
Last evil act of my son's Outback killer as he dies in prison still refusing to reveal the secret of where he left Peter's body 24 years ago
They'd spoken two days previously when the pair were in Alice Springs, a remote Outback town.
'We had a lovely talk together; he was laughing and joking – making plans as he always did,' she recalled. 'Joanne was beside him and I could hear her laughing. They sounded so happy.'
But it wasn't Peter on the line. It was the Australian police.
Two English backpackers had been ambushed on a highway near a place called Barrow Creek. The male was 28; the female 27. She had been tied up but escaped and was found alive. He had been shot and was missing, presumed dead.
'I knew Peter and Joanne were on that road but didn't want to believe it was them,' Joan, now 78, would later say.
'I prayed it wasn't. Two hours later, the phone rang again – it was them. Peter was gone. There was a pool of blood on the road. I fell to my knees.'
Peter Falconio's murder sent shockwaves around the world.
Here was an ordinary young British backpacker, supposedly on an adventure of a lifetime thousands of miles away from home, who had been snatched by a stranger and brutally killed in cold blood.
But what ensued was even more agonising for his parents, Joan and Luciano. For not only would their Peter never come home, but there was no trace of his body.
Rigorous police searches started, scouring barren scrubland around the Stuart Highway, south of Darwin, in the searing Australian heat – but to no avail.
It would be another four agonising years before Bradley John Murdoch, a mechanic and drug smuggler with a chain of previous convictions, was finally arrested and tried for murdering Peter and the attempted kidnap of his girlfriend, Joanne.
This, the Falconio family hoped, was it – they would finally find out what happened and get the chance to bring him home to Yorkshire.
But Murdoch, who was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum of 28 years in December 2005, pleaded not guilty at his trial – and refused to reveal what he did with Peter's body.
For 20 long years, the Falconios have been waiting, desperately hoping that he might change his mind and tell them the truth. Now, however, they know that will never come to pass.
For Murdoch, who died on Tuesday aged 67, has taken his cruel secret to his grave.
The killer, who had terminal throat cancer, had last month been moved from the Alice Springs Correctional Centre to a nearby hospital, where his condition deteriorated over several weeks.
There, he became an emaciated shell of his hulking former self, confined to a wheelchair and drifting in and out of consciousness.
Speaking exclusively to the Mail yesterday, Peter's father said the family preferred not to think about their son's killer. 'He's not a good person,' said the former postmaster, now 83. 'He's cruel, he's a coward and we feel no sadness for him.'
He added: 'He should have admitted his crime. He is the only one who knows where my son is. I don't think he shared anything with Australian police but he
may have told someone – I really hope he has. I am in pain for my wife. I hope I find my son, for both of us... We need an end while we are still here.'
He added: 'I don't wish anybody dead because you have only got one life. I'll tell you what I think, I wish [Murdoch] left something to help me find [Peter].'
Luciano is not the only one who had been hoping for answers. Police in Australia's Northern Territory had repeatedly tried to speak to Murdoch in the weeks before his death, with no success.
In a bid for fresh information, officials even issued a new reward for tips, offering A$500,000 (£240,000) to anyone who could lead officials to Peter's remains.
'It is deeply regrettable that Murdoch has died without, as far as we are aware, ever disclosing the location of Peter Falconio's remains,' a police spokesman said yesterday. 'His silence has denied the Falconio family the closure they have so long deserved.'
It had been rumoured recently that a 'deathbed confession' might be on the cards. Robin Bowles, an Australian true crime author who interviewed Murdoch for a book in 2022, claimed he was planning on making an 'explosive' revelation in his final days.
What he might have been planning to say, or if he did divulge anything before taking his final breath, is not clear.
But the Mail can reveal his mind had been on other things. Rather than thinking of Joan and Luciano, and the son he brutally took from them, his focus was on his own son – with whom we can exclusively reveal he had reconnected after years of estrangement. The son, aged 40, had been visiting his father on his deathbed since they made contact last year.
