Civil society groups stand firm with rights institute against Operation Dudula protest
Operation Dudula's mission to march to the offices of the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) and hand over a memorandum to the civil society organisation fell flat on Thursday, 17 July, when the anti-migrant group was confronted by several rights groups that had gathered outside Seri's offices.
The anti-migrant group descended on the office in Braamfontein, Johannesburg, accusing the organisation of being 'unpatriotic' and protecting undocumented migrants (who they deem to be criminals) by providing them with legal support. It accused the South African Human Rights Commission and the Helen Suzman Foundation of doing the same.
However, as Operation Dudula marched from Mary Fitzgerald Square to Nzunza House, where the Seri offices are located, several civil society organisations gathered outside the building in a show of solidarity with the rights organisation.
'We are here today to show solidarity to Seri, the Human Rights Commission, as well as the Helen Suzman Foundation, who have been attacked by Operation Dudula,' said Thapelo Mohapi, chairperson of Abahlali baseMjondolo. 'We are here for humanity, we are here to protect humanity and to protect our Constitution, which is now under attack more than ever.'
Abahlali baseMjondolo's red-clad supporters were present in large numbers. Also there were members of Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia (KAAX), SECTION27, the Institute for Economic Justice, Equal Education and several other civil society groups.
While the crowd waited for Operation Dudula to arrive, they sang and danced, and their leaders voiced messages of support for Seri.
'We know Operation Dudula are angry and we understand why, but they are directing their anger at the wrong people. Our issue in South Africa is not migrants,' said KAAX's Dale McKinley.
'Our issue is poverty, unemployment, corruption and persistent budget cuts, but instead of directing their attention on holding the government accountable for those problems, Operation Dudula is targeting vulnerable people who had no part in creating them.'
Tense showdown
The sizeable crowd of green and white-clad Operation Dudula members arrived at the offices at 12.30, an hour later than expected, and what had been a peaceful gathering turned into a tense showdown between the organisations gathered to support Seri and the anti-migrant group.
A throng of red and a mass of green and white military-style regalia were separated by a thin blue line of police officers.
Operation Dudula members, some of them wielding sjamboks, hurled insults at the Seri supporters, calling them ' makwerekwere ' (a derogatory term for Africans born outside South Africa), threatening to beat them and telling them to go back home — even though most appeared to be South African citizens.
Operation Dudula leader Zandile Dubula told a member of the South African Police Service that the police must remove the Seri supporters.
'We will not hand over the memorandum with these people here. Our members want to stand here and sing. They must move, our people must stand there,' said Dubula.
The standoff between Operation Dudula and the civil society organisations lasted for more than an hour, with tensions mounting. An Operation Dudula member lunged at the police, who retaliated with pepper spray.
Nkosinathi Sithole, Seri's director of litigation, said, 'If [Operation Dudula] say they are submitting a memorandum at Seri, they should know exactly who Seri's clients are, who Seri fight for, as opposed to the misconception they are presenting in the media.'
Daily Maverick has reported on the court action of several rights groups to stop Operation Dudula from assaulting or harassing foreign nationals and impeding access to healthcare services and schools for the children of international migrants.
The groups accused Operation Dudula of illegally demanding that individuals produce identity documents to prove their right to be in South Africa, and obstructing migrant's access to healthcare facilities and schools.
Judgment in the matter has been reserved.
Memorandum undelivered
Addressing her organisation's members, Dubula accused the police of colluding with Seri by refusing to remove the crowd that had gathered to support the organisation, insisting that she would not hand over the memorandum while they were present.
Dubula and the Operation Dudula members left with the memorandum undelivered, hurling insults and singing derogatory songs.
Dubula told Daily Maverick, 'They [the Seri supporters] definitely took us by surprise. We have never come across such a situation. We are not doing anything wrong; we applied [to protest], and we have the right to be here. We didn't expect to get resistance, but this means that Seri is breaking laws because we have all the right to submit memorandums and Seri must be dealt with.'
