
‘Screwed': Consumers to wear cost of RBA card surcharge ban but central bank insists it won't be inflationary
In a consultation paper on Tuesday, the central bank proposed the removal of surcharge fees on eftpos, Mastercard and Visa transactions, expected to save $1.2 billion annually or about $60 per card-using adult.
The RBA first allowed businesses to start applying a surcharge in 2003 to encourage consumers to use lower-cost payment methods at a time of growth in the higher-cost credit card market.
But RBA governor Michele Bullock said it was now becoming increasingly difficult to avoid surcharges as consumers embraced card and digital payment methods over cash.
Representatives from the hospitality sector slammed the proposed blanket ban, describing it as another blow to businesses already buckling under the weight of skyrocketing operating costs like wages, rent, energy and insurance.
Australian Restaurant and Cafe Association chief executive Wes Lambert said while he appreciated the RBA was working to reduce merchant fees, its proposal added to small businesses' expenses.
'(Businesses) who have always passed on the merchant fee directly to consumers, so therefore never had a merchant fee expense on their (income statement), will either be forced to absorb those new merchant fees . . . or they'll have to pass those additional expenses that they've never had before onto their consumers in the form of increased menu prices,' he said.
'Consumers will end up getting screwed . . . consumers will pay more than $1.2b in increased menu prices.
'The RBA is sounding like a used-car salesman (by) trying to sell us a piece of junk as a brand new car.'
By including credit cards, the central bank's proposal goes further than Treasurer Jim Chalmers' plan to ban fees on debit card transactions from the start of 2026.
Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chair Matthew Addison described the RBA's claim of $1.2b in consumer savings as a 'mirage'.
'Removing surcharges doesn't remove all the cost, it simply hides it,' he said.
'The reality is that these fees will still be paid, just not disclosed. That cost will be baked into the price of coffee, groceries, and services across the country.'
But the RBA in its paper claimed the proposed reforms would not be inflationary, with the aggregate impact on consumer prices expected to be about 0.1 percentage points.
AMP economist My Bui also doesn't expect the removal of surcharges to 'play out in the inflation data'.
'If the cost to do business, in terms of using card or cash, is baked into the price then theoretically, it shouldn't change anything,' she said.
Mr Lambert said customers who pay with cash would be 'the biggest loser'.
'Because they never had to pay a merchant fee and now they will have to pay an increased menu price,' he said.
In a blow to major banks, the RBA has also called for interchange fees — the wholesale fees a merchant's bank pays to a cardholder's bank — to be lowered. The central bank claimed these fees were too high and the proposed changes would leave around 90 per cent of businesses better off.
Commonwealth Bank, Westpac and ANZ all declined to comment and instead directed questions be passed onto the Australian Banking Association.
A National Australia Bank spokeswoman said as the country's biggest business bank, it knew how important it was to support firms and consumers through changes that enhanced competition, transparency, efficiency and consistency.
She said NAB looked forward to the ongoing conversation with the Government and industry over the coming weeks.
The announcement triggered a 2.7 per cent drop in payments provider Tyro's share price to 90¢.
The company provides payment machines used by many retailers and hospitality businesses nationally.
In a statement to the market, Tyro chief Jon Davey said it welcomed the RBA's proposal, which aimed to increase transparency and lower card costs for consumers and merchants.
'The RBA's proposal supports a holistic view of payments reform that benefits small businesses,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Herald Sun
12 hours ago
- Herald Sun
Melbourne: Less listings, rising prices facing home buyers
Melbourne home buyers are facing less choice and a growing risk of imminent price rises after the number of new listings across the city substantially slumped last month. A report released this week shows the amount of new abodes listed in Victoria's capital dropped 14.1 per cent in June, compared to May. While winter starting traditionally leads to fewer homes being put up for sale, there was also a 4.4 per cent decrease in new listings across the 12 months to June. RELATED: Melbourne houses tipped to hit new high by Christmas $3.75m Eaglemont auction shocks buyers Phone bidder from NSW swoops at entry-level Leopold auction And research arm, PropTrack, is expecting 666 across Victoria this week, 19 per cent less than the same time last year. PropTrack senior economist Angus Moore said that having less stock on the market could lead to increased competition and, in turn, support home prices. 'We're expecting to see a couple more rate cuts this year – coupled with the fact Melbourne home prices have been consistently increasing this year for the first time since the RBA started raising rates, that's likely to support vendor confidence,' Mr Moore said. Total Melbourne listings, meaning all homes up for sale, not just new ones, declined 5.8 per cent from June 2024 to June 2025. Plus, PropTrack data last week revealed the city's median house price rose 1.6 per cent to hit $979,979 in June. Industry experts have tipped that Greater Melbourne's median house vale could top seven-figures before December. Victoria also recorded a 66 per cent clearance rate last week. Real Estate Institute of Victoria interim chief executive Jacob Caine said that the state's weekly clearance rates had been incrementally ticking upwards. 'We would attribute that to even though we didn't get an interest-rate cut last week, buyers and sellers are pricing in interest rate cuts to their buying and selling decisions,' Mr Caine said. 'So there's an anticipation of an easing in terms of repayment amounts and interest rates – and as a result, people are starting to demonstrate a little bit more confidence, whether that's from a buying perspective, or from having the confidence to go to the market and sell.' Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox. MORE: Aussie property hotspots: Where homes sell in days AFL stars Mark and Lachie Hunter's family home sets 2025 record Trump role in Melbourne CBD office market's suburb-sized hole