Murdoch married the boy's mother, Dianne, in July 1984. They had their only son before separating in 1986, reportedly because Murdoch was violent towards her.
In recent weeks, father and son were said to be enjoying spending their final time together. Murdoch, who died on the palliative care wing at Alice Springs Hospital, had also been allowed to leave the hospital while escorted around the Outback town – a move that raised eyebrows, given his refusal to divulge the location of Peter's remains.
Under the Northern Territory's 'no body, no parole' law, passed in 2016, authorities had promised the Falconios he would never walk free. Had he not fallen ill, he wouldn't have been eligible for parole until 2032.
The Mail can reveal his final days were far more lenient than his time in Holtze Prison,
Darwin, where he was once under maximum security with other notorious felons, killers and child sex offenders.
He was moved several times during his incarceration, with authorities deliberately trying to break any sense of familiar routine so he could never get too 'settled'. A source told the Mail the constant upheaval was because he was a 'master manipulator' – and authorities feared he might take advantage of others and find a way to escape. 'People got to like him,' the source says. 'He got on well with anyone.'
Known for his handyman skills, he earned a reputation as a compliant, polite prisoner with few misconduct or disciplinary breaches. 'He [could] fix anything, which made him very popular in the workshops of every jail he went to,' the Mail's contact reveals.
News of Murdoch's popularity behind bars will be yet another blow to the Falconio family, who revealed last month they had not been informed about his cancer diagnosis, instead learning about it from media reports.
Ever since the criminal was first identified as the prime suspect in Peter's murder, when DNA evidence linked him to the scene, Murdoch's name – and his refusal to reveal what happened that fateful day – cast a shadow over the Falconios' grief.
They had, as any parents might, harboured their own worries about Peter and Joanne's big adventure around Asia, America and Australia when they set off in November 2000.
Australia is, after all, more than 9,000 miles from Huddersfield, and there were all sorts of stories about backpackers meeting grisly ends in the remotest stretches of the Outback.
But never in their worst nightmares did they imagine the fate that would befall Peter and Joanne. The pair met in a Huddersfield nightclub in 1996 and both moved to Hove, near Brighton, in 1998. Peter was studying for a building construction management degree at Brighton University, while Joanne worked as a travel agent.
They saved for months for their 12-month trip abroad, taking in Nepal, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia before arriving in Sydney on a working visa in January 2001.
Despite his love of adventure, Peter was a homebird. He visited his parents most weekends, and his three brothers – Paul, Nicholas and Mark – all lived within two miles of the family home.
When abroad, he called home every few days; the only time he hadn't in the past was when he was trekking in the Himalayas.
And so, travelling in their orange VW Kombi van along the Stuart Highway, heading for the Devil's Marbles – a scenic conservation site northwards towards Darwin – a pit stop at a phone box would no doubt have been on the agenda.
But they never made it that far.
Around 7.30pm on Saturday, July 14, they spotted a white Toyota blinking its hazard lights at them from behind. They duly pulled over to the side of the road.
According to testimony from Joanne, the driver – now known to be Murdoch – told them sparks were coming out of their exhaust, and coaxed Peter round to the rear of the van.
She moved into the driver's seat, ready to rev the engine, but heard a shot. Then, Murdoch appeared at the front of the van and threatened her with a handgun.
He cable-tied her hands and dragged her into the back of his Toyota. She managed to escape while he was distracted, hiding in bushland for five hours until she flagged down a truck driver, who took her to safety, at 12.35am.
After Peter's disappearance, conspiracy theories raged – including one which painted Joanne as a suspect, and another suggesting Peter had faked his own death and was in fact alive.
The case – the subject of countless documentaries, podcasts and films – became one of the most notorious mysteries in British and Australian criminal history.
With no body and no other witnesses, all police had to go on was a pool of blood and traces of DNA found on Joanne's T-shirt, the cable ties and the gear stick of their camper van.
Police posted a A$250,000 (£125,000) reward, but hopes of finding Peter without the killer were slim: the area being searched is twice the size of France.
