In Belize, Maya ruler's tomb unearthed with artifacts from his ancient world
'They've found a very early ruler, so that's very important, and he's claimed to be the founder of a dynasty,' said Gary Feinman, an archaeologist at Field Museum of Chicago who was not involved in the excavation. 'That's a major find.'
Advertisement
Arlen Chase, one of the archaeologists working at Caracol, was among the first to enter the tomb. 'As soon as we saw the chamber, we knew we had something,' he said.
From the style of ceramic vessels, he knew the tomb was exceptionally old, and the red cinnabar all around indicated it was for someone of very high status.
But it was the mosaic mask, in pieces of jadeite off to the side, that made him realize just how unusual the tomb was. 'Oh my God, this is much more important than I thought it was,' he remembers thinking.
With each discovery he called Diane Chase, an archaeologist with whom he has been working at Caracol for four decades.
Advertisement
'I kept saying, 'Do you want me to come down?'' she said. 'And he kept saying no. And then, eventually he said yes.' The Chases will celebrate 50 years of marriage in August.
Diane Chase hurried from their base at the University of Houston to take stock of the discoveries.
The Maya ruler, they determined, had grown old for his time, living long enough to lose all his teeth and for bone to grow over his jaw.
'We've never found anyone that we could identify as a ruler at Caracol before, so that in itself was amazing,' Diane Chase said. 'Double wow,' she continued, the ruler could be identified as the founder of a dynasty.
The ruler had been interred not just with the mask but three sets of jadeite ear flares, an extraordinary luxury for the Maya elite, and a variety of ceramic vessels. They showed the Maya god of traders — a hummingbird and a ruler holding a spear, with supplicants making offerings to him. Vessels depicted a monkey, an owl, and the heads of coatimundi — mammals sometimes described as raccoons crossed with lemurs.
'It's stuff that we've never seen before,' Arlen Chase said about some of the designs.
Through hieroglyphics, the archaeologists identified the ruler as Te K'ab Chak, who took the throne in A.D. 331. He ruled Caracol as it was growing into a larger city, the Chases said, but centuries before its peak as a regional power with an estimated 100,000 people. Like other Maya cities, it had been abandoned around A.D. 900.
The discovery 'adds a whole new dimension' to the site, said Melissa Badillo, the director of Belize's Institute of Archaeology, a longtime working partner of the Chases. 'This is the first of its kind in that it's a ruler, a founder, somebody so old, and in so good a condition, to be honest, because the humidity doesn't lend itself well to preservation.'
Advertisement
For the Chases, the discovery was thrilling also because of how the artifacts related to other finds over the years. 'Without this tomb, we wouldn't have any idea as to how everything tied together,' Arlen Chase said.
Some of the artifacts found in the tomb closely resemble those at two other Caracol burials, dating around A.D. 350, the Chases said. One of those also held cremated human remains, blades of green obsidian from central Mexico and a projectile for an atlatl — used to throw spears — the sort of object often associated with Teotihuacán, an ancient metropolis nearly 750 miles to the north. Cremation was a practice of high-status Teotihuacán but not of the Maya elite.
The evidence, the Chases argue, suggests that the early Maya had relations with the people of central Mexico decades earlier than previously thought, despite the great geographic distances between their cities. It is likely to have taken more than 150 days to walk from Teotihuacán to Caracol in the days of Te K'ab Chak. Even today it takes nearly 24 hours by car.
The artifacts show that these cities were not just aware of one another but also interacting, perhaps with envoys at the highest levels of society, the Chases said — a sign of what they called a 'globalized' ancient world of trade and diplomacy.
That conclusion fits with other research showing that the Maya built societies with complicated political relationships, experts said, although some expressed caution about extrapolating from the artifacts until they could learn more.
Advertisement
'This was a very dynamic, political world,' Feinman said. 'They have evidence of some kind of connection to Teotihuacán in central Mexico, but what the mechanism of that connection is — a person? ideas? — it's harder to say. Their interpretations may be right, but I would say I'd like to see it spelled out in an article before I could say more.'
