Pak guy mocked Pakistan Army for failing to intercept India's missiles. Now his family's in trouble
We also found a news report on the Pakistani website Siasat about the incident. It quoted Aladeen saying, 'Today, my brother's office was attacked by agencies and police. People came in 4 to 5 vehicles without a warrant. The office was attacked. My two brothers were vandalised and tortured. After beating them, they took them away. Everything in the office was broken, and all the laptops and mobile phones were taken away. My parents have been harassed by the Special Branch Gujrat and the IS office in Kharian Cantt for the past two years.' Notably, Gujrat here refers to the city in Pakistan, not the Indian state.advertisementAladeen's X account lists his location as Germany. Several of his posts questioned Pakistani journalists for letting people die in silence while playing to the tunes of the government.One such post read: 'This is what we are saying: hold the military trial later, pick up Shehr Bano's mother later, threaten my family later. At this time, nothing is more important than Pakistan's defense, survival, and future.'https://t.co/pKxfQxJY2d— Aladeen (@Aladeen_Pro) May 8, 2025Apart from Aladeen, other Pakistanis have also shared videos, calling out the police and authorities for deceiving people and lying about Indian drone attacks.Due to the prevailing war-like situation between India and Pakistan, we were not able to speak directly to Aladeen.Tune InTrending Reel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
5 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"
New Delhi: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday once again claimed that US President Donald Trump has ended the military conflict between India and Pakistan. "The President is using the might of American strength to demand that respect from our allies, our friends, our adversaries all around the world," Leavitt said at a press briefing. She said that it was seen not only in the progress with Russia and Ukraine but also "in the closing of seven global conflicts around the world." "We've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war if we had not had a President who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the President of the United States of America," Leavitt said. In an answer to another question, Leavitt said that Trump used trade "in a very powerful way as leverage" to bring the India-Pakistan conflict to an end. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over 40 times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in Parliament that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. Meanwhile, replying to one more question, Leavitt said that Trump has imposed sanctions on India to bring an end to the Russia-Ukraine war. "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end," she added. Earlier in an interview to CNBC, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also accused India of "profiteering" by reselling Russian oil. US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs totalling 50 per cent on India including 25 per cent for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil that will come into effect from August 27. India has called the tariffs "unjustified and unreasonable". India said that, like any major economy, it will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'
NEW DELHI: Cabinet on Tuesday approved a bill that seeks to ban "online money game", where users pay a fee or deposit money, proposing a maximum three years in jail or fine of up to Rs 1 crore for those involved in offering, encouraging or inducing players to participate, which also extends to banks facilitating these transactions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which will be introduced in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, seeks to promote e-sports and online social games where no money is involved. A regulator body is planned to oversee the functioning of the sector, sources told TOI. The proposed legislation defines "online money game" as an online game played by a user by paying fees, depositing money or other stakes in expectation of winning. 2 years' jail, ₹50L fine likely for those advertising online games Online social games have been defined as those that don't involve exchange of money, although users may be allowed to pay a subscription or one-time access fee. Govt has proposed the new law considering unregulated online money gaming platforms pose threats to national and economic security as they use digital wallets and cryptocurrencies for money laundering and illicit money transfer, cross-border data flows without compliance of data protection law, sources said. Moreover, offshore entities are seen to be circumventing tax and legal obligations. The proposed legislation also assumes significance as online money gaming poses serious concerns, including addiction among children and youth, mental health issues, financial losses leading to suicides and lack of uniform regulation across states. Law enforcing agencies face problems in tracking and regulating these platforms, particularly those hosted or operated from outside India. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sources said the govt proposes penalties of up to two years in jail or with a maximum fine of Rs 50 lakh or both for any entity advertising such games in media. For those offering online money games and banks engaged in transactions face violations of the proposed law will be "cognisable and non-bailable" offences. Every subsequent violation after conviction would attract penalties of at least three years' jail and fine of Rs 10-20 lakh. In the case of advertisers, such penalties would be 2-3 years in jail and fine of Rs 5-10 lakh. The bill proposes to hold senior executives of the companies liable, if it's established that the offences have been committed with the consent or connivance or due to their neglect. It also proposes blocking of platforms and money gaming services, if the entities or individuals fail to comply with the law. According to the proposal, the bill seeks to encourage Indian startups to build culturally relevant content, reduce dependence on foreign platforms and promote self-reliance in the digital gaming ecosystem.
