Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation
The prestigious fifth World Sociology Forum, set for July 6-11, at Mohammed V University in Rabat, now faces a mounting crisis after multiple Moroccan academic bodies called for a complete boycott of Israeli participants in direct protest against the ongoing genocide in Gaza perpetrated by Netanyahu's government, which faces international arrest warrants.
The Moroccan Campaign for Academic and Cultural Boycott (MACBI), operating within the BDS Morocco movement, has formally demanded that the International Sociological Association (ISA) cancel all participation by Israeli academics at the forum.
In a strongly worded statement released Wednesday, the BDS Morocco coordination condemned 'the participation of Israeli academics from complicit institutions' of the occupation, without 'respect for fundamental ethical conditions.'
The movement pointed out that while Gaza continues to suffer under genocide since October 7, 2023, the ISA still plans to include three speakers from Israel. One presenter reportedly characterizes Hamas as a 'terrorist organization' and references the 'displacement' of Israelis following Hezbollah attacks.
MACBI forcefully reminded that 'in 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank was illegal and constituted apartheid.'
When confronted by MACBI regarding presenters whose communications allegedly promote the occupation's narrative, the ISA defended its stance, claiming it would 'not cancel these participations' because of its 'commitment to academic freedom' and desire to 'offer a platform for dialogue as open as courageous.'
The dispute has mobilized Moroccan academics nationwide. The Progressive Current of Professors and Researchers within the National Union of Higher Education (SNE-Sup) declared 'deep concern about the repercussions of the announcement' by the ISA.
The union's secretariat stated that 'the universities of the Zionist entity are partners and strategic actors in the occupation and institutionalization of apartheid, providing academic cover for ethnic cleansing policies, developing repression and espionage tools in cooperation with the occupation army.'
They added that these institutions 'host military bases and security research centers, institutionalize racial discrimination against Palestinian students, and justify crimes against humanity, including famine, massacres, and genocide perpetrated in Gaza.'
For the union, holding this forum in Morocco with academics from institutions 'involved in these crimes' represents 'an attack on the image of the Moroccan university, its moral and academic credibility.'
Respecting national values and regional solidarity principles
The Moroccan Sociological Association has issued an unequivocal rejection of Israeli participation in the forum. The association firmly stated that hosting the event in Rabat must come with 'the necessity of respecting Moroccan values and related positions, especially concerning vital issues for Morocco.'
The association asserted that 'the barbaric practices committed against Palestinian civilians, which Israeli authorities intend as material and moral extermination of the Palestinian existence, drive us […] to not welcome those belonging to the usurping entity even within scientific and academic activities, out of respect for national commitments and the feelings of Moroccans, and to preserve the ties that unite us with components of the region to which we belong.'
The association strongly condemned 'the Israeli attack on all the foundations of the Palestinian people' and denounced 'all forms of extermination practiced against their right to exist within an independent homeland where they can exercise their sovereignty and live with dignity.'
It demanded that the international community 'take the necessary measures to stop these crimes committed against the Palestinian people, and guarantee their legitimate rights in service of global and regional peace.'
The association further insisted that adherence to the academic ethics underlying the ISA's laws is 'necessary and obligatory with regard to respecting international charters and relevant resolutions, especially those related to the Palestinian cause during the selection and programming of participations.'
'An ideological and dangerous drift'
However, Moroccan sociologist Jamal Fezza has criticized what he called an 'ideological and dangerous' drift. In a social media post, Fezza argued that 'sociology is a universal knowledge shaped by both Jewish and Christian thinkers, and no identity dogma can dictate its boundaries.'
He added that 'the most important tools that a sociologist should be armed with is the axiological neutrality that Max Weber called for, without which sociology mixes with opinion and belief.'
Expanding on his position, Fezza stated that the call to boycott the forum due to Israeli participants 'reflects a profound ignorance of the tasks entrusted to sociology, and an attempt to involve science and scientists in ideological and political polemics far removed from the nature of this science and the goals it aspires to.'
