logo
Polis asks public to back his $29M bridge in last-ditch plea

Polis asks public to back his $29M bridge in last-ditch plea

Axios4 days ago
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is looking for a Hail Mary as opposition mounts to his pet project, a $29 million pedestrian walkway that critics call a bridge to nowhere.
Why it matters: The Democrat posted a public survey Tuesday in what amounts to a last-ditch effort to justify the project, designed to commemorate Colorado's 150th anniversary of statehood.
Driving the news: The survey comes eight months after he announced the ornate, winding bridge across Lincoln Street from the state Capitol, and he vowed to accept the public's collective verdict.
The results "will lead to the outcome of the celebration," the survey states.
It asks four questions and gives respondents the opportunity vote for "a major 150th anniversary project" in Denver, "several smaller-scale projects" elsewhere in the state or no project at all.
The fine print: The survey is live through midnight July 21.
Yes, but: The survey is far from scientific and it's easy to manipulate, making the outcome dubious, at best.
Catch up quick: An advisory committee gave an initial nod in favor of the bridge project, but in public testimony, critics called it "ugly" and "useless."
The next step is a legislative committee, where all its members are opposed.
Even if the initiative survives the committee's vote, the bridge needs the approval of the Denver City Council and state Legislature, high political hurdles.
Follow the money: Polis is soliciting big-dollar donations to cover the price tag, but the governor's office has acknowledged they are using federal pandemic relief dollars to get the design process started.
The state also will cover the unknown costs of maintaining the structure if it's built.
The other side: The governor's office touts the project as a grand monument to Colorado that will highlight local artists.
Other touted benefits include easier pedestrian access across Lincoln Street to Memorial Park and revitalizing an area often frequented by people experiencing homelessness.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrat running for NY district attorney ‘encourages' criminals to apply for job on staff
Democrat running for NY district attorney ‘encourages' criminals to apply for job on staff

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democrat running for NY district attorney ‘encourages' criminals to apply for job on staff

Crime doesn't pay — so try politics instead. The Democrat running to be Nassau County's top prosecutor encouraged convicted criminals to apply for a job on her campaign that could pay them up to $7,000 a month. District Attorney candidate Nicole Aloise's campaign posted an ad seeking a 'communications director' on job website as she tries to unseat Republican incumbent District Attorney Anne Donnelly. Advertisement 3 District Attorney candidate Nicole Aloise's campaign posted an ad seeking a 'communications director' on job website Nicole Aloise/Instagram 'People with a criminal record are encouraged to apply,' the job posting says, offering a salary range of between $6,000-$7,000 a month. The call for ex-cons to apply for a job sticks out like a sore thumb in an otherwise traditional job description that notes applicants should have previous experience in media relations, dealing with New York journalists or working on campaigns. Advertisement Any top media manager's goal is to get the candidate favorable press coverage. Donnelly called the advertisement more than politically tone-deaf, labeling the job solicitation 'dangerous,' and claiming it exposes Aloise's 'criminal-first agenda' that puts criminals over law-abiding citizens. 3 'People with a criminal record are encouraged to apply,' the job posting says. Indeed 'The District Attorney is responsible for safeguarding confidential information, ensuring justice, and holding criminals accountable—not inviting them into the heart of a campaign for Nassau County's top law enforcement post,' Donnelly told The Post. Advertisement 'Only someone deeply out of touch would prioritize hiring convicted criminals over qualified, law-abiding citizens for such a sensitive role.' Aloise is a career prosecutor who spent 16 years working in both the Queens and Nassau district attorneys' offices. Some municipalities bar employers from discriminating against convicted criminals. 3 Aloise is a career prosecutor who spent 16 years working in both the Queens and Nassau district attorneys' offices. Nicole Aloise/Instagram Advertisement New York City has the 'Ban the Box' law, also known as the Fair Chance Act, which prohibits employers from asking about an applicant's criminal history or conducting background checks until a conditional job offer is made. That means employers can't include questions about criminal records on job applications or during initial interviews. But Donnelly said explicitly singling out criminals — not law abiding citizens — to apply for a job with a DA candidate whose mission is to enforce the law is beyond the pale. 'This isn't just a campaign misstep—it's a window into Nicole Aloise's dangerous worldview,' Donnelly said. 'Hiring criminals to help run her campaign? That's who she is. Nassau residents can't afford to hand the keys to the DA's Office over to someone who embraces that kind of reckless ideology.' Aloise didn't immediately return a phone message or email seeking comment. Donnelly touted her own prosecutorial record to make Nassau one of the safest counties in America, while fighting to repeal New York's cashless bail law. 'If you want safety, accountability, and common sense in your District Attorney, I'm proud to be the choice of Nassau neighbors who want to keep Nassau the safest community in the U.S.A,' Donnelly said.

Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk
Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk

AUSTIN, Texas — U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, a Texas Democrat who represents a slice of the Rio Grande Valley along the border with Mexico, won his last congressional election by just over 5,000 votes. That makes him a tempting target for Republicans, who are poised to redraw the state's congressional maps this week and devise five new winnable seats for the GOP that would help the party avoid losing House control in next year's midterm elections. Adjusting the lines of Gonzalez's district to bring in a few thousand more Republican voters, while shifting some Democratic ones out, could flip his seat. Gonzalez said he is not worried. Those Democratic voters will have to end up in one of the Republican districts that flank Gonzalez's current one, making those districts more competitive — possibly enough so it could flip the seats to Democrats. 'Get ready for some pickup opportunities,' Gonzalez said, adding that his party is already recruiting challengers to Republicans whose districts they expect to be destabilized by the process. 'We're talking to some veterans, we're talking to some former law enforcement.' Texas has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner, a former Houston mayor, died in March. Gonzalez's district — and what happens to the neighboring GOP-held ones — is at the crux of President Trump's high-risk, high-reward push to get Texas Republicans to redraw their political map. Trump is seeking to avoid the traditional midterm letdown that most incumbent presidents endure and hold onto the House, which the GOP narrowly controls. Trump's push comes as there are numerous political danger signs for his presidency, both in the recent turmoil over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and in new polling. Surveys from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research show most U.S. adults think that his policies have not helped them and that his tax cut and spending bill will only help the wealthy. The fear of accidentally creating unsafe seats is one reason Texas Republicans drew their lines cautiously in 2021, when the constitutionally mandated redistricting process kicked off in all 50 states. Mapmakers — in most states, it's the party that controls the Legislature — must adjust congressional and state legislative lines after every 10-year census to ensure that districts have about the same number of residents. That is a golden opportunity for one party to rig the map against the other, a tactic known as gerrymandering. But there is a term, too, for so aggressively redrawing a map that it puts that party's own seats at risk: a 'dummymander.' The Texas GOP knows the risk. In the 2010s, the Republican-controlled Legislature drew political lines that helped pad the GOP's House majority. That lasted until 2018, when a backlash against Trump in his first term led Democrats to flip two seats in Texas that Republicans had thought safe. In 2021, with Republicans still comfortably in charge of the Texas Legislature, the party was cautious, opting for a map that mainly shored up their incumbents rather than targeted Democrats. Still, plenty of Republicans believe their Texas counterparts can safely go on offense. 'Smart map-drawing can yield pickup opportunities while not putting our incumbents in jeopardy,' said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, which helps coordinate mapmaking for the party nationally. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature, which starts Monday, to comply with Trump's request to redraw the congressional maps and to address the flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people this month. Democratic state lawmakers are talking about staying away from the Capitol to deny the Legislature the minimum number needed to convene. Republican Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton posted that any Democrats who did that should be arrested. Lawmakers can be fined up to $500 a day for breaking a quorum after the House changed its rules when Democrats initiated a walkout in 2021. Despite the new penalties, Democratic state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, who led the walkout in 2021, left open the possibility of another. 'I don't think anybody should underestimate the will of Texas Democrats,' he said. Texas is not the only Republican state engaged in mid-decade redistricting. After staving off a ballot measure to expand the power of a mapmaking commission last election, Ohio Republicans hope to redraw their congressional map from a 10-5 one favoring the GOP to one as lopsided as 13 to 2, in a state Trump won last year with 55% of the vote. Some Democratic leaders have suggested that states where their party is in control should counter the expected redraw in Texas. 'We have to be absolutely ruthless about getting back in power,' former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke said Sunday on CNN. But Democrats have fewer options. More of the states their party controls do not allow elected partisans to draw maps and entrust independent commissions to draw fair lines. Among them is California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has floated the long-shot idea of working around the state's commission. The few Democratic-controlled states that do allow elected officials to draw the lines, such as Illinois, have already seen Democrats max out their advantages. Trump and his allies have been rallying Texas Republicans to ignore whatever fears they may have and to go big. On Tuesday, the president posted on his social media site a reminder of his record in the state in the November election: 'Won by one and a half million Votes, and almost 14%. Also, won all of the Border Counties along Mexico, something which has never happened before. I keep hearing about Texas 'going Blue,' but it is just another Democrat LIE.' Texas has long been eyed as a state trending Democratic because of its growing nonwhite population. But those communities swung right last year and helped Trump expand his margin to nearly 14 percentage points, a significant improvement on his 5½-point win in 2020. Michael Li, a Texas native and longtime watcher of the state at the Brennan Center for Justice in New York, said there's no way to know whether that trend will continue in next year's elections or whether the state will shift back toward Democrats. 'Anyone who can tell you what the politics of Texas looks like for the balance of the decade has a better crystal ball than I do,' Li said. One region of the state where Republican gains have been steady is the Rio Grande Valley, which runs from the Gulf of Mexico along much of the state's southern border. The heavily Latino region, where many Border Patrol officers live, has rallied around Trump's anti-immigration message and policies. As a result, Gonzalez and the area's other Democratic congressman, Henry Cuellar, have seen their reelection campaigns get steadily tighter. They are widely speculated to be the two top targets of the new map. The GOP is expected to look to the state's three biggest cities to find its other Democratic targets. If mapmakers scatter Democratic voters from districts in the Houston, Dallas and Austin areas, they could get to five additional seats. But in doing so, Republicans face a legal risk on top of their electoral one: that they break up districts required by the Voting Rights Act to have a critical amount of certain minority groups. The goal of the federal law is to enable those communities to elect representatives of their choosing. The Texas GOP already is facing a lawsuit from civil rights groups alleging its initial 2021 map did this. If this year's redistricting is too aggressive, it could trigger a second complaint. 'It's politically and legally risky,' Li said of the redistricting strategy. 'It's throwing caution to the winds.' Riccardi and Lathan write for the Associated Press and reported from Denver and Austin, respectively.

