logo
Walter Sofronoff knew material shared during Bruce Lehrmann prosecution inquiry was confidential, Federal Court hears

Walter Sofronoff knew material shared during Bruce Lehrmann prosecution inquiry was confidential, Federal Court hears

Lawyers for the ACT Integrity Commission have rebuffed claims that some of its findings about Walter Sofronoff's conduct during the inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution were legally unreasonable.
The Federal Court has concluded a hearing into Mr Sofronoff's bid for a judicial review of the commission's report into his contact with journalists during the inquiry in 2023.
The retired judge was found to have engaged in serious corrupt conduct, including by giving confidential material to Janet Albrechtsen of The Australian, and a copy of his final report to her and the ABC's Elizabeth Byrne before it was officially released.
In his application to the court, Mr Sofronoff alleged that a range of findings that acted dishonestly or in bad faith were legally unreasonable, with no evidence to support them.
But counsel for the commission, Scott Robertson, has argued there is ample evidence to support those conclusions.
He pointed to Mr Sofronoff's communications with Ms Albrechtsen, including a text message in which he provided a witness statement with the note "strictly confidential".
"Mr Sofronoff knew that this was material that should be kept confidential … consistent with his own suppression order," Mr Robertson told the court.
"Those inferences haven't been demonstrated to be so far beyond the pale, so far off the rails, as to amount to legal unreasonableness."
Walter Sofronoff has argued the legislation allowed him to do whatever he felt necessary for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry, and that he was acting in the public interest.
Mr Robertson said this did not mitigate the finding of corrupt conduct.
"It's not enough just to think … your purposes were higher purposes than those of your statutory function," he said.
In his submissions in reply, Mr Sofronoff's barrister, Adam Pomerenke, argued non-publication orders did not prevent the inquiry chair from disclosing information, and the text message to Ms Albrechtsen did not indicate otherwise.
"It's saying to Ms Albrechtsen: this is strictly confidential, binding on you, do not publish it," Mr Pomerenke told the court.
Justice Wendy Abraham questioned Mr Pomerenke on whether disclosing the material was a breach of witnesses' expectations.
"They would understand that it wouldn't be distributed, because it was confidential," Justice Abraham suggested.
Mr Pomerenke replied that it was not a "legitimate expectation".
He told the court the commission had demonstrated "the unwisdom of what was done".
"But in our respectful submission, [it] has not demonstrated dishonesty," Mr Pomerenke said.
The ACT government called the inquiry after the collapse of Bruce Lehrmann's 2022 criminal trial for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins, which left no verdict.
He later sued Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson for defamation over the interview in which Ms Higgins made her allegations.
Justice Michael Lee found, on the balance of probabilities, Mr Lehrmann did rape his then-colleague at Parliament House in 2019.
An appeal against that decision is due to be heard next month.
Justice Abraham told the court she would not rule on Mr Sofronoff's application today.
"Not surprisingly, I'm going to reserve my decision; I have plenty to think about," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

YouTube to be included in government's new under-16s social media legislation
YouTube to be included in government's new under-16s social media legislation

7NEWS

time2 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

YouTube to be included in government's new under-16s social media legislation

The Albanese Government will include YouTube in its world-first under-16 social media laws that come into effect at the end of the year. Proposed age-restricted social media platforms originally included Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X, but not YouTube as the Government believed it had educational benefits. But eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant intervened following a survey of adolescents, finding YouTube can be just as harmful as other sites. Online Safety (Age-Restricted Social Media Platforms) Rules will be tabled in Federal Parliament on Wednesday to specify which types of online services will not be captured by the social media legislation, including online gaming, messaging apps, health and education services. The government said these types of online services have been excluded from the new minimum age obligations because they pose less of a risk to under 16s, or are regulated under different laws. From December 10, 2025, all services that meet the definition of 'age-restricted social media platform' in the Act, and are not excluded in the rules, will be subject to the social media minimum age law including fines up to $49.5 million. 'We have parents' backs' The prime minister says his government is making it clear that it stands on the side of families. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it,' Albanese said. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' Communications Minister Anika Wells said the government 'is giving kids a reprieve from the persuasive and pervasive pull of social media while giving parents peace of mind'. 'We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are,' Wells said. 'There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online – but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing. 'The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support. 'There are heavy penalties for companies who fail to take reasonable steps to prevent underage account holders onto their services of up to $49.5 million. 'There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children.' 'Voices against the cod cannot be ignored' The Opposition is now questioning the advice and authority of the eSafety Commissioner. Shadow communications spokesperson Melissa McIntosh said 'the remit of the eSafety Commission without adequate safeguards is now in question.' 'Requiring adults to log in to an account to browse the internet is taking the eSafety Commissioner's power to a new level which needs to be scrutinised,' McIntosh said. 'The voices against the code cannot be ignored and whilst the intent is to protect young people from harms it is essential that this is balanced with a person's right to privacy and protection of their personal freedoms.'