'For the person who calls for boycotting the World Forum with that argument to be fully consistent with himself, he needs only boycott sociology itself, because it is simply a science produced by Jews and some Christians. From Durkheim and Simmel through Levi-Strauss and Ezra Park, you will not find the name Ahmed or Ismail leaving their mark in the history of this great science,' Fezza concluded.
Equating 'the criminal and the victim'
Even so, a petition has gained momentum among Moroccan researchers rejecting the participation of Israeli academics in the forum. Researchers are withdrawing en masse from the event, with both Moroccan and international academics pulling out in a powerful show of solidarity with Palestine.
Within hours of the petition's circulation, numerous participants canceled their presentations, creating a ripple effect that threatens the forum's viability.
The researchers stated: 'We, researchers in social sciences, Moroccans and from the rest of the world, express our boycott of the Fifth Sociology Forum of the International Sociological Association, due to the participation of Zionist institutions involved, in one way or another, in the ongoing genocide war on Gaza, and the programming of interventions that appear from their summaries to promote the colonial narrative.'
The petition signatories accused the ISA of 'violating' ethical and research standards by equating 'the criminal and the victim' on the same platform through programming topics that 'beautify the ongoing genocide war on the Palestinian people.'
According to official information, more than 30 Israeli academics and researchers are scheduled to attend, representing Israeli universities that the boycott movement classifies as institutions involved in the occupation and apartheid system, including the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ben-Gurion University, Bar-Ilan University, Tel Aviv University, and the Open University of Israel.
Academic cooperation between Morocco and Israel began in February 2021, when the education ministers of both countries agreed to launch a program for exchanging student delegations and conducting educational competitions in Arabic and Hebrew in both countries.
Despite strong opposition from Moroccan anti-normalization groups, the Moroccan Minister of Higher Education, Abdellatif Miraoui, and his Israeli counterpart, Orit Farkash-Hacohen, signed the first cooperation agreement between universities and research centers in May 2022.
Morocco announced the renewal of diplomatic relations with Israel on December 10, 2020, after they were suspended in 2000 following the outbreak of the Second Palestinian Intifada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
Morocco Joins Arab Countries in Condemning Netanyahu's Illegal ‘Greater Israel' Plans
Marrakech – Morocco has joined more than 30 Arab and Muslim countries in signing a joint statement condemning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent endorsement of the illegal 'Greater Israel' concept. During an interview on August 12 with I24News, when asked if he adhered to the 'vision' of a 'Greater Israel, Netanyahu responded 'very much,' delivering the statement with a knowing smile and no walk-back, triggering immediate outrage across the Arab world. The joint statement, supported by the secretaries general of the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), denounces Netanyahu's comments as a 'flagrant violation of international law' and 'a direct threat to Arab national security, state sovereignty, and regional and international peace and security.' Arab governments from Saudi Arabia to Qatar, Egypt, and Jordan condemned the remarks as evidence of 'a mentality steeped in colonial delusions,' a confirmation of expansionist intent. Egypt, whose Sinai was occupied by Israel following the 1967 war, demanded clarifications about Netanyahu's statements, saying they reflect 'provocation to instability' and 'rejection of the peace option in the region.' Jordan's foreign ministry condemned the remarks as a 'dangerous provocative escalation and a threat to countries' sovereignty.' Iraq similarly denounced what it called 'expansionist ambitions of the occupying entity,' adding that 'these statements represent a clear provocation to the sovereignty of countries.' Saudi Arabia expressed its 'total rejection of the colonization and expansion ideas adopted by Israeli occupation authorities,' while reiterating 'the historical and legal right of the Palestinian people to establish their independent state.' The statement also condemned Israeli Interior Minister Bezalel Smotrich's approval of a settlement plan in the 'E1' zone of the West Bank and his rejection of an independent Palestinian state. The signatories further reaffirmed their rejection of annexation policies, settler violence, and Israeli Occupation Force' (IOF) incursions into Palestinian cities and camps. This verbal escalation comes as Smotrich approved the construction of a colony designed to separate East Jerusalem from the West Bank, both occupied territories, in