logo
Nuclear Science expert Dr Adi Paterson criticises Labor's current energy policy and targets for zero carbon renewables amid soaring power bills

Nuclear Science expert Dr Adi Paterson criticises Labor's current energy policy and targets for zero carbon renewables amid soaring power bills

Sky News AU13-06-2025
A top Australian energy scientist has questioned how Labor's current energy policy could deliver cost effective solutions to consumers on dilute renewables amid soaring power bills.
The former head of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Dr Adi Paterson, told Sky News on Friday evening that the cheapest form of energy is nuclear plus renewables and as few batteries as possible.
Despite his expertise in nuclear energy, Mr Paterson said he could not understand how the government thinks its current policy is the best way to provide low cost to consumers.
"I cannot understand how our government thinks that the current energy policy, which is based on dilute renewables, can get us to a really reliable low cost to consumers, the cost at the meter," he told Sky News host Steve Price.
"This government fundamentally mixes up the cost at the fence of the facility, which is really cheap if you do solar and wind, with the cost of the meter to the consumer, which goes up if you have too much solar and wind.
"And we know that the cheapest form of energy working with renewables, not fighting with renewables, is nuclear plus renewables and as few batteries as possible.
"We're pursuing this crazy dream which is on the input side of the energy economy...which is we want to be a world leader in zero carbon with renewables, which has never been done anywhere and which is a grave mistake."
This comes as NSW Premier Chris Minns announced on Thursday the government would hold talks to to save the potential collapse of the nation's largest aluminium smelter as it struggles with crippling power bills and poor availability of renewable energy.
Rio Tinto-owned Tomago, located north of Newcastle, is reportedly seeking billions of dollars in public funds to prevent collapse.
The producer uses about 10 per cent of NSW's power supply and makes about 37 per cent of Australia's primary aluminium.
Its collapse could lead to more than 1,000 people losing their jobs, while 5,000 indirect workers could suffer.
NSW Premier Chris Minns stressed Tomago was a 'big employer in NSW, it's a dynamic part of the state, the Hunter and manufacturing is a big part of its future'.
'It's difficult for me to speculate about what the next steps are,' Mr Minns told reporters.
'In order for us to have an effective intervention, we need to have commercial discussions with the owners and operators of (Tomago). That's what we're doing.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CNN questions Nancy Pelosi over insider trading allegations
CNN questions Nancy Pelosi over insider trading allegations

Sky News AU

time11 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

CNN questions Nancy Pelosi over insider trading allegations

Former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney has reacted to CNN question former House speaker Nancy Pelosi over insider trading allegations levelled by US President Donald Trump. 'That's the reaction of a Democrat who's never had to answer a tough question before on CNN,' Mr Mulvaney told Sky News host James Morrow. 'She was stunned that they would even ask her that. 'This is the Clinton News Network. You're not supposed to ask me those questions on this.'

1400 batteries in a day: Aussies soak up solar subsidy
1400 batteries in a day: Aussies soak up solar subsidy

Perth Now

time11 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

1400 batteries in a day: Aussies soak up solar subsidy

Australian households are installing solar batteries at record rates, with more than 19,000 registered in a month. Figures released on Friday by market analysis firm SunWiz indicated consumers could more than double the number of home batteries installed in a single year, with NSW households leading the pack. The unprecedented adoption comes one month after the launch of the federal government's $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, which offered discounts of 30 per cent on the technology. But buyers might need greater protections to prevent providers from exploiting the popularity of the scheme, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has warned, and should compare several quotes before joining the trend. Analysis of the first month of the scheme showed more than 19,000 households registered batteries, SunWiz managing director Warwick Johnston said, peaking at 1400 batteries added in a single day. "In just one week, Australians installed more battery capacity than in the entire first two months of 2024," he said. If installations continued at the same pace, he said, households could install more than 220,000 batteries this year, up from 72,500 in 2024. Home batteries installed during July were also larger than typical, with an average capacity of 17 kilowatt-hours compared to between 10 and 12kWh. "Many households recognise this may be a one-time opportunity to access a significant subsidy and they're using it to invest in larger batteries," Mr Johnston said. Households in NSW made up more than a third of those to register batteries under the scheme (38 per cent), followed by Queensland (23 per cent) and South Australia (15 per cent). Most consumers installing batteries already used solar panels. The figures were revealed as the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission released its Electricity Inquiry Report, which found households with solar panels and a battery installed saved an average of 40 per cent on energy bills. Typical electricity users paid $1565 per year for electricity, the report found, while those with both a battery and solar power paid $936. But greater safeguards should be introduced to protect consumers as demand for battery installations increased, commissioner Anna Brakey warned, and the commission would closely scrutinise businesses and offers. "We believe additional consumer protections are needed as more Australians participate in markets for new and emerging energy services," she said. "Consumers looking to take advantage of the new subsidies for solar home batteries to lower their energy bills should take their time and not feel pressured to rush in straightaway." The government would hold consultations into retail price protections and cross-market manipulation following the report, Energy Minister Chris Bowen said.

BHP, Vale accused of 'cheating' UK law firm out of fees
BHP, Vale accused of 'cheating' UK law firm out of fees

Perth Now

time11 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

BHP, Vale accused of 'cheating' UK law firm out of fees

BHP and Vale face a London lawsuit from the law firm representing hundreds of thousands of people over Brazil's worst environmental disaster, alleging the companies sought to cheat the firm out of legal fees by procuring settlements. Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP said it rejected the allegations "in their entirety" and would contest them. Brazil-headquartered multinational Vale declined to comment. Pogust Goodhead, which represents the claimants in an ongoing case against BHP over the 2015 collapse of the Fundao dam in Mariana, southeastern Brazil, says it will seek Stg1.3 billion ($A2.7 billion) for unpaid fees. The firm was representing more than 600,000 Brazilians in the case at London's High Court. A June presentation by BHP and Vale's Samarco joint venture - which owned and operated the dam - said about 130,000 people had settled. In a legal letter sent on Pogust Goodhead's behalf, lawyers representing the firm allege BHP, Vale and Samarco pressured claimants to "settle their claims at far below their true value". Pogust Goodhead also alleges that a 170 billion-reais ($A47 billion) compensation agreement that Brazil signed with BHP, Vale and Samarco in October 2024 prevented claimants discussing the deal with the firm or paying its legal fees. The firm says it has also incurred an extra $US1 billion ($A1.6 billion) in borrowing costs to finance the English case over the dam's collapse. "We reject Pogust Goodhead's claims and allegations in their entirety and dispute their factual and legal basis," a BHP spokesperson said in a statement. "These allegations and threatened claims are entirely without merit and BHP rejects and will vigorously contest them." The BHP spokesperson pointed to 2024's compensation deal, saying: "We continue to believe Brazil is the most appropriate, effective, and efficient place for compensation for the Fundao dam failure from Samarco to be delivered." Pogust Goodhead's threat of legal action - in a so-called "letter before action" that is required as part of the process - is the latest development in the litigation, after the High Court in June ruled BHP should face a full contempt of court hearing for funding parallel litigation in Brazil. BHP, meanwhile, still awaits judgment following a trial of the underlying lawsuit over the dam collapse, in which Pogust Goodhead said it was seeking damages of up to Stg36 billion. When the dam burst in 2015, it unleashed a wave of toxic sludge that killed 19 people, left thousands homeless, flooded forests and polluted the length of the Doce River. The trial began in October and finished in March. BHP denies liability and says the case duplicates legal proceedings and reparation and repair programs in Brazil.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store