logo
Rahul vs Himanta: I will send you to jail; you are out on bail

Rahul vs Himanta: I will send you to jail; you are out on bail

India Today2 days ago
Few rivalries in Indian politics have flipped so dramatically, or so publicly, as the one between Rahul Gandhi and Himanta Biswa Sarma. A decade ago, Rahul, then Congress vice-president and heir to the Nehru-Gandhi legacy, hardly acknowledged Sarma despite his status as the party's most influential leader in Assam.In nearly every visit to Assam over the past few years, Rahul, now leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has taken a pointed aim at Sarma, the state's chief minister and a rising national figure in the BJP. On July 16, at a rally at Chaygaon, Assam, Rahul hardly bothered to conceal that his campaign in Assam revolves around unseating one man.advertisement'Your chief minister thinks of himself as the king of Assam,' he thundered, accusing Sarma of looting public resources and selling Assam's land to corporate cronies. Rahul then issued a dramatic promise to the crowd: 'One day the lions of Congress will catch him Your CM will be in jail after some time, and neither [Narendra] Modi nor Amit Shah will be able to save him.'Sarma, never the one to let a punch go unanswered, hit back on X: 'Rahul Gandhi has come all the way just to issue a threat, conveniently forgetting that he himself was out on bail in multiple criminal cases.'
Then came the backhand compliment: 'He mentioned my name repeatedly in all his meetings. I must thank him. He has elevated my stature far beyond what I could've achieved by staying in the Congress.' It was a classic Sarma flourish—turning Rahul's attacks into validation of his own clout.A decade ago, Sarma was a sidelined Congress leader, denied chief ministership despite commanding the support of 54 of 78 Congress MLAs in Assam. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, an observer then, recorded the numbers and Sonia Gandhi, according to multiple accounts, conceded that 'Sarma had a clear majority and should be the new CM'.But Rahul intervened saying that there would be no change in leadership. When it was pointed out that Sarma might exit the party, Rahul said, 'Let him go'. In an ironical twist, the same Kharge, now Congress president, stands beside Rahul on the same stage, urging Sarma to start 'renovating prisons' for his future lodgings.In 2015, Sarma joined the BJP. He did not just switch parties, he systematically dismantled the Congress edifice he had helped build over two decades. His intimate knowledge of the party's workings, combined with his extensive network across the Northeast, made him the BJP's most potent weapon in a region where the saffron party had historically struggled.The recent exchanges between Rahul and Sarma represent far more than routine political mudslinging. It marks the culmination of a personal conflict that has fundamentally altered the political geography of the Northeast, a transformation that began with a plate of biscuits and a dog named Pidi.advertisementIn one now-famous anecdote recounted by Sarma, Rahul once summoned Assam's Congress leaders to discuss urgent state matters, only to spend the meeting playing with his pet dog, Pidi, and feeding it biscuits while the politicians waited to be heard. Sarma often recalls that encounter in public, describing Rahul's attitude as a 'servant-master relationship' wherein courtiers are expected to quietly endure royal whims.Sarma's revelation about another meeting where Rahul responded to every issue with 'So What?' more than 50 times in 20 minutes paints a picture of a relationship defined by contempt on one side and growing resentment on the other.The personal animus between Rahul and his one-time junior has only grown with time, and often in public view. Once freed from the Congress's decorous restraint, Sarma turned into one of Rahul's most unrelenting critics, frequently launching barbed attacks on the Gandhi scion. When Rahul posted about his dog on social media in 2017, Sarma couldn't resist responding: 'Sir @OfficeOfRG, who knows him better than me. Still remember you busy feeding biscuits 2 him while we wanted to discuss urgent Assam's issues.'Over time, Sarma's taunts grew more personal, less restrained and even crude. He has mocked Rahul's credentials, intelligence and even his lineage. In early 2022, at a rally in Uttarakhand, responding to Rahul's insistence on proof for the Indian Army's surgical strike inside Pakistan in 2016, Sarma sneered, 'Did we ever ask you for proof of whether you are Rajiv Gandhi's son or not? What right do you have to demand proof from my Army?'advertisementFor years after Sarma's departure, Rahul chose not to engage publicly with his former lieutenant, avoiding any descent into political mudslinging. He often dismissed Sarma as a turncoat driven by power, someone who had betrayed his party for office. Rahul has even suggested he was 'perfectly okay' with people like Sarma leaving the Congress, arguing that 'Sarma represents a corrupt of politics that is not Congress' politics'. Citing Sarma's penchant for communally charged statements, Rahul implied that losing such individuals was addition by subtraction for the Congress's values.Even Sarma framed his departure in ideological terms. He portrays Rahul as the epitome of all that was wrong with the Congress: entitlement, indifference and incompetence. His reminiscences of Rahul's dog and the biscuit and jibes about a 'master-servant' culture are meant to underscore that the Congress under Rahul was a feudal family firm where merit had no place.advertisementBy continually poking at Rahul, Sarma keeps alive the narrative that he is everything Rahul is not: grounded, hardworking, aggressive in pursuing his state's interests and unafraid to take the fight to much bigger opponents.BJP supporters cheer Sarma's caustic put-downs of Rahul, the dynasty's prince, for it reinforces their belief that the once unchallenged Gandhis can be humbled by a self-made regional leader. Sarma's very presence in the BJP is a talking point to woo other Congress leaders: it says, join us and you too can eclipse the Gandhis.This simmering feud has lately entered a new phase, one that sees Rahul and Sarma face off almost as equals. Rahul may be a national figure and scion of India's most famous political family while Sarma is 'only' a chief minister of a far-flung state. But in their mutual crosshairs, they appear to recognise in each other a prime political antagonist. The indifferent boss and the disgruntled underling have transformed into combative rivals each determined to best the other.In January 2024, during the Assam leg of his Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra, Rahul called Sarma 'the most corrupt chief minister in India' and alleged that 'every member of his family, children, wife, and he himself, is involved in corruption'. Sarma hit back, calling the remark 'below the belt' and denouncing the dragnet attack on his children—both students with no political role—as deeply inappropriate. With characteristic bite, he added: 'Rahul Gandhi once feared me. Now he fears my son.'advertisementAnd now, the July 16 confrontation represents a remarkable evolution in this relationship. No longer is this a story of an indifferent boss and disgruntled subordinate. Rahul positions the campaign against Sarma as something of a moral crusade, to save Assam from a 'raja' (king) who has betrayed the public trust and will eventually face justice at the hands of the people. This shows that the Congress leader has finally recognised his former party junior as a formidable opponent worthy of sustained attack.From a barely noticed snub in a drawing room to thunderous threats from rally stages, the journey of this rivalry is a story of pride and power, of a relationship soured and then set ablaze. And as the barbs about 'jail' and 'bail' fly, one thing is certain: neither man is likely to back down.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is India not falling into the trap of Russia and China..., taking cautious steps while joining RIC because...
Why is India not falling into the trap of Russia and China..., taking cautious steps while joining RIC because...

