written judgment, stated that the stay was granted pending the determination of his PACC application. Singapore's PACC Act, which came into effect on June 28, 2024, allows prisoners awaiting capital punishment to make post-appeal applications, which can only be heard by the Court of Appeal. – Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
After NFA decision, mum mulls civil action over toddler's injuries
Nur Syaza Syamimi said she noticed the bruises when bathing her daughter, before seeking treatment for her child. PETALING JAYA : A mother is considering civil action against a daycare centre in Iskandar Puteri, Johor, after her two-year-old was found with bruises on her back in January. Nur Syaza Syamimi, 28, said she has been waiting for the outcome of the police investigation into the incident on Jan 17, but was recently informed that the case had been classified as requiring no further action (NFA). She is now seeking legal advice and plans to take civil action. 'I don't want my child or other children to be in danger again. If criminal law fails to help, I will seek justice through other channels,' she told FMT. Syaza claimed the centre failed to hand over CCTV recordings from its premises with the excuse that the CCTVs had been damaged following a thunderstorm. 'Strangely enough, recordings from before the day of the incident are still available. Only recordings from the day of the incident are unavailable,' she said. She previously took to Facebook to express dismay over the police's decision to classify the case as NFA, sharing pictures of the bruise marks on her daughter's back. She said she noticed the bruises when bathing her daughter, and sought treatment at two healthcare facilities, including Hospital Sultanah Aminah in Johor Bahru. The hospital confirmed the injuries were not caused by allergies or skin disease but were consistent with being hit or falling on an object. 'I lodged a police report, informed the social welfare department (JKM), and submitted a full medical report. But, in the end, I was told the case was closed due to insufficient evidence and lack of witnesses,' she said. Syaza and her husband, Mohamad Syazwin, 29, were dissatisfied with how the case was handled, especially in how they had to pester the police for updates. 'I had to WhatsApp the investigating officer almost every day just to get the letter on my daughter's case decision,' she said, adding that she only learned the case had been classified as NFA after asking the officer for updates. In a statement, Iskandar Puteri police chief M Kumarasan confirmed that the case was investigated under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001 for child abuse, ill-treatment, abandonment or neglect. He said the investigation paper was opened after a police report was filed on Jan 19, and was referred to the deputy public prosecutor, resulting in the NFA because of insufficient evidence.
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Family rejoices as dikir barat singer Eda Ezrin walks out a free woman
NARATHIWAT: The family of modern dikir barat singer Eda Ezrin described her release from Narathiwat Prison today as a miracle and the answer to months of relentless prayers. Eda Ezrin, whose real name is Wan Norshaheeda Azlin Wan Ismail, had been detained at the provincial prison in southern Thailand with five others, including her husband, since November last year for possessing methamphetamine pills. She was released after a Thai court allowed an appeal to drop her drug charges. Speaking to Malaysian reporters gathered at the prison, her mother Zaharah Mamat said they never stopped believing in her innocence and had prayed day and night for her safe return. "Since she was detained, not a single day passed without us praying for her. "We knew she was innocent and had been wrongly accused. Today, our prayers were answered," said the 48-year-old mother of four. Zaharah also expressed the family's gratitude to the Thai prison authorities as well as her relatives for their assistance and support. "We are thankful to everyone who helped and supported us throughout this painful journey. "Eda is now safely back with us, and we hope her life will be back to normal soon," she said. Eda's youngest sister, Wan Nur Faqeehah, said the family planned to hold special prayers for her release. "We are happy with her return. Soon after receiving the call from the prison staff about 4.30pm, we immediately rushed here," said the 18-year-old.