It wasn't until August 2002, 13 months later, that Murdoch, who had been arrested by South Australia Police for the suspected rape and abduction of a woman and her 12-year-old daughter, was finally brought into custody.
A DNA sample from his brother, Gary, matched with the murder scene. Joanne identified him as the man who tried to abduct her, and he was also confirmed using CCTV footage from a service station in Alice Springs. Later, one of Joanne's hair ties was found among his belongings – presumably a trophy taken from his intended victim. When shown it in court, he visibly recoiled.
Joanne has spoken about her traumatic experience only on a handful of occasions. She was famously interviewed by Martin Bashir in 2002, followed by a few brief press appearances around the publication of her 2006 autobiographical book, No Turning Back.
Today, she is believed to be leading a low-key life back in her hometown of Huddersfield, where she was most recently employed as a social worker. Now in her 50s, she is reportedly something of a recluse. She has never married nor had a family of her own.
For years, the Falconios were close to Joanne, protesting her innocence and comparing her to a 'daughter'. 'We still see her but our conversations remain private,' Peter's mother said in 2020.
It is, in many ways, astonishing that in the two decades since Murdoch was convicted, police are no closer to finding Peter's remains.
A well at a cattle station close to where he was shot was searched in 2014 and 2019, at the behest of his mother, but nothing was found despite a five-day operation.
In 2017, an anonymous letter sent to a Darwin newspaper claimed Peter's body had been cut up and placed in bin bags, which were given to an associate of Murdoch's to dissolve in acid and dispose of in a river in Perth. The letter claimed the associate ignored the instructions and buried the bags, unopened, in a remote part of Western Australia instead.
Some have suggested that, in the grip of a debilitating illness, Murdoch himself may have forgotten the precise whereabouts of his victim. Whatever the truth, Peter's killer's heartless silence caused untold pain and suffering to the Falconio family.
Though Joan and Luciano, with two of their sons, travelled to Australia for Murdoch's trial in 2005, ill health has prevented them from returning in recent years. Their youngest son has never been.
In a poignant statement read in court, Joan spoke of her 'torment and constant physical pain' after losing Peter. At times, she feared her marriage would collapse and her family would be torn apart. She developed awful anxiety attacks, constantly having to see or check on her three surviving sons to ensure they were safe.
'The pain will never go from me,' she said. 'I think of Peter every minute of every day.' His life, she added, had 'stopped on a lonely road'. 'He was only 28 years old and had so much living left to do.'
As the anniversary of their beloved son's disappearance passes once again, Joan and Luciano will have him on their minds more than ever.
All they have ever wanted is to bring him home – off that lonely road and back to Huddersfield where he belongs.
It seems a cruel twist of fate that this, too, is the week the one man who could have alleviated their pain has died, taking his darkest secret with him.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Son of Sam victim says serial killer's friend told her ‘David didn't do this'
A woman who was shot by the "Son of Sam" killer almost 60 years ago had to revisit her terrifying experience this week when she was confronted by one of David Berkowitz's friends. On Wednesday, Wendy Savino was at the Valley Cottage Library in Rockland County, New York, when she was confronted by Frank DeGennaro, a friend of Berkowitz's who insisted the Son of Sam killer did not shoot her. Savino, 88, told the New York Post that when she left the library, she saw a man standing outside staring at her. 'So I try to walk around him and he says, 'You're Wendy Savino, aren't you? Well, I just want you to know David is very upset about what happened to you. David wants to talk to you," she said, quoting DeGennaro. "'David wants you to know he didn't do it.'" Savino was injured in 1976 when Berkowitz, now 72, shot her while she was sitting in her car in the Bronx. She said she tried to play dead after she realized the gunman was still outside her car, but Berkowitz fired twice more into her back. She managed to crawl down a street to a restaurant where the staff called for help. Last year, NYPD investigators announced that her shooting was the first victim of the Son of Sam, who went on to kill six victims and wound two others between 1976 and 1977. Berkowitz never faced charges for the shooting because the statute of limitations had expired. After DeGennaro told Savino that he was friends with Berkowitz, she asked him to write down his name. She then gave the name to her son, Jason, and they called the Clarkstown Police Department to report the encounter. 'He had me backed into a corner,' she said. 'He's just talking and talking about the same thing. 'David's a really good person.'' DeGennaro told the New York Post that he received a call from the police, but wasn't charged as he had committed no crime. He insisted he wasn't trying to scare Savino. He told the paper that he became friends with Berkowitz 30 years ago after writing him a letter from prison. He said the two men bonded over their shared Christian faith. DeGennaro said that he also happens to live in Clarkstown and visits the same library as Savino. He said he was surprised to run into her and added that he had not told her Berkowitz wanted to talk. 'I realize now that it was probably the wrong thing to do, to even talk to her,' he told the paper. 'This is getting blown out of proportion.' While the encounter was likely terrifying for Savino and perhaps sobering for DeGennaro, it's a great bit of unintentional marketing for Netflix, which is releasing a documentary about Berkowitz on July 30 titled "Conversations with a Killer: The Son of Sam Tapes." The documentary focuses on recently discovered recorded interviews with Berkowitz. The Son of Sam killer confessed to his crimes in 1978, pleading guilty to six counts of second-degree murder and seven counts of attempted second-degree murder. He was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for each murder, and has been denied parole 12 times. Savino said the encounter left her "very nervous." 'I was always afraid someone would come to me and say 'I'll finish you off for David.''


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Bombshell poll reveals MOST Brits think crime is out of control & don't trust cops or govt to keep them safe
CRIME is out of control, according to the majority of people quizzed in a survey. The damning poll, published today, lays bare a shocking lack of confidence in the Government and police to keep us safe. 5 5 The bombshell survey reveals Reform UK boss Nigel Farage is more trusted than the PM or Tory leader Kemi Badenoch on every single question about tackling crime. Voters think sky-high immigration and failure to integrate those coming here are fuelling the crimewave. The shocking findings will spark alarm in Sir Keir Starmer's team, which is under massive pressure to get a grip on law and order. Britain has been plagued by gangs of criminals on bikes snatching mobile phones, brazenly shoplifting, and stealing jewellery and watches. 'Lawless country' Earlier this month, 24-year-old Blue Stevens was stabbed to death in London as he tried to stop robbers taking his Rolex wristwatch. The Survation poll, for Friderichs Advisory Partners, found 49 per cent of people thought Britain was 'becoming a lawless country'. Just 35 per cent of the 2,000 adults quizzed disagreed. Meanwhile, 56 per cent said they believed that crime had risen over the past five years. Voters were asked about nine different crimes and whether they thought they were 'out of control'. Shockingly, a majority answered yes to all nine crimes. Inside UK's crime capital where residents fear for lives and lay out razor wire to stop thieves These were: violent crime, knife crime, burglary, theft, drugs, vandalism, cybercrime, sex offences and gangs. Some 74 per cent said knife crime was 'out of control' and 60 per cent said the same of violent crime. For theft it was 70 per cent, for drug-related crimes 69 per cent, and for burglary 55 per cent. Asked what caused the crimewave, immigration came out top, with 22 per cent blaming the migrant crisis. Next came 'economic inequality' at 20 per cent, then ' lenient sentencing ' at 17 per cent. Worryingly for the PM, the survey also revealed that people have lost faith in the state when it comes to maintaining law and order. Some 52 per cent do not think Starmer can fix things, saying that Labour was performing 'poorly' on tackling crime. 5 Similarly, some 57 per cent said they are 'not confident' the Government can tackle crime. Farage was seen as more trusted than Starmer or Badenoch when it came to fighting crime. Asked which political leader they trust most to maintain law and order, 27 per cent replied Farage. Starmer was next on 21 per cent and Badenoch was third on just 14 per cent. STABBER'S 59 CRIMES A CRIMINAL convicted of 59 offences was jailed for just 33 months after plunging a blade into the neck of a customer in a pharmacy. Alexander Davidson, 38, walked up to the man waiting for his prescription and stabbed him in a desperate craze for heroin and crack cocaine. Liverpool crown court heard he had previously assaulted someone with a dart and stabbed his father during a row over a mobile phone. The thug's 34 previous convictions date back to 2003 — including a suspended prison sentence for unlawful wounding in 2013, a 30-month stretch for assault causing actual bodily harm and five years for drug trafficking offences in 2007. Sentencing him, Recorder William Beardmore said: 'You could have easily severed the carotid artery or jugular vein. 