Pakistan resumes expulsions of Afghan refugees despite UN concerns
The decision affects approximately 1.4 million Afghans holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards, whose legal status expired at the end of June.
Many had hoped for a one-year extension to settle personal affairs, such as selling property or concluding business, before returning to Afghanistan.
In addition to PoR card holders, around 800,000 Afghans hold Afghan Citizen Cards.
Police say they also are living in the country illegally and being detained prior to deportations in the eastern Punjab, southwestern Balochistan and southern Sindh province.
Monday's decision drew criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN refugee agency.
At least 1.2 million Afghan nationals have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, according to a June report published by UNHCR.
Repatriations on such a massive scale have the potential to destabilise the fragile situation in Afghanistan, where the Taliban government came into power in 2021.
A 31 July government notification confirmed Pakistan's decision to repatriate all Afghan nationals holding expired PoR cards.
It states Afghans without valid passports and Pakistani visas are in the country illegally and must return to their homeland under local immigration laws.
Police across Pakistan are detaining Afghans to transport them to border crossings, according to two government and security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly.
They said there are no mass arrests and police were told to go to house-to-house and make random checks to detain foreigners living in the country illegally.
"Yes, the Afghan refugees living in Pakistan illegally are being sent back in a dignified way," said Shakeel Khan, commissioner for Afghan refugees in north-western Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
The latest operation is the most significant step yet under orders from federal government in Islamabad, he said.
Afghan national Rehmat Ullah, 35, said his family migrated to Pakistan's north-western Peshawar city decades ago and now is preparing to return home.
"I have five children and my concern is that they will miss their education," he said. "I was born here, my children were born here and now we are going back."
Millions have fled to Pakistan over the past four decades to escape war, political unrest and economic hardship in Afghanistan.
The renewed deportation drive follows a nationwide crackdown launched in 2023 targeting foreigners living illegally in Pakistan.
The Interior Ministry, which oversees the campaign, did not immediately comment.
Qaiser Khan Afridi, a spokesperson for the UN refugee agency, expressed deep concern over the government's actions.
"Sending people back in this manner is tantamount to refoulement and a breach of a state's international obligations," Afridi said in a statement, urging Pakistan to adopt a "humane approach to ensure voluntary, gradual, and dignified return of Afghans."
"Such massive and hasty return could jeopardise the lives and freedom of Afghan refugees, while also risking instability not only in Afghanistan but across the region."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Pakistan extends Afghan refugee deportation deadline to 1 September
Pakistan extended the deadline for the deportation of millions of Afghan refugees to 1 September, officials said on Wednesday as the United Nations welcomed the decision but still expressed concern over coerced returns. Afghans have fled to Pakistan over the past four decades to escape war, political instability and economic hardship in their homeland. An estimated 1.4 million are now registered with the UN refugee agency and have Proof of Residence cards (PoR) issued by Pakistani authorities, which have refused to reissue them after 30 June, the original deadline for voluntary repatriation, drawing criticism from rights groups. The refugees will be allowed a "grace period" of 25 days, from 4 to 31 August, to voluntarily return to their home country, said Lateef-ur-Rehman, a spokesman for the Home and Tribal Affairs Department. He added that Islamabad approved the new deadline this week, after which those remaining could face arrest and forced expulsion. Islamabad is also targeting an additional 800,000 with Afghan Citizen Cards, who it says reside in the country illegally. While the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) welcomed the extension decision, it warned that forced deportation could violate the international principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits the return of individuals to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom. Qaiser Khan Afridi, the UNHCR's spokesperson in Pakistan, said the agency continued to seek an "extension of the validity of PoR cards." At least 1.2 million Afghan nationals have been forced to return to Afghanistan from Iran and Pakistan so far this year, according to a June report by UNHCR. Repatriations on such a massive scale have the potential to destabilise the fragile situation in Afghanistan, where the Taliban government came into power in 2021, the agency said. A 31 July government notification confirmed Pakistan's decision to repatriate all Afghan nationals holding expired PoR cards. It states Afghans without valid passports and Pakistani visas are in the country illegally and must return to their homeland under local immigration laws. Though hundreds of thousands of Afghans live in refugee camps, many others have fully integrated into the community, with families and businesses of their own, and remain in hiding to avoid arrest. Rights groups have voiced concern that their arrest and deportation would wreak havoc on their lives. Rehman, the ministry spokesperson, said local authorities have been instructed to engage with Afghan community leaders to encourage voluntary repatriation and that there are plans to close down refugee camps, but no dates have been decided. The renewed deportation drive follows a nationwide crackdown launched in 2023 targeting foreigners living illegally in Pakistan.
