
I spent a year in Antarctica. Here's what I learned living through nine months of darkness and -112F temperatures
That complete isolation from the rest of the world is the reason why everybody there needs basic survival skills. Generators can fail, food can spoil, people get locked out of their accommodation by accident, emergencies happen. Knowing how to cope — and to remain calm — in such situations is just common sense. Verseux knew all of that. He thought it was a good idea.
What he didn't expect was what happened once the training kicked off. During a week in Italy, stationed at the side of a lake, Verseux and his team — a small group of scientists and the physician who would be traveling with them — were taken out into the middle of the lake in a boat by one of the trainers, who was from the Italian military. 'We thought it was to learn how to drive the boat,' he says, 'but then one of the trainers… grabbed the medical doctor of our crew and threw him in the water and said: 'Oh, now you're saving him.''
A few days later in the training week, Verseux says, 'we were told to go into a building, and they say: 'OK, you'll get in and then you'll react.' I say: 'To what?' 'Well, react to what you see.' And then we get inside, and we hear some screams coming from a room in the distance. And so we run, we look for the room where the scream was coming from. And then we see somebody on the ground, unconscious, with blood coming out of his arm and a chainsaw next to him.' Verseux shrugs, matter-of-factly. 'Of course, it was an actor, but a very realistic simulation.' Once the group had secured the scene and sent the person for rescue, 'we heard some other screaming, from somewhere else in the building.' The pattern continued for a number of hours: We spent half a day running from emergency to emergency.'
The surprises kept on coming. Not long after that test, Verseux says, he and his team were tasked with running through a U-shaped tunnel whose walls were on fire, armed with only a blanket. And after that, he was told to scale a gymnasium, climb through a window, take a ladder up to the roof and then flick certain switches. That, he says, sounded 'simple enough' — until the room was filled with smoke so thick he couldn't see his hand in front of his face.
A lot of the exercises Verseux and his team took part in involved smoke, heat or fire, he says, because 'fire is one of the main risks in the station, and you have to prepare for that — both to be able to leave the base if there is a fire, but also to save the base if you can. Because of course, if the base burned, then you're outside, it can be -80C [-112F], and then you're in trouble.' 'Trouble' is, of course, somewhat of an understatement.
These tests weren't just designed to test the crew's reactions and their ability to put theory they'd learned previously into practice, but they were also psychological tests overseen by experts who were choosing who might be best suited to lead the station. A station leader can come from any role and any profile — one year, it might be a Navy officer; another, it might be a communications specialist. Different countries have different methods for selecting their leaders, but on Verseux's joint French-Italian mission, the decision was made by overseers while the crew prepared to deploy to Antarctica, and the exact criteria for that decision-making wasn't made known to the crew. At just 27 years old and in the final weeks of his PhD, Verseux was an unlikely candidate. He was surprised as anyone else to find out that he had been selected as leader of the 13-person group just before they set out for the winter.
What probably helped was his calm and measured demeanor. He methodically describes the dramatic battery of tests he went through; the experience, he says simply, was 'interesting'. Sometimes, he adds, it involved some logistical juggling, since he was rushing to finish his PhD in astrobiology at the same time. At one point, he turned up for two days' training at a military hospital, only to find a note in his hotel room that told him to make his way to the other side of the country for a week. So much for his plans to be in the lab at university.
Verseux had originally only applied for the three-month summer stint, doing microbiology research related to his PhD, but he'd been selected for a year-long summer and winter-over doing glaciology instead. He had to convince his professors to allow him to defend his thesis remotely from Antarctica, by satellite connection.
'We had to stop the internet for the entire station so I would have enough bandwidth,' he says, 'and even then it was chaotic.' Somewhat unsurprisingly, the connection dropped while he was in the middle of his defense.
