eSafety Commissioner narrowly escapes Senate inquiry into her powers amid controversial internet search code
Labor and the Greens have halted efforts from a growing bloc of politicians who are demanding transparency and an investigation into the eSafety commissioner's role.
Senators Ralph Babet and Malcolm Roberts put forward a motion in the Senate on Thursday for an inquiry be launched into the controversial Internet Search Engine Services Online Safety Code.
The Senate voted down the motion 34-27, with members of the government, Greens and crossbench all rejecting the proposed inquiry.
The controversial code, which was ushered in by the eSafety Commissioner in June, will require Australians with search engine accounts such as Google to be subject to mandatory age checks.
Senator Babet's motion would have seen the code be investigated by Environment and Communications References Committee.
The inquiry would have probed the "scope and accountability" of the eSafety Commissioner in administering the Online Safety Act.
Ms Inman Grant would have been forced to front the Senate and explain the growing scope of her powers to police the internet.
Senator Babet also sought "appropriate parliamentary oversight and scrutiny" mechanisms for the codes and standards.
Senator Babet has condemned the Senate's decision, slamming his Labor and Greens counterparts in the chamber for blocking the inquiry.
'If this motion had passed, Big Tech and the eSafety Commissioner would have been forced to explain themselves in full view of the public,' Senator Babet said.
"Instead, Labor and the Greens have voted to shield them from scrutiny.'
'No one voted for this Commissioner. Yet she can now demand ID to log in to Google, suppress content she doesn't like, and do so without sufficient Parliamentary oversight. That should alarm every Australian."
Prior to the Thursday's Senate session, Senator Babet outlined his opposition to the dramatic shift in search engine regulations set to come into effect in December, and took aim at the unelected eSafety Commissioner.
'Bureaucrats shouldn't be making the rules without being answerable to Parliament. But that's exactly what this Labor Government is allowing," he said in a statement.
Shadow communications minister Melissa McIntosh MP on Tuesday said the the eSafety Commissioner's remit "without adequate safeguards is now in question" after Ms Inman's Grant's push for the new search engine rules.
'The voices against the code cannot be ignored and whilst the intent is to protect young people from harms it is essential that this is balanced with a person's right to privacy and protection of their personal freedoms," Ms McIntosh said.
The Senate's decision to quash the motion comes a day after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Communications Minister Anika Wells backflipped and announced YouTube would come under its under-16 social media ban.
Children younger than 16 will still be able to use YouTube, but they will not be able to hold an account.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
31 minutes ago
- The Age
The dissident award-winning artist keeping a close watch on China
In an upstairs room of a Collingwood gallery hangs a line of colourful prints on a wall. It's only when you look closely that you see small areas of damage, evidence of their role in a troubled recent past. Dissident Chinese artist Badiucao points to a scratch on one and steps back. 'Some of the frames are even broken', he explains, saying it was a deliberate choice to leave them this way. These works were originally slated for display in 2018 at a doomed exhibition in Hong Kong. They now open his first Australian solo show, Disagree Where We Must. One of the prints features Joshua Wong, a key figure in Hong Kong's pro-democracy Umbrella Movement. At the time it was created, Badiucao was working anonymously. But three days before the Hong Kong show was due to open, 'the Chinese government found out my identity and took my relatives into the police station, ' he says. In response, he cancelled his show. A year later he shed his anonymity and finally revealed his face and identity to the world. The scratches and dings, he explains, help tell the story of how this group of works was hurriedly removed and hidden in the months and years after the show was cancelled. The Shanghai-born Badiucao, who now lives in Australia, contributes to this masthead and is a Walkley Award winner for his cartoons, has always used his art to critique mainland China's government, its policies, and historical wrongs. This ethos is on full display in Disagree Where We Must. Held in Collingwood's Goldstone gallery, a space opened by artist Nina Sanadze this year, the exhibition takes its title from the Labor government's stated approach to China: 'We will co-operate where we can, disagree where we must, but engage in our national interest.' A room at the back of the space is devoted to a video that first screened on billboards in Hong Kong earlier this year in a test of the limits of free speech in the wake of the sweeping National Security Law implemented in 2020. In the four-second clip, Badiucao silently mouths the words 'you must take part in revolution'.
Sydney Morning Herald
31 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The dissident award-winning artist keeping a close watch on China
In an upstairs room of a Collingwood gallery hangs a line of colourful prints on a wall. It's only when you look closely that you see small areas of damage, evidence of their role in a troubled recent past. Dissident Chinese artist Badiucao points to a scratch on one and steps back. 'Some of the frames are even broken', he explains, saying it was a deliberate choice to leave them this way. These works were originally slated for display in 2018 at a doomed exhibition in Hong Kong. They now open his first Australian solo show, Disagree Where We Must. One of the prints features Joshua Wong, a key figure in Hong Kong's pro-democracy Umbrella Movement. At the time it was created, Badiucao was working anonymously. But three days before the Hong Kong show was due to open, 'the Chinese government found out my identity and took my relatives into the police station, ' he says. In response, he cancelled his show. A year later he shed his anonymity and finally revealed his face and identity to the world. The scratches and dings, he explains, help tell the story of how this group of works was hurriedly removed and hidden in the months and years after the show was cancelled. The Shanghai-born Badiucao, who now lives in Australia, contributes to this masthead and is a Walkley Award winner for his cartoons, has always used his art to critique mainland China's government, its policies, and historical wrongs. This ethos is on full display in Disagree Where We Must. Held in Collingwood's Goldstone gallery, a space opened by artist Nina Sanadze this year, the exhibition takes its title from the Labor government's stated approach to China: 'We will co-operate where we can, disagree where we must, but engage in our national interest.' A room at the back of the space is devoted to a video that first screened on billboards in Hong Kong earlier this year in a test of the limits of free speech in the wake of the sweeping National Security Law implemented in 2020. In the four-second clip, Badiucao silently mouths the words 'you must take part in revolution'.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
A super-sized GST – with a $3300 cheque in the mail for all
All Australians would receive $3300 a year in exchange for accepting a higher and broader GST under a plan which proponents claim would boost the budget by $28 billion a year while driving up the nation's living standards. Before this month's economic roundtable, independent MP Kate Chaney has backed an idea first floated by leading Australian economist Richard Holden to lift the GST to 15 per cent and extend the tax on food, education, health and childcare services and water and sewerage. This would raise an additional $92.5 billion in its first full year of operation, but would be offset by a $3300 rebate to every person over the age of 18 that would effectively erase the impact of the higher GST on the first $22,000 of an individual's annual purchases. The rebates would leave low- and middle-income earners up to $371 a year better off but slug the nation's top 20 per cent more than $2200 annually, costing the government $68.8 billion. That would leave the Commonwealth with almost $24 billion a year to put towards other services, paying down debt or reducing personal income tax levels. Chaney, who has been working with Holden on the concept for the past two years, said the roundtable had to be open to all tax reform options. Loading 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower- and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive. Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity,' she said. Holden, who on Thursday will release a paper with fellow economist Rosalind Dixon on the so-called 'progressive GST', said the change would benefit younger Australians who under current tax arrangements paid a disproportionate amount of personal income tax. 'Our proposal would make our taxation system more efficient, make our economy more dynamic and provide the impetus for productivity growth,' he said.