Rosemary Joyce, an anthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley, also said that she wanted to learn more.
DNA and isotope testing, which the Chases hope to do, could reveal more about the lives of the interred people, and more detail about the ceramic vessels could help determine if they were imported or local imitations, Joyce said.
The Chases believe that the artifacts indicate prolonged Maya relations with Teotihuacán decades before A.D. 378, a moment often called the 'entrada,' which some archaeologists believe signals the arrival of central Mexicans into the southern lowlands.
When exactly all these cities were interacting, and how and where, will almost certainly be a matter of intense debate among archaeologists, in part because the degree of precision that dating technology can offer is limited.
Badillo said that Belizean authorities hoped to showcase some of the artifacts at Caracol, and that the site should become more accessible with the completion of a new road. She also said that she expected that the Chases, 'based on their track record,' would be back to the site again soon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
19 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Archaeologists Discover Tomb of Maya King Who Founded a 460-Year Dynasty
A team led by University of Houston archaeologists Arlen Chase and Diane Chase—a married couple about to celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary—has discovered the fourth-century CE tomb of an ancient Maya ruler. Talk about a power couple. The Maya ruler in question was Te K'ab Chaak, the first ruler of Caracol, an important Maya city that ruled the southern part of the Yucatan Peninsula from 560 through 680 CE before it was abandoned by the 10th century. Caracol is now the largest Maya archaeological site in modern-day Belize. Te K'ab Chaak rose to the throne in 331 CE and started a royal dynasty that would last over 460 years. Around 350 CE, he was buried at the base of a royal family shrine along with mortuary objects such as jadeite jewelry, a mosaic jadeite mask, carved bone tubes, Pacific spondylus shells, and pottery vessels. The pottery featured scenes including a ruler receiving offerings, the Maya god of traders, and bound captives. Te K'ab Chaak died at an 'advanced age,' according to a University of Houston statement, with no remaining teeth and standing at around 5 feet 7 inches (170 centimeters) in height. The tomb is one of three major burials excavated in the Caracol Northeast Acropolis dating to around 350 CE and raising questions about the contact between Mayans and people in the ancient city of Teotihuacán. By 300 CE, Teotihuacán—around 746 miles (1,200 kilometers) away in modern-day Mexico—had already become a large city and trading hub, and the mid-fourth century saw early contact between the two peoples. 'One question that has perplexed Maya archaeologists since the 1960s is whether a new political order was introduced to the Maya area by Mexicans from Teotihuacan,' Diane Chase said in the statement. 'Maya carved stone monuments, hieroglyphic dates, iconography, and archaeological data all suggest that widespread pan-Mesoamerican connections occurred after an event in 378 AD referred to as 'entrada.'' She adds, however, that archaeological data from Caracol indicates that the situation was 'far more complicated.' The two other burials include a cremation and another tomb. Archaeologists excavated the tomb in 2009. It was covered in hematite and belonged to a woman who was buried with a spondylus bead necklace, pottery vessels, mirror fragments, and two Pacific spondylus shells. The cremation emerged the following year, along with burial goods and practices of central Mexican tradition, including pottery vessels, green obsidian blades, and a carved projectile tip typical of Teotihuacan warriors. Archaeologists suggest that the deceased individual was probably a Caracol royal family member who followed central Mexican ritual practices, if not a royal Maya envoy to Teotihuacan. 'Both central Mexico and the Maya area were clearly aware of each other's ritual practices, as reflected in the Caracol cremation,' said Arlen Chase. In other words, early Maya rulers clearly had Mesoamerican-wide contacts decades before the supposed 'entrada.' 'The connections between the two regions were undertaken by the highest levels of society, suggesting that initial kings at various Maya cities—such as Te K'ab Chaak at Caracol—were engaged in formal diplomatic relationships with Teotihuacan,' he added. Moving forward, the team will continue to investigate the objects and skeletal remains found in Te K'ab Chaak's burial chamber. To absolutely no one's surprise, the Chases' son is also an archaeologist.