Sithole said Seri was disappointed that Operation Dudula left without delivering its memorandum, because the organisation was looking forward to engaging with the group.
'We were very much prepared to receive Operation Dudula's memorandum and to understand their concerns and make Seri's position clear to them. I think this is a sign that they had no intention to deliver the memo, because we were ready to accept it, and they refused,' he said.
'The reason they are taken aback is because they have a false perception about Seri as an organisation. We represent millions of South Africans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
6 hours ago
- The South African
Why 100 000 South Africans could lose their jobs thanks to Donald Trump
South Africa could lose up to 100 000 jobs if urgent action is not taken to counter looming US tariffs set to take effect next month, Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned. The anticipated job losses would primarily hit the automotive and agricultural sectors, both critical pillars of the country's economy. The warning comes amid growing concern over the US government's decision to impose 30% tariffs on South African imports, a move that could seriously undermine trade relations and damage the country's fragile economic recovery. 'By some measures, if we do not find alternative measures, the impact on jobs could be around 100 000,' Kganyago said during a media briefing. The automotive industry, which supports over 100 000 direct jobs, has already experienced an 82% drop in exports to the US this year due to earlier 25% tariffs on vehicle components. Industry insiders warn that further tariffs could push several manufacturers – particularly those dependent on the US market – into crisis. Meanwhile, agriculture, a major employer in rural areas, faces a similar threat. Despite posting record $13.7 billion in exports in 2024, the sector could see widespread job losses, especially among low-skilled workers with limited alternative employment options. President Cyril Ramaphosa has indicated a willingness to negotiate a reduction in tariffs, but no agreement has been reached with US counterparts. With the tariffs due to take effect in August 2025, time is running out for diplomacy to avert a crisis. Economists and trade analysts have urged the government to: Strengthen trade partnerships beyond the US Accelerate domestic economic reforms to support local industries And implement short-term relief measures to protect jobs South Africa's vulnerability to global trade shifts is once again in sharp focus. Without swift and effective measures, the combination of US tariffs and potential AGOA exclusion could deliver a major blow to economic growth, export revenues, and employment. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Trust in the judiciary: South Africa's crisis of confidence
President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to chair the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into allegations of corruption in the criminal justice system. Ramaphosa and the ANC have demonstrated that an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution is politically meaningless, says the writer. Image: Independent Media Archives Prof. Sipho Seepe South Africans live in hope. For seven nerve-wracking days, they waited patiently for President Cyril Ramaphosa to address them on one of the most pressing crises the country has faced since 1994. A week earlier, Lt. Gen. Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi had placed the entire criminal justice system on trial. Mkhwanazi implicated the Minister of Police, Senzo Mchunu, top brass, correctional services, senior politicians, and members of the judiciary in an intricate web of crime syndicates and drug cartels. The allegations put the country on the knife-edge. This is the stuff that collapses governments. When Ramaphosa finally faced the nation, the address was characteristically and predictably underwhelming. All opposition parties took potshots at Ramaphosa. Those who were disappointed in Ramaphosa's utterances have themselves to blame. First, Ramaphosa is not a man of courage. He has no backbone. Placed in a prickly situation, his instinct is to choose ANC's interests over those of the country. Second, Ramaphosa and the ANC have demonstrated that an oath to uphold and protect the constitution is politically meaningless. Third, Ramaphosa does not come with clean hands. The Phala Phala farmgate scandal must have weighed heavily on his mind. The independent parliamentary panel, comprising luminaries in law, found Ramaphosa to be possibly guilty of serious misconduct of violating section 96(2)(b) by acting in a way that is inconsistent with his office. Ramaphosa was also found to have violated section 96(2)(b) by exposing himself to a situation involving a conflict between his official responsibilities and his private business. The panel concluded that. 