South Korea Begins Removing Border Propaganda Speakers in Conciliatory Gesture Toward North
The speakers had previously been used to blast anti-North Korean propaganda across the border, but the South's new liberal government halted the broadcasts in June in a conciliatory gesture as it looks to rebuild trust and revive dialogue with Pyongyang, which has largely cut off cooperation with the South in recent years.
South Korea's Defense Ministry said the physical removal of the loudspeakers from the border was another 'practical measure' aimed at easing tensions between the war-divided Koreas and that it does not affect the South's military readiness.
Lee Kyung-ho, a spokesperson for the ministry, didn't share specific details on how the removed loudspeakers will be stored or whether they could be quickly redeployed to the border if tensions flare again between the Koreas. There were no discussions between the two militaries ahead of the South's decision to remove the speakers, Lee said during a briefing.
North Korea, which is extremely sensitive to any outside criticism of its authoritarian leadership and its third-generation ruler, Kim Jong Un, didn't immediately comment on the South Korean step.
The South's previous conservative government resumed the daily loudspeaker broadcasts in June last year following a yearslong pause in retaliation for North Korea flying trash-laden balloons toward the South in a psychological warfare campaign.
The speakers blasted propaganda messages and K-pop songs, a playlist clearly designed to strike a nerve in Pyongyang, where Kim's government has been intensifying a campaign to eliminate the influence of South Korean pop culture and language among the population in a bid to strengthen his family's dynastic rule.
The Cold War-style psychological warfare campaigns further heightened tensions already inflamed by North Korea's advancing nuclear program and South Korean efforts to expand joint military exercises with the United States and their trilateral security cooperation with Japan.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, a liberal who took office in June after winning an early election to replace ousted conservative Yoon Suk Yeol, has vowed to improve relations with Pyongyang, which reacted furiously to Yoon's hard-line policies and shunned dialogue.
But Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of the North Korean leader, rebuffed overtures by Lee's government last week, saying that Seoul's 'blind trust' in the country's alliance with the US and hostility toward North Korea make it no different from its conservative predecessor.
Her comments implied that North Korea — now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia over the war in Ukraine – feels no urgency to resume diplomacy with Seoul and Washington anytime soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
India's Modi to visit China for first time in 7 years as tensions with US rise
Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization that begins on Aug. 31Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in OctoberNEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday, in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the United States will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization that begins on Aug. 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the US faces its most serious crisis in years after President Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbors are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two has threatened to charge an additional 10 percent tariff on imports from members — which include India — of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for 'aligning themselves with Anti-American policies.'Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of US efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be is likely to address India's defense cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defense system, and a possible visit by President Vladimir Putin to trip will be followed by Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to IMPACTUS and Indian officials told Reuters a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods sent to the US that account for 80 percent of its total exports, four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government the relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is expected to limit the direct impact on economic Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5 percent and held rates steady despite the tariff government assessment report has assumed a 10 percent penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total US tariff to 35 percent, the sources trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources exported goods estimated at around $81 billion in 2024 to the US.
Al Arabiya
10 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Russia strikes Ukrainian gas infrastructure, TASS says
Russian forces attacked gas transportation facilities in Ukraine that supply the Ukrainian military, the TASS state news agency reported on Wednesday, citing the Defense Ministry.