Boston Globe
10-07-2025
- Boston Globe
In Belize, Maya ruler's tomb unearthed with artifacts from his ancient world
It was the 1,700-year-old tomb of a Maya ruler — the first ever found at Caracol, the largest Maya site in Belize — and it held clues to a Mesoamerican world where cities contended with one another from hundreds of miles apart. 'They've found a very early ruler, so that's very important, and he's claimed to be the founder of a dynasty,' said Gary Feinman, an archaeologist at Field Museum of Chicago who was not involved in the excavation. 'That's a major find.' Advertisement Arlen Chase, one of the archaeologists working at Caracol, was among the first to enter the tomb. 'As soon as we saw the chamber, we knew we had something,' he said. From the style of ceramic vessels, he knew the tomb was exceptionally old, and the red cinnabar all around indicated it was for someone of very high status. But it was the mosaic mask, in pieces of jadeite off to the side, that made him realize just how unusual the tomb was. 'Oh my God, this is much more important than I thought it was,' he remembers thinking. With each discovery he called Diane Chase, an archaeologist with whom he has been working at Caracol for four decades. Advertisement 'I kept saying, 'Do you want me to come down?'' she said. 'And he kept saying no. And then, eventually he said yes.' The Chases will celebrate 50 years of marriage in August. Diane Chase hurried from their base at the University of Houston to take stock of the discoveries. The Maya ruler, they determined, had grown old for his time, living long enough to lose all his teeth and for bone to grow over his jaw. 'We've never found anyone that we could identify as a ruler at Caracol before, so that in itself was amazing,' Diane Chase said. 'Double wow,' she continued, the ruler could be identified as the founder of a dynasty. The ruler had been interred not just with the mask but three sets of jadeite ear flares, an extraordinary luxury for the Maya elite, and a variety of ceramic vessels. They showed the Maya god of traders — a hummingbird and a ruler holding a spear, with supplicants making offerings to him. Vessels depicted a monkey, an owl, and the heads of coatimundi — mammals sometimes described as raccoons crossed with lemurs. 'It's stuff that we've never seen before,' Arlen Chase said about some of the designs. Through hieroglyphics, the archaeologists identified the ruler as Te K'ab Chak, who took the throne in A.D. 331. He ruled Caracol as it was growing into a larger city, the Chases said, but centuries before its peak as a regional power with an estimated 100,000 people. Like other Maya cities, it had been abandoned around A.D. 900. The discovery 'adds a whole new dimension' to the site, said Melissa Badillo, the director of Belize's Institute of Archaeology, a longtime working partner of the Chases. 'This is the first of its kind in that it's a ruler, a founder, somebody so old, and in so good a condition, to be honest, because the humidity doesn't lend itself well to preservation.' Advertisement For the Chases, the discovery was thrilling also because of how the artifacts related to other finds over the years. 'Without this tomb, we wouldn't have any idea as to how everything tied together,' Arlen Chase said. Some of the artifacts found in the tomb closely resemble those at two other Caracol burials, dating around A.D. 350, the Chases said. One of those also held cremated human remains, blades of green obsidian from central Mexico and a projectile for an atlatl — used to throw spears — the sort of object often associated with Teotihuacán, an ancient metropolis nearly 750 miles to the north. Cremation was a practice of high-status Teotihuacán but not of the Maya elite. The evidence, the Chases argue, suggests that the early Maya had relations with the people of central Mexico decades earlier than previously thought, despite the great geographic distances between their cities. It is likely to have taken more than 150 days to walk from Teotihuacán to Caracol in the days of Te K'ab Chak. Even today it takes nearly 24 hours by car. The artifacts show that these cities were not just aware of one another but also interacting, perhaps with envoys at the highest levels of society, the Chases said — a sign of what they called a 'globalized' ancient world of trade and diplomacy. That conclusion fits with other research showing that the Maya built societies with complicated political relationships, experts said, although some expressed caution about extrapolating from the artifacts until they could learn more. Advertisement 'This was a very dynamic, political world,' Feinman said. 