Star Trek: Strange New Worlds EPs Tease Spock and Chapel's Future — Does He Have a New Love Interest?
Spock's heart was shattered — if Vulcan hearts can even shatter, that is — this week on Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. But a fellow Enterprise crew member may be about to mend that heart.
More from TVLine
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds EP Breaks Down Pike's Emotional Struggle in Premiere: 'It's an Opportunity for Him to Dig Deeper'
It's Official: Samuel L. Jackson to Star in Tulsa King Spinoff NOLA King at Paramount+ - See First Photo
Evil Cast, Creators Still 'Sit Around and Talk About It Endlessly,' Aasif Mandvi Says - See Reunion Photo
In Season 3's second episode (which hit Paramount+ on Thursday), Spock was excited to welcome Chapel back after her fellowship, but she didn't return alone: She was accompanied by her dashing new boyfriend, Dr. Roger Korby, played by Cillian O'Sullivan. Spock had trouble processing her new romance — it's not logical! — but after a mischievous alien created an alternate reality where Spock and Chapel were about to be married, Spock realized it wasn't right and did the noble thing, reuniting her with Korby.
So now that they're no longer a romantic item, what's next for Spock and Chapel as shipmates? 'They will have to interact,' executive producer Henry Alonso Myers tells TVLine, and 'that interaction will be dramatic, no matter what… We promise you that those great dramatic and comic scenes between them will continue on. Just because we end that particular romantic part of their relationship doesn't mean that there aren't future interesting parts of the relationship that you're gonna run right into the face of.'
Spock and Chapel have 'a very complex relationship that they don't always spend enough time talking about,' Myers points out, 'and that's part of the challenge that they run into.' Fellow EP Akiva Goldsman adds that 'we love the characters [of Spock and Chapel], and so they're going through a thing, you know. It's hard.'
What might make it easier, though, is a new romantic prospect for Spock, and we saw some hints of that in his interactions with security officer La'an in Episode 2. (We're not the only ones who felt a vibe from those dance lessons, right?) Spock and La'an's connection is 'more casual, and more grown-up,' Myers notes. 'They come into it very much like adults who appreciate what they have to offer each other. They're friends first, I would say.' But maybe not just friends in the end, we're thinking.
Are you liking the idea of Spock and La'an together? Or are you still holding out hope for a rekindling with Chapel? Beam down to the comments to give us your thoughts.
Best of TVLine
Yellowjackets' Tawny Cypress Talks Episode 4's Tai/Van Reunion: 'We're All Worried About Taissa'
Vampire Diaries Turns 10: How Real-Life Plot Twists Shaped Everything From the Love Triangle to the Final Death
Vampire Diaries' Biggest Twists Revisited (and Explained)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Smurfs' Review: Rihanna and James Corden Lead All-Star Voice Cast in a Reboot That Chooses Chaos Over Charm
It's been eight years since the last theatrical Smurfs movie, and you know what that means. A whole new crop of very young children are primed to experience their favorite animated characters on the big screen. Unfortunately, what they're getting is Paramount's new reboot featuring the sort of ridiculously overstuffed big-name cast whose names will mean absolutely nothing to them but will provide some reassurance to their adult chaperones, who would no doubt prefer to be watching the new I Know What You Did Last Summer at the adjoining multiplex theater. Not-so-imaginatively titled Smurfs, this latest incarnation represents the sort of charmless, wildly chaotic animated effort that has the unintended effect of reminding us why cutting publicly funded children's television is such a terrible idea. It's directed by Chris Miller (Puss in Boots, Shrek the Third), who also voices Grouchy Smurf. Watching the movie makes it easy to understand why he chose that character. More from The Hollywood Reporter Rise of the Machines: Inside Hollywood's AI Civil War 'Smurfs' Is a Rihanna Passion Project: "She Was Pursuing It" 'Poker Face' Boss Rian Johnson Delighted in That Finale Cliffhanger Tease: "Peacock Was a Little Nervous" The screenplay is by Pam Brady, who previously wrote such subversive animated efforts as South Park: Bigger, Long & Uncut and Team America: World Police, providing some hope that maybe this is all some big put-on. That's sadly not the case — instead, we get the sort of generic storyline in which evil wizards are once again intent on world domination, in this case by kidnapping Papa Smurf (John Goodman) in an attempt to procure a magic book that will help them achieve their ends. (At least I think that's what the story was. It seemed mostly incomprehensible to me, and asking the seven-year-old sitting nearby to explain it might have come across as creepy.) Anyway, it's up to Smurfette (voiced by Rihanna) to lead her fellow Smurfs in a mission to save their patriarch. Among them is No Name, who's suffering an identity crisis