India.com

time13 minutes ago

  • India.com

Why is India not falling into the trap of Russia and China..., taking cautious steps while joining RIC because...

Why is India not falling into the trap of Russia and China..., taking cautious steps while joining RIC because… New Delhi: The trilateral forum between Russia, India, and China (RIC) has become the talk of the town in recent days. Moscow is trying to restart the forum, as China has also given its consent. Now, India has to decide. The Indian Foreign Ministry has been very cautious in its statements on this issue. The question arising is: why is New Delhi cautious about forming a trio with Beijing and Moscow, as it already has good bilateral relations with Russia? However, it is not as easy as it looks. Retired Indian diplomat Prabhu Dayal, in his article in Firstpost, stated that the RIC structure has been largely inactive in recent years, and the reason for this is military tension and mistrust between India and China. 'Cold War' Continues India And China Dayal said even after recent agreements, tension will remain on the India-China border. It is to be noted that after the Galwan clash of 2020, the relation of India and China deteriorated further and the situation on the India-China border remains complex. Additionally, the increasing infrastructure development near the border by China is further increasing escalating the tensions. Earlier this year, Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi stated that India will not reduce the number of soldiers deployed on the Line of Actual Control. Years Old Dispute Notably, the India-China conflict has deep historical roots. China's long-time challenge to India's sovereignty over Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh, including its depiction of Aksai Chin as Chinese territory on official maps and its renaming of Arunachal Pradesh as 'Jangnan,' has further escalated the tension. Additionally, China's strategic alliance with Pakistan, which includes military and intelligence support, has just intensified existing tensions, creating a major geopolitical rift between India and China. Support Of Pakistan On International Forums After the Pahalgam terror attack, China provided arms and ammunition to Pakistan like – PL-15 air-to-air missiles. During the recent clashes Beijing also provided air defence and satellite support to Islamabad. Not only that China has always backed Pakistan on the issue of terrorism at international forums such as the United Nations, blocking India's efforts. China vetoed India's UN Security Council resolution to designate five Pakistani individuals as terrorists responsible for attacks on India. India's cautious stance toward China stems from a historical perspective and concerns about China's actions and goals.

Trumps Five Jets Remark Sparks Political Row in India; Rahul Gandhi Demands Clarity, BJP Hits Back
Trumps Five Jets Remark Sparks Political Row in India; Rahul Gandhi Demands Clarity, BJP Hits Back

India.com

time13 minutes ago

  • India.com

Trumps Five Jets Remark Sparks Political Row in India; Rahul Gandhi Demands Clarity, BJP Hits Back