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Operation Sindoor a military success, tech breakthrough, political message all rolled into one: NCERT's new module
THE PAHALHAM attack was 'directly ordered by Pakistan's military and political leadership', and the Indian Air Force 'took out command and control centres, radars, surface-to-air guided weapons, runways, and hangars with aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, breaching Pakistan's air defence and 'creating visible gaps that the world saw', according to the NCERT's new module on Operation Sindoor for school students. It refers to Operation Sindoor as a 'military success, a technological breakthrough, and a political message all rolled into one'. Two modules have been released – one for the preparatory (classes 3 to 5) and middle stage (classes 6 to 8), and another for the secondary stage (classes 9 to 12). The NCERT's modules – separate from the textbooks — are short publications on specific topics that schools can use as an additional resource. In the form of a conversation between the teacher and students, the module for the secondary stage – 'Operation Sindoor – A Mission of Honour and Bravery' – states that since Independence, Pakistan 'has often tried to disturb peace in India – sometimes through war, and at other times, through terrorism'. In 2019, Article 370 was abrogated, paving the way for development in Jammu and Kashmir, including improved infrastructure, upgraded schools, and direct rail links connecting the region more closely with the rest of India, the module says, adding: '…by 2023, Kashmir saw the highest number of tourists ever. People were living in peace. But unfortunately, Pakistan was not ready to accept this progress.' 'After years of calm', in April 2025, terrorists attacked tourists in Pahalgam, killing 26 innocent people. The terrorists' 'goal' was to create fear and religious tension, going by the module, and Operation Sindoor was a 'strong and clear response to that cowardly attack.' Before it goes into Operation Sindoor, the module features a section on the 2019 Pulwama attack, and India's response in the form of the Balakot air strike. It specifies that India chose to target terrorist camps, not civilian areas. On the Pahalgam attack, the module states: 'TRF (The Resistance Front) first claimed responsibility, then denied it four days later. But India's National Investigation Agency confirmed the group was behind it— with solid evidence and eyewitness accounts. Indian agencies found that the attack was a well-planned conspiracy led by Pakistan's ISI and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). It was directly ordered by Pakistan's military and political leadership.' In addition to the details of Operation Sindoor, the module refers to 'a coordinated and extensive exercise' taken to 'reach out diplomatically by our missions abroad.' Pointing to Operating Sindoor as a strategic move that 'told the world – India will protect its people and values' and 'restored faith in our armed forces and reassured citizens that justice would not be delayed', the module refers to the Indian Armed Forces' planning – pinpointing terrorist infrastructure, choosing the right weapons for precision strikes, setting the date and time for the attack, and strategically moving naval assets forward. The armed forces were directed to identify multiple targets related to terrorism, minimise civilian casualties, and gather evidence after the strike. The nine targets that were attacked were directly linked to terror networks threatening India, it states. Pakistan then resorted to ceasefire violations all along the Line of Control, and 'escalated the conflict by attacking our bases, logistic nodes, forward posts all along the Line of Control and Army formation headquarters – some using Unmanned Aerial Systems, or UAS'. The module refers to India's defence systems: 'Our integrated air defence grid and Counter-UAS grid were already in place. These systems—like the S-400, MRSAM, AKASH, and traditional air defence guns—proved highly effective. Along with legacy platforms like Pechora, L-70, ZU-23 and OSA-AK, we created a layered defence.' On May 8, India targeted select Pakistani air defence systems and sensor networks using precision air launched munitions, and 'it was a calibrated response—sending a strong message while avoiding civilian population.' Pakistan's ceasefire violations continued on May 9, and they intensified attacks not only on military sites, but also schools, religious places, and civilian infrastructure, killing 14 Indian civilians, it added. The Indian army 'neutralized 35-40 Pakistani Army personnel.' In another attack on May 10, Pakistan targeted Indian Air Force bases, army ammo depots and cantonments, but 'not one critical Indian asset was damaged.' 'The Indian Air Force took out command and control centres, radars, surface-to-air guided weapons, runways and hangars with aircrafts. The response shook Pakistani establishment as our airstrike breached their air defence, creating visible gaps that the world saw,' the module reads. It also refers to the Indian Navy's contribution in asserting maritime dominance by deploying its Carrier Battle Group 'with Integral MiG-29K fighter jets, early warning helicopters, and surveillance systems in the North Arabian Sea, to protect Indian maritime interest and prevent any misadventure by Pakistan in the maritime domain.' Pointing to the use of Indian-made systems, the module states that Operation Sindoor was a symbol of technological self-reliance. '…it also shows we don't depend on foreign tech anymore. We are building our own systems, and they're actually working when it counts,' it added.