Sky News AU
17 hours ago
- Sky News AU
RBA 'made a mistake' with shock interest rate hold, KPMG's Brendan Rynne declares after unemployment rate rises in June
A leading economist has torn into the Reserve Bank of Australia's recent decision to hold the cash rate after it was revealed the unemployment rate rose in June. Fresh data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed the unemployment rate rose 0.2 per cent to 4.3 per cent after it sat near historic lows following the pandemic. The unemployment rate is a critical piece of data for the RBA's cash rate decision, and a rise would typically mean the central bank would lower rates. After the central bank held the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, despite money markets overwhelmingly factoring in a 0.25 per cent cut, many lashed out over the shock decision. The fresh jobs data led to heightened backlash, with KPMG's chief economist Brendan Rynne joining the chorus during an appearance on Sky News Business Now. "I think they made a mistake in keeping the cash rate at 3.85 per cent," Mr Rynne said. "The risk associated with dropping that cash rate down - in terms of getting an inflation bounce compared to providing some support into the private side of the economy - we think that risk trade-off is one that should have been associated with the dropping the cash rate down to 3.6 per cent. "In the next meeting, we know that the Reserve Bank was saying it's not a matter of if rates are going to drop, it's just going to be a matter when rates drop. "We fully expect now that 25 basis points to come off at the next meetings." After holding the rate earlier this month, RBA governor Michele Bullock said the decision was due to "timing" as it awaited further data on inflation. 'The board decided to wait a few weeks to confirm that we're still on track to meet our inflation and employment objectives," she told reporters after the decision. Mr Rynne predicted annual trimmed mean inflation - the middle 70 per cent of price changes core to the RBA's decision - would come in a 2.5 per cent for the June quarter, which is in the RBA's target band. He did forecast headline inflation - which examines everything in the ABS' consumer price index - will shift as government rebates phase out. "Headline inflation will bounce over the remainder of this year, coming back up a little as the full effect of the electricity rebates and cost of living rebates start to roll off," "Notwithstanding those, we do think that that inflation is still pretty weak, particularly goods inflation, and it's going to be that further rolling off of services inflation that's going bring it down in total." If the RBA had cut rates in July, it would have been the first consecutive rate cut since the central bank delivered an emergency cut in 2020 during the onset of the pandemic. Every major bank forecasted a 25 basis point cut in July while money markets at one pointed priced in a 99 per cent chance of a cut. If the RBA is to cut rates in August, it will be the third rate cut this year and will bring the cash rate down to 3.6 per cent.

Sydney Morning Herald
21 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Forget card surcharges, these three invisible fees are costing us more
But with online overseas shopping now so popular, they are a larger deal than ever. They also remain curiously large. While the average foreign transaction fee is 3 per cent, it can go as high as 5 per cent. And besides this card-issuer fee, payment networks like Visa, Mastercard, and American Express may also charge their own international transaction fees, which can be up to another 1 per cent. Card surcharges are rarely levied on online purchases, because of the no-cash-no-card-charge rule, but per $100 purchase, you can still easily forgo $4 for, well, nothing. Various cards now offer foreign-exchange-fee-free transactions. And a new alternative is to maintain a travel money card at all times for overseas purchases. These are purpose-designed debit cards with favourable exchange rates for money pre-loaded onto them in other currencies. The cost of that exchange is usually not explicit. Instead, it's built into the conversion rate you get. (Such cards also usually spruik no- or low-cost ATM withdrawals overseas.) The problem I've found with travel cards, especially when you travel, is if you incorrectly estimate what you'll spend, currency stuck on such a card becomes a conundrum. Do you wait until you next visit that country? Travel card companies pick up a pretty penny if you leave money languishing, in interest. Loading But you'll wear a double conversion cost if you instead switch the money again into another currency, maybe Australian dollars. Which brings me to the enormous amount you might not realise you are paying from your superannuation and investments. 3. Investing, whether in or out of super. Hidden trailing commissions on your investments, which came straight out of your fund balance, were banned many years ago now. These were rivers of perennially flowing gold for financial advisers. But guess what? Asset-based fees were not banned. And if there was an adviser in the mix of any investments, these may lop off the top of your money, too. However, there is another layer of charging we all pay: fund management fees. These vary significantly depending on the level of management of your investments – or superannuation fund. An average amount would be 1.5 per cent – or $1500 on a $100,000 balance. Which might be fine … but check, when your super performance for last financial year is released (any day), whether your returns made your fees worth it. If you're paying more for 'highly active' management, are you getting higher returns? Now, also coming out of your super fund will be insurance premiums, but I generally support these – they're cheap, and the insurance is a great safety net. You'll have a default level of life and total and permanent disability insurance. You may also be able to get limited income protection insurance on request. Hidden fees are a fact of life in our financial system – and you can bet they're about to be re-hidden when it comes to card purchases. Just never obliviously hand over more than you need.