because, unlike such fellow Smurfs as Hefty Smurf (Alex Winter), Worry Smurf (Billie Lourd) and Vanity Smurf (Maya Erskine), he doesn't have a 'thing.' He's voiced by James Corden, and for those of you desperately missing Carpool Karaoke, rest assured that you get to hear Corden crooning a power ballad. Yes, this is one of those animated movies in which the characters periodically break into song, and sometimes even elaborate dance numbers. None of the songs, not even Rihanna's 'Friend of Mine,' proves particularly memorable. But there are certainly enough of them to fill the inevitable soundtrack album. The Smurfs' mission launches them into the real world, including such locations as Paris, the Australian Outback, and Munich, which only serve as unpleasant reminders of Sony's previous, misbegotten animated/live-action hybrids. The Australian section features a musical number showcasing CGI kangaroos, which even one of the characters aptly describes as 'weird.' It also serves to introduce us to the Snooterpoots — small, feathered, Minion-like creatures who will definitely be showing up at a toy store near you. Their leader, Mama Poot, is voiced by Natasha Lyonne, who uses her distinct gravelly voice to good comic effect. The Smurfs also venture into alternate universes, as if we didn't already get enough of that nonsense from the MCU. Weirdly, there's a lot of sibling stuff going on in the movie. The villains are brother evil wizards Razamel and Gargamel (both played by JP Karliak), who have serious rivalry issues. And Papa Smurf has not one but two brothers, Ken (the ever-reliable Nick Offerman) and long-lost Ron (Kurt Russell), who, needless to say, reappears by the story's end. It was telling that at a preview screening packed with young children, there was nary a laugh to be heard despite the film featuring one would-be joke after another. The sole exception was when one of the Smurfs referred to himself as 'kick-ass,' with the profanity bleeped out, which the kids found absolutely hilarious. If you look at the credits box accompanying this review, you'll see that the cast also includes such ringers as Amy Sedaris, Sandra Oh, Jimmy Kimmel, Octavia Spencer, Nick Kroll, Hannah Waddingham and Daniel Levy, among others. Few of them make any impression whatsoever, but it's comforting to know that already overpaid stars are getting big bucks to sit in recording booths for a couple of days while reading from scripts. Best of The Hollywood Reporter The 40 Best Films About the Immigrant Experience Wes Anderson's Movies Ranked From Worst to Best 13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Democrats fawn over Stephen Colbert for holding 'truth to power' after CBS cancels show
Top Democrats fawned over late-night host Stephen Colbert after news broke that his long-running late-night program would be canceled in 2026. "Thank you Stephen Colbert for your willingness to speak truth to power. Staying far from timid. And never bending the knee to a wannabe king," House Minority leader Hakeem Jeffries wrote on X. CBS announced on Thursday that the network will cancel "The Late Show" in 2026, insisting it's a "financial decision" and has nothing to do with a looming ownership change. Gov. Tim Walz, former Vice President Kamala Harris' 2024 running mate, also praised Colbert for telling "truth to power." Several Democrats posted photos alongside Colbert, either on the show or in public. "Stephen Colbert is the best in the business. He always told truth to power and pulled no punches. We need more of that, not less," Walz wrote. CBS said it was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night," adding, "It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount." Failed Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams also applauded Colbert on social media, posting photos from her several appearances on the show. "If you refuse to see what is happening, the cancellation of the Colbert show should open your eyes. I want to explain to you what a censorship state looks like - where a corrupt government gives favors to media that suppresses criticism of the regime," Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called Colbert an "extraordinary talent," and argued the cancellation of his show was not a coincidence, because the liberal late-night host had slammed Paramount's decision to settle with Trump. "CBS's billionaire owners pay Trump $16 million to settle a bogus lawsuit while trying to sell the network to Skydance. Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," the progressive senator wrote. Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Adam Schiff, D-Calif., both argued the public deserved to know if his show was canceled for "political reasons." "The Late Show," which Colbert took over from David Letterman in 2015, leaned into liberal politics in the Trump era and had become a major platform for Democratic politicians. Last month, Colbert welcomed New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani before the socialist hopeful clinched the Democratic nomination. Schiff, who was Colbert's Thursday night guest, reacted on X, "If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better."