A place that belongs to everyone and no one
Although no country owns Antarctica, several nations have made territorial claims on parts of the continent. Those claims are held in check by the Antarctic Treaty System, signed in 1959 and now with 56 parties, which freezes all sovereignty disputes, bans military activity (except for military deemed necessary to help protect civilians undertaking research) and mineral mining, and reserves the region for peaceful scientific collaboration. Seven countries — Australia, New Zealand, France, Norway, the U.K., Argentina, and Chile — have formal claims, some of which overlap, particularly around the Antarctic Peninsula. (Notably, the U.K., Argentina, and Chile all claim the same swath of land.) These claims are not universally recognized, and under the treaty, no new claims can be made.
Many other countries, including the United States, Russia, China, South Africa and India, maintain scientific bases on the continent without asserting ownership. The U.S. and Russia, while not claiming territory, reserve the right to do so. In practice, Antarctica operates as a rare example of international cooperation: a vast, frozen expanse governed not by national borders, but by a shared commitment to science, conservation, and diplomacy.
At the remote Concordia station where Cyprien Verseux was stationed — a research facility shared between France's Polar Institute and Italy's PNRA, and one of only three based far into interior Antarctica — a maximum of 40 people usually come for the three-month summer period. Once they leave, the station has an even smaller skeleton crew of around 16 people. Verseux's crew, of course, was even smaller than that.
Among the skeleton winter crew, most work individually, in two separate teams: the technical team (a plumber, a mechanic, an electrical engineer, a janitor, a cook) and the research team (a computer scientist, an astrophysicist, a glaciologist and so on.) Nine months of non-collaborative work in the pitch black in the middle of nowhere with just 12 other human beings would be a challenge for a lot of people.
'Many people hardly sleep' during the 24 hours of sunlight in the summer, he says, 'and so there's always a lot of things going on — until one day in the beginning of February. Then everybody goes away, except the people who stay for the winter-over, and from that moment, we know we'll be completely isolated because it gets colder and colder, and often it can be down to below -80 Celsius (-112 Fahrenheit). And [in that temperature] planes cannot fly, as all the soft parts will freeze and they would break when they try to land.' As the light fades day by day, there is 'a period when you have sunsets and sunrises that follow each other. And then [the sun] goes lower and lower, and then sometime in May, it goes below the horizon for last time, and then for three months you won't see it at all. Most of the time it's pitch black — except of course for the stars and the moon, which you see very, very well.'
Did he never find that psychologically challenging, I ask? No, he says. As the sun began to gradually disappear from the sky and the summer team left — retracing their three-week-long journey by helicopter, then icebreaker, then plane from Tasmania in Australia, and eventually back to Europe — he simply bedded down. 'It felt like home.'
Penguins and 'Polies'
It was a different experience for Lauren Lipuma, an American communications specialist who summered at the much larger, U.S.-run McMurdo research base in 2021 as the sole editor of the only Antarctica-based newspaper, The Antarctic Sun. At the peak of the summer there, she says, there were just under 1,000 people at McMurdo, making it 'basically a small town'. Like Verseux — who saw a collection of striking photos of the Concordia base one day and decided 'I have to go there' — Lipuma had her interest piqued by chance. She met the man who previously held the editor's position at the Antarctic Sun at a social engagement a few years before being deployed, and was taken with the idea of visiting the continent after hearing him talk about his job. When he retired, he let her know, and she put in an application that was ultimately accepted. She set out to the base in her mid-30s, having completed training with the American team that focused on building survival skills and was decidedly less intense than the training program run by their French and Italian counterparts.
Lipuma had probably the most enviable job at McMurdo, because she was tasked with accompanying scientists on their most interesting missions in order to write about them. 'I got to go out with some researchers who study Adelie penguins,' she recalls. 'They spend pretty much their whole time down there at a small field camp near a penguin colony.' She went on a two-day trip to observe the research, which was a highlight of her summer.
'Penguins build nests out of stones. And so they are actually really wily and they steal stones from each other,' she says, with a laugh. 'They'll go to the other penguin nest and steal stones and kind of walk around and do that. And then the other penguin gets mad.'
