Gov. Stein to deliver his first State of State address
North Carolina Governor Josh Stein is delivering his first State of the State address Wednesday night.
Gov. Stein will lay out his plans for the next two years from the N.C. Legislative Building in Raleigh.
ALSO READ: Gov. Stein visits western NC after Senate approves round of Helene disaster relief
One honored guest expected at Wednesday night's address is from Mecklenburg County.
Debbie Dalton lost her son, Hunter, to a fentanyl overdose in 2016. Since then, she's founded the The Hunter Dalton HDLife Foundation.
The foundation provides education and resources to help prevent drug use.
Following Stein's address, N.C. House Speaker Destin Hall will offer the Republican Party's response.
You can watch the governor's address on wsoctv.com, or our free WSOC-TV App, beginning at 7 p.m.
WATCH BELOW: CMS faces $100M funding cut as federal COVID stimulus expires
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' cracks down on Biden's student loan 'scheme,' top Republican says
The chairman of a key Senate panel is claiming victory against former President Joe Biden's student loan plans as part of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill." "The Biden administration was attempting to forgive student loans for people who willingly took on the loan and required the taxpayer, including people who never went to college and would never make what the person who took the loan would ever have the hope to make," Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, R-La., told Fox News Digital. "So we end that transfer of that student loan on the taxpayers, and that's probably our biggest savings." Cassidy's committee released its portion of the Trump agenda bill late on Tuesday. A press release for the legislation said it "ends Biden's student loan schemes that transfer debt onto the 87 percent of Americans who chose to not go to college or already paid off their loans" and "also prevents future Democrat administrations from implementing schemes." The bill specifically takes aim at Biden's expansion of Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations and Closed School Discharge regulations, which Republicans have held up as costly policies that shift federal student loan borrowers' burdens onto other taxpayers. Various versions of Biden's plans had previously been struck down in court. The bill would also eliminate federal Grad PLUS loans, a program used by graduate-level and professional students to pay for their studies, which can be used for graduate students' entire cost of attendance. It would instead keep in place a $20,500 annual limit for Federal Direct Unsubsidized Loans on graduate degrees, capped at $100,000 total, excluding undergraduate loans. For professional degrees, it keeps a $50,000 annual unsubsidized loan limit and a $200,000 total cap. The legislation is also aimed at cracking down on taxpayer funding subsidizing degrees from lower-performing universities. Colleges that see people with undergraduate degrees earn less than the typical high school graduate in their state, or graduate programs where attendees then earn less than the normal bachelor's recipient, would be blocked from federal student loan programs. "What we've got was a situation where people can borrow more money than they can effectively pay back, and that destroys their life, leaving them with a debt burden which keeps them unable to do other things in life. And there's at least some sense that universities offering these programs know that's the case. And so we attempt to fix that," Cassidy said. "So we have provisions that would say that if the degree being acquired does not end up paying more, the person receiving that degree doesn't get more on average than a person who did not get that degree, then the federal government is not going to lend them money." To encourage more people to pursue non-collegiate degrees, the bill would also establish a Workforce Pell Grant. Pell Grants are currently aimed at low-income students pursuing bachelor's degrees and are generally not repaid. "For example, a student gets a commercial driver's license. They're going to go out and make $100,000 a year after a couple of years of driving, I am told. And so we want to enable those people to accomplish that," Cassidy said. Foreign income would be taken into account when evaluating Pell Grants, while farm and small business assets would not, under the GOP bill. Those and several other measures in the legislation would add up to roughly $300 billion in taxpayer savings, Cassidy said. Senate Republicans are currently working through their version of Trump's massive agenda bill, which passed the House late last month. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to pass a sweeping bill advancing Trump's agenda on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt. They are also working to use it to bring down the national debt – nearing $37 trillion – with the aim of cutting $1.5 trillion in federal spending. Reconciliation allows the party in power to completely skirt the minority, in this case Democrats, by lowering the Senate's threshold to advance from 60 votes to 51. The legislation must adhere to a specific set of rules, however, including measures that deal with the budget, taxation, or the national debt. Both the House and Senate must agree to identical versions of the bill before it gets to Trump's desk for a signature. The House's version passed 215 to 214, and leaders there have implored the upper chamber to change as little as possible. Cassidy acknowledged there were some changes made but was optimistic about how they'll be met in the House. "There's several things, but one thing I think that they're going to like is that we do fully fund the Pell Grant program. You know, we address the shortfall there. And so I think they're going to like it," he said. "It's going to give low-income students access to career education. We need those kind of career type jobs to make sure that all this manufacturing and construction has a workforce to address it. And so we think it helps the needs of society. We think it helps the needs of the student." House and Senate GOP leaders had previously set a goal of having a bill on Trump's desk by the Fourth of July. Cassidy declined to comment on whether that was a feasible benchmark but argued that lawmakers should be ready to extend that timeline – and possibly shrink their summer recess – to get the final product. "As far as I'm concerned, the most important thing is to get it right. So if there is a delay, the president said it today – if there is a delay, that's not that big of a deal. The most important thing is we get it right," he said.