'They have evidence of some kind of connection to Teotihuacán in central Mexico, but what the mechanism of that connection is — a person? ideas? — it's harder to say. Their interpretations may be right, but I would say I'd like to see it spelled out in an article before I could say more.' Rosemary Joyce, an anthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley, also said that she wanted to learn more. DNA and isotope testing, which the Chases hope to do, could reveal more about the lives of the interred people, and more detail about the ceramic vessels could help determine if they were imported or local imitations, Joyce said. The Chases believe that the artifacts indicate prolonged Maya relations with Teotihuacán decades before A.D. 378, a moment often called the 'entrada,' which some archaeologists believe signals the arrival of central Mexicans into the southern lowlands. When exactly all these cities were interacting, and how and where, will almost certainly be a matter of intense debate among archaeologists, in part because the degree of precision that dating technology can offer is limited. Badillo said that Belizean authorities hoped to showcase some of the artifacts at Caracol, and that the site should become more accessible with the completion of a new road. She also said that she expected that the Chases, 'based on their track record,' would be back to the site again soon.
Yahoo
07-07-2025
- Yahoo
I Was Unexpectedly Widowed At 36. I Expected To Grieve, But I Never Expected This.
During the pandemic, my husband Brent bought a used Jon boat to escape the confinement of lockdowns — to find a sense of peace in nature. On July 10, 2020, two hours after he took it out for a test drive, the police showed up at my door. Brent was missing. Two days later, EquuSearch found his body. He had drowned. He left behind two young sons, ages 11 and 3. I was 36 — and suddenly, a widow. In the days after his death, I moved through the world in a daze. The grief was crushing, but it wasn't just that. I began to feel lost and unmoored in a way that surprised and frustrated me. I expected the sorrow. What I didn't expect was the disorientation, the sense that I no longer recognized the world, or myself in it. After all, I had strong friendships, a deeply fulfilling role as a newly appointed assistant professor of social work at the University of Houston-Downtown, and a clear sense of purpose as a researcher. I couldn't understand it — how I could be so surrounded, so rooted in meaning, and still feel like I was disappearing. Later, as I pivoted my research to study young widowhood more deeply, I started to hear the same thing from others: 'I'm lost. I don't know who I am anymore.' From research participants and grief scholars, I've come to understand this as the loss of self-familiarity. We aren't sealed-off individuals, we're co-created through our relationships. So when someone central to you dies, it's not just grief. It's the slow, disorienting unraveling of who you were in their presence. I felt that unraveling most clearly in the smallest moments, like the first time I sat down for dinner without him. Brent used to set a drink beside me every night at dinner. I never had to ask. It was just there — part of the rhythm we had created. Three days after he died, my family urged me to eat. I hadn't touched food in days. I was too terrified, too grief-stricken. I sat down in my usual spot at our breakfast table. My body moved the way it always did: I reached out for the drink that should be there. But there was no drink. Instantly, I realized no one would be thinking of me in that quiet, everyday way anymore. I felt less important. Unseen. That small act — him pouring me a drink — had been a reflection of care, of attention, of mattering. I hadn't even known how much it meant until it was gone. The missing glass of water became the clearest symbol of what I had lost — not just Brent, but the quiet feeling of being cherished. That's when I understood something I hadn't fully realized before: So much of my self-worth had been quietly held in his ordinary acts of care. In that moment, everything I thought I knew about who I was began to unravel. I didn't have the language for it then. I just knew something inside me had shifted. I became unrecognizable to myself. Some books give language to grief's sorrow. Fewer speak to the quiet horror of becoming unfamiliar to yourself. Strangely, I began to recognize pieces of this experience not in grief literature, but in psychological horror films. In one movie, 'The Substance' (2024), a discarded fitness icon takes a black-market serum that splits her into two