What advisories for Indian, foreign students in US warn against
"If you drop out, skip classes, or leave your program of study without informing your school, your student visa may be revoked, and you may lose eligibility for future US visas," the US Embassy in India said in an official statement on Tuesday.The US Embassy in India also issued a warning to foreigners on May 14 about the serious consequences of staying in the United States beyond the allowed time on their visa.On Saturday, the embassy posted on X (formerly Twitter), saying, "If you remain in the United States beyond your authorised period of stay, you could be deported and could face a permanent ban on travelling to the United States in the future."advertisementIt has also advised students to steer clear of criminal convictions.EMBASSY URGES STUDENTS TO MAINTAIN LEGAL STATUSThe Embassy asked students to maintain their student status."Always adhere to the terms of your visa and maintain your student status to avoid any issues," the statement issued on Tuesday added.The US has issued a strong warning to visa applicants, stating that criminal convictions may result in a permanent ban on entry."Criminal convictions can permanently bar you from entering the United States. Even minor offences can trigger visa denials. Consular officers have access to your criminal background and will discover past violations or arrests," the US Embassy in New Delhi wrote on X on May 22."Tell the truth on your application and in your interview – lying can get you banned", it added.US ADVISORY FOLLOWED BY VISA REVOCATIONS TOOThe advisories were issued following President Donald Trump's recent crackdown on immigrant students, which began last month. Many students have been forced to leave the country after their F-1, J-1, or M-1 visa status was abruptly revoked and their SEVIS records canceled — often due to minor past infractions.In certain cases, the immigrant students were not even found guilty, while in others, no reasons were stated.advertisementAccording to a report by ICEF Monitor, a source for data on international education and student mobility, nearly 5,000 student records were impacted at the height of the visa revocations.The reasons have varied from pro-Palestine protests to minor traffic violations, often dragging students into complex legal situations and creating widespread confusion.In response to legal challenges from students, universities, and educational organisations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reversed its decision in late April and reinstated the visa status of the affected students.Amid increasing uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of immigration policies, universities throughout the US are advising international students to avoid non-essential travel.US UNIVERSITIES TO STUDENTS: 'AVOID NON-ESSENTIAL TRAVEL'Numerous universities across the country have warned international students against travelling abroad this summer, expressing concern that they may face difficulties reentering the US."Due to the increased risks involved in re-entering into the United States, we are advising members of the Duke international community to avoid international travel unless essential," Duke University wrote last month in a memo to students and faculty."A valid visa does not guarantee entry to the US," the varsity warned.Boston University also encourages its students to postpone non-essential travel, especially if they require a new visa to return, citing potential delays and uncertainties in visa processing.advertisementThe university, in a note issued last month, stated that given recent Executive Orders signalling possible travel restrictions and changes to US visa processing, they are encouraging current international students and scholars to consider postponing nonessential travel (especially if you need a new visa to return) until there is more clarity from the Trump administration.University of California, Berkeley, also issued an advisory, saying upcoming international travel was risky due to "strict vetting and enforcement."Amid advisories and regulations, Indian students face anxiety and uncertainty about finishing their education and a life ahead in the US.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Who is Stephan Miran? Did you know Trump's interim Fed pick is the ‘mind' behind his tariffs?
United States President Donald Trump has appointed Dr Stephen Miran as the temporary appointee to the Federal Reserve Board until January 31, 2026, filling the seat left vacant by the surprise resignation of Governor Adriana Kugler. In a statement posted on Truth Social, Trump said: 'It is my great honor to announce that I have chosen Dr. Stephen Miran. He has been with me from the beginning of my Second Term, and his expertise in the World of Economics is unparalleled. He will do an outstanding job.' Miran, 42, is currently serving the US government as the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors. He is often credited as the 'mind' behind Trump's economic policies including the tariffs. He has been a prominent figure in conservative economic policy, shaping key financial strategies under Trump since the beginning of the president's second term. Previously, he served in the Treasury Department under Secretary Steven Mnuchin, where he was assigned the position to design the Paycheck Protection Program during the 2020 COVID-19 crisis. Other than serving the U.S. government, Miran has worked as a senior strategist at Hudson Bay Capital Management and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. He is known for his strong economic views, such as publicly criticizing the Federal Reserve's pandemic-era stimulus policies. He has also authored 'Mar-A-Lago Accord,' a controversial proposal that suggests dollar devaluation as a way to address the U.S. current account deficit. His economic stance aligns closely with Trump's viewpoints, as he is a strong advocate for not just reciprocal tariffs but also pro-crypto initiatives. Miran earned his bachelor's degree in Economics, Philosophy, and Mathematics from the prestigious Boston University in 2005, and went on to complete a PhD in Economics at Harvard University in 2010. Miran was the son of Dan and Jane Miran who served as civil servants at theSocial Security Administration.