a move critics say aims to torpedo the creation of a Palestinian state. Theology as cartography For extremist Israelis, the concept of 'Greater Israel' would extend from the Nile to the Euphrates in Iraq, encompassing parts of territories in neighboring countries that these ultranationalist Zionists dream of occupying. The biblical notion draws from verses in Genesis 15:18, Exodus 23:31, Deuteronomy 11:24, and Joshua 1:4 that outline boundaries far beyond Israel's current borders. Critics characterize 'Greater Israel' as dangerous territorial irredentism. The concept transforms liturgy into latitude by elevating Greater Israel from scripture and slogans into a political program. It represents maximalist cartography dressed in messianic rhetoric that collapses ethics into acreage and swaps statecraft for a theology of permanent exception. Israel's application of the 'Greater Israel' doctrine has proceeded methodically. Piece by piece, it has entrenched irreversible control over the West Bank, normalized its occupation through diplomatic breakthroughs, and tested its reach in Gaza with unprecedented genocidal acts, destruction, and displacement. The Golan Heights, seized from Syria in 1967 and unilaterally recognized by the United States as Israeli territory in 2019, exemplifies how conquest has been laundered into permanence. The rhetoric around Greater Israel has not only intensified but become explicitly unapologetic. Israel's far-right government no longer attempts to hide its expansionist agenda. Netanyahu himself declared in January 2024 that Israel must retain 'security control over all territory west of the Jordan River' – a statement that amounts to a formal 'river to sea' position merely disguised with security terminology. Finance Minister Smotrich has openly advanced his 'Decisive Plan' that baldly outlines permanent Israeli sovereignty and creates a framework for systematic annexation through bureaucratic means. Even more explicit is National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has abandoned all pretense of equality, stating with remarkable candor: 'My right, the right of my wife and my children, to move around Judea and Samaria [West Bank] is more important than freedom of movement for the Arabs [Palestinians].' These are not isolated slips but coordinated policy positions from Israel's highest officials. Netanyahu's repeated talk of a 'New Middle East' is not the visionary project he claims but a recycled slogan. Originally popularized by Shimon Peres in his 1993/1994 book as a utopian vision of post-Oslo economic integration, today's version is less about prosperity and more about power. It represents a map of the region carved up to fit Israel's security obsessions and expansionist appetites, sold under the false banner of 'stability' and 'peace.' Demographically, the project faces overwhelming challenges. An Arabic Rawabet Center think-tank analysis in 2016 noted the global Jewish population was too small to sustain the Greater Israel project. Even with today's approximately 15.8 million Jews worldwide (about 7.3 million in Israel), representing less than 0.2% of the global population, there remains a vast gap between territorial ambition and human resources. Critics argue the project is strategically self-defeating. 'Security control' over millions of unwilling subjects produces not stability but a permanent mobilization. It creates perpetual reserve duty, perpetual guard duty, perpetual flashpoints, while organizing politics around sacred soil corrodes the state and breeds messianic governance. Regionally, the 'river to sea' frame – whether chanted by Palestinians or coded into Israeli platforms – makes the conflict zero-sum, ensuring it remains endless. Critics add that Israel cannot normalize relations with neighbors or stabilize alliances while simultaneously signaling that Palestinian self-determination will never be realized. The project undermines international legitimacy, strengthens boycott movements, and provides ammunition to Israel's harshest critics. Put simply, if Zionism was meant to normalize Jewish self-determination, 'Greater Israel' represents its self-abnormalization – solidifying the so-called 'only democracy in the Middle East' into a permanent occupation that erodes its foundational values. Read also: Morocco Condemns Israeli Maps Showing 'Historic Israel' Over Arab Territories Tags: Benjamin NetanyahuGreater Israel
Morocco World
3 hours ago
- Morocco World
Morocco Appoints Arbitrator in $2.2 Billion Emmerson Mining Dispute
