logo
I felt sick when a scammer stole £2k from my bank despite writing about fraud for 20 years – the red flags I ignored

I felt sick when a scammer stole £2k from my bank despite writing about fraud for 20 years – the red flags I ignored

The Sun2 days ago
DRIVING home from an emergency vet trip for my miniature schnauzer, Luna, and my phone rang.
I pulled into answer and my mind was racing. It was two days before we were due to go on a two-week family holiday to France and I was juggling picking up the kids from nursery.
1
'Hello? Is that Ruth Jackson-Kirby…', a calm man said, with a professional voice, 'I'm from Santander's fraud team. There's been a suspicious payment on your card'.
My stomach flipped. This is the last thing we need, I thought.
He knew everything - my name, my credit card provider, the exact product, the colour of the card, and even the last four digits of a card that I'd cancelled months earlier due to fraud.
'In order to reverse the transaction, I need you to approve it in your app,' he said.
He asked me how someone could've got my card details. Had I used it somewhere dodgy? Responded to any texts from HMRC or the police?
We spoke for around 20 minutes — he waited until I got home, as I didn't have the card with me.
Then he told me the transaction was with a car hire firm in Spain, Discovery Cars. He said he could reverse it — but I'd need to approve it in the app first.
I hesitated. But he reassured me that it was just a step in the refund process — and that only a Santander staff member could trigger the app notification.
I was flustered and distracted. I tapped approve.
Despite my two-decade long career as a financial journalist where I write about scams for a living, I didn't question it.
It was only when he started talking about a second transaction that I realised and hung up.
But it was too late - £2,059 disappeared from my bank.
I had become a victim of an impersonation scam – where criminals pose as your bank, the police or HMRC – are the most common cons around.
'Despite the rise of AI, what we're seeing right now is criminals continuing to use tried and tested methods,' a National Trading Standards spokesperson told The Sun.
'These include impersonation scams that see criminals bombard consumers with texts, emails or calls that appear to be from banks or other trusted organisations like the NHS, HMRC or parcel delivery firms.'
While I was on the phone to Santander – having dialled the number on the back of my card – he rang back five times. When I finally got through, the real fraud team confirmed I'd been scammed. A payment to Discovery Cars for £2,059.99 had gone through. I felt sick.
I couldn't believe I'd fallen for it. I've written about scams for 20 years. Now I was the victim.
Thankfully, Santander refunded the money four days later. But I barely slept in the meantime. I thought I'd lost the money.
'Scammers are ruthless – and impersonation scams are rife,' says Michelle Pilsworth, head of fraud and customer experience at Santander.
'Scammers use personal data that they have taken from interactions with the individual or via the dark web to convince them to trust them, and in turn, part with their money.'
Someone at Santander told me that it often starts with a text saying you need to pay a fine or unpaid bill. You click, tap in your details, hear nothing more.
Then a year or two later, a scammer uses those details in a call like the one I received.
The red flags I ignored
LOOKING back there were red flags on the call, I just didn't notice them.
The second time he called, my husband overheard and picked up on something I'd missed: the scammer used my maiden name.
I haven't been great at updating my name everywhere, but my bank would use my married name.
He also mentioned a credit card I'd cancelled — but that card wasn't from Santander. A real Santander employee wouldn't have had access to that.
And when I started hesitating, he turned up the pressure.
'We need to act now to reverse the payment,' he said. Creating urgency is a classic scam tactic, and I fell for it
In my case, the scammer put the charge on my credit card.
Santander refunded it quickly, but if they hadn't, I could've claimed under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act.
This law means credit card providers must refund you if the goods or service don't arrive, which they wouldn't have done, and they cost between £100 and £30,000.
If I'd paid straight from my current account, it would've been a type of Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud.
Since new rules came in last year, banks must refund victims of APP scams — up to £85,000, though they can deduct a £100 excess.
But if you ignore your bank's warnings or wait too long to report the fraud, you might not get your money back.
The same scammer has called me twice since. Now I know what to do. 'I'll call you back,' I say, and hang up.
That's my advice to everyone. If someone calls saying they're from your bank or card provider – don't even listen. Don't argue. Don't let them draw you in.
Hang up. Then find the right number and call back yourself. If it's genuine, they'll tell you. And if it's not – you've just saved yourself a lot of money.
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

There are questions Beijing must answer about its Embassy plans
There are questions Beijing must answer about its Embassy plans