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
As hurricane season ramps up, Trump is giving FEMA the USAID treatment
So far, President Trump's message to states in crisis after catastrophic natural disasters has been 'you're on your own.' Last month, he reduced federal aid to Hurricane Helene-stricken parts of North Carolina. In April, he denied aid to tornado survivors in Arkansas as they tried to recover from severe storms that killed 40 people. Imagine the tragic toll of death and destruction if fire departments across the U.S. were sharply downsized or even closed in the name of efficiency. Unfortunately, we could see a similarly horrific outcome as the result of Trump administration actions that have shrunk the Federal Emergency Management Agency and might even abolish it. FEMA has been helping states deal with the devastating impacts of catastrophic natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, wildfires and floods since it was created in 1979. But federal aid to places hard-hit by disasters dates to 1803, when Congress recognized the federal responsibility to respond to emergencies too severe for states to handle on their own. Trump has threatened to abolish FEMA — something that could legally happen only with congressional approval. In January, he said he would 'begin the process of reforming FEMA or getting rid of FEMA,' arguing that it would be better for states to deal with disasters on their own, with the federal government paying for some of their expenses. But Trump wants to use federal money as a weapon. Trump has repeatedly acted or threatened to act to cut off assistance to states, local governments and universities if they don't follow his policies. So state officials could never be sure if he would reimburse their disaster spending or how large the reimbursement would be. We know Trump's team won't trust the experts. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose agency oversees FEMA, testified before a congressional committee in May that 'FEMA as it exists today should be eliminated.' The next day, FEMA acting Director Cameron Hamilton took the opposite position, telling the committee: 'I do not believe it is in the best interest of the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency.' He was forced out of his job a day later. Trump may try to bypass Congress to cut FEMA. He has already allowed it to get dangerously smaller. The agency has lost about 2,000 full-time employees — about a third of its staff — as a result of firings and resignations of employees taking buyouts pushed by Elon Musk to supposedly make the government more efficient. But rather than make FEMA more efficient, big cuts to its workforce, including the loss of 16 senior executives, have weakened FEMA. Trump might decide to shrink the agency even further with more job cuts, effectively rendering it unable to carry out its duties, as he has done with the U.S. Agency for International Development and other agencies. This would enable him to justify abolishing a crippled FEMA. Effective disaster response is a labor-intensive task requiring skilled and courageous men and women working in dangerous conditions. It can't be accomplished by AI or by clever computer programmers sitting comfortably at desks far away. This hit home for me two decades ago. Federal and state officials deployed almost 5,900 FEMA employees, more than 30,000 National Guard troops, nearly 13,000 active-duty military troops and others — including state employees and many thousands of volunteers — to respond to Hurricane Katrina in my home state of Louisiana and nearby states in 2005. Tragically, Katrina killed about 1,800 people and caused $170 billion in property damage. The federal response was far too slow, but the toll of the disaster would have been even worse if the number of people responding to Katrina had been reduced by one-third. The recovery from Katrina showed me how important FEMA can be. Members of my extended family in Louisiana were left homeless by the hurricane and evacuated to cities across America. When it was time for them to return home, FEMA was there with essential supplies and assistance to help them start rebuilding. This was life-changing, but Trump's plan would leave the next struggling family on their own. FEMA has been largely revamped since Katrina. But as extreme weather gets more frequent and more destructive, it needs more investment. FEMA must be returned to its previous size and preferably expanded. And it needs competent and experienced leadership. Trump's purge of FEMA officials has served as a brain drain that has reduced the agency's effectiveness. Trump appointed David Richardson, who has no experience in disaster management, as acting director of FEMA in May. Richardson surprised his staff by telling them he was not aware the nation had a hurricane season — a remark a Department of Homeland Security official later claimed was a joke. Hurricane season runs from June 1 through November, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasts that 13 to 19 named storms will strike during the period. Serious hurricanes are increasing due to climate change, NOAA reports. Meanwhile, as of June 4, the National Weather Service reported that 1,047 tornadoes have struck in the U.S. this year. AccuWeather forecasts that 1,300 to 1,450 will hit by the end of the year, above the historic average of 1,225. It is impractical for the federal government to hand off more responsibility for disaster response to states. Although there are disasters every year somewhere in the U.S., there are not necessarily disasters every year in every state. FEMA is in a better position than individual states to respond rapidly with skilled and experienced professionals wherever and whenever a natural disaster strikes and to coordinate action by multiple states when a disaster crosses state lines. We need a national response to defend America from natural disasters in the same way we need a national response when we defend America militarily. That's why we have a national armed forces, rather than a separate Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Space Force in every state. America needs a fully staffed and well-led FEMA. Sadly, we are not getting this today. Donna Brazile is a political strategist, a contributor to ABC News and former chair of the Democratic National Committee. She is the author of 'Hacks: Inside the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House.'
