China's textile exports stay strong despite falling US orders
Breaking it down, clothing exports dipped by 0.2% to $73.5 billion, while textile exports rose by 1.8% to $70.52 billion. However, data from the China National Textile and Apparel Council (CNTAC) shows more variation when viewed month by month.
In March, American buyers rushed to place early orders in anticipation of potential tariffs. This led to a 16.5% jump in textile exports and a 9.3% increase in clothing exports. The Trump administration formally announced the new tariffs on April 2.
By April, clothing exports had slipped 0.5% year-over-year, while textile exports rose 3.4%. The half-year closed with a 1.1% increase in clothing exports and a 1.6% decline in textiles in June.
Between April and May, Chinese textile and clothing exports to the U.S. fell by 20%. However, stronger demand from the European Union, Japan and South Korea helped balance out the losses.
This article is an automatic translation. Click here to read the original article.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines moved after Russian 'provocative' comments
01:46 02/08/2025 'Trump is tightening his grip on American economic policy and institutions' Americas 01/08/2025 Trump Tariffs : US President Donald Trump grants Mexico 90-day reprieve Americas 01/08/2025 US tariffs on India: A changing tide in their partnership? Americas 01/08/2025 El Salvador's parliament approves reform to allow Bukele to run indefinitely Americas 01/08/2025 D-Day for Trump's tariffs: 'A complete rewiring of the global trade system' Americas 01/08/2025 US President Donald Trump hits dozens of countries with steep duties Americas 01/08/2025 MAGA global shakedown: Facing tariffs, sanctions, Lula now stands 'good chance of getting reelected' Americas 31/07/2025 Trump slaps 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports over Bolsonaro trial Americas
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump fires jobs statistics chief after dismal employment report
US President Donald Trump fired the head of the government agency in charge of monthly jobs data after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported. In a post on his social media platform, Trump alleged that the figures by the Bureau of Labor Statistics were manipulated for political reasons, saying Erika McEntarfer, the director of the agency who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, should be fired. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' The US leader later posted: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' While Trump provided no evidence, the charge that the data was faked was seen as explosive action that threatens to undercut the political legitimacy of the US government's economic data. Economists and Wall Street investors have for decades generally accepted the data as free from political bias. McEntarfer's removal condemned After Trump's initial post, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS,' Chavez-DeRemer said. But condemnation soon followed. A group that included two former BLS commissioners, including William Beach, who was appointed by Trump to the position, berated McEntarfer's firing. They particularly objected to the charge that the data was altered for political reasons. 'This rationale for firing Dr. McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers,' the statement from the group, the Friends of BLS, said. In addition to Beach, the statement was signed by Erica Groshen, BLS commissioner under former President Barack Obama. 'Firing the Commissioner ... when the BLS revises jobs numbers down (as it routinely does) threatens to destroy trust in core American institutions and all government statistics,' Arin Dube, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, said on X. 'I can't stress how damaging this is.' Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated. The report suggested that the economy has sharply weakened during Trump's tenure, a pattern consistent with a slowdown in economic growth during the first half of the year and an increase in inflation during June that appeared to reflect the price pressures created by the president's tariffs. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate job numbers,' Trump wrote. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate; they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Trump has not always been so suspicious of the monthly jobs report and responded enthusiastically after the initial May figures came out on June 6, when it was initially reported that the economy added 139,000 jobs. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG!' Trump posted at the time. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, before the most recent revision down to just 19,000.
LeMonde
8 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU artificial intelligence regulation takes effect, sparking new Europe-US clash
Despite provoking the ire of the Trump administration and many large companies on both sides of the Atlantic, European legislation affecting the tech sector has continued to move forward − for now. This is the case with the regulation on artificial intelligence (AI), some of whose central provisions take effect on Saturday, August 2, a little more than one year after the final adoption of the bill – one of the world's most ambitious in this field. This applies in particular to the governance component; the 27 member states must inform the European Commission about which national authorities will be responsible for ensuring the proper enforcement of the rules. Service providers will therefore be subject to closer scrutiny – though that remains mostly theoretical in some member states, which have yet to designate the relevant bodies. In France, the Directorate General for Competition Policy, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control, the French Data Protection Authority, and the Defender of Rights have been chosen for this role.
