
Drilling for Auckland's mythical harbour crossing
Is it a Pak'nSave for yachties, or maybe a new venue for manu competitions?
The yellow platform on sticks in the Waitematā Harbour is the topic of discussion on a series of Reddit and Facebook threads.
But instead of suppling everyday bargains or a big splash, this mysterious vessel is providing information about the seabed to inform plans of a second city harbour crossing.
We've been here before. There was the Skybridge, then the Northern Pathway, and let's not forget mayoral hopeful John Tamihere's double-decker 18-lane proposal.
Yet despite the many plans, reports and debates, no government has managed to get a shovel in the ground.
So what makes it different this time?
'There's never been any substantive geo-technical drilling in the Waitematā before, so this is really the first time that we're seeing a picture of what the rock conditions are underground,' Sian France, a geologist and the investigations lead of the Waitematā Harbour Connections Alliance says.
Today The Detail gets a closer look at this jack-up barge, finding out more about the drilling process, the geological testing and how it's helping further plans for the long-awaited new crossing.
The project should take about seven months, which sounds like a long time, but Mark Ware, project director for the NZ Transport Agency, says there's a lot more to it than drilling a couple of holes.
'Each hole takes between four and five days. So you're drilling upwards of 75 metres in the marine area below the surface and 65 [metres] on land,' he says.
Ware is hoping for a decision on the crossing by mid next year.
'Depending on what that decision looks like it will then take us a number of years to finish off the designs, procure our services and contractors, so we're looking to be in the ground or under the seabed by 2029-2030,' he says.
But for this to go ahead, governments over the next couple of parliamentary terms will need to be on board. With an election happening next year and no legislation securing the plan, there is the risk that it could be scrapped in favour of a new idea.
'Hopefully we've got a strong enough case that any government coming in sees the benefit of actually undertaking the work that we're doing and building an alternative harbour crossing,' Ware says.
NZTA project director Mark Ware. Photo: Davina Zimmer
The drilling is done with a steel pipe that has industrial grade diamonds on the end of it, which cuts through the rock. Sections have to be removed 1.5 metres at a time.
Then geologists, like Georgia Woodside and Sian France, get the extracted material ready for testing.
'Often when it comes out it's got a bit of drilling fluid or a bit of clay from the hole so we wash it off so it's clear what we're looking at and then we box it up, taking great care not to break it because it can be used for different kinds of testing,' Woodside says.
That testing includes looking at the rock formation, and what it's made of.
'For example, here [Waitematā Harbour] we've got the East Coast Bays Formation, so that's saltstone and sandstone interbedded,' Woodside explains.
All of this information is logged and used to inform how the crossing will be built.
'It's all about how the ground will repond to construction activity,' France says.
'So if you pile for a bridge, if we bring a tunnel-boring machine in for a tunnel, how will the ground respond? Will it stay open by itself? Do we need additional engineering means to support it? How do we design and build it in a safe manner?' she says.
From left to right: Sam Woodford, Georgia Woodside and Sian France. Photo: Davina Zimmer
France says all this prior investigation is important to avoid later cost blowouts, because by the time shovels are in the ground it's too late.
'You've missed the opportunity to really manage cost risk and so that's a really huge part of getting Geotech investigations done upfront.
'We're trying to minimise surprises; there's a whole bunch of really good stats that come out of construction projects in the UK that essentially demonstrate that a very small percentage of overall spending on Geotech will significantly reduce the likelihood of having construction overruns.'
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
A Bold Dream Gets A Cut As Predator Free 2050 Ltd Is Disestablished
Article – RNZ Predator Free 2050 was hit by a budget blow, and now the 'moonshot' goal is under threat, for The Detail The environmental sector worries that the future of a predator-free Aotearoa is in jeopardy after the Government swung the axe in the latest budget. It was billed as a 'moonshot' for New Zealand's environment – a bold, world-leading goal launched by Sir John Key in 2016, aimed at eradicating rats, possums and stoats from our islands by 2050. The vision has been clear – bring back birdsong to every valley, protect the flightless kiwi, and restore what once thrived. But today, the future of Predator Free 2050 looks uncertain. Predator Free 2050 Ltd, the Crown-owned company established to drive and fund large-scale eradication and breakthrough science, is now being disestablished, as announced as part of Budget 2025. Funding for the company will cease by the end of the year, with its responsibilities shifted to the Department of Conservation (DOC), which the government says will reduce duplication, increase efficiency and save about $12 million. 'People are now worried for this programme,' Newsroom environment editor David Williams tells The Detail. 'They say without ongoing funding, we will not only not go forward, but we will go backwards. This programme needs funding, and that's up to the government.' The government insists the broader goal of predator eradication remains. But Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, chief executive of WWF New Zealand, is not entirely convinced. 'New Zealanders believe in the Predator Free 2050 dream, and we want the government to get behind them too. But I'm not sure this will happen. 'I've not been seeing a lot of enthusiasm for environmental outcomes from this government, full stop. We describe the government's policy agenda as a war on nature, and I think it is disappointing that a previous National government got so strongly behind this moonshot objective, and this government does not seem to care so much.' Both Williams and Kingdon-Bebb say the country has 'overwhelmingly' backed the Predator Free 2050 initiative, allowing it to 'come a long way, in a relatively short time'. Already, predator-elimination projects cover more than 800,000 hectares. 'This is a big amount of land,' says Williams. 'And the goal is big … but they have done well. 'They also said they wanted to fund scientific research, and 15 or 20 projects have already had money to try and sort this problem out. 'A lot of community groups have latched on to this – someone said to me that this is the one conservation project that has captured the imagination of New Zealanders more than any other.' Kingdon-Bebb agrees. 'It has certainly captured the hearts and minds like nothing else,' she says. 'We have seen an explosion of community trapping groups and landscape-scale projects over the last nine years, which has been amazing … now I feel the government is taking its foot off the pedal. 'What is apparent is that the government has had a look at the delivery model of the programme as a whole, which is complex. 'So, if it is the case that the government has reviewed it and determined that a crown-owned corporation is not the best delivery methodology, I can accept that. 'DOC has a lot of capability … and perhaps it is appropriate for DOC to be coordinating this work, perhaps there was duplication of roles and functions and costs. 'But where I would be concerned is that in the wider scale of what has happened in the last two budgets, the Department of Conservation will see, in total, about 300 million dollars in savings exacted from it. 'So, it does beg the question whether a very stretched department can pick up the leadership of this initiative in a way we would want to see it done.' Critics say that move will slow momentum, bury innovation under bureaucracy and confuse local projects already stretched thin. They also argue that across the country, hundreds of predator-free community groups, many driven by volunteers, will be left wondering what support will look like without the company's funding, research backing and strategic oversight. But the government insists the predator-free projects and contracts funded by the company are not affected and it is committed to the predator-free 2050 goal.


Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
AI Gun Video Of Nelson Councillor Campbell Rollo Sparks Warning For Voters
Article – Max Frethey – Local Democracy Reporter The councillor says voters should always look for an authorisation statement or something that's genuine. Nelson City councillor Campbell Rollo has condemned an 'AI-generated' video of him that was posted to social media. The video, which featured the first-term councillor shooting a military-style firearm, was uploaded to a Nelson community Facebook page on Friday, but was later taken down. It had been posted by an account called Nelson NZ Video Game Buyer, with a caption: 'This is who your [sic] voting for Nelson community! How shameful, encouraging violence!' Rollo said the video was generated by artificial intelligence and was 'quite taken back' when he saw the video online. 'The video was not real. It was generated by someone using my Facebook picture without my knowledge.' A watermark reading ' – a generative AI website – appeared in the corner of the video, and the backdrop and clothing being worn by Rollo in the video match his Facebook profile image. 'I literally had no idea where it had come from. I quickly went back and kind of scrolled over it; could tell quite quickly it was AI-generated,' he said. 'I really just think someone was having a wee bit of fun. But yeah, in hindsight, probably a bit too far.' He said it was worrying to see that some commenters had wondered if the video was real and urged residents to be 'very mindful' of online content, especially as the local election approaches. 'If you see something come up of a political figure or someone who's running for council, I would certainly be looking for an authorisation statement or something that's genuine.' Nelson Mayor Nick Smith echoed Rollo's concerns. He said it was a good thing the video was 'so fake' and that most people would be able to determine the post was made by 'somebody being mischievous'. 'However, it's a real warning, particularly as we go into the local elections, for people to be cautious of false claims being made to besmirch people and to influence how they vote.' Smith added that Rollo, the Tāhunanui liaison councillor, was 'very effective' in his role. 'He's done a great job for Tāhunanui and associating him with gun violence is very unfair.' After the video was taken down, Rollo found the outpouring of support from residents and his fellow elected members 'super humbling'. 'The amount of phone calls and messages I had from people just reaching out, making sure I was okay. It's quite cool,' he said. 'At the end of the day, we are humans that are trying to do the best we can for the community.'


Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
AI Gun Video Of Nelson Councillor Campbell Rollo Sparks Warning For Voters
Nelson City councillor Campbell Rollo has condemned an "AI-generated" video of him that was posted to social media. The video, which featured the first-term councillor shooting a military-style firearm, was uploaded to a Nelson community Facebook page on Friday, but was later taken down. It had been posted by an account called Nelson NZ Video Game Buyer, with a caption: "This is who your [sic] voting for Nelson community! How shameful, encouraging violence!" Rollo said the video was generated by artificial intelligence and was "quite taken back" when he saw the video online. "The video was not real. It was generated by someone using my Facebook picture without my knowledge." A watermark reading " - a generative AI website - appeared in the corner of the video, and the backdrop and clothing being worn by Rollo in the video match his Facebook profile image. "I literally had no idea where it had come from. I quickly went back and kind of scrolled over it; could tell quite quickly it was AI-generated," he said. "I really just think someone was having a wee bit of fun. But yeah, in hindsight, probably a bit too far." He said it was worrying to see that some commenters had wondered if the video was real and urged residents to be "very mindful" of online content, especially as the local election approaches. "If you see something come up of a political figure or someone who's running for council, I would certainly be looking for an authorisation statement or something that's genuine." Nelson Mayor Nick Smith echoed Rollo's concerns. He said it was a good thing the video was "so fake" and that most people would be able to determine the post was made by "somebody being mischievous". "However, it's a real warning, particularly as we go into the local elections, for people to be cautious of false claims being made to besmirch people and to influence how they vote." Smith added that Rollo, the Tāhunanui liaison councillor, was "very effective" in his role. "He's done a great job for Tāhunanui and associating him with gun violence is very unfair." After the video was taken down, Rollo found the outpouring of support from residents and his fellow elected members "super humbling". "The amount of phone calls and messages I had from people just reaching out, making sure I was okay. It's quite cool," he said. "At the end of the day, we are humans that are trying to do the best we can for the community."