Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill has safeguards to prevent misuse, critics haven't read it: CM Fadnavis
'Those opposing the legislation have not studied it. And Those who have read are supporting it,' Fadnavis told reporters in Nagpur.
Reiterating that the stated objective of the legislation was to prevent unlawful activities of left-wing extremist organisations with a focus on 'urban Naxalism', Fadnavis said, 'The safeguards in the legislation are so strong leaving no scope for its misuse.'
Passed in the Legislative Assembly and Council, the Bill will now be referred to Governor C P Radhakrishnan for his consent, paving the way for its enforcement.
'I have repeatedly stated that the objective of the Bill is to combat Naxalism and banned Maoist extremist outfits. And take action against those organisations that are systematically operating to create anarchy. They are challenging the Indian Constitution, Parliament and institutions…' Fadnavis said.
More than 12,000 suggestions received from various organisations and the public were taken into consideration while making the final draft of the Bill, the chief minister said. Fadnavis did not mention any individual leader or organisation.
'This legislation is not directed at any political parties or agitation or critics. All those working within the framework of the Indian Constitution and democracy have no reason to fear. Their rights and freedom remain intact,' he added.
On Friday, Shiv Sena (UBT) president Uddhav Thackeray voiced strong opposition to the legislation. 'If the legislation is to combat Naxalism and terror, why are these terms not mentioned? Simply say the Bill is to fight Naxals and terrorism, ' he said while speaking to reporters on Vidhan Bhawan premises.
Fadnavis further said that under the Bill, action cannot be taken against an individual but an organisation first. 'It would require consent from an advisory board headed by the chief justice of the high court or a retired judge,' he added.
The advisory board will include district magistrates or government pleaders in the high court, and investigating officers will be of the rank of superintendent of police.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘If anyone has a problem, they need to learn to deal with it': Uddhav Thackeray on alliance with Raj
Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray Sunday addressed the political buzz surrounding his recent show of unity with Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray, stating that people who have a problem with the two cousins coming together need to learn to deal with it. He also cryptically remarked that their coming together on the issue of Marathi should not be seen through a political prism. 'If someone has a problem with the two of us brothers coming together, they should deal with their discomfort. Together, we will work for Maharashtra's betterment and take the right decisions at the right time,' Uddhav Thackeray said in the second part of his interview with his party's newspaper, Saamana. On July 5, 2025, Uddhav shared the stage with his cousin Raj for the first time in 20 years. They held a victory rally in Mumbai over the Maharashtra government's U-turn on introducing Hindi as a third language in primary schools. When asked directly about discussions with Raj regarding a political alliance, Uddhav said,'Yes, we have spoken. The very fact that we have come together after 20 years is significant. Sometimes, unity in appearance says more than a thousand words.' He, however, added, 'Not everything needs to be turned into a political arrangement. But for the sake of the Marathi language, identity, and pride, I am ready to do whatever it takes.' On the Hindi-Marathi language issue, Thackeray stated that while he is not opposed to Hindi, he would stand up against any injustice perpetrated against the Marathi language. 'The Marathi community has a distinct character. We are not aggressive, not rebellious, and we don't commit injustice against others. But we don't tolerate injustice either. Patience has its limits. The Marathi community has risen again, just like during the Samyukta Maharashtra movement,' he said. Dismissing claims that the Shiv Sena is anti-Hindi, Thackeray said, 'We are not against the Hindi language. My grandfather always encouraged learning multiple languages but never by force. I have spoken in Hindi in front of my uncle, and Sanjay Raut speaks Hindi in Parliament. The issue is not Hindi , the issue is its imposition.' On the broader narrative of a Maharashtra vs. other states conflict, Thackeray was quick to blame the BJP for stirring tensions. 'There is no Maharashtra versus other states conflict, but the BJP is trying to create one. We don't hate any language. We are Marathi in Maharashtra, and when we think of the nation, we are Hindus and united.' He also stated that his reconciliation with his once estranged cousin had an impact on the state's polity. 'After 20 years, we came together on the Marathi issue. This was welcomed not just by Marathi people, but also by non-Marathis and even Muslims. Some may not like it; that is their issue. But because of this protest, the Central government had to withdraw its Hindi language enforcement plan,' he said.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Stage set for a stormy Monsoon Session; Centre, opposition to face-off over Pahalgam attack, Trump's claim: Here's what to expect