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

There are questions Beijing must answer about its Embassy plans

The saga of the new Chinese Embassy in London has reached its climax. Having bought the Royal Mint, a huge and historic site of more than five acres opposite the Tower of London, for £255m in 2018, Beijing is now developing it. Much of this building would be used for normal cultural and diplomatic purposes. But the plans include a vast basement with no obvious function. More concerningly, details of these plans have been redacted in Beijing's application. There are justifiable fears that the basement could become a high-tech centre for espionage, surveillance and monitoring of Chinese nationals. The basement might even include facilities where pro-democracy activists from Hong Kong could be interrogated. Lawyers for the Chinese are already exploring legal loopholes to extradite its opponents and rewards are offered to those who turn them in. The decision on granting planning permission now rests with the Housing Secretary. Angela Rayner is, of course, also the Deputy Prime Minister. As such she will be more concerned about global than local issues. Britain's economic dependence on China means that it seems most unlikely that Ms Rayner will refuse planning permission, apart from minor modifications. But it is welcome that she has at least asked for an explanation as to why the plans have been redacted. This is, however, an issue that transcends normal diplomatic relations. We cannot allow the largest embassy in Europe to be erected in such a strategic location in London without proper parliamentary and press scrutiny. Ms Rayner must elicit more information from the Chinese about what would go on inside their proposed basement. Until the Beijing authorities are more forthcoming about their intentions, the public is entitled to presume that they are sinister.

Gala Bingo players who thought they had won up to £10,000 each from £1.6m prize pot are left with NOTHING as firm blames 'computer glitch'
Gala Bingo players who thought they had won up to £10,000 each from £1.6m prize pot are left with NOTHING as firm blames 'computer glitch'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Gala Bingo players who thought they had won up to £10,000 each from £1.6m prize pot are left with NOTHING as firm blames 'computer glitch'

Almost 2,000 players were left furious after they believed they had won up to £10,000 each from a prize pot of £1.6million. Some bingo players believed their lives had been changed on Monday night after scooping what they thought were legitimate prizes. But when they attempted to withdraw their winnings, they were told by Gala Bingo that the prizes were in fact glitches and they would not be able to cash the winnings. The glitch in the bingo company's system resulted in the prize pot increasing to £1.6million when it should have only reached a maximum of £150. As a result 1,188 players were left disappointed and out of pocket. The gambling site then sent out an email to it customers explaining the wins were a result of a technical fault. One couple believed they'd won almost £10,000 between themselves on the Monday-night game. The Scottish pair, who wished to remain anonymous, had hoped to spend their winnings on the funeral of a relative but were shocked to find their accounts frozen and the money nowhere to be seen. A Scottish couple had hoped to spend their £7,000 on a funeral for a family member who had recently died and were disappointed when they were told the winnings were not theirs to cash One player even had his account on the website frozen and claims he has had his chat room privileges stopped because he was encouraging others to complain The woman told the Daily Mail that her partner had recently lost his mother and was over the moon to find the 1p game providing winnings of up to £7,200. She added that they were relieved and planned to spent the jackpot on a fully pink-themed funeral in honour of his mother. The woman said: 'My partner went up to get his medication and when he came back and sat down he looked shocked. I double checked and it said we had won £2,400. We thought we could take care of the funeral with no worries about the expense.' But the Scottish native added that she feared something wasn't right when she saw there were as many as 1,000 winners and the jackpost was still available. But her and her partner continued to play and their fears were even soothed by the bingo chat room host who told them to enjoy their winnings. She said: 'I wasn't sure about it all but then the host said "enjoy your winnings" - they obviously didn't realise what was happening.' The 52-year-old woman said that some players were able to withdraw the money straight to their Santander bank accounts but others couldn't. She told the Daily Mail that since the shocking incident, Gala Bingo has frozen her and her partners accounts and even disabled her husband's chat room privileges. because of his complaining. As recompense, she said they had been given some money back in the form of vouchers but felt it wasn't enough. She said: 'My partner is angry and it's become all-consuming, especially at such a difficult time. this has just knocked him sideways. 'It's all been dealt with so badly, it wasn't right.'

Zelenskiy says Russia seems more inclined now to a ceasefire
Zelenskiy says Russia seems more inclined now to a ceasefire

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Zelenskiy says Russia seems more inclined now to a ceasefire

KYIV, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Wednesday that Russia seemed "more inclined" to a ceasefire, but details of a potential deal are of great significance and neither Ukraine nor the U.S. should be deceived by Moscow. President Donald Trump said his special envoy Steve Witkoff's meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Wednesday delivered "great progress," but Trump gave no specifics. Following the meeting, Zelenskiy had a call with Trump, joined by European allies. "Ukraine will definitely defend its independence. We all need a lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it itself started," Zelenskiy said on X. Trump, who has signalled frustration with Putin in recent weeks and has given the Russian president until Friday to make peace with Ukraine or face tougher sanctions, hailed Witkoff's visit as highly productive. But a White House official said the secondary sanctions that Trump has threatened against countries doing business with Russia were still expected to be implemented on Friday. An executive order introducing additional 25% tariffs on India for Russian oil imports was signed on Wednesday. "The pressure on (Russia) works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details – neither us nor the U.S.," Zelenskiy said. Ukraine has repeatedly called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. Russia, which now controls about a fifth of Ukrainian territory and proceeds with its advances on the eastern front, rejected the idea. National security advisers from Ukraine and allied nations were to meet soon to work out a "joint stance", Zelenskiy added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store