Another 'very fun' field trip she went on was to the McMurdo Dry Valleys, the largest ice-free area of Antarctica. There, where rock valleys without snow are surrounded by mountains and frozen lakes, there is surprisingly abundant microbial life. Lipuma accompanied a group of scientists who were looking at microbes in one of those frozen lakes among the dry valleys — and in order to get to those microbes, these researchers had to learn how to scuba-dive onsite, in the most challenging conditions imaginable.
'You can imagine like how cold the water is,' she says. 'It's covered with ice, so they have to make a big hole, drill it, and then you go down there and the divers are basically in a drysuit that keeps them warm, and there's like all sorts of cables hooked up. And I don't know if you remember the old Scooby-Doo cartoons, but that is what it looks like: a big, metal, round helmet with a big glass plate.' Lipuma watched two young women take a little boat into the middle of the lake and then dive down, while other people on their team held thick cords attached to their suits. Deep under the surface, 'they're taking soil samples, water samples, leaving certain things down there to track chemical processes and chemical reactions,' she says. You have to be 'in really good physical shape' to even attempt something like that, she adds; even simply collecting the gasoline to fuel the boats requires a lot of strength to turn the cranes in the freezing air.
Lipuma's days were all very different from one another. Sometimes she'd go on an outing; sometimes she'd take time to write up her findings on the base. She reported on the lighthearted parts of being in Antarctica — the nicknames the crew had for various things ('When we would get shipments of fresh fruits and vegetables down, we'd call those 'freshies'. The people who go to the South Pole are 'Polies''); the movie screenings and holiday plays they put on for each other, like a version of the Nutcracker themed to McMurdo or a tongue-in-cheek Olympics — and the more hard-hitting science. And she loved living with 24 hours of daylight: 'It's really great because you kind of always feel safe. At least at McMurdo, there are three or two or three bars on station, or just kind of social gathering spots, and so you can go and hang out with people, and even if you want to stay out till the middle of the night, you open the door and you can walk back to your dorm. You don't have to be like: Oh, I'm walking in the dark.'
Verseux's days, by contrast, were almost all the same. He would get up early in the morning and immediately eat as much bread as he could stomach, along with five eggs and any extra trimmings available, because his body burned so many calories to stay warm. Then he'd get dressed for the two to three hours he'd spend outside taking measurements, in multiple layers of clothing, socks, gloves, balaclavas, hats and masks. 'You had a mirror next to the door where you could make sure that you have no skin exposed, because if it's close to -112F in temperature and you have even a square centimeter exposed, and then there's a bit of wind, your skin can freeze within seconds,' he says.
Outside in the darkness, he would emerge under 'a crazy night sky, because the atmosphere is very thin and very dry. So you see the stars like nowhere else.' Alone, he would walk 700 meters from the station and take measurements in the snow and record observations on the weather. Then he would spend some time in an outpost shelter, maintaining instruments and eating chocolate and raisins to keep his energy up.
He returned to the station for meals — everyone eats lunch and dinner together, in order to keep on a proper circadian rhythm in the absence of sunlight. In the afternoons, Verseux would dedicate time to do the admin tasks expected of the station leader: making sure problems were being addressed in the right places, writing up reports, organizing equipment. Then, during their free time and their one-day weekend, the French crew members would teach their language to the Italians and vice versa. Despite the fact that they were a group of very different people, they had to work hard to foster good feeling and a positive group dynamic. Because when you're unreachable by the rest of the world and living in a tiny research station surrounded by darkness and ice, making sure you can stand the people around you isn't just a good idea; it's a survival strategy.
A strange kind of addiction
Lauren Lipuma says she met a few people at McMurdo who had been coming back year after year, some of them for decades. 'There are some people who joke that they can't go back to the real world anymore,' she says. 'They just don't know how to function around a non-Antarctica environment. I mean, people really, really love it.' Some of the most committed keep coming until they're in their seventies, at which point the possibility of ill health rules them out.
There is clearly something addictive about the 'unplugged' nature of the continent, Lipuma says, and the way in which you can avoid the politics and the 'drama' of everywhere else. It's also 'the most beautiful scenery you can imagine,' she adds: she wasn't prepared to be so taken aback by the sight of the region. Nothing elsewhere on earth can compare.
