
Aquaculture shock: Spare a lifeline for shrimp farmers reeling under US tariffs
This comes on top of existing anti-dumping and countervailing duties of approximately 8% on shrimp, pushing the total effective duty to 33%, which was just 7.5% before US President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariff announcements of 2 April.
In recent years, Indian shrimp farming has shown an impressive performance. It grew at a compound annual growth rate of 18% between 2011 and 2023. This growth relied heavily on exports. Demand from the US has been a major driver of this increase. Consider the numbers.
In 2023-24, India exported over $2.5 billion worth of shrimp to the US, making up nearly 38% of America's total shrimp imports, followed by Ecuador's share of 21%, Indonesia's 17% and Vietnam's 11% (ITC data, 2024).
Also read: Trump's trade shock: There's a world beyond those stars and stripes
However, major competitors of India in the US shrimp market have secured far more favourable terms in terms of import tariffs. Ecuador currently faces an effective duty of 18%, Indonesia's rate has dropped from 35% to 25.3% and Vietnam's has been reduced from a steep 46% to 20% following recent negotiations by these countries with the US.
In contrast, India now faces an effective tariff of 33%, creating a 14 to 15 percentage point disadvantage compared to Ecuador, its closest competitor in US market. The widened tariff gap risks diminishing India's competitive edge and reducing its market share in the US, which would put pressure on Indian exporters, processors and farmers.
India's 'revealed comparative advantage'—a measure of a particular good's concentration in a country's export basket in relation to its share of world trade—in shrimp exports is 4.4, lower than Ecuador's 16.0, highlighting Ecuador's stronger specialization and rapid growth through vertical integration.
India primarily exports raw frozen shrimp, which make up about half of US imports. In 2024, India's average landing price in the US of this export was $7.69 per kg, compared to Ecuador's $7.06. Despite higher freight charges, India's cost advantage was on account of labour-intensive peeling and processing. However, the recent 25% US tariff threatens this competitiveness.
Prepare for rising costs and shrinking margins: Even before this tariff increase, Indian shrimp farmers were facing lower profits due to high input costs. Shrimp feed, which makes up nearly 60% of total production costs, has seen the highest rise.
Global inflation in feed ingredients like fishmeal and soybean, along with the depreciation of the rupee and supply chain glitches, has pushed feed prices up by 25-30% in the last three years.
For small and medium farmers culturing Litopenaeus vannamei (white leg shrimp), the average production cost has risen to about ₹280- ₹300 per kg. However, with average farm-gate prices ranging between ₹340 and ₹360 per kg, profit margins have shrunk. If farm-gate prices drop below ₹280 per kg, many businesses incur losses.
Also read: India may cut duties on US shrimp imports
Indian processors are currently delivering past export orders, as the peak harvest and export period is on, with stocking underway in export destinations for a festive demand bounce. With the new American tariff rules, exporters may need to absorb the extra cost burden, reducing their margins.
The impact will percolate to farmers, who are already operating on low margins. It will hit farmers in Andhra Pradesh the hardest as they account for over 82% of India's total shrimp production, followed by those in states like Odisha, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat.
The impact is not limited to coastal areas. Under the Union government's Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana, inland saline aquaculture is being promoted in inland states like Haryana and Punjab. These states are converting salinity-affected lands into productive aquaculture zones.
Inland farmers, many of whom are new to shrimp farming, are now facing uncertainty just as they begin to expand operations. If farm-gate prices fall due to an export disruption, it could stall progress in these emerging aquaculture areas.
What can be done in response: The Indian shrimp industry's hope is of lower tariffs through negotiations. But if high US tariff rates persist, India must treat this trade shock as a wake-up call to diversify export markets, increase production efficiency and boost domestic demand for shrimp.
There is an urgent need to diversify India's shrimp export markets beyond the US, with a greater focus placed on East Asia, the EU, UK and West Asia. The India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement offers a timely opportunity to boost shrimp exports to the UK by leveraging the pact's tariff advantages.