'Viewed as a whole, the information presented to the Panel, prima facie, establishes that (1) There was a deliberate intention not to investigate the commission of the crimes committed at Phala Phala openly.' The damning findings by the former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo-led panel have not triggered the usual knee-jerk reaction that we have come to expect from the self-appointed custodians of constitutionalism. If anything, they have been conspicuously silent and absent. Confronted by the ever-lingering prospect of possible impeachment of Ramaphosa over the farmgate scandal, the ANC did what it does best. It closed ranks and squashed parliament's attempt to establish a Multi-Party Committee to investigate its leader. An annoyed Thabo Mbeki wrote. 'Are we [the ANC] saying that we suspect or know that he (Ramaphosa) has done something impeachable and therefore decided that we must protect our president at all costs by ensuring that no Multi-Party Committee is formed?...... We acted as we did [as if] there was something to hide'. There is no way that Ramaphosa was going to throw Mchunu, one of his supporters, under the bus without facing serious political repercussions. The establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry was the only safe route open to Ramaphosa. It enables Ramaphosa to postpone addressing a tricky political question of dispensing with Mchunu's services. Be that as it may, the inquiry should not prevent the police from conducting criminal investigations against those implicated in the alleged commission of crimes. Neither does the commission absolve parliament of its oversight responsibility. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ With a president burdened by allegations of possible criminality, it would be foolhardy to expect that the recommendations of the Madlanga Judicial Commission of Inquiry will be taken seriously. That the country can be held in suspense by a President who has proved to be a constitutional delinquent reflects the pervasive sense of lack of accountability, paralysis, and resignation that grips the nation. South Africans deserve Ramaphosa. No self-respecting country would allow this. South Africans have expressed a sense of inquiry-fatigue. They have witnessed far too many commissions without any of them leading to discernible positive effects. Some commissions were demonstrably weaponised to target certain individuals disliked by the establishment. Ordinarily, had it not been for the fact that Mkhwanazi implicated judges in the commission of corrupt activities, the establishment of a judicial commission would be unquestionable. Matters become complex if one considers the fact that the very judiciary had decided that South Africans cannot be entrusted with information relating to who funded President Ramaphosa's 2017 ANC presidential candidacy. Mkhwanazi's allegations lend credence to the speculations that the reason the CR17 files are sealed is that they may implicate some members of the judiciary or their family members. Ramaphosa is lucky. Each time he asks the courts to seal matters that relate to him, the courts oblige. This raises several questions. What happened to transparency being the lifeblood of democracy? If Ramaphosa is innocent as he pretends, why rush to the courts for cover? Who are the funders and beneficiaries of the CR17 funds? The tendency to obfuscate issues whenever Ramaphosa is involved played itself out at the Constitutional Court. Instead of zeroing in on the bigger picture, the country's esteemed jurists inordinately debated whether the parliamentary panel had established a prima facie or sufficient evidence. Their colleague, Justice Owen Rogers, would have none of it. He contended. 'A person loses 8.7 million Rand, they would want to know who the investigating officer is, and has it been reported to the police. Is there a case pending? It is a common cause that there wasn't… There was a deliberate decision because the president wanted to keep secret the source of the money; that's the background to where the panel was coming from.' This invariably raises the perennial question: Who judges the judges? The former Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng answered that question when he contended that 'one of the things we needed to do as judges is to give reasons for our decisions that an ordinary man can understand. You must be worried when you read a judgment, and you are struggling to make sense of it.... We ought to know that partly, we account to the public through our judgments. Now, if you write in such a way that the public can't even understand what you are doing, what kind of accountability is that? We don't write for lawyers. We don't account to lawyers only; we account to every South African citizen.' The question becomes pertinent given society's growing mistrust of the judiciary. According to the 2018 Afrobarometer survey, 32% of South Africans suspect that judges are involved in corruption. In 2002, the level of mistrust was 15%. Responding to the 2021 Afrobarometer report on the society's loss of confidence in the judiciary, Chief Justice Mandisa Maya argued that 'the judiciary itself needs to do an introspection and check if we are to blame for this change of attitude towards the institution.' The chair of a commission of inquiry must be beyond reproach for the commission to enjoy legitimacy and credibility. For now, we can only speculate. And the picture is not rosy. * Professor Sipho P. Seepe is an Higher Education & Strategy Consultant. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Positive mindset is vital to get South Africa to move the dial