'Even though it's quite monotonous, there is an intensity of living there which you kind of miss when you are back in a city,' says Verseux. 'You are living with people with whom you are going through very strong experiences and you have to solve problems together. And, you know, sometimes you are outside on the ice and it's very intense and you feel very alive.' It's easy to at least 'somewhat miss that intensity.'
For Lipuma, however, the practical challenges of preparing to go outside each day in such unrelenting cold meant she didn't become one of the regulars. She still remembers the moment she stepped out of the small plane that brought her to McMurdo and her snot instantly froze inside her nose. It was weird and it was incredible, she says, and she'd be happy to work in an isolated region again — but she'd rather do it somewhere a little more hospitable, weather-wise.
Verseux says he brought back 'an appreciation from simple things' after returning from his year in Antarctica: being outside without having to put on a thick suit; being able to call his friends and family; eating a variety of food. Three years before he set out to Antarctica, in 2016, he'd spent a year in isolation with just five other people on a remote expanse in Hawaii, as part of a NASA-funded Mars simulation. There, in a geodesic dome with a single tiny cot for privacy and powdered cheese and canned tuna for food, he began to write.
'I found writing very useful, especially when the environment doesn't change, when your memories tend to blend into each other,' he says. 'So I started writing a blog and then books, and I've kept up this habit.'
Verseux's abiding memory of Antarctica is, like Lipuma's, the staggering beauty of the environment. 'It's like, the Milky Way seems painted and white and the moon is enough to light your path because it'll reflect in the snow, almost like it's glowing,' he says. 'And it looks like the snow and the stars are made of the same material — the same glowy, diamond white. It's really, really beautiful.' The beauty is otherworldly, he adds: stepping out of the prop plane that dropped him off at the station at the beginning of his year on the continent, it feels like you are 'stepping onto another planet'.
And then, eventually, you return — to traffic, and news cycles, and fresh fruit. Verseux often thinks about the quiet, the clarity, and the discipline of that year. Having experienced the highs and the lows of two separate years in extreme isolation — after which he emerged into the Covid pandemic and its associated lockdowns — he says he'd happily go on a Mars mission, if given the chance.
Research is ongoing throughout the multiple stations in Antarctica. A 10-year long effort to find air bubbles in ice that's been in place for two million years is the one that Lipuma says most fascinates her. If scientists are successful in finding them, it could tell us a huge amount about how the world's climate has changed over a record amount of time, and potentially how we can mitigate climate disasters in the future.
Each year, a few thousand scientists continue to deploy to research stations clustered mostly around Antarctica's coasts. Of those, only around 1,000 in total remain through the unforgiving winter. And yet, many of them come back. The appeal of such a self-imposed hardship can be hard to grasp — until someone like Verseux describes the infinite silence, the Milky Way hanging bright above the glowing snow. Then it begins to make sense. After all, Antarctica is what's left when the niceties and complexities of the everyday fall away. Little wonder some people feel the pull to return to the only place left in the world untouched by politics and unreachable for most of the year, a place where every person has a purpose and every action has a consequence, a place where you can quietly live as the most extreme version of yourself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How many colours in a rainbow? More than 100: Think Like A Mathematician by Junaid Mubeen
Think Like A Mathematician by Junaid Mubeen (Profile Books £18.99, 352pp) Doing jigsaws with Junaid Mubeen doesn't sound like much fun. Mubeen insists on sorting the pieces according to three characteristics: colour, number of tabs (pointy bits) and size. He uses three trays – one for each size – and creates grids on them, with each row representing a colour and each column a number. His brother-in-law, with whom he does jigsaws, prefers to just fish pieces out of a messy jumble. Mubeen is a mathematician. He believes that understanding mathematical concepts will help us think more clearly about everyday issues. And he's not just talking about 'applied' maths that helps us construct bridges or check our bank statements. He means 'pure' maths, which is more abstract and usually has no obvious utility. 