
Woman in her 70s hospitalized following 2-vehicle collision in downtown Toronto
A woman in her 70s has been seriously injured in a two-vehicle collision in downtown Toronto.
Emergency services responded to the crash that occurred in the area of Lower Jarvis Street and Lake Shore Boulevard East just after 6:15 p.m.
Toronto paramedics said the woman was taken to the hospital with serious but non-life-threatening injuries.
The cause of the collision is unknown.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Teacher says online misogyny seeping into classrooms in 'frightening' ways
"Shut up and make me a sandwich." "I don't have to listen to you, go get the man in charge." Those are some of the comments one Halifax teacher says she has heard from some of her male students in recent years. Christine Emberley said the comments range from sarcastic sniping about a woman's place in society to "grotesquely sexual" remarks. Sometimes, the students refuse to make eye contact, listen or acknowledge her. "It's frightening," she said. Emberley has been teaching for nearly two decades and says the sexist and offensive remarks started cropping up only in the last few years. She teaches drama in classrooms across all grade levels and said these attitudes are more common among boys in junior high and high school. She is not the only one noticing this rhetoric in the classroom. Luc Cousineau is a researcher at Dalhousie University and director of the Canadian Institute for Far-Right Studies. In a recent study, he analyzed what teachers said about their experiences on Reddit, a social media platform that hosts discussion boards for various communities, by filtering the teachers' discussion board for posts that mention Andrew Tate. Tate has millions of followers on social media, with a message of unapologetic misogyny that has drawn boys and young men to the luxurious lifestyle he projects. The 38-year-old influencer is also facing 10 charges in Britain related to three women that include rape, actual bodily harm, human trafficking and controlling prostitution for gain. A major component of Tate's rhetoric is the belief that women are subordinate to men. According to the latest data from Statistics Canada, just over 75 per cent of teachers are female in Canada. Cousineau said his research, published in the peer-reviewed journal Gender and Education, showed misogynistic comments from students are disrupting learning environments, as teachers deal with sexist and degrading comments, defiance and male-supremacist sentiments. "Teachers expressed that this content and these things that students were saying in class were making them feel unsafe," he said. Cousineau said boys are exposed to misogynistic influences, even if they don't want to be, because they're suggested by social media algorithms. He said not all content from the influencers focuses on misogyny. They also post about bodybuilding, politics or feeling misunderstood. "If young people are engaging with the messaging that doesn't feel contentious, then they're going to get that other [misogynistic] content as well." Lance McCready is an associate professor at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. He said the issue of so-called "manosphere" influencers comes up in classrooms of soon-to-be-teachers. "It's definitely on a lot of people's minds," he told CBC News. He said young men and boys are looking for representation and relatable role models; they want to feel like their voice is heard. He said there needs to be more positive representations of masculinity for boys early in childhood. "We have to start having these conversations and discussing it in our curriculum, in our family," said McCready. "I would like to see more men willing to have these conversations." Responding to misogyny from students When a student makes a misogynistic comment, Emberley said she responds by saying it's inappropriate and talks to the student. "The way that we need to deal with it, from my perspective, is curiosity and empathy," she said. "Shame is just going to make somebody double down on that belief. "They need guidance. They need someone who's offering an attractive or a palatable alternative to what they're consuming online." Depending on the severity of the comment, the consequences can escalate, Emberley said. In her experience, some students adjust their behaviour after an intervention while others don't. "When you have a kid who's really into that messaging, are they even going to listen?" Emberley said it's a minority of boys who hold these anti-women opinions, but other boys rarely speak out against their peers. "Not everybody is comfortable doing that, so sometimes it ends up feeling like the majority." Emberley said she's heard from female students about their peers' behaviour. "There's a lot of helplessness that they're feeling and a lot of disgust." Emberley said teachers and parents should talk to boys about what they're seeing online, but the issue requires a larger solution. She said creating a framework to guide teachers' responses to misogyny would help, but the process is falling behind the growth of the problem. Curriculum updates around gender-based violence are ongoing for Nova Scotia schools following recommendations in the Mass Casualty Report in response to the province's 2020 mass shooting. More changes to the curriculum are expected to be implemented in the fall. Cousineau said social conditions, media and tech infrastructure make it easy for boys to latch onto these ideas. He said solutions will require more research. "We're talking about a global phenomenon here," he said. "If we are going to only have country-by-country or province-by-province actions, then we're fighting a battle on a different playing field." Cornelia Schneider, an associate professor at the Mount Saint Vincent University department of education, specializes in inclusive practices in education. She said this behaviour is likely amplified by the success of political movements, like MAGA. "These voices, that might always have existed but were more underground, now have a legitimate outlet and are allowed and applauded." She said responses to the influence of social media can only be so effective because of how rapid its presence has grown. She said we're only learning about the effects of social media "in real time." "[It's] this tool that we're developing and using at the same time."