France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Putin decree allows Russia to increase greenhouse gas emissions
Russia, the world's fourth-largest emitter of planet-warming carbon dioxide gas, aims to achieve net zero emissions by 2060. But activists say its current climate goals are woefully insufficient to combat global warming. In the decree, Putin ordered his government to implement "by 2035 a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions to 65-67 percent relative to the 1990 level", taking into account the impact of Russia's vast forests that soak up carbon. This would set Russia's maximum allowed emissions at around two billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2035 -- lower than the record of 3.1 billion tonnes in 1990 but around 22 percent higher than the 2021 figure of 1.7 billion, according to data provided by Russia to the United Nations. Russia has cautioned against phasing out fossil fuels at previous climate summits. Its economy is largely dependent on oil and gas exports and it has repeatedly set targets campaigners have described as unclear and unambitious. Experts say the 1990 baseline is also misleading as Russia's greenhouse gas emissions plunged by more than half between 1990 and 2000, largely due to the collapse of industry following the break-up of the Soviet Union. The Paris Agreement, which Russia has signed, aims to limit a rise in global warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. Russia is warming 2.5 times faster than the rest of the planet, according to the head of Russia's state meteorological service. Experts from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have warned that there is a 50/50 chance the world will pass the 1.5C threshold in the early 2030s. © 2025 AFP
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
The urgent need to halt plastic pollution
Long ignored, plastic pollution has now become a scourge sparing no corner of the globe. It ravages the planet in myriad ways: Every minute, the equivalent of a garbage truck full of plastic waste is dumped into the oceans. Plastic breaks down, degrades and permeates the air, rivers, food and even our bodies, threatening ecosystems and human health. The production of plastic, which relies on the extraction and processing of fossil fuels, exacerbates the threat to the climate. This is why the stakes are high at the UN-sponsored international conference taking place in Geneva from August 5 to 14. The aim is to conclude the first global treaty against plastic pollution. From production to use to recycling, plastics cause tens of thousands of cases of illness and death each year. An article published on Monday, August 4, by leading scientists in The Lancet confirmed that workers at polymer production sites, people living nearby, and consumers of plastic products – in other words, all humans – are affected. While only a third of the 16,000 chemicals used in plastics have ever been tested for toxicity, thousands are already considered "highly hazardous" to health. This alarming reality, combined with surging plastic production projected to double to one billion tons annually by 2050, and dismal recycling rates of less than 10% worldwide, makes an immediate halt all the more urgent. Yet the world remains divided on how to address this calamity. A coalition of about 100 countries – including the 27 member states of the European Union – supported by environmental NGOs and the scientific community, has advocated for a treaty that includes a clause to reduce global plastic production and consumption. Risk of another failure However, a core group of countries producing oil and gas (notably Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran, supported by China and the United States) opposed such measures. They rather opted for a bill focused solely on waste management and recycling. The Geneva meeting is actually a catch-up session, following the collapse of negotiations in South Korea in December 2024, which were supposed to conclude talks begun in 2022. The risk of another failed round of negotiations is high, given that Donald Trump denies the environmental impact of plastic and China – the world's largest producer accounting for a third of global output, and the largest consumer alongside the US – rejects binding targets and prefers only voluntary national commitments. Adopting an ambitious bill by a vote limited to willing states, rather than by consensus as per United Nations rules, would certainly increase pressure from consumers on producers. However, this would be a significant setback for an issue that is inherently global. Chinese negotiators could be tempted by a compromise, as China could emerge as a leader in alternatives to plastic. One thing is certain: The failure of the Geneva talks would be a serious setback for the health of the planet and its people, especially the poorest.