'Pure mathematicians often take pride in the apparent uselessness of their work, even deriding the supposed need for their subject to bring practical benefits,' Mubeen writes. ''Here's to pure mathematics', starts one toast, 'may it never be of use to anyone.'' Across ten chapters he covers topics such as 'dimensionality', 'sets', 'axioms' and 'fractals'. He's good at leading readers through unfamiliar concepts and most of it is pretty interesting stuff. For example, everyone knows that the rainbow has seven colours, right? At school, we all learned 'Red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet'. But that number is arbitrary. In his chapter on 'the continuum', Mubeen points out that: 'Those colours represent specific wavelengths (in increasing order) but we could just as well reference ten colours, or a hundred, or indeed any number between the two extremes of red and violet. Isaac Newton, whose experiments led to the discovery of the visible light spectrum, attached mystical significance to the number seven, which is probably why he settled on that many markers.' This leads into a discussion about numbers that can't be accurately expressed as fractions – irrational numbers, such as pi – and then to a description of 'calculus' and, for the first time, I, a non-mathematician, felt as though I understood what the latter is. But his efforts to show how this knowledge can map on to everyday issues are less successful. The jigsaw story comes in the chapter on 'dimensionality', in which he attempts to relate the mathematical concept of spaces with many more dimensions than three to the notion that there are lots of different types of intelligence. An understanding of multi-dimensional spaces doesn't add much to the idea that intelligence is a complex attribute. Elsewhere he writes that just as the limitations of our senses mean our perception of the world is a distortion of the reality, so the sort of mathematical concepts with which we are most familiar do not truly reflect the subject. Then he compares that with the way we provide only a selective view of our lives on social media. The analogy is reasonable but we don't need an understanding of complex mathematical ideas to get the measure of Instagram. I think I might be with those who celebrate pure mathematics for its lack of applications.


Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
The health minister, the pub and the disappearing plaque
Jennifer Carroll MacNeill asked for a plaque celebrating her attendance at the reopening of a pub in her constituency to be removed as she felt it was inappropriate given her role as minister for health. Carroll MacNeill, a Fine Gael TD for Dun Laoghaire, attended an event celebrating the reopening of the Queens in Dalkey, south Co Dublin, on Saturday, July 12. Photographs showed a clearly elated Carroll MacNeill unveiling the plaque alongside her fellow constituency TDs Barry Ward, of Fine Gael, and Cormac Devlin, of Fianna Fail. However, the plaque, which said the pub was 'officially reopened by the minister for health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill', has now been removed on request by the minister. A spokeswoman for Carroll MacNeill said: 'The minister attended an event for the reopening of a local food and beverage business in her constituency. 'Ahead of attending the event she was not aware there would be a plaque unveiling at it. She subsequently asked the business to remove the plaque, not wanting to take away from the event on the evening, which was a community celebration.' It is understood that Carroll MacNeill did not ask for the plaque to be removed until a few days after the event. The pub, which is now under the ownership of Doherty Hospitality, has been a favoured haunt of celebrities such as Bono and Bruce Springsteen. In a video post uploaded to the Queens Dalkey Instagram page, Carroll MacNeill is also seen cutting a red ribbon at the event. 'With the sun shining, the garden packed and the drinks flowing we were honoured to have councillor Jim Gildea, cathaoirleach of Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown county council, and minister for health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill officially open this exciting new chapter for a beloved local landmark,' the post's caption read. The Queens declined to comment on Carroll MacNeill's request for the plaque to be removed. The plaque was gone when The Sunday Times visited the pub last Thursday evening. Separately, the minister has been warned against deferring legislation to compel the drinks industry to include health warning labels on its products. Sheila Gilheany, chief executive of Alcohol Action Ireland, the national charity, urged Carroll MacNeill to stick to the timeline for introducing the new alcohol labelling by May next year, despite suggestions that the government intends to delay the legislation until 2029. 'We assume that at cabinet she will vigorously defend her own department's long-stated policy against the recent attacks on it by some of her own party colleagues, who have taken the mantle of the health-harming alcohol industry,' Gilheany said. She added that deferring alcohol labelling laws would mean that Carroll MacNeill was allowing the alcohol industry to set health policy. 