New Delhi: A political clash has erupted in India following US President Donald Trump's ambiguous remarks about five jets being downed during Operation Sindoor, India's military response to the April Pahalgam terror attack. The comment has prompted Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi to demand an explanation from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while the BJP has accused him of harboring a "traitor's mentality." Trump, speaking at a private dinner on Friday, claimed that five fighter jets were shot down during the operation but did not specify whether the aircraft belonged to India or Pakistan. "Planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually," Trump said. Operation Sindoor was launched by India to strike terror infrastructure across nine locations in Pakistan. These included key sites like the Jaish-e-Mohammed headquarters in Bahawalpur and Lashkar-e-Taiba's base in Muridke. In the aftermath, Pakistan claimed it had shot down multiple Indian jets — including three Rafale fighters, which are among the most advanced aircraft in the Indian Air Force. India acknowledged some losses during the operation but has not disclosed a specific figure. Instead, it emphasized the strategic lessons learned from the mission. "What is important is that, not the jet being down, but why they were being down," said India's Chief of Defence Staff, General Anil Chauhan, while firmly denying Pakistan's assertion that six Indian jets were shot down. He added, "The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and fly all our jets again, targeting at long range." Following Trump's comments, Rahul Gandhi took to Twitter (X) on Saturday, sharing the video and demanding answers from the Prime Minister. "Modi ji, what is the truth behind the five jets? The country has a right to know," he wrote in Hindi. — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) July 19, 2025 Responding sharply, BJP leader Amit Malviya pointed out that Trump had not specified the nationality of the jets and accused Rahul Gandhi of aligning with Pakistan's narrative. "Rahul Gandhi's mentality is that of a traitor. In his statement, Trump neither took the name of India nor said that those five planes belonged to India. Then why did the prince of Congress accept him as belonging to India? Why did he not accept him as belonging to Pakistan? Does he sympathise more with Pakistan than his own country?" Malviya wrote in a post on X in Hindi. He continued, "The truth is that Pakistan has not yet recovered from Operation Sindoor... but Rahul Gandhi is in pain! Whenever the country's army teaches a lesson to the enemy, Congress gets irritated. Anti-India sentiment is no longer a habit of Congress; it has become its identity. Rahul Gandhi should make it clear - is he an Indian or a spokesperson of Pakistan?"

Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma & WB counterpart Mamata Banerjee engage in a bitter verbal volley over infiltration, identity & language
Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma & WB counterpart Mamata Banerjee engage in a bitter verbal volley over infiltration, identity & language

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma & WB counterpart Mamata Banerjee engage in a bitter verbal volley over infiltration, identity & language

A dispute has erupted between Assam's chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and West Bengal's chief minister Mamata Banerjee. The conflict centers on Bengali speakers, identity, and demographic shifts in Assam. Banerjee criticized Assam's stance on language rights. Sarma defended Assam's actions, citing concerns about illegal immigration and demographic changes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Guwahati: Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and West Bengal counterpart Mamata Banerjee are engaged in a bitter verbal volley over the Bengali speaking, identity and demographic stated in X, 'The second most spoken language in the country, Bangla, is also the second most spoken language of Assam. To threaten citizens, who want to coexist peacefully respecting all languages and religions, with persecution for upholding their own mother tongue is discriminatory and unconstitutional. This divisive agenda of the BJP in Assam has crossed all limits and people of Assam will fight back. I stand with every fearless citizen who is fighting for the dignity of their language and identity, and their democratic rights.'Sarma replied, 'In Assam, we are not fighting our own people. We are fearlessly resisting the ongoing, unchecked Muslim infiltration from across the border, which has already caused an alarming demographic shift. In several districts, Hindus are now on the verge of becoming a minority in their own land. This is not a political narrative—it's a reality. Even the Supreme Court of India has termed such infiltration as external aggression. And yet, when we rise to defend our land, culture, and identity, you choose to politicize it. 'He continued, 'We do not divide people by language or religion. Assamese, Bangla, Bodo, Hindi—all languages and communities have coexisted here. But no civilisation can survive if it refuses to protect its borders and its cultural foundation. While we are acting decisively to preserve Assam's identity, you, Didi, have compromised Bengal's future—encouraging illegal encroachment by a particular community, appeasing one religious community for vote banks, and remaining silent as border infiltration eats away at national integrity—all just to stay in power. Assam will continue to fight to preserve its heritage, its dignity, and its people—with courage and constitutional clarity'.Controversy started earlier this month when Sarma said that Assamese is the state language and there cannot be blackmail to it. He said that threats by some minority organizations that they will not write Assamese as their mother tongue in the census will only quantify the number of Bodoland Territorial Council Minority Students Union (ABMSU) threatened to replace language in the census. He threatened to replace Assamese with Bengali following the state government's eviction drive in had said, "Language cannot be used as a tool for blackmail. In Assam, Assamese is permanent — both as the state and official language. However, if they write Bengali in electoral rolls or census, it will only quantify the number of foreigners in the state.'ABMSU leader Mainuddin Ali said that Bengali-speaking Muslims would now choose to write Bengali — not Assamese — in public declarations, claiming that Assamese would no longer remain a majority language. All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) affiliated workers' union, the Indian National Trinamool Trade Union Congress (INTTUC), staged a protest march against the National Register of Citizens(NRC) in Siliguri, condemning the alleged harassment and pushback of migrant Bengali-speaking individuals from several BJP-ruled comprise 34% of the 3.12 crore population of Assam, of which 4% are indigenous Assamese Muslims and the remaining are mostly Bengali- speaking Muslims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store