India's Marine Products Export Development Authority can play a key role in branding Indian shrimp and facilitating market development abroad.
Also read: Raising farmer income is a key priority for India
Also, the farmers' access to institutional credit and insurance must be improved. Small farmers often struggle with working capital constraints and shrimp crop insurance schemes need to be scaled up with transparent and efficient claim-settlement mechanisms.
Boosting domestic consumption is no less critical. Shrimp could be mainstreamed into Indian non-vegetarian diets through awareness campaigns of its nutritional value. Our growing market for ready-to-eat and ready-to-cook food is likely to welcome it.
These are the authors' personal views.
The authors are a fellow and a research associate, respectively, at the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
How Trump and Putin reached a new make-or-break moment on Ukraine
WASHINGTON—President Trump has long believed the crux of foreign policy is two leaders in a room making historic deals. Pulling off a cease-fire in Ukraine with Russian President Vladimir Putin would be the kind of diplomatic coup he has long craved. It remains a long shot. The leaders could meet as soon as next week to pursue a peace agreement following months of maneuvering. But their approaches remain at odds. Trump has urged Putin to stop the war but has shown little interest in the specifics of a deal. The Kremlin boss has rebuffed all appeals to halt the fighting, except on his terms. After months of failed efforts to forge a deal, first by coercing Kyiv and later by wooing Putin, Trump has come around to the belief that heightened economic pressure on Moscow might be the only way to get an agreement. To sway Putin, Trump has embarked on a more confrontational course, threatening sanctions on countries that purchase Russian energy. He targeted India, a major buyer of Russian oil, with 50% tariffs on its goods shipped to the U.S. Other nations that import Russian oil and gas, including China, could see their duties raised by Trump's Friday deadline for an agreement. But even Trump seemed less than optimistic Thursday following talks earlier in the week between his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Putin in Moscow. 'We're going to see what he has to say," Trump told reporters of Putin. 'That's going to be up to him." The White House is working on arranging a meeting with Putin but would like a three-way meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'President Trump would like to meet with both President Putin and President Zelensky because he wants this brutal war to end," she said. The Russian leader said he is only open 'in principle" to talks with Zelensky. 'We are still far from creating such conditions," said Putin, who has frequently called into question Zelensky's legitimacy. Putin wouldn't have to agree to meet Zelensky for Trump to see him, the White House said. If the Trump-Putin summit happens, it could prove the biggest test of Trump's dealmaking skills this term. Trump returned to the White House vowing he could stop the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, later claiming he was merely joking. Privately, Trump is fuming at his failure to halt the war 200 days into his second presidency, according to aides. He has slowly come to recognize that a settlement must take account of Zelensky's bottom line and that of key European governments, who insist they won't recognize Russian control over any conquered territory—a key Kremlin demand—as part of an agreement. There is the added concern that Putin may not be serious about reaching a deal. 'Putin has made it clear that the Ukraine war is more important to him than the relationship with the U.S.," said Alina Polyakova, president and CEO of the Washington-based Center for European Policy Analysis. Another challenge for Trump will be navigating talks with a Russian leader who has a quarter-century of experience dealing with various U.S. presidents and has proved himself skilled in influencing them. If Trump meets with Putin and emerges empty-handed, he will have to decide whether to increase pressure on Russia, despite his skepticism that economic or military moves would alter the Kremlin's calculus, or follow through on a threat he had made repeatedly to abandon the peace process. Either way, Polyakova said, 'the war keeps dragging on." Russian President Vladimir Putin and Steve Witkoff, President Trump's envoy, in Moscow this week. Trump entered his second term confident his rapport with Putin would overcome the complexities of the war Russia launched in February 2022. The president's supporters say he has been wrongly caricatured as too cozy and deferential to the Russian leader. 'People have misunderstood Trump's approach," said Fred Fleitz, who was a senior National Security Council official during the first term. 