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
A beaver's warning slap
Steven Hiltz was kayaking on Darlings Lake on Darlings Island when a beaver disturbed the once-calm waters.


CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Ontario's proposed landlord drug liability law rattles supportive housing providers
Social Sharing The first time Fay Martin read up on the details of a proposed act to make landlords responsible for preventing drug activities in their units in Ontario, she says her hair stood on end. As a founder and board member of Places for People, which rents out 20 affordable units in Haliburton Highlands, Ont., she says the legislation — which threatens landlords with fines or jail time if their properties are used for producing or trafficking drugs — conflicts with both the goals of her charity and possibly with its ability to survive long-term . "It's going to be a total disincentive to housing the people that most need housing, and that the community needs to have housed," she said. Martin said that's because it could discourage supportive housing providers from "taking a chance" on tenants who need a home but who may be dealing with addictions. The act, which has received royal assent but has not yet been proclaimed into law, is a sub-section of Bill 10 — a multi-part piece of legislation broadly focused on public safety by making changes to areas like bail, courts and policing. In the act, the government also says landlords will be able to legally defend themselves by taking "reasonable measures" to "prevent the [drug] activity." With no clarity on what those measures could be, housing providers like Martin are anxiously waiting to learn more about what their new responsibilities will be — and how much they will cost. Fines could reach up to $250,000 on the first conviction, something Martin says would "kill us." Her charity receives no additional funding from the government and relies on donations to subsidize its units, she says. Jennifer Van Gennip, who works for supportive housing provider Redwood Park Communities in Simcoe County, Ont., is also worried, explaining that she's already seeing a "chilling effect in the sector around providing housing for people who use drugs" as a result of the proposed act. "We're hearing about other supportive housing providers who are trying to get out ahead of it ... and evicting residents who use drugs," said Van Gennip, who is also a co-chair of the Ontario Alliance to End Homelessness. What she wants is more information on who is being targeted under the act, with the hope that there is a "very clear" distinction between people who use drugs or do what she calls "survival dealing" — where people sell a small amount of drugs, to finance their own habits or pay for food or rent — and larger-scale trafficking and drug production. 'Some form of guidance is really needed here' Toronto-based lawyer John Fox , who specializes in law pertaining to affordable housing, says the legislation was written in a "fairly vague way." "Some form of guidance is really needed here," said Fox, explaining that he expects more information from the province clarifying things before it comes into force. Among the key questions now being discussed by landlords, whether non-profit, for-profit or commercial, is what the government means when it says that landlords can legally defend themselves by taking "reasonable measures" to stop drug activity. A look at Toronto's newest supportive housing initiative for unhoused people 10 months ago "People wonder whether that means more CCTV monitoring," said Fox. "Could it mean that in a lease that you should now include monthly inspections of the premises because you want to make sure that none of this is happening?" Then there are uncertainties more specific to non-profit housing, says Fox, including how much liability will fall to a non-profit's board of directors, who are volunteers, and whether there will be any financial help for them to pay for whatever "reasonable measures" they are eventually expected to take. Should supportive housing be excluded? CBC Toronto asked the Ministry of the Solicitor General about its timelines for putting the act into force and publishing more detailed regulations, but did not hear back by deadline. Fox says the province is currently being urged by advocates to consider whether supportive housing should be excluded altogether from the act —something the province also did not confirm. "[Supportive housing providers] are looking to be exempt from this act on account of the fact that their activities are directly related to reducing this kind of [drug] activity," he said. "This is not a risk that is fair for them to take on." If that campaign is successful, Fox continued, it raises yet another wrinkle: how to distinguish between non-profit housing, which doesn't generate profits for owners and sometimes offers non-market rent, and supportive housing, which typically offers non-market rent and tenant support. "That line will not be an easy one to draw," he said. Wait for 'clarity' continues The hope now in the non-profit sector is for more consultations with the province, says Marlene Coffey, CEO of the Ontario Non-profit Housing Association. "What we would expect is that as regulations are developed, we will work with the government in consultation and then there will be more clarity," she said. Her association has also submitted a list of recommendations to the province, including requests for more funding and clarity on personal liability rules. The Association of Municipalities of Ontario is asking for consultation as well, submitting in a letter to the Ministry of the Solicitor General in June that it is concerned about " unintended consequences… undue burdens… and risks to municipal landlords." The Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario, meanwhile, is preparing presentations for front-line staff on how to "mitigate the negative impacts on Ontarians" of both this act and Bill 6, which gives new powers to municipalities to remove homeless people from public spaces. "The practical impact of both Bills is that Ontarians will lose their housing and be pushed into greater precarity," the centre wrote in submissions sent this spring to Attorney General Doug Downey.