French PM may scrap two public holidays to reduce country's crippling debt
Outlining the 2026 budget on Tuesday, Bayrou suggested Easter Monday and 8 May, when France commemorates Victory Day, marking the end of the second world war, although he said he was open to other options.
The centrist prime minister said: 'The entire nation has to work more so that the activity of the country as a whole increases, and so that France's situation improves. Everyone will have to contribute to the effort.'
France is under pressure to bring its public deficit, running at 5.8% of GDP, under the 3% figure required by EU rules, and to rein in €3.3tn of public debt – on which the annual interest, of €60bn, could soon become its biggest budget outlay.
The debt mountain represented a 'mortal danger' for a country 'on a cliff edge' and 'still addicted to public spending', Bayrou said, outlining steps he said would cut €43.8bn from the budget, reducing the deficit to 4.6% next year and 3% by 2029.
Other measures would include an across-the-board freeze on government spending except for debt servicing and the defence sector, which President Emmanuel Macron demanded should be increased by €3.5bn next year and more in 2027.
The budget squeeze will also entail keeping pensions at their 2025 level, capping welfare spending and reducing healthcare expenditure by €5bn. Civil service and government agency salaries would be frozen and public sector job numbers cut.
The move to scrap public holidays is likely to meet strong resistance, although France has previously discussed combining VE Day with Armistice Day on 11 November, creating a single memorial day for the victims of the first and second world wars.
'Cancelling two holidays is a direct attack on our history, our roots and on working France,' said Jordan Bardella of the far-right National Rally (RN), the largest single party in parliament. 'No RN MP will accept a measure that amounts to provocation.'
Other party leaders were equally damning. The proposals were 'an organised hold-up', said Fabien Roussel of the French Communist party. Jean-Luc Mélenchon of the radical left LFI said it was 'time to expel Bayrou' and 'end this destruction, these injustices'.
A Socialist party MP, Boris Vallaud, condemned it as 'a brutal and unacceptable budget'. He added: 'Asking always more from those who have little, and so little from those who have much, is neither serious, effective, nor just.'
Macron's decision to call a snap election last year delivered a hung parliament in which Bayrou does not have enough votes to pass a budget without the support of the left or the right, both of which oppose his proposals for different reasons.
Without an agreement, the veteran prime minister could face a no-confidence motion similar to the one that toppled his predecessor, Michel Barnier, as early as October, when his detailed budget bill is due to go before to parliament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Of course the SNP has never been in politics for Unionists... now it seems not to care for Nationalists, either
The older you get the grumpier you become about repeats, and not just on television. In the world of public policy, you begin to notice that the same bad ideas keep coming round and round. The sales pitch might be altered, the window dressing rejigged, but the goods being flogged remain unchanged. Albert Einstein said repeating the same action while expecting a different outcome was the definition of madness, but it's also an uncanny description of politics. John Swinney 's new independence plan, announced at the end of last week, proposes a three-pronged approach. First, it commits to building up support for separation so that it becomes the settled will of the vast majority of Scots. Next, it undertakes to ramp up pressure on Westminster to concede that will and permit another referendum to confirm it. Finally, it asks the voters to give the SNP another term in charge at next year's Scottish Parliament elections. The word 'new' is doing a lot of heavy-lifting here. Swinney is not submitting any novel tactics or strategies; he offers no answers to impediments economic or constitutional. He is simply rewrapping the same hollow pledges in a shinier bow, and he is doing it for cynical reasons. A growing faction inside the SNP wants Swinney gone and replaced by a younger, more aggressive leader like Stephen Flynn, whom they believe can regain momentum on the constitution. Swinney is looking out for his own skin, not Scotland. In his defence, he's hardly the first SNP leader to string along the party faithful with empty promises. There is an Indyref 2 panic button at Bute House and, little more than a year into his leadership, Swinney has punched it. It's a wonder this button still works given the scale of overuse in the past decade. In March 2016, Nicola Sturgeon hit the alarm and announced 'a new initiative to build support for independence' that summer. Once summer was over, she unveiled a 'new conversation' on independence, then, the following month, a consultation on an Indyref2 Bill. In March 2017, Sturgeon said autumn 2018 would be a 'common sense' time for a new referendum and, later that month, that she planned to request a Section 30 order from Westminster. The following May, the panic alarm was back in use when Sturgeon published the report of her