Marrakech – Amid the ongoing arbitration process between Morocco and British mining company Emmerson Plc (Khemisset UK Limited and Potasse de Khemisset S.A.), the country has appointed Professor Zachary Douglas KC as its arbitrator at the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The appointment, officially recorded by ICSID on August 15, marks an important step forward in the dispute registered under case number ARB/25/22. Douglas, who holds both Australian and Swiss nationality, is a professor of international public law at Geneva and Rome, with substantial experience before international courts as an arbitrator, lawyer, and expert witness. Emmerson had previously appointed its own arbitrator, Bulgarian national Stanimir A. Alexandrov, whose nomination was registered on August 5. Alexandrov brings 30 years of experience in international commercial arbitration, particularly in investor-state disputes, and is the current president of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA). He previously served as Bulgaria's Deputy Foreign Minister. The arbitration tribunal now awaits only the appointment of a president, who must be accepted by both parties, before proceedings can formally begin. This president will play a crucial role in directing discussions and potentially influencing the outcome of the arbitration. The dispute stems from Emmerson's claim that Morocco violated multiple provisions of the bilateral investment treaty between Morocco and the United Kingdom, signed in 1990 and enacted in 2002. The company is seeking full compensation for what it values at $2.2 billion after its Khemisset potash project was halted. Located approximately 90 kilometers from Rabat, the Khemisset project represented Emmerson's primary asset. With estimated resources of 311 million tons at an average grade of 10.2% potassium oxide, the mine was expected to produce over 700,000 tons of potash annually for 19 years. This would have positioned Morocco as a major player in the global potash market. The project was derailed following an unfavorable environmental and social impact assessment issued by the Regional Unified Investment Commission (CRUI) on October 28, 2024. The commission determined that the project's projected water consumption was incompatible with local capacities. Emmerson, represented by law firm Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF), views this decision as an unjustified eviction from its investment and is pursuing arbitration under the provisions of the bilateral treaty, which allows for private arbitration in case of disputes. The Moroccan government has appointed attorney Hicham Naciri as its representative in the proceedings. Observers in international arbitration circles note that Morocco's choice of Douglas may be strategic, as he is described as a 'typical state defender' who has 'ruled massively in favor of the state' in previous cases. Even when tribunals have ruled in favor of investors by majority, Douglas has reportedly filed dissenting opinions. As both parties await the appointment of the tribunal president, this case brings to light the tensions between foreign investment protection and environmental concerns in resource development projects in Morocco. Tags: Emmerson MoroccoEmmerson plcEmmerson potash
Morocco World
4 hours ago
- Morocco World
500,000 Israelis Take to Tel Aviv Streets to Demand Gaza Ceasefire, Release of Hostages
Casablanca – Israel witnessed one of its largest demonstrations since the outbreak of the Gaza genocidal campaign, as around 500,000 protestors took to the streets on Sunday demanding a deal to free hostages and an end to the Israeli Occupation Forces' (IOF) offensive. Organized by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, the protestors swept across the country, from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, with demonstrators blocking highways and gathering outside politicians' homes and IOF headquarters. Many restaurants and theaters also closed in solidarity. Police reported 38 arrests, while organizers stated that half a million people joined the rally in Tel Aviv alone. The protest culminated in Hostage Square, where families of hostages urged the government to prioritize their release over increasing the IOF offensive. Nearly two years into the genocide, 50 hostages remain in Gaza. Israeli officials believe only 20 are still alive. Families of the hostages accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of turning a 'just war into a pointless war' by refusing to strike a deal with Hamas. A recently released video shows one of the hostages, Matan Zangauker, reportedly appearing weak and malnourished. One protester warned that 'this is probably the last minute we have to save the hostages.' Prime Minister Netanyahu has dismissed calls for an immediate truce, claiming the usual baseless talking point that any deal leaving Hamas in power would be 'ensuring that the horrors of October 7 will be repeated.' Far-right members of his coalition, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have threatened to collapse the government if concessions are made. The protests came amid worsening conditions in Gaza, where relentless Israeli air and ground assaults have killed more than 61,900 people. The United Nations has warned that malnutrition and starvation are at their highest levels since the start of the genocide, as Israel continues its inhumane aid blockade and man-induced famine in Gaza. Read also: More Palestinians Die of Hunger in Gaza Due to Israeli Blockade Tags: Gaza ceasefiregaza genocideIsraelIsrael protestsisraeli hostages