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
Israel is losing the war of algorithms over Gaza
Away from the real world and the killing fields of Gaza, another war rages between pro-Palestine activists on the one hand and Israel's high-tech military, supported by IT giants primarily from the US, on the other. This conflict is taking place mainly on social media platforms across the digital sphere in a bid to sway global public opinion. The good news is that Israel is losing the war of algorithms. Immediately after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, Israel's propaganda machine kicked in to distort, exaggerate, and lie about the scale of the atrocities that took place on that day. The objective was to mobilize public opinion through mainstream Western media, by feeding them enough horror stories to justify Israel's whole-scale retaliation against the people of Gaza under the banner of 'Israel's right to self-defense.' Israel imposed a total shutdown of all news coming out of Gaza. It barred, as it continues to do today, all international media from entering the besieged enclave. The only version or narrative of what was taking place there was primarily through the well-established Israeli propaganda machine, the hasbara. But while the Western mainstream media had no qualms about its reporters being barred from entering Gaza to carry out independent coverage of the war, they were happy to repeat and promote the Israeli narrative without verification. The only other source was and remains the tens of Palestinian journalists, native residents of Gaza, who were associated with Arab TV networks and many key Western news agencies and TV stations. The onslaught on Gaza has been aired live by Arab TV networks, thanks to these Palestinian journalists, many of whom were deliberately targeted by Israel in order to silence them. As of late July 2025, at least 232 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed in Gaza since Israel launched its military campaign. That is the most significant number of journalists killed in a conflict since the Vietnam War. Israel was winning the propaganda war by playing the victim, but then the tide began to change. While Western mainstream media looked the other way, Palestinian journalists and activists in the beleaguered strip started sharing videos and testimonies of the massacres on social media platforms. Initially, Israel used its influence to force platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X to ban and shadow ban pro-Palestine users, as well as remove content that exposed the atrocities taking place in Gaza. That tactic worked for a while, but then users began boycotting such platforms and heading to other platforms like TikTok, where pro-Palestine content was tolerated. Social media has transformed global outrage into protests. Osama Al-Sharif Israel could have won the digital war with minimum losses, were it not for its leaders who doubled down and allowed the Israeli military to unleash the most destructive bombing of a residential zone since the Second World War. It was impossible, with such a high number of casualties, to hide the images of slaughtered babies, maimed children, and wailing parents. Israel could not lie about the blowing up of hospitals, schools, universities, and places of worship. The floodgates burst open, and the social media platforms caved in. While Israeli jets bombed and destroyed more than 90 percent of Gaza, social media has irreversibly altered the global understanding of the genocide in Gaza. Today, the daily reality in Gaza is transmitted directly to the world by its victims. Viral hashtags such as #FreePalestine or #GazaUnderAttack have mobilized millions, sidelining mainstream media and challenging the dominant Western portrayal of Israel as a democratic outpost and as a recurrent victim. Instead, for much of the world, Israel stands increasingly accused of operating as a Western colonial and apartheid state in the heart of the Middle East, charged with war crimes documented in real time. Social media has transformed global outrage into protests on university campuses, boycotts against complicit corporations, and, crucially, legal action. For instance, evidence gleaned from soldiers' posts and digital archives — often collected by grassroots actors — has been used by organizations and even states when filing cases at the International Court of Justice. The trail of legal pursuit is now extending to IT companies that have enabled Israel to weaponize untested artificial intelligence to hunt down Palestinians. Gaza has become a testing ground for future weapons of mass destruction. In response to pro-Palestinian posts on social media, Israel uses bots, particularly AI-powered fake or automated accounts, to influence pro-Gaza algorithms and social media narratives by amplifying pro-Israeli content and sowing doubt within pro-Palestinian discussions. These bots rapidly respond to pro-Palestinian posts with pro-Israeli comments, creating a swarm of replies that can flood social media platforms almost immediately after Palestinian content is posted. The accounts often follow similar patterns and try to appear almost human. Even then, pro-Palestine supporters have developed a robust set of strategies to counter the influence and narratives pushed by pro-Israel AI bots. Activists and organizations such as Tahaqaq (Palestinian Observatory for Fact-Checking and Media Literacy), and other independent fact-checkers actively monitor social media for AI-generated disinformation. They quickly investigate viral images and videos, exposing those that are deep fakes or manipulated, thus preventing bots from distorting the narrative unchallenged. Activists and digital rights groups often publish evidence of AI bot networks — sometimes created by companies like the Israeli firm STOIC — flooding platforms with pro-Israel messaging. In this war of algorithms, Israel is losing ground daily, and every time its army commits a war crime in Gaza. The technology alliance it created has not worked, and it has lost the initial narrative. Today, we see millions of people protesting every week in support of Palestine. Israel's hold on Western politicians is loosening as governments and leaders become aware of the seismic change that is taking place in their constituencies. The war of algorithms is not over, but Israel is no longer able to thwart the global conscience movement it created through its atrocities, and as it carries out this 'first livestreamed genocide,' as it has been described. • Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman. X: @plato010