Sustainable Growth Commission into 'the economic opportunities of independence'. In April 2019, she confirmed her government would be 'giving people a choice on independence later in this term of parliament'. That October, she told SNP conference there would be a referendum in 2020. In January 2021, Sturgeon promised a referendum if the SNP won that May's Holyrood elections and then, in September, commissioned a 'detailed prospectus' on the case for independence. Two months later, she told SNP conference that her independence campaign would relaunch in 2022. In June 2022, the Indyref button was jabbed again, as Sturgeon set out plans for a referendum in 2023. Then, that November, she declared the 2024 general election a 'de facto referendum'. Come October 2023, her successor Humza Yousaf stated that election would in fact be an opportunity to give the SNP a mandate to enter negotiations for a second referendum. Then last June, his successor John Swinney said voting SNP in the following month's election would 'intensify the pressure to secure Scottish independence'. For a decade, party members have been left waiting for a referendum that was never coming and perhaps never will. The SNP has enough financial woes as it is, but its constitutional strategists ought to be paying royalties to the estate of Samuel Beckett. The secret to the SNP's success in the Alex Salmond and early Sturgeon years was its positioning as a big-tent, New Labour-style party. By being all things to all people, the Nationalists were able to cobble together a formidable electoral coalition. Independence supporters could back the SNP safe in the knowledge that secession was its chief priority, while Unionists could back them knowing they were in no hurry to secede. That tent has been stretched to breaking point. Swinney's latest ruse will have been greeted with horror by pro-Union voters and people of all constitutional persuasions who want to see the Scottish Government focused on the economy, services and public safety for the time being. He was supposed to be different. A fresh start. A first minister who would move beyond division and get Holyrood back on track. Instead, he has revealed himself to be every bit the political tribalist that Sturgeon and Yousaf were, more fixated on internal party disputes than on the concerns of ordinary Scots. Swinney has made clear that he puts party before nation. How can he expect voters who put Scotland before the SNP to lend him their votes? And while he disregards the interests of pro-Union voters, he doesn't do so to serve the interests of pro-independence voters. He puts party before nation but also puts self before party. All Yes voters get from Swinney is pandering. He has no intention of doing anything for them. He talks independence to get them riled up and out to the polls to vote SNP but, once the ballots are in, the constitution tumbles back down the hierarchy of priorities. Unionists decry the contempt in which they are held within the senior ranks of the SNP, but they should spare a thought for the grubby, exploitative way in which Yes voters are treated. Set aside your own thoughts about independence. It is something half the people in this country believe in, many of them passionately and some of them their whole life long. Time and again they were assured by Sturgeon, then Yousaf, and now Swinney that it was coming yet for a' that. One more plan, one more push. It's within reach, almost there. Vote here, donate there. But it wasn't coming, it still isn't, and it won't be any time soon. At this point, there are two paths to independence. Convince Westminster to allow a repeat of the 2014 vote. Granting another referendum would be an act of unparalleled stupidity, sure to do grievous harm to Britain, and would require a prime minister with the strategic nous of a baked potato. You can see why the SNP might harbour hopes for Keir Starmer, but it is still highly unlikely that Westminster would take the risk. Alternatively, you could go down the route of a unilateral declaration of independence, but it's fraught with risk, has no guarantee of success and might even make some important nations ill-disposed to Scotland. (They have their own separatist movements and it would not be in their interests for a Scottish UDI to be a success.) If Holyrood declares independence, there is no mechanism to compel Westminster or any foreign state to recognise it. Instead of being honest with their voters, the SNP leadership spins out fantasies like Swinney's three-pronged plan and tries to gull ordinary Nationalists into thinking independence is imminent, so they keep voting and donating. Giving people false hope is one of the cruellest things you can do in politics but the SNP does it to its own voters without compunction. The SNP has never been in politics for Unionists, of course, but it's no longer in it for Nationalists either. It has ceased to be a big-tent party and has become a narrow elite that exists only to serve its own interests and maintain itself in power. No plan, no matter how many prongs it has, is going to change that. The only way forward is for all Scots, Unionists and Nationalists alike, to declare their independence from the SNP at the ballot box.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Should the voting age be lowered or raised and what about a top limit?