Wighton cops four-game ban in a huge blow for the Rabbitohs
Wighton cops four-game ban in a huge blow for the Rabbitohs

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Wighton cops four-game ban in a huge blow for the Rabbitohs

Wayne Bennett's hopes of avoiding his first wooden spoon have taken a massive hit with veteran playmaker Jack Wighton slapped with a whopping four-match ban after he was found guilty of a grade two shoulder charge at the NRL judiciary on Tuesday night. The Rabbitohs have lost eight in a row and head into round 22 in last spot behind the Knights and Titans on points differential, but their hopes of causing a gigantic boilover against the Broncos have copped a devastating blow with their five-eighth sidelined. He joins a host of stars who are missing for the club including Cam Murray, Latrell Mitchell and Cody Walker. Wighton could have accepted a three-match ban for the grade two charge that saw him sent to the sin bin for a tackle that knocked out Cronulla's Toby Rudolf on Saturday night but rolled the dice after he pleaded not guilty. The panel of Greg McCallum and Bob Lindner listened to the 75-minute hearing and deliberated for just 15 minutes before they unanimously found him guilty. 'It was a fair hearing,' Wighton said afterwards. 'We came here thinking we had a good case. We didn't get the result we wanted. 'I'll turn my attention to preparing my teammates and really helping everyone at my club the best way I can.' It was a reunion of sorts between Wighton and judiciary counsel Patrick Knowles, with the five-eighth asking him 'how many games of rugby league have you played?' during a fiery hearing in 2023 when he was banned for three matches for biting. Wighton didn't give evidence on this occasion, a point not lost on Knowles who suggested he could have explained why there were no other options available to him to make a different type of tackle. However, judiciary chairman Geoff Bellew reminded the panel that Wighton had no obligation to justify. Knowles described the contact as a 'textbook example of a shoulder charge' and that he twisted his body, the right shoulder led the forceful contact and that his left arm raised in a bracing motion but didn't attempt to wrap. 'The amount of force generated in a tackle that used no arms carries a significant risk of injury,' he said. 'The shoulder was the first impact and carried the primary degree of force.' Prominent Sydney lawyer Nick Ghabar represented Wighton and argued it was 'quite wrong' to suggest he propped and drove with the shoulder and that he did his best to avoid a head on collision. Ghabar argued that the right arm wrapped around Rudolf's left arm before contact and that the Cronulla forward generated the force by leading with his head and arms. 'Rudolf stepped 'violently' off his left foot,' he said, arguing that it was inevitable that there'd be a more violent collision if Wighton hadn't dipped his body. 'Wighton drops his body height to avoid the risk of a head clash. He's got a split second decision to make. He's attempting to tackle with his left arm but his right arm doesn't have the ability to swing around the back of Rudolf.' The referee's report from Belinda Sharpe included a quote from Wighton that said 'I couldn't get my arm out', while the medical report said the injury was caused by a 'head clash from opponent'. Ghabar suggested that the first contact was shoulder on shoulder, but that played into the argument it was an actual shoulder charge. Knowles refuted a number of those arguments and pointed out Wighton's right fist was clenched so it couldn't have been a conventional wrapping tackle and that he could've twisted the other way and made a conventional left shoulder tackle. Ghabar sought a downgrade that would have seen Wighton miss two matches, but it was dismissed after Knowles argued the force was moderate, it was careless and the risk of injury was moderate and that the risk came to fruition. Wighton will miss matches against the Broncos, Titans, Eels and Dragons and will return in the final round against the Roosters, with Lewis Dodd likely to start in the halves.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store