
Trespassing Tradition: How ISKCON's Parallel Jagannath Yatra Risks Diluting India's Sacred Heritage
At stake is not simply a question of which date a ritual is performed, but who gets to define and control cultural and liturgical grammar of one of India's oldest living traditions
Gajapati Maharaja Dibyasingha Deb, the hereditary head and ceremonial servitor of Hindu deity Jagannath in Odisha's Puri, issued a formally worded letter expressing deep concern to ISKCON's global leadership on June 15.
The message was unequivocal: temples affiliated with the organisation are increasingly conducting Snana-yatra and Ratha-yatra festivals of Jagannath on dates directly contravening those laid down in sacred scripture, and have been traditionally honoured in Puri for centuries.
This was not a minor calendrical disagreement, but a misappropriation and breach of the cultural and heritage integrity of Jagannath. The closest analogy of this would be that a Chinese company tomorrow decides to celebrate Christmas in summer because it is convenient.
This cultural and religious misappropriation will continue if we don't grant protection — the legal kind — to assets such as Jagannath yatra. This requires a policy shift to recognise it and give it GI (geographical identification) protection as a cultural asset.
The letter may appear to be an internal dispute between two branches of Vaishnavism. But read more closely, it reveals a deeper anxiety – one that touches the heart of India's spiritual and cultural sovereignty. At stake is not simply the question of which date a ritual is performed, but who gets to define and control the cultural and liturgical grammar of one of India's oldest living traditions.
When a global institution like ISKCON, with temples in over 150 countries, celebrates these key festivals independently of the Puri calendar – sometimes weeks earlier or in different months – it doesn't just introduce confusion. It subtly creates a parallel universe of legitimacy that dilutes the sanctity and singularity of the original tradition rooted in Odisha.
To understand why this is so significant, one must revisit the origins and structure of these festivals. The Snana-yatra (ceremonial bathing festival) and Ratha-yatra (chariot procession) of Jagannath are not just festivals – they are deeply codified rituals mentioned in several ancient texts, including the Skanda Purana, Padma Purana, and Brahma Purana.
According to these scriptures, Snana-yatra is to be performed on Jyeshtha Purnima, which was on June 11. The Ratha-yatra begins on the Asadha Shukla Dwitiya – June 27 this year – and culminates on Dashami Tithi or July 5, after the Bahuda-yatra (return journey). They have been practiced as such on these dates for years.
These dates are not arbitrary, but based on the lunar calendar and cosmological alignments scrupulously maintained in Puri for centuries. More than a million followers gather each year to witness the deities of Jagannath, Balabhadra, and Subhadra ride three massive chariots from the Jagannath temple to Gundicha temple in a grand and spiritually charged procession.
This is not merely symbolic; it is one of the most ancient and vibrant public rituals in India's religious life, forming a key part of the country's intangible cultural heritage, as recognised by the culture ministry and international organisations like UNESCO.
Yet, ISKCON, possibly to make the festival globally accessible, has chosen to perform Ratha-yatra on other dates. While inclusivity and global devotion are laudable goals, they do not grant licence to sever sacred tradition from its roots. In doing so, it may be unwittingly engaging in a form of spiritual franchising – taking the symbols, names, and outer rituals of Jagannath worship while ignoring the particular, scripturally sanctioned contexts in which these festivals are meant to be celebrated.
The Gajapati Maharaja's intervention is, therefore, more than a defence of temple authority; it reveals an enormous gap in our cultural policy structure, which allows appropriation and control to be taken away by any organisation anywhere in the world. It's not just important to preserve the ritual coherence and historical ownership of this sacred tradition but also identify and recognise other such misappropriations.
The chariot festivals of Jagannath have been stewarded for centuries by a complex ecosystem: the temple priests (daitapatis), the king as adya sevaka, the calendar scholars (panchangis), and a social consensus that ensures the tradition survives unbroken from generation to generation. Performing these festivals on unauthorised dates, without alignment with the anasara period (when the deities rest after the snana-yatra) or the auspicious lunar tithis, is not merely a deviation – it constitutes a disruption itself.
This misalignment cannot be dismissed as mere administrative flexibility. It echoes a pattern seen in colonial interventions where indigenous rituals were reinterpreted or reorganised for the benefit of external audiences, often leading to cultural misappropriation.
When ISKCON holds a ratha-yatra weeks ahead of the Puri yatra, it not only fractures devotional attention but also risks establishing a separate, unsanctioned lineage of Jagannath worship. Over time, this could dilute the spiritual primacy of the Puri tradition and confuse the global understanding of what the ratha-yatra represents.
This is not a mere question of orthodoxy versus reform. It is about the difference between rootedness and reproduction. Just as celebrating Diwali in April or performing Holi during the monsoon would ring hollow, conducting Jagannath's snana-yatra or ratha-yatra out of sequence, and disconnected from the mother tradition in Puri, renders the ritual a simulacrum – a surface spectacle lacking its spiritual depth.
The warning issued by Gajapati Maharaja Dibyasingha Deb, and echoed by scholars at the March 2025 conference in Bhubaneswar, must be taken seriously. As reported by the Times of India, they concluded that the performance of these sacred yatras outside the nine-day window between June 27 and July 5 – and without observing the necessary antecedents such as the anasara period – is a violation of 'ancient, well-established tradition".
The risk here is not that ISKCON will 'take over" Jagannath worship. The danger is subtler: that by operating without deference to the Puri canon, it unintentionally creates a global version of Jagannath worship, which is slowly decoupled from the very soil, time, and ritual infrastructure that makes it sacred.