'That would have killed him, and you would have been facing an allegation of murder. You should regard yourself as exceptionally lucky.' Farage also came up trumps on tackling migrant offenders. Some 37 per cent thought Farage was more likely to deport foreign criminals, while 17 per cent backed Starmer and 11 per cent Badenoch. Quizzed on which political leader they trusted to make Britain safer, Farage was again top on 29 per cent, Starmer second on 20 per cent, and Badenoch last again on 12 per cent. Worryingly, the poll also found that trust in the police's ability to catch criminals was at rock bottom. 5 5 One in five said they or a member of their family had been a victim of crime in the past year. But of these, 18 per cent did not bother to call the police because they had no faith they would catch the criminals or take the crimes seriously. The Labour Government made tackling crime one of its top five priorities when it was elected last year. 'Lenient sentencing' But police chiefs have furiously accused the Government of failing to fund forces properly. A row exploded earlier this year when Chancellor Rachel Reeves agreed to hand police another £2billion a year. Top cops had been publicly demanding more, and the National Police Chief Council said the failure to stump up cash threw Labour's promises to hire another 13,000 neighbourhood officers into doubt. LABOUR IS FAILING COUNTRY By Nigel Farage, Reform Leader THIS new polling confirms what many of us already knew — Britain has become a lawless country. It lays bare the lack of faith the British people have in Labour to make our streets and communities safe. And it's not hard to understand the reasons why. Total crime is now 50 per cent higher than it was in the 1990s. Police no longer investigate or attend shoplifting or theft. Violent repeat offenders are released early and two-tier policing has completely eroded trust. People feel that Keir Starmer is not tough on crime and he goes easy on the criminals. As for Conservatives, they have broken Britain and their own brand is broken, too. They are no longer the party of law and order. The decline that we see today began during their 14 failed years in office. Successive Tory governments cut thousands of police officers but oversaw an explosion in the population. It is clear to me that they should be in hiding for the damage they have done and must simply never be forgiven. Reform UK will fix broken Britain and restore law and order in our country. The British people deserve nothing less. This is a topic you'll be hearing a lot more about from us over the next few days and weeks. Career criminals will be put on notice. This is a national emergency and, after years of complacency by the other parties, it's clear that lawless Britain needs Reform.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Brits have NO faith in Labour to keep our streets safe – and it's not hard to understand the reasons why
THIS new polling confirms what many of us already knew — Britain has become a lawless country. It lays bare the lack of faith the British people have in Labour to make our streets and communities safe. 2 2 And it's not hard to understand the reasons why. Total crime is now 50 per cent higher than it was in the 1990s. Police no longer investigate or attend shoplifting or theft. Violent repeat offenders are released early and two-tier policing has completely eroded trust. People feel that Keir Starmer is not tough on crime and he goes easy on the criminals. As for Conservatives, they have broken Britain and their own brand is broken, too. They are no longer the party of law and order. The decline that we see today began during their 14 failed years in office. Successive Tory governments cut thousands of police officers but oversaw an explosion in the population. It is clear to me that they should be in hiding for the damage they have done and must simply never be forgiven. Reform UK will fix broken Britain and restore law and order in our country. The British people deserve nothing less. This is a topic you'll be hearing a lot more about from us over the next few days and weeks. Career criminals will be put on notice. This is a national emergency and, after years of complacency by the other parties, it's clear that lawless Britain needs Reform.