NY Dem stronghold padded voter rolls with dead people, locals born in the 19th Century, new lawsuit claims
NY Dem stronghold padded voter rolls with dead people, locals born in the 19th Century, new lawsuit claims

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

NY Dem stronghold padded voter rolls with dead people, locals born in the 19th Century, new lawsuit claims

The voter rolls in the heavily Democratic city of Mount Vernon are so shady that they include dead residents and locals who were born as early as 1897, a scathing new lawsuit claims. In just over a year, the number of voters in the small Westchester County city spiked by 30%, with the increase heavily favoring the Democratic majority, City Council candidate Bill Schwartz alleged in the shocking complaint filed against county election officials last week. 'This lawsuit is about more than messy records,' Schwartz, who lost a party primary bid last month, told The Post. 'When the voter rolls are that sloppy and no one at the Board of Elections is answering questions you start to wonder what else is slipping through the cracks — or being pushed through them. Advertisement 5 Bill Schwartz, who lost a Democratic primary bid last month, says there's something fishy in Mount Vernon voter rolls. Facebook/Bill Schwartz for City Council 'I'm asking the court to step in and make sure the November election and future elections are conducted fairly, transparently and by the book,' he said. The lawsuit, filed July 15 in Supreme Court in White Plains, names the Westchester County Board of Elections and its two commissioners, Republican Doug Colety and Democrat Tajian Nelson. Advertisement Nelson could not be reached for comment, but Colety told The Post that the board couldn't comment as it had not officially been served with Scwhartz's complaint. According to Schwartz, the Democrats control the suburban city of about 80,000 residents, traditionally a powerful voting bloc that holds great political influence in the county. 5 The Westchester County city of Mount Vernon has been a powerful Democratic voting block with tons of political clout. Robert Kalfus 5 A new lawsuit claims Mount Vernon voter rolls spiked by 30% in just over a year, including with dead voters listed. Michael Nagle Advertisement Nelson, a Mount Vernon resident, not only holds the election commissioner post, but is also recording secretary for the city's Democratic committee. Her mentor, the late Reginald LaFayette, not only held the commissioner's post for years, but also served as the county and Mount Vernon party chair. Schwartz maintains party bigwigs also call the shots in the city — and not on the up-and-up. He compared voter records from last year and from June of this year and found there had been more than 10,000 new voter IDs in 13 months — a whopping number in a city with just over 41,000 voters. Last year, county board records listed 34,386 unique voter IDs, with 25,900 registered Democrats, 2,167 registered Republicans and the rest either independent or listing other parties. Advertisement 5 Bill Schwartz said he's notified the Westchester County Board of Elections of voter concerns but was ignored. Facebook/Bill Schwartz for City Council The lawsuit said this year there were now 44,021 unique voter IDs, with 31,311 registered as Democrats and just 2,821 Republicans, with the rest independent or registered to minor political parties. Schwartz also said the records were 'deeply problematic,' with the oldest voter listing a birthdate of Oct. 13, 1897, and the earliest registration date listed as Oct. 12, 1927, he said. Some 2025 voters hadn't cast a ballot in over 10 years, while others had their birthdates, addresses and party affiliation changed on the records, the lawsuit claimed. Schwartz cited two city residents now registered to vote — John Gallagher and Gregory Bonaparte — 'who are, in fact, deceased and have been for many years,' the suit said. Another 'active' voter on the Mount Vernon rolls moved to Virginia 12 years ago, another died more than 15 years ago, and yet another died in 2002, according to the lawsuit. 5 The oldest voter on the Mount Vernon rolls was born in 1897, and several others have long since died or moved away. Michael Nagle Advertisement However, Schwartz said the elections board refused to fix the records when the fraud was reported. 'This isn't just about party politics,' he said. 'It's about fairness. If we want people to have faith in our elections, then the rules need to apply to everyone, no matter how connected they are. 'Right now I don't think that's happening,' he added. 'I'm dong what I can to change it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store