'Presumably she would not allow the tobacco industry to do likewise. It is worth noting that alcohol swallows up 11 per cent of her department's budget and likely costs Ireland twice as much as tobacco in terms of impacts to health, justice, loss of workplace productivity and harm to others,' Gilheany said. On Wednesday last week Carroll MacNeill was asked by Sinéad Gibney, the Social Democrats TD, when the legislation would be implemented. Gibney cited recent statements by Simon Harris, the tanaiste, about pausing the rules. Carroll MacNeill replied. 'The minister for health made the Public Health (Alcohol) (Labelling) Regulations 2023 and commenced section 12 of the act on May 18, 2023. The law will come into operation on May 22, 2026.' Last month Harris indicated that the timing of the labelling legislation would need to be reconsidered because of uncertainty for businesses in the international trade environment. 'We are very proud of the Public Health (Alcohol) Act, but we will make a decision in the coming weeks on the timing of the labels. I personally believe a deferral will be required,' Harris told the Dail. Alcohol Action Ireland said last week that the decision on alcohol labelling ultimately taken by Micheál Martin, the taoiseach, would have a lasting impact on his legacy. The legislation would make Ireland the first country in the world to introduce such rules. 'He [Martin] is rightly held in the highest regard nationally and internationally thanks to his leadership around Ireland's smoking regulations and he knows all too well the power of industry lobbying, having faced down the tobacco industry,' Gilheany said. She added that deferring the legislation would be a 'betrayal of Ireland's health and democratic processes'. 'The eyes of the world are on him again and Alcohol Action Ireland is strongly urging the taoiseach to do the right thing and resist industry lobbying once more and proceed as planned with alcohol labelling's introduction in May 2026,' Gilheany said.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Lipstick and fake nails can increase risk of getting asthma in adulthood, study finds
Regularly wearing make-up may increase the risk of developing asthma in adulthood, a study has found. Research has shown a potential link between those who use products such as lipstick, eyeshadow and mascara and an increase in late-onset cases of the chronic respiratory condition, which affects around 5.4 million people in the UK. Women who used false nails, cuticle cream, blush and lipstick had a 47 per cent higher risk of being diagnosed with asthma, the study based on nearly 40,000 people found. Just using blush and lipstick five times a week or more increased the risk by 18 per cent. The researchers, from the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, said the association did not prove the products caused the uptick in risk but did suggest common chemicals in make-up could have an effect. Some are thought to weaken the immune system, while others – such as polyfluoroalkyl substances (known as PFAs), parabens, phthalates and phenols may interfere with the body's hormones. 'Our findings reinforce the need for regulation of personal care products and their components,' the researchers said. The study, published in the journal Environment International, used data gathered over 12 years, which was based on the use of 41 different beauty products. At the end of the research period, 1,774 of the women – around 4 per cent – had been diagnosed with adult-onset asthma. Symptoms of the condition include coughing, wheezing, tightness in the chest and shortness of breath. Overall, using the products was associated with a 19 per cent increased risk of asthma. Frequent use corresponded to a 22 per cent increase risk. Previous studies have found that exposure to chemicals contained in beauty products during early pregnancy correlates with an increased risk of the baby going on to develop asthma in childhood. But little research has been conducted on the potential risk to adults. 'Understanding the biological pathways through which EDCs (endocrine-disrupting chemicals) in PCPs (personal care products) may increase the risk of asthma is important for understanding disease development,' the researchers said. 'If our findings are confirmed in other large-scale multi-ethnic prospective studies, they support PCPs as a potentially targetable lifestyle factor to reduce the burden of adult-onset asthma among women.' Dr Samantha Walker, director of research and innovation at Asthma + Lung UK, said: 'We know that women get worse asthma than men and are more likely to be admitted to hospital, but it's not clear why although we believe female hormones play a part. 'More research is needed into this area so we can understand how to keep women well.'