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles
NYT News Service FILE -- Utility infrastructure under construction in Johnstown, Ohio, to support a planned Intel chip manufacturing plant, Jan. 3, 2025. Intel's challenges in Ohio highlight both the risks that federal and state officials took in financially backing Intel, and the struggles the Trump administration will face in trying to shift more semiconductor production from Asia to the U.S. (Brian Kaiser/The New York Times) At the end of July, Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel's chief executive was "very, very optimistic" about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. Last week, President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside Columbus. Trump demanded Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's new CEO, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a "Silicon Heartland." To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly $1.5 billion in federal funding in recent years, as well as a $2 billion incentive package from the state. The project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least 2030. The company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Intel's situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries -- through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House -- to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to back. But whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate. "It's pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio," Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, wrote on social media Thursday. "Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the CCP," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. "The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio," Moreno added. Semiconductor factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an $18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC. Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer demand. Dan Tierney, press secretary for DeWine, said Friday that the governor remained optimistic about the project. "We expect chips to be made in that facility," Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested $7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state's incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid out. The incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Tierney said. As for the allegations against Tan, he said, DeWine is concerned about any allegation of involvement with the Chinese Communist Party that is detrimental to the national interest but is not rushing to judgment. "We don't have all the facts, and we will need to see what facts come out," Tierney said. The stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Trump, as they were for former President Joe Biden. Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by China. In 2022, under Biden, Congress passed a bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the United States. Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to $7.9 billion to build factories in the United States. (Only about $2 billion of that has been disbursed.) Trump has criticized the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the United States. He threatened last week to impose a 100% duty on many imported chips. Tan, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a savior of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a longtime Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor startups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and apps. On July 28, a company that Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under U.S. export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Tan, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., wrote to the chair of Intel's board of directors Tuesday, raising questions about what Tan may have known about the illicit activity. In a statement Thursday, Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that "misinformation" was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared "the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security." "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. He added that he was engaging with the administration "to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts." The questions surrounding Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Ohio. Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, was among the lawmakers who supported public funding for the Intel semiconductor factory. He posted a message on social media saying the company had promised to "respond promptly" to Cotton's letter. "The facts have not changed: We need an American company to make American chips on American soil," Husted wrote. "Producing the world's most advanced high-tech chips in the U.S. is not just economic policy -- it's a national security imperative. Every day we are not doing that, we are putting our country at risk." Husted did not respond to a request for comment. State Sen. Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Trump's attack on Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has stalled. DeMora, who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview Friday that Ohio Republicans "did all this hoopla and pageantry" to hype the Intel project. "Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China," he said. "That's their excuse." He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory. "Intel is never going to make a chip there," he said. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? The airport lounge war has begun — and DreamFolks is losing End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out India's last cement IPO did not work. Can JSW Cement break that curse? Is Shadowfax closing in on its closest rival? Stock Radar: APL Apollo Tubes stock fails to hold momentum after hitting highs in June; what should traders do? Buy, Sell or Hold: Avendus trims target on Titan Company; Motila Oswal maintains buy on Jindal Stainless These large- and mid-cap stocks may give more than 25% return in 1 year, according to analysts
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Defence production hits record Rs 1.5 lakh crore, private firms' share up
Synopsis India's defence production has surpassed ₹1.5 lakh crore, marking a significant milestone fueled by increased private sector participation. The defence minister highlighted an 18% growth in FY 2024-25, showcasing the strengthening of India's defence industrial base. Defence exports also saw a surge, reaching ₹23,622 crore, reflecting a 12% increase over the previous year. PTI Indian defence production has crossed the ₹1.5 lakh crore mark, with private companies increasing their share in production and export of military systems, defence minister Rajnath Singh said on Saturday. Lauding the collective effort that led to an all-time high figure of defence production worth ₹1,50,590 crore, Singh said that the milestone is a clear indicator of India's strengthening defence industrial base. Officials said that in the 2024-25 FY, there has been an 18% growth over the previous fiscal's output of ₹1.27 lakh crore, and a 90% increase since FY 2019-20, when the figure was ₹79,071 crore. The numbers have been achieved as the government has gone on overdrive to promote Indian companies to enter the sector and has initiated programs like Emergency Procurement (EPs) that have given orders to a large number of startups and smaller companies as well. Defence Public Sector Undertakings (DPSUs) and other PSUs accounted for around 77% of total production, while the private sector contributed 23%. The share of the private sector has been steadily rising, from 21% in FY 2023-24 to 23% in FY 2024-25, and is expected to go up exponentially in the coming years as several big projects have been opened up to competitive bidding. Dozens of companies, from backgrounds as diverse as automobile component manufacturing to civil works have entered the defence manufacturing sector as opportunities grow."Both public and private segments of the industry have demonstrated consistent year-on-year growth, attributed to far-reaching policy reforms, enhanced ease of doing business, and a strategic focus on indigenisation over the past decade," officials said. There has been a surge in defence exports as well, with the figure growing to ₹23,622 crore in FY 2024-25, a 12% growth over the previous year.