NEW DELHI: The Monsoon Session of Parliament, beginning Monday, is expected to be stormy as the opposition INDIA bloc and the BJP-led government prepare to face off on several issues. The opposition has demanded discussions on the Pahalgam terror attack, Operation Sindoor, and what they term as a "drift" in foreign policy, insisting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should personally respond to these debates. Here's what we can expect from the upcoming Monsoon session of Parliament: Stack of bills The government has listed seven bills for consideration and eight more for introduction, discussion, and passage. Among the bills scheduled for the Monsoon session are: The National Sports Governance Bill The Geoheritage Sites and Geo-relics (Preservation and Maintenance) Bill The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill The government is also expected to present the Income Tax Bill, 2025, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha in February and referred to a Select Committee. According to news agency PTI, the Centre will also seek Parliament's approval for an extension of President's Rule in Manipur and present the Demand for Grants for the state. Other pending bills in the Lok Sabha include: The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of Goa Bill, 2024 The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 The Indian Ports Bill, 2025 Pahalgam attack & Trump's ceasefire claim Ahead of the session, the INDIA bloc resolved on Saturday to raise the issue of the Pahalgam terrorist attack, where perpetrators remain at large, as well as US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan post-Operation Sindoor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Senior opposition leaders, including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, parliamentary party chief Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah, Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren, NCP(SP)'s Sharad Pawar, Uddhav Thackeray (SS-UBT), Abhishek Banerjee (TMC), Tejashwi Yadav (RJD), Ram Gopal Yadav (SP), Tiruchi Siva (DMK), MA Baby (CPI-M), D Raja (CPI), and CPI(ML) general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, took part in an online strategy meeting. 'We discussed how to highlight the government's failures and atrocities affecting the people. I'm happy to inform you that leaders from all 24 parties participated,' said Congress deputy leader in the Rajya Sabha, Pramod Tiwari. "Eight major issues have been finalised. Besides these, regional and public-interest concerns will also be raised," he added. Tiwari said the opposition expects the Prime Minister to be present and respond to these matters on the floor of the House. "Parliament is more important than travelling abroad," he said. Meanwhile, Union minister of parliamentary affairs Kiren Rijiju on Sunday said the Centre will respond appropriately in the Parliament if the opposition raises the issue Bihar SIR row The opposition also plans to raise concerns over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, which they claim threatens voting rights. 'There's a threat to voting rights under the 'undeclared Emergency' in the country,' Tiwari said. "The way vote-bandi is happening in Bihar—after note-bandi—is anti-democratic," he added. Ahmedabad p lane c rash The Ahmedabad plane crash, which claimed 260 lives, will also be brought up. The latest report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has stirred controversy over an alleged bias, with critics accusing the agency of suggesting pilot error before completing the investigation. The government has declined to comment on the report until the final version is released. "This is a preliminary report. The AAIB has done a commendable and professional job while adhering to international protocols," civil aviation minister K Rammohan Naidu said. "Let's not jump to conclusions. It would be immature to comment at this stage." Impeachment of justice Yashwant Varma The opposition also intends to bring up the impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma, who faces scrutiny after burnt wads of currency were discovered at his residence following a fire incident. If the government moves a resolution for his removal, the opposition will also push for early action against Justice Shekhar Yadav, against whom a removal notice has been pending in the Rajya Sabha since December 2024, PTI reported citing sources. That notice accuses Justice Yadav of delivering a hate speech last year. Several opposition parties want this issue addressed during the session as well. AAP 's e xit from INDIA b loc The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) will not sit with the opposition in the House after formally exiting the INDIA bloc ahead of floor coordination talks. The party said the alliance was meant only for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and accused both BJP and Congress of a 'secret, corrupt deal.' AAP national media in-charge Anurag Dhanda posted on X: 'The real alliance is between BJP and Congress behind the scenes. Rahul Gandhi only says what helps Modi politically. In return, Modi protects the Gandhi family from jail. Neither is interested in delivering basic services like education, healthcare, or clean water to the people.'