'It isn't that Trump likes dictators. He believes America has to coexist with Russia. Since we're not going to war, how do we deal with them?" Trump and Putin have held multiple calls and passed numerous messages through intermediaries, U.S. officials and other people familiar with their communications said. Their conversations, according to a senior administration official, have been typically friendly. Trump often discusses his aim of a revived U.S.-Russian relationship propelled by growing economic cooperation. Putin lists his grievances and core desires, mainly international recognition of Russia's control over Crimea and the Donbas region, much of which it has seized from Ukraine. Their calls extend for hours sometimes due to lengthy Putin monologues and the need for translations, current and former U.S. officials said. Trump, usually impatient and anxious to chime in, listens attentively, aides said. 'Putin does this very methodically," John Bolton, Trump's third national security adviser during the first term, said of the former KGB officer. 'He's very knowledgeable, he knows what he's talking about. When he wants to try and influence somebody, he just talks and talks and talks." Putin has carefully studied the new Trump administration and understands where Russia's leverage with the president lies, said Fiona Hill, who was a top Russia aide in the White House during Trump's first term. 'Putin's done his homework. He's had years of figuring out who Trump is," she said. Part of that homework was determining how to prosecute his war while sending signals of openness to diplomacy. Russia still attacks Ukrainian cities and infrastructure with long-range missiles and drones, killing civilians with regularity. The conflict along the roughly 750-mile front line remains a grinding war of attrition, with Russia's summer offensive clawing gradual gains against a staunch and stretched Ukrainian defense. Moscow's lead in air power and troop numbers have given it the upper hand in the fight, U.S. and European officials quietly admit, though Russia's glaring weakness remains its heavily sanctioned economy. Trump's frustrations with Putin started to seep into the open at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in June, when he called his Russian counterpart's refusal to end the war 'misguided." 'I'm very surprised. Actually, I thought we would have had that settled easy," Trump told reporters. A July 3 phone call lasted barely an hour—far shorter than their previous chats. The call lacked the warmth with which they normally spoke to each other, the senior administration official said. There wasn't a flashpoint, but Trump ended it feeling perplexed, adding to his gnawing sense of being dragged along. Trump later acknowledged that Putin would say one thing in their conversations about his interest in halting the war and yet do another thing. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'And I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit.'" A frustrated Trump announced last month that he would give Putin 50 days to complete a cease-fire with Ukraine, later shortening the deadline to Friday. Failure to do so would lead the U.S. to sanction some of Russia's top energy customers, a strategy aimed at choking off Moscow's major remaining sources of revenue for its war effort. Administration officials and close presidential confidants said Trump and Putin didn't have a single, major blowup this year. Instead it was a 'series of moments," in the words of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), that ultimately convinced Trump that 'Putin was trying to play him." 'You see now a turning of the page, and Putin has nobody to blame but himself," Graham said. But there are concerns in the U.S. and Europe that Putin floated the idea of a meeting to continue stringing Trump along, not to settle for peace. Putin might propose that Russia officially control some of the Ukrainian territory it occupies in exchange for a withdrawal of his forces from other parts of Ukraine, said a senior European diplomat and a Ukrainian official. Trump, eager for a deal, might urge Ukraine and allies to accept the offer. Kyiv and other European governments would likely reject the plan, the official said, playing into Putin's hands because Trump, rarely concerned with the details of a peace settlement, might then blame Ukraine for continuing to fight. Trump could cut off intelligence and military support for Ukraine, as he did earlier this year, setting back Zelensky's efforts to align himself more closely with Trump following a combative Oval Office meeting in February. The U.S. could also remove itself from the diplomatic process entirely, leaving Moscow and Kyiv to continue what Trump has long labeled 'Biden's war." But those who know Trump suspect he will keep pursuing the most prized deal of his early presidency, where success or failure could define his legacy. 'He wants to be the guy who gets deals," said Marc Short, a first-term senior White House aide. 'That is his brand." Write to Alexander Ward at Alex Leary at and Matthew Luxmoore at


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
US calls India strategic partner, vows full and frank talks despite trade, oil rift