Devotion does not require distortion. If ISKCON's aim is to honour Jagannath, it must also honour the tradition that made the deity known to the world. The sacred is not scalable in the way software is. It demands fidelity to time, to tradition, and to the keepers of memory who have sustained it for over a thousand years.
top videos
View all
In an age where cultural icons can be copied, rebranded, and globalised with ease, the call from Puri is not for exclusivity but for integrity. Jagannath, the Lord of the Universe, deserves nothing less than the truth of the time and place. Anything else is not homage, it is erasure.
(K Yatish Rajawat is a public policy researcher and works at the Gurgaon-based think tank Centre for Innovation in Public Policy (CIPP). Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views)
First Published:
June 16, 2025, 21:06 IST
News opinion Opinion | Trespassing Tradition: How ISKCON's Parallel Jagannath Yatra Risks Diluting India's Sacred Heritage
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Construction of 130-km alternative road to DBO outpost in Ladakh reaches final stages
Representational Image NEW DELHI: The new alternative 130-km road to the country's strategically located Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO) military outpost in eastern Ladakh is now in the final stages of construction in the forbidding high-altitude region, with the entire stretch likely to be fully operational by Oct-Nov next year. The Border Roads Organisation (BRO) has been working hard to complete this much-needed alternative road to the crucial sector - which includes Depsang Plains where Indian and Chinese troops disengaged in Oct last year - from Sasoma in the Nubra Valley through Saser Brangsa to the DBO outpost, as reported by TOI earlier. DBO, which includes an advance landing ground (ALG) at an altitude of 16,614 feet, overlooks the Karakoram Pass and is just a few km from the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and the China-occupied Aksai Chin region. All connectivity work from Sasoma to Saser Brangsa on the new road, including black-topping, and around 60%-70% of it eastwards towards Murgo and Gapshan has been completed by BRO, said sources. "Some heavy military equipment, including artillery guns like Bofors, have been moved on the completed stretches to test their load-carrying capacity. The entire 130-km road (Sasoma-Saser La-Saser Brangsa-Gapshan-DBO) should be ready by Oct-Nov 2026," a source said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo It will enhance the capacity to move soldiers, weapons and logistics faster to the frontier. A seven-km tunnel under Saser La (La means pass), which is at an altitude of 17,660 feet, is also planned for all-weather connectivity. The People's Liberation Army will not be able to easily track military movements on the new road, unlike the existing 255-km Darbuk-Shyok-DBO road that runs almost parallel to the LAC before ending around 20 km short of the Karakoram Pass. India had stepped-up the construction of the new 130-km road in the backdrop of the military confrontation with China.


Deccan Herald
4 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
More opposition MPs in touch with BJP; 'our tally will rise soon', claims Maharashtra minister
In an interview with Saamana'' executive editor Sanjay Raut, Uddhav has stated that Thackeray is not just a brand, but an identity of Maharashtra, Marathi manoos and Hindu pride.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
Trump-Xi meet likely in Shanghai or on the sidelines of Apec summit in South Korea: Report
This month, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met face-to-face, a step toward a potential leaders' summit. read more The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit in South Korea, set for October 30 to November 1, offers a key opportunity for Chinese President Xi Jinping and his US counterpart Donald Trump to meet, South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported, citing sources. Trump might visit China beforehand or meet Xi on the sidelines of the Apec event in Gyeongju, where Xi plans to attend, though Trump's participation is unconfirmed, the Hong Kong based outlet reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This month, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met face-to-face, a step toward a potential leaders' summit. Last month, Xi invited Trump and his wife to China, an invitation Trump reciprocated. Rubio noted a 'strong desire on both sides' for a presidents' meeting. US-China relations have been rocky since Trump's January return to the White House, as the US leader issued threats of imposing 145 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods. Both sides have since worked on stabilising ties, reaching a preliminary trade deal easing China's rare-earth export restrictions and US technology trade barriers. Analysts suggest a pre-Apec meeting in China, possibly in Shanghai, is likely to differentiate from Trump's 2017 Beijing visit. Diao Daming of Renmin University was quoted by SCMP as saying: 'Under favourable conditions and an appropriate atmosphere, any form of interaction between the two leaders will aid in the stabilisation and development of US-China relations.' Bonnie Glaser of the German Marshall Fund noted that China sees a summit as stabilising. 'They maintain that a leaders' meeting could create greater stability in the relationship,' she said, adding it could allow Xi to push for eased technology restrictions and the US reaffirmation against Taiwan independence. Beijing views Taiwan as its territory, to be reunited if necessary by force. The US, while not recognising Taiwan's independence, opposes forceful takeover and is obligated to arm Taiwan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sun Chenghao of Tsinghua University said a summit could break deadlocks on issues like fentanyl and tariffs: 'If certain issues can be clarified directly through a summit between the two leaders, I believe we could see relatively swift breakthroughs in specific areas of US-China relations.' Chen Qi of Tsinghua added: 'Both sides are indeed working to create a conducive atmosphere for a meeting.' Cooperation on trade and export controls could foster positive interactions. Observers note that Trump's greater eagerness gives Beijing leverage. 'It's up to China. Trump would be on a plane to Beijing tomorrow if he could,' said Jeremy Chan of Eurasia Group. 'China is very protocol driven and wants all agreements lined up well in advance while Trump would be happy to hash it all out over a Big Mac.' However, Taiwan or hawkish US actions could derail plans. 'The summit will be well telegraphed in advance,' Chan said. 'But all it would take would be one slip up along the way to derail the whole thing.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD