logo
Retro Chinese takeaway menu from the 1970s leaves foodies stunned over unbelievably cheap prices including 5p chips

Retro Chinese takeaway menu from the 1970s leaves foodies stunned over unbelievably cheap prices including 5p chips

Daily Mail​27-05-2025

A decades-old menu from a Chinese takeaway restaurant in London has stunned foodies over the prices of popular meals from years past.
The vintage menu resurfaced after a man found it with his father's belongings and guessed it was from the late 1970s or early 1980s when he lived in the British capital.
After he shared a photo of the menu on Reddit, many were wowed by the jaw-droppingly low prices that wouldn't get customers a cup of coffee in today's economy.
A meal for two including roast duck, fried chicken, pork, prawns, fried rice and prawn crackers, only cost £1.25 back in the day.
Meanwhile a serving of chips, listed under the 'vegetables' section of the menu, cost a miniscule 5p.
The retro find made today's food lovers nostalgic for ultra-affordable prices with one pointing out that ordering one of everything on the menu would cost less than £20.
'Found an old Chinese food menu behind a filing cabinet. Wouldn't mind a 50p set these days,' the finder said in a Reddit post.
The eatery named On Lok was in Leyton in London's north-east and only closed recently under a different name.
The retro find made today's food lovers nostalgic for ultra-affordable prices with one pointing out ordering one of everything on the menu would cost less than £20
It listed soups for only 18p, noodle dishes for 15p, curries from 20p and specialities like fried beef in oyster sauce for as little as 30p.
The 'highly recommended special dinners' started from just 40p for one person and £1.15 for two and included multiple dishes.
A customer could have ordered one of every item on the menu excluding the special dinners for around £17 - less than a standard takeaway order total today.
People were quick to express their shock at the relic with one joking: 'Have you told the British Library about this rare manuscript?'.
'The prices, omg!' a second exclaimed and another replied: 'Why is everyone ignoring the lobster in the room? When was the last time you saw lobster on your local takeaway menu? My last time was never'.
'Yeah I'll have one of everything please mate - stick it all in a cardboard box for me. How much? £8.42? Ok, great,' someone laughed.
One user thought it was amusing that most of the vegetable dishes were served with some form of meat.
Others compared the old prices to what they have paid at their local takeaway joint recently and some speculated about the time period the menu was from.
'I just paid £18 for a regular cod and chips,' one commenter wrote.
'Chicken chow mein at my local Chinese is £7.80. Plain omelette £6.80,' another said and someone replied: 'The rent of this place was probably the price of that omelette back in the day.'
'Looking at the prices this has to be very soon after decimalisation in 1971,' one man guessed.
'£1 in 1971 is equivalent to just under £12 now, so this is still really cheap - that set meal for two which is £1.45 would still only be about £16.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bank of England is 'not sanguine' about inflation hump, Greene says
Bank of England is 'not sanguine' about inflation hump, Greene says

Reuters

time37 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Bank of England is 'not sanguine' about inflation hump, Greene says

DUBROVNIK, Croatia, June 7 (Reuters) - The Bank of England still expects the ongoing rise in UK inflation to fade but is "not sanguine" about it after price growth proved more persistent than anticipated only a few years ago, BoE monetary policymaker Megan Greene said on Saturday. Britain suffered a bigger than expected inflation surge in April - even after taking out an error in the data - prompting investors to bet on the BoE slowing its already gradual pace of interest rate cuts. "Our view is that we can look through it, but of course there's a pretty big risk," Greene told a conference in Croatia. "The last time we had a lot of second round effects. We're hoping that we won't have second round effects this time around, but we're not sanguine about it." She argued the recent cost-of-living crisis, which saw inflation peak at 11.1% in 2022, might have made "people ... more sensitive to upticks in inflation and so that could feed through the wage-price behavior." Greene, an external member of the BoE's Monetary Policy Committee, voted last month with the majority for a quarter-point cut in rates to 4.25% and has said she was part of the group who might have voted to keep rates on hold if it hadn't been for U.S. tariffs. She reaffirmed on Saturday that private-sector pay growth was "way above what would be consistent with a 2% inflation target". "It's (going) in the right direction, it's just not going as quickly as I would like it to," she added.

Why the BBC thinks it can get Labour to give it more funding
Why the BBC thinks it can get Labour to give it more funding

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Why the BBC thinks it can get Labour to give it more funding

Tim Davie struck a gloomy tone when discussing the BBC's finances on Tuesday, as he renewed calls for extra funding. 'I want proper investment and not begrudging, grinding cuts to the BBC, which you've had in the last 10 years, which have just not helped,' the director general said. The timing of his comments was key. Davie is currently locked in talks with ministers ahead of the BBC's Charter renewal in 2027, as he fights for the future of the licence fee. Bosses in W1A acknowledge that the funding model requires reform in the modern media age. But how this will affect the BBC's stretched finances is a critical question as it continues to lose viewers at an alarming rate. Identity crisis The licence fee has existed in some guise since the BBC's launch in 1922, when the government decided the new broadcaster should be publicly funded. This, the corporation says, allows its UK output to remain 'free of advertisements and independent of shareholder and political interest'. While the BBC was initially limited to radio services, the first combined radio and TV licence was issued in 1946 for £2. Fast-forward to the 21st century and the BBC has transformed from a fledgling broadcaster into a public service behemoth. Income from the licence fee stood at £3.7bn last year, a significant chunk of the UK's entertainment and media market, which is valued at around £100bn by PwC. However, this scale does not tell the full story. With the emergence of streaming rivals such as Netflix and Disney, as well as social media platforms such as YouTube and TikTok, the BBC is facing an identity crisis. While the public service broadcaster continues to dominate the UK media space – around 86pc of adults consume its services each week, according to the latest Ofcom figures – it is losing ground. This is particularly acute among 16 to 24-year-olds, who spend just 5pc of their in-home video time with the BBC, compared to the 23pc for over-35s. Waning interest has meant lower income as viewers vote with their feet. The number of households paying the licence fee dropped to 23.9m last year – a 500,000 fall that sucked £80m from the BBC's budget. The figure is 2.3m lower than the peak of 26.2m between 2017 and 2019. Cost is likely to be a factor. At £174.50 per year, the licence fee comes in at around £14.50 a month. That compares to £5.99 a month for Netflix's ad tier, or £12.99 for its standard ad-free service. Disney charges £4.99 with ads and £8.99 without. While the BBC argues it offers good value for money given the breadth of its service, this is unlikely to win over apathetic youngsters who consider Auntie irrelevant. The fall in licence fee payers is not the only driving force behind the BBC's squeezed finances, however. Over the last 15 years, repeated government interventions have taken their toll. In 2010, George Osborne announced the licence fee would be frozen for seven years at £145.50. Nadine Dorries, former culture secretary, then froze the levy again in 2022, even as inflation surged. The fee will now increase in line with inflation until the end of the Charter in 2027, but only after another Tory culture secretary, Lucy Frazer, stepped in to prevent a 9pc – or £15 – rise amid concerns it would fuel the cost of living crisis. Adding further strain to the budget, the government in 2015 forced the BBC to take over the cost of providing free licence fees to the over-75s, while it also handed over the main burden of funding the World Service. Analysis shows that Government interference, coupled with a decline in licence fee payers, amounts to a real-terms decrease of around 30pc – or £1.4bn – in the broadcaster's domestic funding over the last 15 years. The question, then, is how to plug the gap. Davie has been wielding the axe on both staff and programming as he seeks to strip £700m from the BBC's annual budget. Yet this whittling down of resources has fuelled anger and concern about the impact on the quality of the broadcaster's output, with spending on new shows poised to fall by £150m this year. The BBC has also ramped up enforcement of the licence fee, with 41m warnings sent out in the 2024 financial year – an increase of almost 13pc year on year. Another method championed by Davie, the former BBC Studios boss, is to boost the broadcaster's commercial income to help balance the books. Measures so far have included taking full control of BritBox International, the BBC's joint streaming venture with ITV, after buying out its rival for £225m. The BBC has also struck a co-production deal with Disney to air Doctor Who overseas, worth an estimated $100m (£73m). But other schemes, such as its plan to run adverts around radio and podcast output, have been scrapped in the face of fierce opposition from commercial rivals. Despite its bold aims, the BBC's commercial income fell to £1.7bn last year from just under £2bn the year before. Overall, the BBC is forecasting a £33m deficit for the coming year. While this is down from the eye-watering £500m shortfall the previous year, it highlights the ongoing strain on the corporation's finances. It is against this precarious backdrop that the BBC has entered discussions with the Government. Ministers have made it clear, however, that reform, or even scrapping, of the licence fee is top of the agenda. While the licence fee is now lower as a proportion of average household income – 0.46pc last year compared to 0.64pc in 2012 – the levy is facing scrutiny in a world where viewers have a plethora of entertainment options. What's more, the licence fee is regressive, with poorer households paying more relative to their income and women disproportionately prosecuted for not paying. So if the licence fee were to be scrapped, what could take its place? One option is replacing it with a subscription model, similar to those of streaming services. However, critics have warned that such a move risks undermining the BBC's ability to serve its audiences and would limit the scope of its output. 'A subscription funding model would be antithetical to the BBC's public service mission, necessarily ending universality of access and undermining its breadth of content,' said analysts at Enders Analysis. Similarly, funding the BBC through advertising has been viewed as a non-starter as it would draw too much money away from the commercial TV and radio sector. Both Davie and Samir Shah, the BBC chairman, have pushed to retain the licence fee with reforms, acknowledging the shortcomings of a regressive flat tax. But what would this look like? Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, has pushed back against the idea of funding the BBC through general taxation, saying it would leave the broadcaster exposed to political interference. Another option is a household tax similar to the one used in Germany. This would boost the BBC's income by widening the payment of the licence fee to all households, rather than just those who use its services. It could also be linked to council tax bands, creating a more progressive system where wealthier households pay more. Other options under consideration include linking the levy to broadband bills – a measure that would take on particular relevance as Britain prepares to switch off terrestrial TV and move to a streaming-only model. It is thought that any of these reforms would reduce the rate of evasion, though ministers will no doubt be reluctant to introduce new taxes, especially in light of the upcoming spending review. In a speech last month, Davie said: 'When it comes to funding, we are not asking for the status quo. We want modernisation and reform. But in doing so, we must safeguard universality.' Alternatively, as the BBC's Charter comes up for renewal, ministers could opt for a bolder rethink. The corporation retains its Reithian principles to inform, educate and entertain. But in the modern age, does the BBC still need to be all things to all people? Some industry watchers note that the BBC could drop some of its more peripheral services, such as its education unit Bitesize. BBC bosses are themselves alive to this possibility, and the broadcaster in March launched its largest ever public survey to ask audiences what they want from the broadcaster in the future. A more radical view espoused by a number of industry bigwigs is a merger between the UK's public service broadcasters. Sir Peter Bazalgette, the former chairman of ITV, says: 'There's no doubt in my mind that there ought to be mergers between domestic broadcasters, not just in England, but right across Europe, in order for those broadcasters to survive and have big enough businesses in their streaming services.' Speaking at a conference in London this week, Sony Pictures international boss Wayne Garvie said: 'We've got five public service broadcasters in Britain. The rest of the world might have one. 'It is unsustainable and the future has got to be, surely, Channel 4 and the BBC coming together.' The idea of slimming down the BBC or combining it with its rivals will no doubt rankle supporters who view the universality of access as a key tenet of its purpose. But as competition grows and audiences continue to defect, it is clear the status quo cannot continue.