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NC doctors, legislators, and cancer survivors push for prostate cancer screening money
New Bern Alderman Victor Taylor speaks about his prostate cancer treatment at a news conference on a proposal to establish a statewide screening program for uninsured and underinsured men. (Photo: Lynn Bonner/NC Newsline) Offering prostate cancer screening to men who are uninsured or underinsured will save lives, legislators, doctors, advocates, and cancer survivors said at a news conference Tuesday. 'Prostate cancer is one of the most curable cancers if it is detected early,' said Rep. Rodney Pierce (D-Halifax), the bill's lead sponsor. But, too many North Carolinians are diagnosed too late. 'This legislation is about saving lives, about a higher quality of life, and giving our fathers, uncles, brothers, nephews and sons the fighting chance they deserve,' he said. House bill 128 would appropriate $2 million to establish a prostate cancer screening program modeled after the state's breast and cervical cancer screening program. Money for prostate screening is not in the House or Senate budget proposals, but Pierce hopes it will be funded. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the state, according to the UNC Men's Health Program. The issue has gained increased attention in the last few weeks after former President Joe Biden was diagnosed with 'a more aggressive form' of prostate cancer. Men in North Carolina are diagnosed with prostate cancer at higher rates than men nationally, according to the National Cancer Institute, and North Carolina's mortality rate is higher, at 20.2 per 100,000 men. Black men are more likely to develop prostate cancer and more likely to die from it, according to the American Cancer Society. Legislators at the Tuesday news conference made direct appeals to Black men to be screened. A blood test is used to screen for and monitor prostate cancer. Rep. Abe Jones (D-Wake) said he's tested twice a year because his father had prostate cancer. 'It is a sneaky, nasty, tricky disease,' Jones said. 'It's ugly and it kills Black men at a higher rate.' 'It doesn't give you a warning, it just comes on you,' Jones said. 'I just encourage all my brothers out there to please get tested.' New Bern Alderman Victor Taylor, a prostate cancer survivor, said the screening bill would help men in rural areas. It's vital for men to talk about prostate cancer, he said. 'It's so important to talk, talk, talk and share,' he said. 'You don't know how many lives you've saved by talking and sharing.' The bill proposes free or low-cost testing for uninsured or underinsured men ages 40 to 70 who have a family history of prostate cancer. Men without a family history would be eligible for screening at ages 50 to 70. Recommendations for screening have a cloudy history. In 2012, the US Preventative Service Task Force, a group of independent experts, recommended against routine screening. The recommendation changed in 2018, with the group suggesting men 55- to 69-years old talk with their doctors about regular screening. The task force is in the process of updating its recommendation. Dr. Dan George, a member of the Duke Cancer Institute who specializes in prostate cancers, said there's a concern that prostate cancer is going under-treated. 'It's so vitally important for people to recognize that knowledge is power,' George said. 'Understanding your cancer status is an opportunity for you to prevent a leading cause of death in this state.' Rural residents would benefit from routine testing that residents with access to medical specialists can more easily obtain, he said. Former state Sen. Eddie Goodall, a Union County Republican, talked about his prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Goodall said he was diagnosed in 2005, just as his first term in the legislature was beginning. 'I was excited about being a freshman senator and being able to change the world,' Goodall said. Instead, he received a diagnosis that he kept secret from his mother because he didn't want her to worry about another son dying. Goodall said that five years before he was diagnosed, his brother died of cancer. Goodall said he talked and compared notes with another former senator who was diagnosed with prostate cancer at about the same time. Goodall decided against surgery. The cancer spread to his bones. Goodall said he started hormone therapy in 2018 and was told he had 18 months to two years to live. 'But it's been seven years, and I'm still here. So I'm very grateful for that.'
