logo
US to burn $10m of birth control intended for low-income countries

US to burn $10m of birth control intended for low-income countries

Independent29-07-2025
The US government is incinerating $9.7 million worth of contraceptives, originally purchased for low−income countries, at an additional cost of $167,000.
It comes despite offers from charities and European governments, including France and Belgium, to take on the costs of distributing the supplies.
The contraceptives were acquired under a contract partially cancelled as part of President Donald Trump 's significant reductions to foreign aid.
Critics, including charities and medical experts, contend that the destruction is driven by a political agenda harmful to women, rather than efficiency, and will exacerbate health crises in vulnerable populations.
The US State Department 's claim that the birth control is "abortifacient" has been refuted by medical professionals and a congressional aide who inspected the stock.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ opens probe into NY Attorney General Letitia James
DOJ opens probe into NY Attorney General Letitia James

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

DOJ opens probe into NY Attorney General Letitia James

New York Attorney General Letitia James is under investigation by the Department of Justice for bringing a civil fraud case against President Donald Trump during the 2024 election. The investigation is reportedly set to focus on whether James' office deprived legal rights to Trump and his business during their 2024 civil suit. The investigation will operate out of the US Attorney's Office in the Northern District of New York. James launched a lawsuit against Trump and his company starting in 2023 over allegations of misrepresenting his wealth and overvaluing company properties. Moreover, the criminal investigation will focus on James' 2020 lawsuit against the NRA and the organization's leadership. James sought to legally dissolve the NRA but was overruled by a judge. However, in 2024 James' office won the civil fraud case against former NRA leader Wayne LaPierre after a jury found he had misspent millions of dollars from the gun group. The NY attorney general's office responded to the investigation by calling the DOJ's actions a 'weaponization of the justice system.' 'Any weaponization of the justice system should disturb every American,' the statement reads. 'We stand strongly behind our successful litigation against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, and we will continue to stand up for New Yorkers' rights.' Details surrounding the scope, evidence, or how far along the DOJ investigation into James' office is not available. The DOJ's latest investigation into James is not the first probe launched since the start of the start of the Trump administration. Earlier this year, the FBI opened a criminal investigation into whether the attorney general made false claims on her mortgage applications. In a letter to sent DOJ Attorney General Pam Bondi back in April, James' attorney Abbe Lowell argued the mortgage filings were mistakes that were later corrected by her client on other forms. Following the Trump organization fraud conviction, the president along with his two elder sons received a $454 million judgement. The Manhattan judge in the case found that Trump and his executives misrepresented the president's wealth in order to receive favorable loans.

Trump officials will not face contempt over Venezuela deportations, appeals court rules
Trump officials will not face contempt over Venezuela deportations, appeals court rules

Reuters

time30 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump officials will not face contempt over Venezuela deportations, appeals court rules

WASHINGTON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court overturned on Friday a lower court's ruling that found probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in contempt of court over their handling of the deportations of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants under a centuries-old wartime law. The decision was a win for Republican President Donald Trump and his allies, who have argued some judges are overstepping their authority and thwarting the executive branch's broad power to conduct foreign policy and law enforcement as it sees fit. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found in April that officials could face criminal contempt charges for willfully disregarding his March 15 order barring the deportations to El Salvador of alleged Venezuelan gang members under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without the chance to challenge their removals. That ruling marked a dramatic escalation in a confrontation between the administration and the judiciary. Trump's critics say his administration has demonstrated a willingness to ignore unfavorable orders from the courts, a co-equal branch of government under the U.S. constitution. On Friday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government in its appeal of Boasberg's ruling by a 2-1 vote. "The District Court's order raises troubling questions about judicial control over core executive functions like the conduct of foreign policy and the prosecution of criminal offenses," Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas, who was appointed by Trump during his first term as president, wrote in an opinion. Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, also a Trump appointee, wrote a concurring opinion, with Circuit Judge Cornelia Pillard, an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama, dissenting. "Our system of courts cannot long endure if disappointed litigants defy court orders with impunity rather than legally challenge them," Pillard wrote. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the migrants, had no immediate comment. The contempt ruling stemmed from Boasberg's order that the administration return to the U.S. hundreds of Venezuelans who had been swiftly deported to a prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, used to intern and deport people of Japanese, German and Italian descent during World War Two. That ruling was meant to preserve Boasberg's jurisdiction as he weighed the ACLU's challenge to the legality of the deportations. Trump administration officials argued that the order to return migrants who had already been deported improperly interfered with U.S. foreign policy. Last month, the 252 deported Venezuelans being held at El Salvador's notorious CECOT maximum security prison were released and sent home to Venezuela as part of a coordinated prisoner exchange in which 10 Americans held in Venezuela returned to the United States.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store