Aldi selling £7.99 gadget that will keep your garden free of bugs and pests throughout summer
Aldi selling £7.99 gadget that will keep your garden free of bugs and pests throughout summer

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Aldi selling £7.99 gadget that will keep your garden free of bugs and pests throughout summer

ALDI is launching a budget-friendly gadget this weekend that promises to keep bugs and pests at bay throughout the warmer months. Available in stores across the UK from Sunday, June 8, the Zero In Bug Zapper Lantern is priced at just £7.99 — and it's already catching the attention of bargain hunters. The lantern kills nuisance flies and mosquitoes on contact, helping to create a bug-free zone ideal for BBQs, camping trips or even indoor use. It's designed for versatility, you can hang it up or stand it on any surface, and it works best in low-light conditions. The gadget also features four built-in LED lights and comes complete with a USB rechargeable battery pack and charging cable, making it easy to power up for evening use. Whether you're enjoying a quiet evening on the patio or hosting friends and family for a garden gathering, this simple tool could make all the difference. Aldi says the lantern is 'perfect for outdoor living,' especially for those who want to enjoy summer evenings without being pestered by insects. It's part of Aldi's wider push to offer low-cost garden essentials this season, with the budget supermarket regularly selling out of its Specialbuys aimed at outdoor living. Shoppers have already snapped up Aldi's £4.99 concrete citronella candle, which comes in a range of colours and shapes to suit any garden table. It doubles as a stylish decoration while helping to keep bugs at bay. Other garden deals from Aldi include anti-rust fencing panels, colourful planters, and solar-powered lighting, all priced to suit every pocket. If you're heading on a camping trip or caravan break this summer, the zapper's portable design and rechargeable battery make it easy to take on the go. And while most bug repellents rely on sprays or sticky traps, this zapper offers a cleaner alternative with no mess or harsh chemicals. Aldi's garden gadgets have built up a loyal fan base online, with shoppers often praising their affordability and ease of use. The Zero In Bug Zapper Lantern is expected to sell fast, so those hoping to grab one should head to stores from Sunday before stock disappears. It's not the only budget option on the high street either, rival stores like Home Bargains and B&M are also offering low-cost pest solutions, from citronella torches to portable fire pits. IF you want to ensure that your home is pest free this summer, here's what you need to know. here's what you need to know. Hornets and wasps - hate the smell of peppermint oil so spraying this liberally around your patio or balcony can help to keep them at bay. Moths - acidic household white vinegar is effective for deterring moths. Soak some kitchen roll in vinegar and leave it in your wardrobe as a deterrent. Flying ants - herbs and spices, such as cinnamon, mint, chilli pepper, black pepper, cayenne pepper, cloves, or garlic act as deterrents. Mosquitoes - plants, herbs and essential oil fragrances can help deter mozzies inside and out. Try eucalyptus, lavender and lemongrass. 3

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store