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The new Income Tax Bill: Will linguistic makeover lead to taxation simplicity?
India's Income Tax Act is getting its biggest rewrite in over six decades. The Select Committee of Parliament has unanimously adopted the draft Income Tax Bill, 2025, which proposes 285 amendments to the original draft tabled in the Lok Sabha on 13 February. The government has accepted most of the committee's recommendations, paving the way for its likely passage in the ongoing monsoon session. At first glance, the new Bill appears to simplify India's notoriously dense tax code. It's shorter, cleaner, and more intuitively laid out. But scratch the surface, and questions emerge: does a change in language truly make for a simpler law? A clean slate While the new Income Tax Bill boasts a significantly reduced word count—almost half of the existing Income Tax Act—this brevity is largely a result of smart formatting and presentation rather than a fundamental simplification of the law. Much of the detailed content that previously existed as dense prose in long-winded sections, sub-sections, provisos and explanations has now been streamlined into clearer tables, schedules, and structured sections. For instance, the existing bulky sub-clauses containing saving and investment avenues in section 80C have now been moved into a separate Schedule XV. This reorganization enhances readability and accessibility, but the underlying legal complexity and scope of the law largely remain intact. Words that matter The Bill replaces traditional legal expressions like 'notwithstanding anything" with 'irrespective of anything." While the latter may sound simpler, it lacks the legal clarity that decades of judicial interpretation have attached to the former. 'Notwithstanding" indicates overriding power—'irrespective" does not carry that settled meaning, potentially reigniting legal disputes courts had already resolved. Moreover, for a common taxpayer, both phrases remain equally opaque. Replacing legalese with plain language doesn't necessarily make the law easier to follow—certainty in interpretation matters more than tone. There's no change in the fundamental classification of income. The new Bill retains all five heads of income—salaries, house property, business or profession, capital gains, and other sources. These are simply presented in a neater layout. Key provisions, such as tax slabs, standard deductions, and the ₹12 lakh threshold under the new regime, remain as defined in the Finance Act, 2025. This ensures continuity and avoids compliance shocks—but also means that long-standing complexities such as capital gains computation, valuation rules, and transfer pricing remain intact. Provisos reimagined A major shift lies in how the Bill handles provisos. The 1961 Act used them to carve out exceptions to main provisions, often viewed as subordinate. The new Bill, however, replaces many of these with separate sub-sections. While this improves visual clarity, it can change legal interpretation—turning what was once an exception into a standalone obligation or right. This could reopen settled positions and generate fresh litigation, particularly when courts try to interpret these new standalone sub-sections. In an unexpected move, the new Bill dials back the codified certainty around faceless assessments and appeals. Instead of clear statutory mandates, it leaves much of the process to be prescribed via future government notifications or schemes. This opens the door to discretionary interpretations and potential confusion around procedure. The Bill explicitly grants tax authorities powers to access digital devices, cloud storage, and social media during search and seizure operations. Though these were often exercised informally, they now gain legal footing. This raises privacy concerns and the urgent need for clear procedural safeguards to prevent misuse. The real test ahead To its credit, the Bill streamlines definitions, introduces logical sequencing, and replaces dense legal blocks with structured tables and sub-sections. It also adopts more intuitive terminology—such as replacing 'previous year" and 'assessment year" with 'tax year." These changes will certainly help professionals and users navigate the law more easily. But true simplification requires more than a cosmetic facelift—it must reduce ambiguity and litigation, not merely restructure it. The Income Tax Bill, 2025 brings welcome clarity in format and a future-ready design. But tax law isn't just about how it reads—it's about how it works. The law's strength lies in the continuity of judicial interpretation, and rewriting it without preserving this context risks making it unpredictable in practice. The real test won't be readability. It will be how well the new law holds up—in assessment proceedings, in courts, and in reducing taxpayer disputes. Mayank Mohanka is founder, TaxAaram India, and a partner at S.M. Mohanka & Associates.