The United States called India a "strategic partner" and said it will keep engaging New Delhi in a "full and frank dialogue," even as the two sides grapple with disputes over tariffs, trade imbalance and Russian oil US President Donald Trump ruling out further trade negotiations with India until issues over its Russian oil imports are resolved, the State Department struck a more measured Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott said the president had been clear about his concerns about the trade imbalance and oil purchases but emphasised that India remains a strategic partner with whom the US maintains a "full and frank dialogue."WASHINGTON REAFFIRMS ENGAGEMENT WITH INDIA Speaking to reporters in Washington on Thursday, Pigott said the Trump administration was committed to addressing disagreements directly."The President has been very clear in terms of the concerns he has regarding the trade imbalance, regarding the concerns he has when it comes to the purchase of Russian oil. You have seen him take action directly on that. India is a strategic partner with whom we engage in a full and frank dialogue. That will continue," Pigott said. When asked whether Washington was concerned about worsening ties with India or the risk of New Delhi drawing closer to China, State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott said the US remained committed to addressing differences through direct and ongoing engagement with its strategic pointed to two specific areas of friction -- the trade imbalance and India's purchase of Russian oil."Addressing those concerns is important. The President has been very clear," Pigott said. "Ultimately, this is about a frank and full dialogue. That's what it means to advance American interests."Pigott avoided addressing China and other Brics nations' role in mobilising opposition to US trade measures but reaffirmed that engagement with India will RULES OUT INDIA TRADE TALKSEarlier, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump was asked if he expected further talks following his announcement of steep tariffs, to which he replied, "Not until we get it resolved."Trump's remarks follow his earlier warning of new "secondary sanctions" on countries trading with Moscow, after being questioned on why India was being singled out for its ties with Russia while others continue to purchase Russian US president on Wednesday signed an executive order subjecting Indian imports to an additional 25 per cent trade tariff on India after warning the country over its oil purchases from Russia, taking the total levy to 50 per cent. The new tariffs will take effect on August 27.- EndsWith inputs from agencies Tune InMust Watch


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Billions of dollars flowing into US: Trump after sweeping new tariffs take effect
United States President Donald Trump on Thursday celebrated the official rollout of his wide-ranging new tariffs, targeting imports from more than 90 countries. In a late-night post on Truth Social, just as the higher tariff rates came into effect, Trump said: 'It's midnight!!! Billions of dollars in tariffs are now flowing into the United States of America!'The new tariffs, ranging from 10 per cent to 50 per cent, officially began at 12:01 am on August 7, when US Customs and Border Protection started collecting the revised Trump described the moment as a turning point in US trade policy, claiming that revenues were largely coming from nations that had 'taken advantage of the United States for many years, laughing all the way.''The only thing that can stop America's greatness would be a radical left court that wants to see our country fail!' he added in another rollout followed a week of uncertainty after Trump delayed implementation of most tariffs just hours before an earlier August 1 deadline. According to the New York Post, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent projected that annual tariff revenues could exceed USD 300 countries are seeing steep penalties, while Brazil and India face tariffs as high as 50 per cent. Trump framed Brazil's hike as retaliation for the prosecution of his political ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro. India was targeted over its continued purchase of Russian oil, with Trump initially threatening a 25 per cent tariff before increasing it to 50 per not all US trade partners faced equal treatment. Eight major countries, including Japan, South Korea, and the EU, secured negotiated reductions to 15 per cent. The UK received a 10 per cent rate, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Philippines saw duties adjusted to around 19–20 per has also hinted at using tariffs as leverage in future trade showdowns, particularly with China, where an August 12 deadline looms for a possible agreement. Without a deal, tariffs on Chinese goods could rise to a staggering 245 per the administration sees the tariffs as a tool to 'reset the global trading order,' economists warn of broader market disruptions and potential cost increases for American consumers.- EndsTune InMust Watch