bodies: her younger self and her deteriorating original form. The younger version starts stealing time, accelerating the original woman's decay. One morning, she wakes to find just one finger aged beyond recognition. Over a short period of time, she watches in helpless terror as her body becomes something monstrous. That jolt of horror — of watching yourself change and not being able to stop it — felt eerily familiar. Because what grief did to me and to other mourners wasn't just emotional. It was embodied. It was cognitive. It was identity-shattering. My body felt different too. My chest felt tight, like an elephant was sitting on it. My joints ached. I was exhausted all the time. I had always loved movement. But after Brent died, it became something else entirely. Certain songs in workout classes would bring me to tears. Physical effort unearthed buried emotion. I'd cry while stretching. During the pandemic, I was grateful for the masks because they gave me privacy to fall apart without having to explain. It wasn't that I couldn't move my body, it was that I couldn't bear what movement was unearthing. My body had become a mirror of what I was trying so hard to survive. I started forgetting things. Losing things. The worst was my keys. I lost them constantly. I'd be late, panicked, digging through bags, retracing my steps. Eventually, I had to get my truck rekeyed. After that, my twin sister Brenda showed up with a pack of Bluetooth trackers. She handed them to me like a care package. 'For the hard days,' she said. She wasn't just talking about the keys. She was acknowledging how grief had hijacked my mind. How I couldn't hold onto anything — not objects, not time, not even a coherent sense of myself. People call it 'grief brain.' And it's real. Your brain is doing invisible labor, trying to reconcile reality, review memories, scan for threat. That takes energy. What's left for daily tasks is minimal. When you begin to lose yourself, you realize you are made of multiple parts. Some are intact — even strengthened — and others are still collapsing. People would see me at work and assume I was fine. My research on young widowhood even began to thrive. I focused intensely. I was productive. In my annual review, I received a comment that my research 'exceeded expectations.' Meanwhile, I was writing things like this in private: 'I dread nights, fearful of the nightmares. I dread the mornings, with their terrible reminder of reality. I dread the days, knowing the desperate yearning for Brent always gives way to horror at how he died.' I was in survival mode — just trying to stay alive. Both were true. At the very same time. Grief doesn't always look like tears. Sometimes it looks like achievement. Like showing up, smiling, getting it done — while falling apart in private. I became a question mark to myself — unanswered, undefined. There was no map. Just blank space where the familiar used to be. And the hardest part? Most people don't see it. You seem 'fine.' You're functioning. So they assume the worst is over. And here is what becoming unfamiliar with yourself does: It makes it incredibly hard to rebuild and heal. People ask you what you need and you have no clue. You don't like what you used to. What used to bring you joy no longer does. And so, you lose trust in yourself. You become alienated from yourself and from others. If you've felt this — if you're feeling it now — I want you to know: You're not crazy. Writing this is my way of saying that you are not alone. It is possible to rebuild, but let's not pretend this is simple. It is complex, layered, and you have to start from scratch in places you thought were solid. Five years later, I'm still finding my way through it. I've begun to catch glimpses of myself again — laughing with my son, feeling grounded in my work, sitting at a table with friends and feeling almost normal. I've also discovered brand new things. I like to dance now. I've fallen in love again. I even earned tenure. It's not a clean return. It's slow. Layered. And still, somehow, holy. I didn't just lose Brent. I lost the version of myself that existed with him. And I've had to grieve her, too — while slowly, unevenly, becoming someone new. Dr. Liza Barros-Lane is a social work professor, researcher and founder of The Young Widowhood Project. Widowed at 36, she combines personal experience with research to better understand what it means to lose a partner too soon. Find her on Instagram and Facebook at @the_widowed_researcher. Do you have a compelling personal story you'd like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we're looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@