Business leaders are key to moving South Africa faster along its current, generally upwards trajectory, says the author. Image: Picture: Henk Kruger/ Independent Newspapers Thirty years ago, if you told someone you were optimistic about the future of South Africa, they would lecture you about being a 'realist'. Well, now that we're in the future, it's time for this unrepentant optimist to engage in a little lecturing. The reality of 2025 is that South Africa is today an upper middle income country. Our gross domestic product (GDP) has doubled in 20 years and is similar to that of Bulgaria, Hungary and Serbia combined. Our national debt to GDP ratio is heading towards a manageable 75%. The richest nation on earth, conversely, is very good at dropping bombs but clearly hasn't figured out how to pay for them as it heads towards a debt to GDP ratio of 125%. While attention on mining fixates like it's still the only show in town, the last few decades have seen South Africa cement its successful transition from a primary, minerals-based economy to a services-based economy that contributes much more to GDP than mining. The City of Gold might as well now be called eRingRing for the proliferation of services-based contact centres. Inflation dropped below 3% this year. Unemployment is our bugbear but finally questions are being asked about how we measure this metric. It has never made any sense to me how a country can function with a third of workers not working. The truth is, more people are working and earning than is recorded. More South African children attend school now than at any point in our history. Our military is in bad shape because the biggest share of our budget goes to education and health. Smart nations on the rise do not direct money to the armed forces when people are hungry and need to be educated. Aggressors and victims build their militaries and we want to be neither. SA's sensible, soft power approach is cheaper and sustainable. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ South Africa has its priorities right and the reality shines through in the numbers that matter. If potholes were in this latter group, the UK, for instance, would be in deep trouble. That Daily Mail calls Britain's potholes an 'international embarrassment' with drivers there having to deal with 1.5m of them. And that's a small island - we have the world's 10th largest road network to maintain. The fundamentals of South Africa are largely sound and tell a story of a country making its way in the right direction. What we need to do, however, is move truth-telling of the kind above to the centre of our daily conversations. This will serve to motivate. Nobody feels like getting out there and fixing what's wrong when everyone is telling you it's too broken to fix. Let's take the example of Australia, one of the countries doing relatively well (I mean, if you take away the environment, drinking culture, domestic violence, biker gangs, gambling and cocaine). I don't think I have ever heard an Australian criticise the place. They always talk their country up, and the results are plain to see. Australia has, I would say, a very positive reputation that's overdone. South Africa, on the other hand, has the reverse. Yet, almost every visitor to our shores will remark how different the reality is on the ground to what's being reported overseas. This is partially our own fault. How many readers, like me, wanted to shrink into the floor when earlier this year we heard Johann Rupert randomly introducing the world to Cape Flats gangsterism in the White House, not to mention Retief Goosen going on about his parents living like virtual prisoners while Donald Trump looked on? Don't hide the truth, but my goodness, these South Africans had an audience with the President of the United States - in the full glare of the world's media - and could not think of a single positive fact about South Africa to perhaps help boost tourism, our economy and our future! Talk the truth, yes please, but don't make the situation look so beyond hope that negativity becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Business leaders are key to moving South Africa faster along its current, generally upwards trajectory. So many are mentors to their employees and I would appeal to them to make educating younger South Africans about what's good about their country a priority. Mentorship is surely as much about motivating as it is about imparting wisdom. Employees cannot be expected to achieve greatness on the decks when they believe the ship is sinking. Ivan Booth is a PR consultant, an occasional author and amateur pothole enthusiast. Image: Supplied Ivan Booth is a PR consultant, an occasional author and amateur pothole enthusiast. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT