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Regarding Labour's announcement that the voting age will be lowered from 18 to 16 for the next general election (Metro, Fri). The young are more invested in the future of this country than voters in their 70s or 80s because they are the ones who will have to live with the consequences of political decisions made in the here and now. A great many of them are far more attuned to the challenges facing our nation and our planet. Age doesn't necessarily bring wisdom. Those who were stirred up by rabble-rousers on social media and went on to riot in the streets last year – burning libraries and looting shops – were by and large in their 20s, 30s and 40s. More pertinent, surely, would be to consider placing an upper age limit on voting, given that many in their twilight years will no longer have full command of their mental faculties and may tend to vote for more selfish reasons. It is said that voters tend to become more right-wing as they grow older and, as was amply illustrated by Brexit, this is often because they haven't thought through the implications of any political changes, since they are unlikely to have to contend with them. Encouraging people to participate in politics from an earlier age can only be a good thing. A great many of those who complain about politicians today don't even bother to vote, feeling they can't make a difference or that the outcome will have little effect upon them. Apathy is the enemy of social cohesion – an engaged population is good for the health of the nation. Julian Self, Wolverton I was absolutely sickened when I heard Sir Keir Starmer is allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote! Before last year's general election, he promised that if Labour won, he would grant the vote to EU nationals with settled status, who – unlike youth – contribute (or have contributed) to the economy of this country through their skills and taxes. I have lived in this country for more than 40 years and have a sound knowledge of the political, economic, security and defence issues it is facing. Is that the case with 16-year-olds? Thanks, Starmer, for breaking your promise and continuing to treat more than three million people as second-class citizens. This is a very strange and unfair concept of democracy! Marie-Claire Orton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, A Frustrated EU National Lowering the voting age to 16 is just another clutching-at-straws idea by a poor government that knows it will be voted out. The age should be raised to 21. There are so many things you are not allowed to do until you are even 18, such as leave education, so at least have a few years in the adult world before being allowed to make a decision about who runs the country – because at 16 your choices will be misguided. RCG, Bishop's Stortford Regarding the pair jailed for felling the Sycamore Gap tree (MetroTalk, Thu), they should be released as soon as it grows back to its former size. Our new neighbour has bulldozed all their plants and trees to make way for concrete extensions, outbuildings and a patio – all legal. No one speaks up for these well-established plants and trees. Mity, London I'd like to join Terry McCranor (MetroTalk, Fri) in raising a glass in toasting Rob Buckhaven's column on 'Why it's cool to chill red wine'. The British hospitality trade needs all the help it can get and this article should be flagged up on your website for months. That would allow diners and pub-goers to point to it when commenting or challenging restaurateurs and landlords about the temperature of red wine. More Trending Most staff have no idea about wine, or the best serving temperature, and pour red wine from bottles on shelves behind the bar. Perhaps a future column might include four cut-out business card-size summaries of it, so readers can pass them on to the food and drink emporiums they visit. Supermarkets and leading wine merchants must help, too, by insisting winemakers include relevant advice about red wine temperature on the back label. Warm red wine is horrible and unlikely to result in a repeat order from discerning customers. Lester May, Camden Town MORE: Don't expect water bills to stop rising after we overhaul sector, minister warns MORE: Who's next for Oleksandr Usyk? Joseph Parker could get his shot but a third fight with Tyson Fury cannot be ruled out MORE: Charli XCX and new husband George Daniel celebrate wedding with wild afterparty
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Fantastic deals for teachers to take advantage of over the summer holidays
THE kids might be starting their summer holidays but the staff also deserve their break. If you are a teacher about to settle into your summer holiday, make sure you know about these fab deals. We've done the homework for you . . . TASTY OFFER: Use your work email address to register for the free scheme, unlocking over 1,500 deals. Nab a free year's Tastecard membership (normally £79.99) for 2-for-1 restaurant meals, plus get 20 per cent off rail travel with TransPennine Express trains, as well as other discounts such as 15 per cent off at Clarks shoes. Teaching assistants, office staff and support workers all qualify, too, so don't miss out. LIGHT WORK: Did you know the Blue Light Card discount scheme has been extended to teachers? For just £4.99 for a two-year membership, you can access serious savings at hundreds of brands. Get 25 per cent off Pizza Hut meals, ten per cent off at Starbucks, 20 per cent off at Wagamama and ten per cent off at Welcome Break KFCs. Plus, you can get discounts at hotel chains such as Holiday Inn and Britannia hotels. A handy tip is to add the free Chrome extension to your browser when shopping online, which will alert you to deals as you shop. BACK TO COOL: The Ode prepaid card gives teachers up to 12 per cent cashback at lots of high street shops. Get five per cent back at Boots and John Lewis, seven per cent at Primark and 12 per cent at Virgin Experience Days. There's no credit check and the first year is free, but only top up if you are about to make a purchase. Get yours at PERK OF THE JOB: The Teacher Perks scheme offers lots of useful deals for teachers this summer. Get back in the gym during the holidays with ten per cent off Nuffield Health membership. Or treat yourself to a meal at TGI Fridays and take 20 per cent off when you dine between Sunday and Friday. Sign up at Watch as ex-teacher reveals why she quit and doubled her income 7 Deal of the day STAY on schedule in style with the Spirit digital watch. Was £19.99, now £4, at Cheap treat 7 GET a cool deal on Snickers white ice cream bars, usually £2.74, now £1.98 for a pack of four at Asda. Top swap HIDE away your bedroom clutter in a cool boucle storage bench, £119, Dunelm, or order a similar one at for £50. Shop & save FOR small spaces, the Robert Dyas BBQ Time 14in steel barbecue is perfect. Was £9.99, now £3.93. Hot right now GET a new bargain bikini in the H&M summer sale. Tops start at £7 and bottoms are on sale for £3 each. PLAY NOW TO WIN £200 JOIN thousands of readers taking part in The Sun Raffle. Every month we're giving away £100 to 250 lucky readers - whether you're saving up or just in need of some extra cash, The Sun could have you covered. Every Sun Savers code entered equals one Raffle ticket. The more codes you enter, the more tickets you'll earn and the more chance you will have of winning!