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Critic's Notebook: The Awful Optics of CBS Canceling ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert'
In a shocking move that reflected just about every deeply felt insecurity in the TV industry, the entertainment industry and perhaps American media at large, CBS announced on Thursday, July 17, that The Late Show With Stephen Colbert will wrap its run in May 2026, following the 2025-26 broadcast season. Eager to emphasize that this wasn't a Colbert-specific thing, CBS, in its statement, said that the entire Late Show franchise is coming to an end. This isn't quite the same, in historical terms, as the legacy shift that would occur if NBC announced the end of The Tonight Show — The Late Show was David Letterman and then it was Stephen Colbert, not an endless and storied parade of hosts — but it's a degree of finality that few could have expected. More from The Hollywood Reporter Jimmy Kimmel, Elizabeth Warren, Ben Stiller React With Shock Over CBS' Decision to End 'Late Show': "F*** You and All Your Sheldons CBS" 'Late Show' Shocker: CBS Ending Late-Night Franchise in 2026 Joaquin Phoenix Explains Reason Behind That Awkward 'Late Show With David Letterman' Interview Actually, the statement from CBS brass had a lot of things it wanted to emphasize. 'This is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night,' the statement read. 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.' Methinks the CBS triumvirate — George Cheeks, Amy Reisenbach, David Stapf — doth emphasize too much, because they don't want imaginations to run wild. And therefore, we must trust them, for official purposes. I'm sure that The Late Show With Stephen Colbert is absolutely ending because of a financial decision against the challenging backdrop of late night and it's not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount. The official reasons for the cancellation are whatever they are, and who am I to question the co-CEO of Paramount Global (and president and chief executive officer of CBS), the president of CBS Entertainment and the president of CBS Studios? Nobody. That's who. But official reasons and optics are two different things, and if the folks in charge at CBS didn't know what the optics were, they wouldn't have released a statement saying that what we think we can see with our eyes and infer with our common sense definitely aren't the truth. The optics here may not have any connection to facts, but man the optics here suck — and they suck on a slew of levels that are ALL addressed in the statement as things that we're not supposed to be thinking about but can't help but think about. So it's not related to anything happening at Paramount! Good to know! What could possibly be happening at Paramount? A merger between CBS' parent company, Paramount Global, and Skydance? A massive deal that was seen as a major part of why CBS just settled a lawsuit brought by Donald Trump over details from a Kamala Harris interview that basically everybody in the news business said was standard operating procedure? The deal, of course, requires FCC approval, and the FCC under Trump is looking a lot less like a nonpartisan commission and more like a direct arm of the Trump administration. And what content could the statement possibly be referring to? Well, Colbert was not a huge fan of the settlement. Colbert has not been a huge fan of the president. If you want to send signs to the FCC and Trump that you really want to be allowed to merge with Skydance, canceling a show fronted by one of Trump's most vocal comic opponents would be a great way of saying, 'Hey, we're playing ball here!' If Trump hasn't already enthusiastically gloated on social media about getting Colbert fired — which he definitely didn't do, because CBS' statement definitely says he didn't do it — he's bound to. (Update: He did on Friday morning.) Then again, Colbert isn't going anywhere for 10 months and it's hard to imagine him agreeing to stick around for a swan song in which his content is being restricted by the network that canceled the show. So let's assume that he's going to spend a season lampooning Trump, even as a lame duck. I wouldn't even say that Colbert has been Trump's stiffest critic in the talk show space. John Oliver is aggressive in his analysis on HBO, thumbing his nose at corporate parents who, all things considered, might prefer that he not do that. Jimmy Kimmel is toward the tail-end of a multi-decade journey from jovial, trampoline-loving young man to angry, dogmatic middle-aged man, eviscerating the current administration at every turn. No matter who is hosting on any given night, The Daily Show takes pride in taking shots at whoever is in power, finding shots at Trump to be particularly easy to come by. The 'A Closer Look' segment on Late Night With Seth Meyers rivals Last Week Tonight as TV's most scathing deep dive into whatever is most immediately infuriating in the current landscape. There are less political talk show hosts. Jimmy Fallon plays his various games and goofs around with celebrities and, you know what? There's room for that! (I want nothing to do with it, but that's OK, too.) And when Seth Meyers isn't taking closer looks, sometimes he's just drinking with stars or making fun of his own errors. And you know what? There's room for that! And if Netflix would renew Everybody's Live With John Mulaney, I'd like to believe there's room for doing a talk show episode blindfolded or fighting a trio of 14-year-old boys on live television. Or is there? As the CBS statement wanted to emphasize, this is about 'a challenging backdrop in late night.' Even before All of This, CBS had already ended The Late Late Show after James Corden departed, replacing it with After Midnight, only to cancel After Midnight when host Taylor Tomlinson opted to focus on other professional projects. At some point, CBS might just air whatever procedural or reality show is in the 10 p.m. slot, kick to local news and then play the national anthem and go black, just like back in the good old days. And might everybody else do the same? Talk shows aren't watched like they used to be. Sure, they're one of the best vehicles going for movie stars looking to promote their latest aspiring blockbuster or politicians looking to show they have a sense of humor, but it's been 10 years of increased focus on YouTube and viral clips and nobody has quite figured out how to eliminate the pesky 'late night television show' aspect of things. But it sure feels like they want to try! So the reasons CBS is actually ending The Late Show With Stephen Colbert are what they are. The reasons it FEELS like CBS is ending The Late Show With Stephen Colbert FEEL like they include a precarious situation in which a multibillion-dollar corporate deal might hinge on doing everything possible to kowtow to a commission that isn't supposed to be political, but absolutely is; a political climate in which outspoken opponents to the current regime are more vulnerable than ever before to silencing ripples; and an entertainment economic landscape in which one of the most venerable of television genres is no longer profitable, and thus might go the way of live anthology drama and broadcast Westerns. And even if none of those things has anything to do with anything … It sure looks awful. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise Solve the daily Crossword
